Theorem dfoprab3 6089

Description: Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3.1	⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3	⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝜓,𝑤   𝑥,𝑧,𝑤,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑧,𝑤)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab3s 6088	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓)}
2		vex 2689	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
3		1stexg 6065	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ V → (1st ‘𝑤) ∈ V)
4	2, 3	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1st ‘𝑤) ∈ V
5		2ndexg 6066	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ V → (2nd ‘𝑤) ∈ V)
6	2, 5	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2nd ‘𝑤) ∈ V
7		eqcom 2141	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝑤) ↔ (1st ‘𝑤) = 𝑥)
8		eqcom 2141	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝑤) ↔ (2nd ‘𝑤) = 𝑦)
9	7, 8	anbi12i 455	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = (1st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝑤)) ↔ ((1st ‘𝑤) = 𝑥 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑤) = 𝑦))
10		eqopi 6070	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑤) = 𝑥 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑤) = 𝑦)) → 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
11	9, 10	sylan2b 285	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝑤))) → 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
12		dfoprab3.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
13	11, 12	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝑤))) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
14	13	bicomd 140	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝑤))) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
15	14	ex 114	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) → ((𝑥 = (1st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝑤)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)))
16	4, 6, 15	sbc2iedv 2981	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) → ([(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
17	16	pm5.32i 449	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑))
18	17	opabbii 3995	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)}
19	1, 18	eqtr2i 2161	1 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1331   ∈ wcel 1480  Vcvv 2686  [wsbc 2909  ⟨cop 3530  {copab 3988   × cxp 4537  ‘cfv 5123  {coprab 5775  1^st c1st 6036  2^nd c2nd 6037

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-13 1491  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121  ax-sep 4046  ax-pow 4098  ax-pr 4131  ax-un 4355

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2002  df-mo 2003  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-ral 2421  df-rex 2422  df-v 2688  df-sbc 2910  df-un 3075  df-in 3077  df-ss 3084  df-pw 3512  df-sn 3533  df-pr 3534  df-op 3536  df-uni 3737  df-br 3930  df-opab 3990  df-mpt 3991  df-id 4215  df-xp 4545  df-rel 4546  df-cnv 4547  df-co 4548  df-dm 4549  df-rn 4550  df-iota 5088  df-fun 5125  df-fn 5126  df-f 5127  df-fo 5129  df-fv 5131  df-oprab 5778  df-1st 6038  df-2nd 6039

This theorem is referenced by:  dfoprab4  6090  df1st2  6116  df2nd2  6117