P. 80 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 7901-8000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	omssnlim 7901	The class of natural numbers is a subclass of the class of non-limit ordinal numbers. Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ω ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ¬ Lim 𝑥}
Theorem	limom 7902	Omega is a limit ordinal. Theorem 2.8 of [BellMachover] p. 473. Theorem 1.23 of [Schloeder] p. 4. Our proof, however, does not require the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Lim ω
Theorem	peano2b 7903	A class belongs to omega iff its successor does. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω ↔ suc 𝐴 ∈ ω)
Theorem	nnsuc 7904*	A nonzero natural number is a successor. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
Theorem	omsucne 7905	A natural number is not the successor of itself. (Contributed by AV, 17-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ≠ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	ssnlim 7906*	An ordinal subclass of non-limit ordinals is a class of natural numbers. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2004.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ¬ Lim 𝑥}) → 𝐴 ⊆ ω)
Theorem	omsinds 7907*	Strong (or "total") induction principle over the finite ordinals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2015.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝜒)
Theorem	omsindsOLD 7908*	Obsolete version of omsinds 7907 as of 16-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jul-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝜒)
Theorem	omun 7909	The union of two finite ordinals is a finite ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ ω)
2.4.5  Peano's postulates
Theorem	peano1 7910	Zero is a natural number. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. Note: Unlike most textbooks, our proofs of peano1 7910 through peano5 7915 do not use the Axiom of Infinity. Unlike Takeuti and Zaring, they also do not use the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.) Avoid ax-un 7753. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ ω
Theorem	peano1OLD 7911	Obsolete version of peano1 7910 as of 29-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ ω
Theorem	peano2 7912	The successor of any natural number is a natural number. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → suc 𝐴 ∈ ω)
Theorem	peano3 7913	The successor of any natural number is not zero. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → suc 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	peano4 7914	Two natural numbers are equal iff their successors are equal, i.e. the successor function is one-to-one. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	peano5 7915*	The induction postulate: any class containing zero and closed under the successor operation contains all natural numbers. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43, except our proof does not require the Axiom of Infinity. The more traditional statement of mathematical induction as a theorem schema, with a basis and an induction step, is derived from this theorem as Theorem findes 7922. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.) Avoid ax-10 2138, ax-12 2174. (Revised by GG, 3-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((∅ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → ω ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	nn0suc 7916*	A natural number is either 0 or a successor. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
2.4.6  Finite induction (for finite ordinals)
Theorem	find 7917*	The Principle of Finite Induction (mathematical induction). Corollary 7.31 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. The simpler hypothesis shown here was suggested in an email from "Colin" on 1-Oct-2001. The hypothesis states that 𝐴 is a set of natural numbers, zero belongs to 𝐴, and given any member of 𝐴 the member's successor also belongs to 𝐴. The conclusion is that every natural number is in 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ω ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = ω
Theorem	finds 7918*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝜏)
Theorem	findsg 7919*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. The basis of this version is an arbitrary natural number 𝐵 instead of zero. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1995.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝜏)
Theorem	finds2 7920*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2002.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝜏 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜏 → 𝜑))
Theorem	finds1 7921*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-2006.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → 𝜑)
Theorem	findes 7922	Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. See tfindes 7883 for the transfinite version. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.)
⊢ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → 𝜑)
2.4.7  Relations and functions (cont.)
Theorem	dmexg 7923	The domain of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	rnexg 7924	The range of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. Similar to Lemma 3D of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ran 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	dmexd 7925	The domain of a set is a set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	fndmexd 7926	If a function is a set, its domain is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ V)
Theorem	dmfex 7927	If a mapping is a set, its domain is a set. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	fndmexb 7928	The domain of a function is a set iff the function is a set. (Contributed by AV, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐹 ∈ V))
Theorem	fdmexb 7929	The domain of a function is a set iff the function is a set. (Contributed by AV, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐹 ∈ V))
Theorem	dmfexALT 7930	Alternate proof of dmfex 7927: shorter but using ax-rep 5284. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.) (Proof shortened by AV, 23-Aug-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	dmex 7931	The domain of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	rnex 7932	The range of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. Similar to Lemma 3D of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ran 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	iprc 7933	The identity function is a proper class. This means, for example, that we cannot use it as a member of the class of continuous functions unless it is restricted to a set, as in idcn 23280. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jan-2007.)
