ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  supubti GIF version

Theorem supubti 6599
Description: A supremum is an upper bound. See also supclti 6598 and suplubti 6600.

This proof demonstrates how to expand an iota-based definition (df-iota 4932) using riotacl2 5558.

(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Nov-2021.)

Hypotheses
Ref Expression
supmoti.ti ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢𝐴𝑣𝐴)) → (𝑢 = 𝑣 ↔ (¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣 ∧ ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢)))
supclti.2 (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝐴 (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
Assertion
Ref Expression
supubti (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑢,𝐴,𝑣,𝑥   𝑦,𝐴,𝑥,𝑧   𝑥,𝐵,𝑦,𝑧   𝑢,𝑅,𝑣,𝑥   𝑦,𝑅,𝑧   𝜑,𝑢,𝑣,𝑥
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦,𝑧)   𝐵(𝑣,𝑢)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑣,𝑢)

Proof of Theorem supubti
Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 simpl 107 . . . . 5 ((∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → ∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
21a1i 9 . . . 4 (𝑥𝐴 → ((∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → ∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
32ss2rabi 3087 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))} ⊆ {𝑥𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦}
4 supmoti.ti . . . . 5 ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢𝐴𝑣𝐴)) → (𝑢 = 𝑣 ↔ (¬ 𝑢𝑅𝑣 ∧ ¬ 𝑣𝑅𝑢)))
5 supclti.2 . . . . 5 (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝐴 (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
64, 5supval2ti 6595 . . . 4 (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) = (𝑥𝐴 (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))))
74, 5supeuti 6594 . . . . 5 (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝐴 (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)))
8 riotacl2 5558 . . . . 5 (∃!𝑥𝐴 (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧)) → (𝑥𝐴 (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ∈ {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
97, 8syl 14 . . . 4 (𝜑 → (𝑥𝐴 (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))) ∈ {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
106, 9eqeltrd 2159 . . 3 (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑧𝐵 𝑦𝑅𝑧))})
113, 10sseldi 3008 . 2 (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦})
12 breq2 3815 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦𝑥𝑅𝑤))
1312notbid 625 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤))
1413cbvralv 2583 . . . . 5 (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑤𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤)
15 breq1 3814 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
1615notbid 625 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
1716ralbidv 2374 . . . . 5 (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (∀𝑤𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑤 ↔ ∀𝑤𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
1814, 17syl5bb 190 . . . 4 (𝑥 = sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) → (∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑤𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
1918elrab 2759 . . 3 (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} ↔ (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤))
2019simprbi 269 . 2 (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅) ∈ {𝑥𝐴 ∣ ∀𝑦𝐵 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} → ∀𝑤𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤)
21 breq2 3815 . . . 4 (𝑤 = 𝐶 → (sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 ↔ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
2221notbid 625 . . 3 (𝑤 = 𝐶 → (¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 ↔ ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
2322rspccv 2709 . 2 (∀𝑤𝐵 ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝑤 → (𝐶𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
2411, 20, 233syl 17 1 (𝜑 → (𝐶𝐵 → ¬ sup(𝐵, 𝐴, 𝑅)𝑅𝐶))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wa 102  wb 103   = wceq 1285  wcel 1434  wral 2353  wrex 2354  ∃!wreu 2355  {crab 2357   class class class wbr 3811  crio 5544  supcsup 6582
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 577  ax-in2 578  ax-io 663  ax-5 1377  ax-7 1378  ax-gen 1379  ax-ie1 1423  ax-ie2 1424  ax-8 1436  ax-10 1437  ax-11 1438  ax-i12 1439  ax-bndl 1440  ax-4 1441  ax-17 1460  ax-i9 1464  ax-ial 1468  ax-i5r 1469  ax-ext 2065
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 922  df-tru 1288  df-fal 1291  df-nf 1391  df-sb 1688  df-eu 1946  df-mo 1947  df-clab 2070  df-cleq 2076  df-clel 2079  df-nfc 2212  df-ral 2358  df-rex 2359  df-reu 2360  df-rmo 2361  df-rab 2362  df-v 2614  df-sbc 2827  df-un 2988  df-in 2990  df-ss 2997  df-sn 3428  df-pr 3429  df-op 3431  df-uni 3628  df-br 3812  df-iota 4932  df-riota 5545  df-sup 6584
This theorem is referenced by:  suplub2ti  6601  supisoti  6610  inflbti  6624  suprubex  8304  zsupcl  10721  dvdslegcd  10734
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator