Theorem soex 7900

Description: If the relation in a strict order is a set, then the base field is also a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
soex	⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem soex

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 484	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → 𝐴 = ∅)
2		0ex 5265	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
3	1, 2	eqeltrdi 2837	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
4		n0 4319	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
5		vsnex 5392	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ {𝑥} ∈ V
6		dmexg 7880	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝑅 ∈ V)
7		rnexg 7881	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ran 𝑅 ∈ V)
8		unexg 7722	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((dom 𝑅 ∈ V ∧ ran 𝑅 ∈ V) → (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅) ∈ V)
9	6, 7, 8	syl2anc 584	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅) ∈ V)
10		unexg 7722	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (({𝑥} ∈ V ∧ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅) ∈ V) → ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ∈ V)
11	5, 9, 10	sylancr 587	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ∈ V)
12	11	ad2antlr 727	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ∈ V)
13		sossfld 6162	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
14	13	adantlr 715	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
15		ssundif 4454	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) ↔ (𝐴 ∖ {𝑥}) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅))
16	14, 15	sylibr 234	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ⊆ ({𝑥} ∪ (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)))
17	12, 16	ssexd 5282	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
18	17	ex 412	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V))
19	18	exlimdv 1933	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V))
20	19	imp 406	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
21	4, 20	sylan2b 594	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
22	3, 21	pm2.61dane 3013	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2926  Vcvv 3450   ∖ cdif 3914   ∪ cun 3915   ⊆ wss 3917  ∅c0 4299  {csn 4592   Or wor 5548  dom cdm 5641  ran crn 5642

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7714

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3or 1087  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-po 5549  df-so 5550  df-cnv 5649  df-dm 5651  df-rn 5652

This theorem is referenced by:  ween  9995  zorn2lem1  10456  zorn2lem4  10459