Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > opabid | GIF version |
Description: The law of concretion. Special case of Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
opabid | ⊢ (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | vex 2729 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V | |
2 | vex 2729 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V | |
3 | 1, 2 | opex 4207 | . 2 ⊢ 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ V |
4 | copsexg 4222 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
5 | 4 | bicomd 140 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑)) |
6 | df-opab 4044 | . 2 ⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
7 | 3, 5, 6 | elab2 2874 | 1 ⊢ (〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 = wceq 1343 ∃wex 1480 ∈ wcel 2136 〈cop 3579 {copab 4042 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1435 ax-7 1436 ax-gen 1437 ax-ie1 1481 ax-ie2 1482 ax-8 1492 ax-10 1493 ax-11 1494 ax-i12 1495 ax-bndl 1497 ax-4 1498 ax-17 1514 ax-i9 1518 ax-ial 1522 ax-i5r 1523 ax-14 2139 ax-ext 2147 ax-sep 4100 ax-pow 4153 ax-pr 4187 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 970 df-tru 1346 df-nf 1449 df-sb 1751 df-eu 2017 df-mo 2018 df-clab 2152 df-cleq 2158 df-clel 2161 df-nfc 2297 df-v 2728 df-un 3120 df-in 3122 df-ss 3129 df-pw 3561 df-sn 3582 df-pr 3583 df-op 3585 df-opab 4044 |
This theorem is referenced by: opelopabsb 4238 ssopab2b 4254 dmopab 4815 rnopab 4851 funopab 5223 funco 5228 fvmptss2 5561 f1ompt 5636 ovid 5958 enssdom 6728 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |