Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > opabid | GIF version |
Description: The law of concretion. Special case of Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
opabid | ⊢ (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | vex 2689 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V | |
2 | vex 2689 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V | |
3 | 1, 2 | opex 4151 | . 2 ⊢ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ V |
4 | copsexg 4166 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
5 | 4 | bicomd 140 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑)) |
6 | df-opab 3990 | . 2 ⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
7 | 3, 5, 6 | elab2 2832 | 1 ⊢ (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 = wceq 1331 ∃wex 1468 ∈ wcel 1480 〈cop 3530 {copab 3988 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 698 ax-5 1423 ax-7 1424 ax-gen 1425 ax-ie1 1469 ax-ie2 1470 ax-8 1482 ax-10 1483 ax-11 1484 ax-i12 1485 ax-bndl 1486 ax-4 1487 ax-14 1492 ax-17 1506 ax-i9 1510 ax-ial 1514 ax-i5r 1515 ax-ext 2121 ax-sep 4046 ax-pow 4098 ax-pr 4131 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 964 df-tru 1334 df-nf 1437 df-sb 1736 df-eu 2002 df-mo 2003 df-clab 2126 df-cleq 2132 df-clel 2135 df-nfc 2270 df-v 2688 df-un 3075 df-in 3077 df-ss 3084 df-pw 3512 df-sn 3533 df-pr 3534 df-op 3536 df-opab 3990 |
This theorem is referenced by: opelopabsb 4182 ssopab2b 4198 dmopab 4750 rnopab 4786 funopab 5158 funco 5163 fvmptss2 5496 f1ompt 5571 ovid 5887 enssdom 6656 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |