Theorem funfvdm2f 5742

Description: The value of a function. Version of funfvdm2 5741 using a bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Jan-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
funfvdm2f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
funfvdm2f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funfvdm2f	⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Proof of Theorem funfvdm2f

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfvdm2 5741	. 2 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤})
2		funfvdm2f.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		funfvdm2f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹
4		nfcv 2384	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤
5	2, 3, 4	nfbr 4156	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑤
6		nfv 1577	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝐴𝐹𝑦
7		breq2 4113	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝐴𝐹𝑤 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	cbvab 2358	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
9	8	unieqi 3924	. 2 ⊢ ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
10	1, 9	eqtrdi 2281	1 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1398   ∈ wcel 2203  {cab 2218  Ⅎwnfc 2371  ∪ cuni 3914   class class class wbr 4109  dom cdm 4749  Fun wfun 5346  ‘cfv 5352

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-14 2206  ax-ext 2214  ax-sep 4228  ax-pow 4287  ax-pr 4322

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2083  df-mo 2084  df-clab 2219  df-cleq 2225  df-clel 2228  df-nfc 2373  df-ral 2525  df-rex 2526  df-v 2815  df-sbc 3043  df-un 3215  df-in 3217  df-ss 3224  df-pw 3671  df-sn 3695  df-pr 3696  df-op 3698  df-uni 3915  df-br 4110  df-opab 4172  df-id 4414  df-xp 4755  df-rel 4756  df-cnv 4757  df-co 4758  df-dm 4759  df-rn 4760  df-res 4761  df-ima 4762  df-iota 5312  df-fun 5354  df-fn 5355  df-fv 5360

This theorem is referenced by: (None)