Theorem funfvdm2f 5698

Description: The value of a function. Version of funfvdm2 5697 using a bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jan-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
funfvdm2f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
funfvdm2f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funfvdm2f	⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Proof of Theorem funfvdm2f

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfvdm2 5697	. 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤})
2		funfvdm2f.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		funfvdm2f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹
4		nfcv 2372	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤
5	2, 3, 4	nfbr 4129	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑤
6		nfv 1574	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝐴𝐹𝑦
7		breq2 4086	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝐴𝐹𝑤 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	cbvab 2353	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
9	8	unieqi 3897	. 2 ⊢ ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
10	1, 9	eqtrdi 2278	1 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1395   ∈ wcel 2200  {cab 2215  Ⅎwnfc 2359  ∪ cuni 3887   class class class wbr 4082  dom cdm 4718  Fun wfun 5311  ‘cfv 5317

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4201  ax-pow 4257  ax-pr 4292

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-v 2801  df-sbc 3029  df-un 3201  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210  df-pw 3651  df-sn 3672  df-pr 3673  df-op 3675  df-uni 3888  df-br 4083  df-opab 4145  df-id 4383  df-xp 4724  df-rel 4725  df-cnv 4726  df-co 4727  df-dm 4728  df-rn 4729  df-res 4730  df-ima 4731  df-iota 5277  df-fun 5319  df-fn 5320  df-fv 5325

This theorem is referenced by: (None)