P. 73 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 7201-7300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Definition	df-omni 7201*	An omniscient set is one where we can decide whether a predicate (here represented by a function f) holds (is equal to 1o) for all elements or fails to hold (is equal to (/)) for some element. Definition 3.1 of [Pierik], p. 14. In particular, om e. Omni is known as the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2022.)
|- Omni = { y | A. f ( f : y --> 2o -> ( E. x e. y ( f ` x ) = (/) \/ A. x e. y ( f ` x ) = 1o ) ) }
Theorem	isomni 7202*	The predicate of being omniscient. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2022.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. Omni <-> A. f ( f : A --> 2o -> ( E. x e. A ( f ` x ) = (/) \/ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o ) ) ) )
Theorem	isomnimap 7203*	The predicate of being omniscient stated in terms of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. Omni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m A ) ( E. x e. A ( f ` x ) = (/) \/ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o ) ) )
Theorem	enomnilem 7204	Lemma for enomni 7205. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. Omni -> B e. Omni ) )
Theorem	enomni 7205	Omniscience is invariant with respect to equinumerosity. For example, this means that we can express the Limited Principle of Omniscience as either om e. Omni or NN0 e. Omni. The former is a better match to conventional notation in the sense that df2o3 6488 says that 2o = { (/) , 1o } whereas the corresponding relationship does not exist between 2 and { 0 , 1 }. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. Omni <-> B e. Omni ) )
Theorem	finomni 7206	A finite set is omniscient. Remark right after Definition 3.1 of [Pierik], p. 14. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jun-2022.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> A e. Omni )
Theorem	exmidomniim 7207	Given excluded middle, every set is omniscient. Remark following Definition 3.1 of [Pierik], p. 14. This is one direction of the biconditional exmidomni 7208. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jun-2022.)
|- (EXMID -> A. x x e. Omni )
Theorem	exmidomni 7208	Excluded middle is equivalent to every set being omniscient. (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jun-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x x e. Omni )
Theorem	exmidlpo 7209	Excluded middle implies the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Mar-2023.)
|- (EXMID -> om e. Omni )
Theorem	fodjuomnilemdc 7210*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7215. Decidability of a condition we use in various lemmas. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> F : O -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ X e. O ) -> DECID E. z e. A ( F ` X ) = (inl ` z ) )
Theorem	fodjuf 7211*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7215 and fodjumkv 7226. Domain and range of P. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ph -> F : O -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   &    |- P = ( y e. O |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )   &    |- ( ph -> O e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> P e. ( 2o ^m O ) )
Theorem	fodjum 7212*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7215 and fodjumkv 7226. A condition which shows that A is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ph -> F : O -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   &    |- P = ( y e. O |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )   &    |- ( ph -> E. w e. O ( P ` w ) = (/) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x x e. A )
Theorem	fodju0 7213*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7215 and fodjumkv 7226. A condition which shows that A is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ph -> F : O -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   &    |- P = ( y e. O |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. w e. O ( P ` w ) = 1o )   =>    |- ( ph -> A = (/) )
Theorem	fodjuomnilemres 7214*	Lemma for fodjuomni 7215. The final result with P expressed as a local definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> O e. Omni )   &    |- ( ph -> F : O -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   &    |- P = ( y e. O |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x x e. A \/ A = (/) ) )
Theorem	fodjuomni 7215*	A condition which ensures A is either inhabited or empty. Lemma 3.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 4. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> O e. Omni )   &    |- ( ph -> F : O -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x x e. A \/ A = (/) ) )
Theorem	ctssexmid 7216*	The decidability condition in ctssdc 7179 is needed. More specifically, ctssdc 7179 minus that condition, plus the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO), implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2023.)
|- ( ( y C_ om /\ E. f f : y -onto-> x ) -> E. f f : om -onto-> ( x ⊔ 1o ) )   &    |- om e. Omni   =>    |- ( ph \/ -. ph )
2.6.39  Markov's principle
Syntax	cmarkov 7217	Extend class definition to include the class of Markov sets.
