![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > opabid | GIF version |
Description: The law of concretion. Special case of Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
opabid | ⊢ (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | vex 2763 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V | |
2 | vex 2763 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V | |
3 | 1, 2 | opex 4258 | . 2 ⊢ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ V |
4 | copsexg 4273 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
5 | 4 | bicomd 141 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑)) |
6 | df-opab 4091 | . 2 ⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
7 | 3, 5, 6 | elab2 2908 | 1 ⊢ (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 104 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1364 ∃wex 1503 ∈ wcel 2164 〈cop 3621 {copab 4089 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1458 ax-7 1459 ax-gen 1460 ax-ie1 1504 ax-ie2 1505 ax-8 1515 ax-10 1516 ax-11 1517 ax-i12 1518 ax-bndl 1520 ax-4 1521 ax-17 1537 ax-i9 1541 ax-ial 1545 ax-i5r 1546 ax-14 2167 ax-ext 2175 ax-sep 4147 ax-pow 4203 ax-pr 4238 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 982 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1472 df-sb 1774 df-eu 2045 df-mo 2046 df-clab 2180 df-cleq 2186 df-clel 2189 df-nfc 2325 df-v 2762 df-un 3157 df-in 3159 df-ss 3166 df-pw 3603 df-sn 3624 df-pr 3625 df-op 3627 df-opab 4091 |
This theorem is referenced by: opabidw 4287 opelopabsb 4290 ssopab2b 4307 dmopab 4873 rnopab 4909 funopab 5289 funco 5294 fvmptss2 5632 f1ompt 5709 ovid 6035 enssdom 6816 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |