Theorem dfoprab3 6097

Description: Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3.1	⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfoprab3	⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝜑   𝜓,𝑤   𝑥,𝑧,𝑤,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑧,𝑤)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem dfoprab3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfoprab3s 6096	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓)}
2		vex 2692	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
3		1stexg 6073	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ V → (1st ‘𝑤) ∈ V)
4	2, 3	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1st ‘𝑤) ∈ V
5		2ndexg 6074	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ V → (2nd ‘𝑤) ∈ V)
6	2, 5	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2nd ‘𝑤) ∈ V
7		eqcom 2142	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝑤) ↔ (1st ‘𝑤) = 𝑥)
8		eqcom 2142	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝑤) ↔ (2nd ‘𝑤) = 𝑦)
9	7, 8	anbi12i 456	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 = (1st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝑤)) ↔ ((1st ‘𝑤) = 𝑥 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑤) = 𝑦))
10		eqopi 6078	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑤) = 𝑥 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑤) = 𝑦)) → 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
11	9, 10	sylan2b 285	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝑤))) → 𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
12		dfoprab3.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
13	11, 12	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝑤))) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
14	13	bicomd 140	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝑤))) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
15	14	ex 114	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) → ((𝑥 = (1st ‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝑤)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)))
16	4, 6, 15	sbc2iedv 2985	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) → ([(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
17	16	pm5.32i 450	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑))
18	17	opabbii 4003	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜓)} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)}
19	1, 18	eqtr2i 2162	1 ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104   = wceq 1332   ∈ wcel 1481  Vcvv 2689  [wsbc 2913  ⟨cop 3535  {copab 3996   × cxp 4545  ‘cfv 5131  {coprab 5783  1^st c1st 6044  2^nd c2nd 6045

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1424  ax-7 1425  ax-gen 1426  ax-ie1 1470  ax-ie2 1471  ax-8 1483  ax-10 1484  ax-11 1485  ax-i12 1486  ax-bndl 1487  ax-4 1488  ax-13 1492  ax-14 1493  ax-17 1507  ax-i9 1511  ax-ial 1515  ax-i5r 1516  ax-ext 2122  ax-sep 4054  ax-pow 4106  ax-pr 4139  ax-un 4363

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1335  df-nf 1438  df-sb 1737  df-eu 2003  df-mo 2004  df-clab 2127  df-cleq 2133  df-clel 2136  df-nfc 2271  df-ral 2422  df-rex 2423  df-v 2691  df-sbc 2914  df-un 3080  df-in 3082  df-ss 3089  df-pw 3517  df-sn 3538  df-pr 3539  df-op 3541  df-uni 3745  df-br 3938  df-opab 3998  df-mpt 3999  df-id 4223  df-xp 4553  df-rel 4554  df-cnv 4555  df-co 4556  df-dm 4557  df-rn 4558  df-iota 5096  df-fun 5133  df-fn 5134  df-f 5135  df-fo 5137  df-fv 5139  df-oprab 5786  df-1st 6046  df-2nd 6047

This theorem is referenced by:  dfoprab4  6098  df1st2  6124  df2nd2  6125