Theorem f1dom2gOLD 9030

Description: Obsolete version of f1dom2g 9029 as of 25-Sep-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
f1dom2gOLD	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem f1dom2gOLD

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1f 6817	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
2		fex2 7974	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
3	1, 2	syl3an1 1163	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
4	3	3coml 1127	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
5		simp3 1138	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
6		f1eq1 6812	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
7	4, 5, 6	spcedv 3611	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
8		brdomg 9016	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
9	8	3ad2ant2 1134	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
10	7, 9	mpbird 257	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ w3a 1087  ∃wex 1777   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3488   class class class wbr 5166  ⟶wf 6569  –1-1→wf1 6570   ≼ cdom 9001

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pow 5383  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-f1 6578  df-dom 9005

This theorem is referenced by: (None)