Theorem erdisj 8754

Description: Equivalence classes do not overlap. In other words, two equivalence classes are either equal or disjoint. Theorem 74 of [Suppes] p. 83. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
erdisj	⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝑋 → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ∨ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅))

Proof of Theorem erdisj

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		neq0 4340	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅))
2		simpl 482	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝑅 Er 𝑋)
3		elinel1 4190	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅)
4	3	adantl 481	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅)
5		vex 3472	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
6		ecexr 8707	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
7	4, 6	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
8		elecg 8745	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
9	5, 7, 8	sylancr 586	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐴]𝑅 ↔ 𝐴𝑅𝑥))
10	4, 9	mpbid 231	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐴𝑅𝑥)
11		elinel2 4191	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅)
12	11	adantl 481	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅)
13		ecexr 8707	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
14	12, 13	syl 17	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
15		elecg 8745	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
16	5, 14, 15	sylancr 586	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → (𝑥 ∈ [𝐵]𝑅 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝑥))
17	12, 16	mpbid 231	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐵𝑅𝑥)
18	2, 10, 17	ertr4d 8721	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → 𝐴𝑅𝐵)
19	2, 18	erthi 8753	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 Er 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅)) → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅)
20	19	ex 412	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝑋 → (𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
21	20	exlimdv 1928	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝑋 → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
22	1, 21	biimtrid 241	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝑋 → (¬ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ → [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
23	22	orrd 860	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝑋 → (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ [𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅))
24	23	orcomd 868	1 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝑋 → ([𝐴]𝑅 = [𝐵]𝑅 ∨ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 844   = wceq 1533  ∃wex 1773   ∈ wcel 2098  Vcvv 3468   ∩ cin 3942  ∅c0 4317   class class class wbr 5141   Er wer 8699  [cec 8700

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2697  ax-sep 5292  ax-nul 5299  ax-pr 5420

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3065  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-dif 3946  df-un 3948  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960  df-nul 4318  df-if 4524  df-sn 4624  df-pr 4626  df-op 4630  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-xp 5675  df-rel 5676  df-cnv 5677  df-co 5678  df-dm 5679  df-rn 5680  df-res 5681  df-ima 5682  df-er 8702  df-ec 8704

This theorem is referenced by:  qsdisj  8787