Theorem brecop2 8801

Description: Binary relation on a quotient set. Lemma for real number construction. Eliminates antecedent from last hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 13-Feb-1996.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jul-2022.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
brecop2.1	⊢ dom ∼ = (𝐺 × 𝐺)
brecop2.2	⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝐺 × 𝐺) / ∼ )
brecop2.3	⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐻 × 𝐻)
brecop2.4	⊢ ≤ ⊆ (𝐺 × 𝐺)
brecop2.5	⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺
brecop2.6	⊢ dom + = (𝐺 × 𝐺)
brecop2.7	⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ 𝑅[⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐷) ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brecop2	⊢ ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ 𝑅[⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐷) ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶))

Proof of Theorem brecop2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		brecop2.3	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐻 × 𝐻)
2	1	brel 5739	. . 3 ⊢ ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ 𝑅[⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ ∈ 𝐻 ∧ [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ∈ 𝐻))
3		brecop2.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ dom ∼ = (𝐺 × 𝐺)
4		ecelqsdm 8777	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((dom ∼ = (𝐺 × 𝐺) ∧ [⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ ∈ ((𝐺 × 𝐺) / ∼ )) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐺 × 𝐺))
5	3, 4	mpan 688	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ ∈ ((𝐺 × 𝐺) / ∼ ) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐺 × 𝐺))
6		brecop2.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐻 = ((𝐺 × 𝐺) / ∼ )
7	5, 6	eleq2s 2851	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ ∈ 𝐻 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐺 × 𝐺))
8		opelxp 5711	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ (𝐺 × 𝐺) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺))
9	7, 8	sylib 217	. . . 4 ⊢ ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ ∈ 𝐻 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺))
10		ecelqsdm 8777	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((dom ∼ = (𝐺 × 𝐺) ∧ [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ∈ ((𝐺 × 𝐺) / ∼ )) → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∈ (𝐺 × 𝐺))
11	3, 10	mpan 688	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ∈ ((𝐺 × 𝐺) / ∼ ) → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∈ (𝐺 × 𝐺))
12	11, 6	eleq2s 2851	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ∈ 𝐻 → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∈ (𝐺 × 𝐺))
13		opelxp 5711	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∈ (𝐺 × 𝐺) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺))
14	12, 13	sylib 217	. . . 4 ⊢ ([⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ∈ 𝐻 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺))
15	9, 14	anim12i 613	. . 3 ⊢ (([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ ∈ 𝐻 ∧ [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ∈ 𝐻) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺)))
16	2, 15	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ 𝑅[⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺)))
17		brecop2.4	. . . . 5 ⊢ ≤ ⊆ (𝐺 × 𝐺)
18	17	brel 5739	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐷) ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶) → ((𝐴 + 𝐷) ∈ 𝐺 ∧ (𝐵 + 𝐶) ∈ 𝐺))
19		brecop2.6	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom + = (𝐺 × 𝐺)
20		brecop2.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺
21	19, 20	ndmovrcl 7589	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐷) ∈ 𝐺 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺))
22	19, 20	ndmovrcl 7589	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 + 𝐶) ∈ 𝐺 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐺))
23	21, 22	anim12i 613	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 + 𝐷) ∈ 𝐺 ∧ (𝐵 + 𝐶) ∈ 𝐺) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐺)))
24	18, 23	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐷) ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐺)))
25		an42 655	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐺)) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺)))
26	24, 25	sylib 217	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 + 𝐷) ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺)))
27		brecop2.7	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐺)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ 𝑅[⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐷) ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
28	16, 26, 27	pm5.21nii 379	1 ⊢ ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩] ∼ 𝑅[⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩] ∼ ↔ (𝐴 + 𝐷) ≤ (𝐵 + 𝐶))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106   ⊆ wss 3947  ∅c0 4321  ⟨cop 4633   class class class wbr 5147   × cxp 5673  dom cdm 5675  (class class class)co 7405  [cec 8697   / cqs 8698

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5298  ax-nul 5305  ax-pr 5426

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4322  df-if 4528  df-sn 4628  df-pr 4630  df-op 4634  df-uni 4908  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-xp 5681  df-cnv 5683  df-dm 5685  df-rn 5686  df-res 5687  df-ima 5688  df-iota 6492  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7408  df-ec 8701  df-qs 8705

This theorem is referenced by:  ltsrpr  11068