class Markov
Definition	df-markov 7218*	A Markov set is one where if a predicate (here represented by a function f) on that set does not hold (where hold means is equal to 1o) for all elements, then there exists an element where it fails (is equal to (/)). Generalization of definition 2.5 of [Pierik], p. 9. In particular, om e. Markov is known as Markov's Principle (MP). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2023.)
|- Markov = { y | A. f ( f : y --> 2o -> ( -. A. x e. y ( f ` x ) = 1o -> E. x e. y ( f ` x ) = (/) ) ) }
Theorem	ismkv 7219*	The predicate of being Markov. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2023.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. Markov <-> A. f ( f : A --> 2o -> ( -. A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o -> E. x e. A ( f ` x ) = (/) ) ) ) )
Theorem	ismkvmap 7220*	The predicate of being Markov stated in terms of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2023.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. Markov <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m A ) ( -. A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o -> E. x e. A ( f ` x ) = (/) ) ) )
Theorem	ismkvnex 7221*	The predicate of being Markov stated in terms of double negation and comparison with 1o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Nov-2023.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. Markov <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m A ) ( -. -. E. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o -> E. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o ) ) )
Theorem	omnimkv 7222	An omniscient set is Markov. In particular, the case where A is om means that the Limited Principle of Omniscience (LPO) implies Markov's Principle (MP). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2023.)
|- ( A e. Omni -> A e. Markov )
Theorem	exmidmp 7223	Excluded middle implies Markov's Principle (MP). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Apr-2023.)
|- (EXMID -> om e. Markov )
Theorem	mkvprop 7224*	Markov's Principle expressed in terms of propositions (or more precisely, the A = om case is Markov's Principle). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. Markov /\ A. n e. A DECID ph /\ -. A. n e. A -. ph ) -> E. n e. A ph )
Theorem	fodjumkvlemres 7225*	Lemma for fodjumkv 7226. The final result with P expressed as a local definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ph -> M e. Markov )   &    |- ( ph -> F : M -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   &    |- P = ( y e. M |-> if ( E. z e. A ( F ` y ) = (inl ` z ) , (/) , 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A =/= (/) -> E. x x e. A ) )
Theorem	fodjumkv 7226*	A condition which ensures that a nonempty set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Mar-2023.)
|- ( ph -> M e. Markov )   &    |- ( ph -> F : M -onto-> ( A ⊔ B ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A =/= (/) -> E. x x e. A ) )
Theorem	enmkvlem 7227	Lemma for enmkv 7228. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. Markov -> B e. Markov ) )
Theorem	enmkv 7228	Being Markov is invariant with respect to equinumerosity. For example, this means that we can express the Markov's Principle as either om e. Markov or NN0 e. Markov. The former is a better match to conventional notation in the sense that df2o3 6488 says that 2o = { (/) , 1o } whereas the corresponding relationship does not exist between 2 and { 0 , 1 }. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. Markov <-> B e. Markov ) )
2.6.40  Weakly omniscient sets
Syntax	cwomni 7229	Extend class definition to include the class of weakly omniscient sets.
class WOmni
Definition	df-womni 7230*	A weakly omniscient set is one where we can decide whether a predicate (here represented by a function f) holds (is equal to 1o) for all elements or not. Generalization of definition 2.4 of [Pierik], p. 9. In particular, om e. WOmni is known as the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). The term WLPO is common in the literature; there appears to be no widespread term for what we are calling a weakly omniscient set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
|- WOmni = { y | A. f ( f : y --> 2o -> DECID A. x e. y ( f ` x ) = 1o ) }
Theorem	iswomni 7231*	The predicate of being weakly omniscient. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. WOmni <-> A. f ( f : A --> 2o -> DECID A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o ) ) )
Theorem	iswomnimap 7232*	The predicate of being weakly omniscient stated in terms of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. WOmni <-> A. f e. ( 2o ^m A )DECID A. x e. A ( f ` x ) = 1o ) )
Theorem	omniwomnimkv 7233	A set is omniscient if and only if it is weakly omniscient and Markov. The case A = om says that LPO <-> WLPO /\ MP which is a remark following Definition 2.5 of [Pierik], p. 9. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A e. Omni <-> ( A e. WOmni /\ A e. Markov ) )
Theorem	lpowlpo 7234	LPO implies WLPO. Easy corollary of the more general omniwomnimkv 7233. There is an analogue in terms of analytic omniscience principles at tridceq 15700. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jul-2024.)
|- ( om e. Omni -> om e. WOmni )
Theorem	enwomnilem 7235	Lemma for enwomni 7236. One direction of the biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. WOmni -> B e. WOmni ) )
Theorem	enwomni 7236	Weak omniscience is invariant with respect to equinumerosity. For example, this means that we can express the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience as either om e. WOmni or NN0 e. WOmni. The former is a better match to conventional notation in the sense that df2o3 6488 says that 2o = { (/) , 1o } whereas the corresponding relationship does not exist between 2 and { 0 , 1 }. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jun-2024.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. WOmni <-> B e. WOmni ) )
Theorem	nninfdcinf 7237*	The Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO) implies that it is decidable whether an element of ℕ∞ equals the point at infinity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2024.)
|- ( ph -> om e. WOmni )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ℕ∞ )   =>    |- ( ph -> DECID N = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) )
Theorem	nninfwlporlemd 7238*	Given two countably infinite sequences of zeroes and ones, they are equal if and only if a sequence formed by pointwise comparing them is all ones. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Dec-2024.)
|- ( ph -> X : om --> 2o )   &    |- ( ph -> Y : om --> 2o )   &    |- D = ( i e. om |-> if ( ( X ` i ) = ( Y ` i ) , 1o , (/) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( X = Y <-> D = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) ) )
Theorem	nninfwlporlem 7239*	Lemma for nninfwlpor 7240. The result. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Dec-2024.)
|- ( ph -> X : om --> 2o )   &    |- ( ph -> Y : om --> 2o )   &    |- D = ( i e. om |-> if ( ( X ` i ) = ( Y ` i ) , 1o , (/) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> om e. WOmni )   =>    |- ( ph -> DECID X = Y )
Theorem	nninfwlpor 7240*	The Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO) implies that equality for ℕ∞ is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Dec-2024.)
|- ( om e. WOmni -> A. x e. ℕ∞ A. y e. ℕ∞ DECID x = y )
Theorem	nninfwlpoimlemg 7241*	Lemma for nninfwlpoim 7244. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2024.)
|- ( ph -> F : om --> 2o )   &    |- G = ( i e. om |-> if ( E. x e. suc i ( F ` x ) = (/) , (/) , 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> G e. ℕ∞ )
Theorem	nninfwlpoimlemginf 7242*	Lemma for nninfwlpoim 7244. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2024.)
|- ( ph -> F : om --> 2o )   &    |- G = ( i e. om |-> if ( E. x e. suc i ( F ` x ) = (/) , (/) , 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( G = ( i e. om |-> 1o ) <-> A. n e. om ( F ` n ) = 1o ) )
Theorem	nninfwlpoimlemdc 7243*	Lemma for nninfwlpoim 7244. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2024.)
|- ( ph -> F : om --> 2o )   &    |- G = ( i e. om |-> if ( E. x e. suc i ( F ` x ) = (/) , (/) , 1o ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. ℕ∞ A. y e. ℕ∞ DECID x = y )   =>    |- ( ph -> DECID A. n e. om ( F ` n ) = 1o )
Theorem	nninfwlpoim 7244*	Decidable equality for ℕ∞ implies the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Dec-2024.)