⊢ ¬ I ∈ V
Theorem	resiexg 7934	The existence of a restricted identity function, proved without using the Axiom of Replacement (unlike resfunexg 7234). (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( I ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	imaexg 7935	The image of a set is a set. Theorem 3.17 of [Monk1] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	imaex 7936	The image of a set is a set. Theorem 3.17 of [Monk1] p. 39. (Contributed by JJ, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	rnexd 7937	The range of a set is a set. Deduction version of rnexd 7937. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	imaexd 7938	The image of a set is a set. Deduction version of imaexg 7935. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	exse2 7939	Any set relation is set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)
Theorem	xpexr 7940	If a Cartesian product is a set, one of its components must be a set. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∨ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	xpexr2 7941	If a nonempty Cartesian product is a set, so are both of its components. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	xpexcnv 7942	A condition where the converse of xpex 7771 holds as well. Corollary 6.9(2) in [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	soex 7943	If the relation in a strict order is a set, then the base field is also a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elxp4 7944	Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp5 7945, elxp6 8046, and elxp7 8047. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨∪ dom {𝐴}, ∪ ran {𝐴}⟩ ∧ (∪ dom {𝐴} ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∪ ran {𝐴} ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	elxp5 7945	Membership in a Cartesian product requiring no quantifiers or dummy variables. Provides a slightly shorter version of elxp4 7944 when the double intersection does not create class existence problems (caused by int0 4966). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨∩ ∩ 𝐴, ∪ ran {𝐴}⟩ ∧ (∩ ∩ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∪ ran {𝐴} ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	cnvexg 7946	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	cnvex 7947	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ◡𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	relcnvexb 7948	A relation is a set iff its converse is a set. (Contributed by FL, 3-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ V ↔ ◡𝑅 ∈ V))
Theorem	f1oexrnex 7949	If the range of a 1-1 onto function is a set, the function itself is a set. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	f1oexbi 7950*	There is a one-to-one onto function from a set to a second set iff there is a one-to-one onto function from the second set to the first set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑔 𝑔:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐴)
Theorem	coexg 7951	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	coex 7952	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	coexd 7953	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by SN, 7-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	funcnvuni 7954*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of single-rooted sets is single-rooted. (See funcnv 6636 for "single-rooted" definition.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (Fun ◡𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → Fun ◡∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	fun11uni 7955*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of one-to-one functions is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ Fun ◡𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → (Fun ∪ 𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡∪ 𝐴))
Theorem	fex2 7956	A function with bounded domain and codomain is a set. This version of fex 7245 is proven without the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5284, but depends on ax-un 7753, which is not required for the proof of fex 7245. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	fabexd 7957*	Existence of a set of functions. In contrast to fabex 7960 or fabexg 7958, the condition in the class abstraction does not contain the function explicitly, but the function can be derived from it. Therefore, this theorem is also applicable for more special functions like one-to-one, onto or one-to-one onto functions. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2025.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑓:𝑋⟶𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑓 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)
Theorem	fabexg 7958*	Existence of a set of functions. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 25-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	fabexgOLD 7959*	Obsolete version of fabexg 7958 as of 9-Jun-2025. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 25-Feb-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	fabex 7960*	Existence of a set of functions. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	mapex 7961*	The class of all functions mapping one set to another is a set. Remark after Definition 10.24 of [Kunen] p. 31. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 4-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Jun-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵} ∈ V)
Theorem	f1oabexg 7962*	The class of all 1-1-onto functions mapping one set to another is a set. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 25-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	f1oabexgOLD 7963*	Obsolete version of f1oabexg 7962 as of 9-Jun-2025. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 25-Feb-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	fiunlem 7964*	Lemma for fiun 7965 and f1iun 7966. Formerly part of f1iun 7966. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑢 = 𝐵) → ∀𝑣 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = 𝐵} (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∨ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢))
Theorem	fiun 7965*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of functions is a function. Analogous to f1iun 7966. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵:∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐷⟶𝑆)
Theorem	f1iun 7966*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of one-to-one functions is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵:𝐷–1-1→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵:∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐷–1-1→𝑆)
