Theorem soex 7917

Description: If the relation in a strict order is a set, then the base field is also a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
soex	⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem soex

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 489	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → 𝐴 = ∅)
2		0ex 5269	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
3	1, 2	eqeltrdi 2869	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
4		n0 4306	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
5		vsnex 5406	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ {𝑥} ∈ V
6		dmexg 7897	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝑅 ∈ V)
7		rnexg 7898	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran 𝑅 ∈ V)
8		unexg 7741	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((dom 𝑅 ∈ V ∧ ran 𝑅 ∈ V) → (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅) ∈ V)
9	6, 7, 8	syl2anc 595	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅) ∈ V)
10		unexg 7741	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (({𝑥} ∈ V ∧ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅) ∈ V) → ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ∈ V)
11	5, 9, 10	sylancr 598	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ∈ V)
12	11	ad2antlr 739	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ∈ V)
13		sossfld 6184	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
14	13	adantlr 727	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
15		ssundif 4447	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ↔ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
16	14, 15	sylibr 237	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ⊆ ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)))
17	12, 16	ssexd 5294	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
18	17	ex 417	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V))
19	18	exlimdv 1961	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V))
20	19	imp 411	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
21	4, 20	sylan2b 605	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
22	3, 21	pm2.61dane 3043	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1568  ∃wex 1807   ∈ wcel 2141   ≠ wne 2956  Vcvv 3453   ∖ cdif 3901   ∪ cun 3902   ⊆ wss 3904  ∅c0 4285  {csn 4588   Or wor 5568  dom cdm 5661  ran crn 5662

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1571  df-fal 1581  df-ex 1808  df-sb 2095  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-po 5569  df-so 5570  df-cnv 5669  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672

This theorem is referenced by:  ween  10018  zorn2lem1  10479  zorn2lem4  10482