|- ( A. x e. ℕ∞ A. y e. ℕ∞ DECID x = y -> om e. WOmni )
Theorem	nninfwlpo 7245*	Decidability of equality for ℕ∞ is equivalent to the Weak Limited Principle of Omniscience (WLPO). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2024.)
|- ( A. x e. ℕ∞ A. y e. ℕ∞ DECID x = y <-> om e. WOmni )
2.6.41  Cardinal numbers
Syntax	ccrd 7246	Extend class definition to include the cardinal size function.
class card
Definition	df-card 7247*	Define the cardinal number function. The cardinal number of a set is the least ordinal number equinumerous to it. In other words, it is the "size" of the set. Definition of [Enderton] p. 197. Our notation is from Enderton. Other textbooks often use a double bar over the set to express this function. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2003.)
|- card = ( x e. _V |-> |^| { y e. On | y ~~ x } )
Theorem	cardcl 7248*	The cardinality of a well-orderable set is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2021.)
|- ( E. y e. On y ~~ A -> ( card ` A ) e. On )
Theorem	isnumi 7249	A set equinumerous to an ordinal is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ A ~~ B ) -> B e. dom card )
Theorem	finnum 7250	Every finite set is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. Fin -> A e. dom card )
Theorem	onenon 7251	Every ordinal number is numerable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. On -> A e. dom card )
Theorem	cardval3ex 7252*	The value of ( card ` A ). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2021.)
|- ( E. x e. On x ~~ A -> ( card ` A ) = |^| { y e. On | y ~~ A } )
Theorem	oncardval 7253*	The value of the cardinal number function with an ordinal number as its argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Sep-2013.)
|- ( A e. On -> ( card ` A ) = |^| { x e. On | x ~~ A } )
Theorem	cardonle 7254	The cardinal of an ordinal number is less than or equal to the ordinal number. Proposition 10.6(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 85. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. On -> ( card ` A ) C_ A )
Theorem	card0 7255	The cardinality of the empty set is the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 25-Oct-2003.)
|- ( card ` (/) ) = (/)
Theorem	carden2bex 7256*	If two numerable sets are equinumerous, then they have equal cardinalities. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2021.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ E. x e. On x ~~ A ) -> ( card ` A ) = ( card ` B ) )
Theorem	pm54.43 7257	Theorem *54.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 360. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2007.)
|- ( ( A ~~ 1o /\ B ~~ 1o ) -> ( ( A i^i B ) = (/) <-> ( A u. B ) ~~ 2o ) )
Theorem	pr2nelem 7258	Lemma for pr2ne 7259. (Contributed by FL, 17-Aug-2008.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D /\ A =/= B ) -> { A , B } ~~ 2o )
Theorem	pr2ne 7259	If an unordered pair has two elements they are different. (Contributed by FL, 14-Feb-2010.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. D ) -> ( { A , B } ~~ 2o <-> A =/= B ) )
Theorem	exmidonfinlem 7260*	Lemma for exmidonfin 7261. (Contributed by Andrew W Swan and Jim Kingdon, 9-Mar-2024.)
|- A = { { x e. { (/) } | ph } , { x e. { (/) } | -. ph } }   =>    |- ( om = ( On i^i Fin ) -> DECID ph )
Theorem	exmidonfin 7261	If a finite ordinal is a natural number, excluded middle follows. That excluded middle implies that a finite ordinal is a natural number is proved in the Metamath Proof Explorer. That a natural number is a finite ordinal is shown at nnfi 6933 and nnon 4646. (Contributed by Andrew W Swan and Jim Kingdon, 9-Mar-2024.)
