Theorem soex 7891

Description: If the relation in a strict order is a set, then the base field is also a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
soex	⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem soex

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 487	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → 𝐴 = ∅)
2		0ex 5251	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
3	1, 2	eqeltrdi 2864	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
4		n0 4300	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
5		vsnex 5386	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ {𝑥} ∈ V
6		dmexg 7871	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝑅 ∈ V)
7		rnexg 7872	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran 𝑅 ∈ V)
8		unexg 7715	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((dom 𝑅 ∈ V ∧ ran 𝑅 ∈ V) → (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅) ∈ V)
9	6, 7, 8	syl2anc 592	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅) ∈ V)
10		unexg 7715	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (({𝑥} ∈ V ∧ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅) ∈ V) → ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ∈ V)
11	5, 9, 10	sylancr 595	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ∈ V)
12	11	ad2antlr 735	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ∈ V)
13		sossfld 6161	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
14	13	adantlr 723	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
15		ssundif 4435	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ↔ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
16	14, 15	sylibr 236	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ⊆ ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)))
17	12, 16	ssexd 5274	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
18	17	ex 415	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V))
19	18	exlimdv 1947	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V))
20	19	imp 409	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
21	4, 20	sylan2b 602	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
22	3, 21	pm2.61dane 3038	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1554  ∃wex 1793   ∈ wcel 2136   ≠ wne 2951  Vcvv 3448   ∖ cdif 3896   ∪ cun 3897   ⊆ wss 3899  ∅c0 4280  {csn 4576   Or wor 5547  dom cdm 5640  ran crn 5641

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1809  ax-4 1823  ax-5 1924  ax-6 1981  ax-7 2022  ax-8 2138  ax-9 2146  ax-ext 2728  ax-sep 5240  ax-nul 5250  ax-pr 5384  ax-un 7707

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 857  df-3or 1096  df-3an 1097  df-tru 1557  df-fal 1567  df-ex 1794  df-sb 2085  df-clab 2735  df-cleq 2748  df-clel 2831  df-ne 2952  df-ral 3071  df-rab 3409  df-v 3450  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4281  df-if 4475  df-sn 4577  df-pr 4579  df-op 4583  df-uni 4860  df-br 5095  df-opab 5157  df-po 5548  df-so 5549  df-cnv 5648  df-dm 5650  df-rn 5651

This theorem is referenced by:  ween  9981  zorn2lem1  10443  zorn2lem4  10446