Theorem funfvdm2f 5643

Description: The value of a function. Version of funfvdm2 5642 using a bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jan-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
funfvdm2f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
funfvdm2f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funfvdm2f	⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Proof of Theorem funfvdm2f

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfvdm2 5642	. 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤})
2		funfvdm2f.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		funfvdm2f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹
4		nfcv 2347	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤
5	2, 3, 4	nfbr 4089	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑤
6		nfv 1550	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝐴𝐹𝑦
7		breq2 4047	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝐴𝐹𝑤 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	cbvab 2328	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
9	8	unieqi 3859	. 2 ⊢ ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
10	1, 9	eqtrdi 2253	1 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1372   ∈ wcel 2175  {cab 2190  Ⅎwnfc 2334  ∪ cuni 3849   class class class wbr 4043  dom cdm 4674  Fun wfun 5264  ‘cfv 5270

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1469  ax-7 1470  ax-gen 1471  ax-ie1 1515  ax-ie2 1516  ax-8 1526  ax-10 1527  ax-11 1528  ax-i12 1529  ax-bndl 1531  ax-4 1532  ax-17 1548  ax-i9 1552  ax-ial 1556  ax-i5r 1557  ax-14 2178  ax-ext 2186  ax-sep 4161  ax-pow 4217  ax-pr 4252

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1375  df-nf 1483  df-sb 1785  df-eu 2056  df-mo 2057  df-clab 2191  df-cleq 2197  df-clel 2200  df-nfc 2336  df-ral 2488  df-rex 2489  df-v 2773  df-sbc 2998  df-un 3169  df-in 3171  df-ss 3178  df-pw 3617  df-sn 3638  df-pr 3639  df-op 3641  df-uni 3850  df-br 4044  df-opab 4105  df-id 4339  df-xp 4680  df-rel 4681  df-cnv 4682  df-co 4683  df-dm 4684  df-rn 4685  df-res 4686  df-ima 4687  df-iota 5231  df-fun 5272  df-fn 5273  df-fv 5278

This theorem is referenced by: (None)