|- ( om = ( On i^i Fin ) -> EXMID )
Theorem	en2eleq 7262	Express a set of pair cardinality as the unordered pair of a given element and the other element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( X e. P /\ P ~~ 2o ) -> P = { X , U. ( P \ { X } ) } )
Theorem	en2other2 7263	Taking the other element twice in a pair gets back to the original element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( X e. P /\ P ~~ 2o ) -> U. ( P \ { U. ( P \ { X } ) } ) = X )
Theorem	dju1p1e2 7264	Disjoint union version of one plus one equals two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- ( 1o ⊔ 1o ) ~~ 2o
Theorem	infpwfidom 7265	The collection of finite subsets of a set dominates the set. (We use the weaker sethood assumption ( ~P A i^i Fin ) e. _V because this theorem also implies that A is a set if ~P A i^i Fin is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-May-2015.)
|- ( ( ~P A i^i Fin ) e. _V -> A ~<_ ( ~P A i^i Fin ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemeldju 7266	Lemma for exmidfodomr 7271. A variant of djur 7135. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ( A ⊔ 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( B = (inl ` (/) ) \/ B = (inr ` (/) ) ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemreseldju 7267	Lemma for exmidfodomrlemrALT 7270. A variant of eldju 7134. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ 1o )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. ( A ⊔ 1o ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( (/) e. A /\ B = ( (inl |` A ) ` (/) ) ) \/ B = ( (inr |` 1o ) ` (/) ) ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemim 7268*	Excluded middle implies the existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates. Proposition 1.1 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- (EXMID -> A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemr 7269*	The existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates implies excluded middle. Proposition 1.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidfodomrlemrALT 7270*	The existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates implies excluded middle. Proposition 1.2 of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. An alternative proof of exmidfodomrlemr 7269. In particular, this proof uses eldju 7134 instead of djur 7135 and avoids djulclb 7121. (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2022.)
|- ( A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidfodomr 7271*	Excluded middle is equivalent to the existence of a mapping from any set onto any inhabited set that it dominates. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jul-2022.)
|- (EXMID <-> A. x A. y ( ( E. z z e. y /\ y ~<_ x ) -> E. f f : x -onto-> y ) )
2.6.42  Axiom of Choice equivalents
Syntax	wac 7272	Formula for an abbreviation of the axiom of choice.
wff CHOICE
Definition	df-ac 7273*	The expression CHOICE will be used as a readable shorthand for any form of the axiom of choice; all concrete forms are long, cryptic, have dummy variables, or all three, making it useful to have a short name. Similar to the Axiom of Choice (first form) of [Enderton] p. 49. There are some decisions about how to write this definition especially around whether ax-setind 4573 is needed to show equivalence to other ways of stating choice, and about whether choice functions are available for nonempty sets or inhabited sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Feb-2015.)
|- (CHOICE <-> A. x E. f ( f C_ x /\ f Fn dom x ) )
Theorem	acfun 7274*	A convenient form of choice. The goal here is to state choice as the existence of a choice function on a set of inhabited sets, while making full use of our notation around functions and function values. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Nov-2023.)
|- ( ph -> CHOICE )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x e. A E. w w e. x )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. f ( f Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) e. x ) )
Theorem	exmidaclem 7275*	Lemma for exmidac 7276. The result, with a few hypotheses to break out commonly used expressions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
|- A = { x e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( x = (/) \/ y = { (/) } ) }   &    |- B = { x e. { (/) , { (/) } } | ( x = { (/) } \/ y = { (/) } ) }   &    |- C = { A , B }   =>    |- (CHOICE -> EXMID )
Theorem	exmidac 7276	The axiom of choice implies excluded middle. See acexmid 5921 for more discussion of this theorem and a way of stating it without using CHOICE or EXMID. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2023.)
