Theorem f1dom2gOLD 8968

Description: Obsolete version of f1dom2g 8967 as of 25-Sep-2024. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
f1dom2gOLD	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem f1dom2gOLD

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1f 6781	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
2		fex2 7923	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
3	1, 2	syl3an1 1160	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
4	3	3coml 1124	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
5		simp3 1135	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
6		f1eq1 6776	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
7	4, 5, 6	spcedv 3582	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
8		brdomg 8954	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
9	8	3ad2ant2 1131	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
10	7, 9	mpbird 257	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ w3a 1084  ∃wex 1773   ∈ wcel 2098  Vcvv 3468   class class class wbr 5141  ⟶wf 6533  –1-1→wf1 6534   ≼ cdom 8939

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-ext 2697  ax-sep 5292  ax-nul 5299  ax-pow 5356  ax-pr 5420  ax-un 7722

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-sb 2060  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3065  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-dif 3946  df-un 3948  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960  df-nul 4318  df-if 4524  df-pw 4599  df-sn 4624  df-pr 4626  df-op 4630  df-uni 4903  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-xp 5675  df-rel 5676  df-cnv 5677  df-co 5678  df-dm 5679  df-rn 5680  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-dom 8943

This theorem is referenced by: (None)