Theorem	fviunfun 7967*	The function value of an indexed union is the value of one of the indexed functions. (Contributed by AV, 4-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝑈 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝐹‘𝑖)    ⇒   ⊢ ((Fun 𝑈 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹‘𝐽)) → (𝑈‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝐽)‘𝑋))
Theorem	ffoss 7968*	Relationship between a mapping and an onto mapping. Figure 38 of [Enderton] p. 145. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	f11o 7969*	Relationship between one-to-one and one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-1998.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	resfunexgALT 7970	Alternate proof of resfunexg 7234, shorter but requiring ax-pow 5370 and ax-un 7753. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	cofunexg 7971	Existence of a composition when the first member is a function. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	cofunex2g 7972	Existence of a composition when the second member is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun ◡𝐵) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	fnexALT 7973	Alternate proof of fnex 7236, derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funimaexg 6653. This version uses ax-pow 5370 and ax-un 7753, whereas fnex 7236 does not. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	funexw 7974	Weak version of funex 7238 that holds without ax-rep 5284. If the domain and codomain of a function exist, so does the function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	mptexw 7975*	Weak version of mptex 7242 that holds without ax-rep 5284. If the domain and codomain of a function given by maps-to notation are sets, the function is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	funrnex 7976	If the domain of a function exists, so does its range. Part of Theorem 4.15(v) of [Monk1] p. 46. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funex 7238. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐹 → ran 𝐹 ∈ V))
Theorem	zfrep6 7977*	A version of the Axiom of Replacement. Normally 𝜑 would have free variables 𝑥 and 𝑦. Axiom 6 of [Kunen] p. 12. The Separation Scheme ax-sep 5301 cannot be derived from this version and must be stated as a separate axiom in an axiom system (such as Kunen's) that uses this version in place of our ax-rep 5284. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)
Theorem	focdmex 7978	If the domain of an onto function exists, so does its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	f1dmex 7979	If the codomain of a one-to-one function exists, so does its domain. This theorem is equivalent to the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5284. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	f1ovv 7980	The codomain/range of a 1-1 onto function is a set iff its domain is a set. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	fvclex 7981*	Existence of the class of values of a set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-1995.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ V
Theorem	fvresex 7982*	Existence of the class of values of a restricted class. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)‘𝑥)} ∈ V
Theorem	abrexexg 7983*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. The class 𝐵 can be thought of as an expression in 𝑥 (which is typically a free variable in the class expression substituted for 𝐵) and the class abstraction appearing in the statement as the class of values 𝐵 as 𝑥 varies through 𝐴. If the "domain" 𝐴 is a set, then the abstraction is also a set. Therefore, this statement is a kind of Replacement. This can be seen by tracing back through the path axrep6g 5295, axrep6 5293, ax-rep 5284. See also abrexex2g 7987. There are partial converses under additional conditions, see for instance abnexg 7774. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2138, ax-11 2154, ax-12 2174, ax-pr 5437, ax-un 7753 and shorten proof. (Revised by SN, 11-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V)
Theorem	abrexexgOLD 7984*	Obsolete version of abrexexg 7983 as of 11-Dec-2024. EDITORIAL: Comment kept since the line of equivalences to ax-rep 5284 is different. Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. The class 𝐵 can be thought of as an expression in 𝑥 (which is typically a free variable in the class expression substituted for 𝐵) and the class abstraction appearing in the statement as the class of values 𝐵 as 𝑥 varies through 𝐴. If the "domain" 𝐴 is a set, then the abstraction is also a set. Therefore, this statement is a kind of Replacement. This can be seen by tracing back through the path mptexg 7240, funex 7238, fnex 7236, resfunexg 7234, and funimaexg 6653. See also abrexex2g 7987. There are partial converses under additional conditions, see for instance abnexg 7774. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V)
Theorem	abrexex 7985*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. See the comment of abrexexg 7983. See also abrexex2 7992. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V
Theorem	iunexg 7986*	The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	abrexex2g 7987*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝑊) → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3d 7988*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3rd 7989*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction if the second components are elements of a set. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2023.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3 7990*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
Theorem	iunex 7991*	The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for 𝐵, which can be read informally as 𝐵(𝑥). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V
Theorem	abrexex2 7992*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥 and 𝑦. See also abrexex 7985. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	abexssex 7993*	Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both 𝑥 and 𝑦 can be free in 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
Theorem	abexex 7994*	A condition where a class abstraction continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	f1oweALT 7995*	Alternate proof of f1owe 7372, more direct since not using the isomorphism predicate, but requiring ax-un 7753. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝑆 We 𝐵 → 𝑅 We 𝐴))
Theorem	wemoiso 7996*	Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. TODO: Shorten finnisoeu 10150. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	wemoiso2 7997*	Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	oprabexd 7998*	Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ∃*𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	oprabex 7999*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	oprabex3 8000*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V