|- (CHOICE -> EXMID )
2.6.43  Cardinal number arithmetic
Theorem	endjudisj 7277	Equinumerosity of a disjoint union and a union of two disjoint sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ ( A i^i B ) = (/) ) -> ( A ⊔ B ) ~~ ( A u. B ) )
Theorem	djuen 7278	Disjoint unions of equinumerous sets are equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ C ~~ D ) -> ( A ⊔ C ) ~~ ( B ⊔ D ) )
Theorem	djuenun 7279	Disjoint union is equinumerous to union for disjoint sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2023.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ C ~~ D /\ ( B i^i D ) = (/) ) -> ( A ⊔ C ) ~~ ( B u. D ) )
Theorem	dju1en 7280	Cardinal addition with cardinal one (which is the same as ordinal one). Used in proof of Theorem 6J of [Enderton] p. 143. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ -. A e. A ) -> ( A ⊔ 1o ) ~~ suc A )
Theorem	dju0en 7281	Cardinal addition with cardinal zero (the empty set). Part (a1) of proof of Theorem 6J of [Enderton] p. 143. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A ⊔ (/) ) ~~ A )
Theorem	xp2dju 7282	Two times a cardinal number. Exercise 4.56(g) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( 2o X. A ) = ( A ⊔ A )
Theorem	djucomen 7283	Commutative law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(c) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A ⊔ B ) ~~ ( B ⊔ A ) )
Theorem	djuassen 7284	Associative law for cardinal addition. Exercise 4.56(c) of [Mendelson] p. 258. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( ( A ⊔ B ) ⊔ C ) ~~ ( A ⊔ ( B ⊔ C ) ) )
Theorem	xpdjuen 7285	Cardinal multiplication distributes over cardinal addition. Theorem 6I(3) of [Enderton] p. 142. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( A X. ( B ⊔ C ) ) ~~ ( ( A X. B ) ⊔ ( A X. C ) ) )
Theorem	djudoml 7286	A set is dominated by its disjoint union with another. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> A ~<_ ( A ⊔ B ) )
Theorem	djudomr 7287	A set is dominated by its disjoint union with another. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> B ~<_ ( A ⊔ B ) )
2.6.44  Ordinal trichotomy
Theorem	exmidontriimlem1 7288	Lemma for exmidontriim 7292. A variation of r19.30dc 2644. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ( A. x e. A ( ph \/ ps \/ ch ) /\ EXMID ) -> ( E. x e. A ph \/ E. x e. A ps \/ A. x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem2 7289*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7292. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. y e. B ( A e. y \/ A = y \/ y e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A. y e. B y e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem3 7290*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7292. What we get to do based on induction on both A and B. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. A A. y e. On ( z e. y \/ z = y \/ y e. z ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. y e. B ( A e. y \/ A = y \/ y e. A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A = B \/ B e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriimlem4 7291*	Lemma for exmidontriim 7292. The induction step for the induction on A. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. On )   &    |- ( ph -> EXMID )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z e. A A. y e. On ( z e. y \/ z = y \/ y e. z ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A e. B \/ A = B \/ B e. A ) )
Theorem	exmidontriim 7292*	Excluded middle implies ordinal trichotomy. Lemma 10.4.1 of [HoTT], p. (varies). The proof follows the proof from the HoTT book fairly closely. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2024.)
|- (EXMID -> A. x e. On A. y e. On ( x e. y \/ x = y \/ y e. x ) )
2.6.45  Excluded middle and the power set of a singleton
Theorem	pw1on 7293	The power set of 1o is an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o e. On
Theorem	pw1dom2 7294	The power set of 1o dominates 2o. Also see pwpw0ss 3834 which is similar. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2022.)
|- 2o ~<_ ~P 1o
Theorem	pw1ne0 7295	The power set of 1o is not zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= (/)
Theorem	pw1ne1 7296	The power set of 1o is not one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= 1o
Theorem	pw1ne3 7297	The power set of 1o is not three. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ~P 1o =/= 3o
Theorem	pw1nel3 7298	Negated excluded middle implies that the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> -. ~P 1o e. 3o )
Theorem	sucpw1ne3 7299	Negated excluded middle implies that the successor of the power set of 1o is not three . (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- ( -. EXMID -> suc ~P 1o =/= 3o )
Theorem	sucpw1nel3 7300	The successor of the power set of 1o is not an element of 3o. (Contributed by James E. Hanson and Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2024.)
|- -. suc ~P 1o e. 3o