| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 80 of 504) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31014) |
(31015-32537) |
(32538-50302) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | funexw 7901 | Weak version of funex 7170 that holds without ax-rep 5206. If the domain and codomain of a function exist, so does the function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | mptexw 7902* | Weak version of mptex 7174 that holds without ax-rep 5206. If the domain and codomain of a function given by maps-to notation are sets, the function is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | funrnex 7903 | If the domain of a function exists, so does its range. Part of Theorem 4.15(v) of [Monk1] p. 46. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funex 7170. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.) |
| ⊢ (dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐹 → ran 𝐹 ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | zfrep6OLD 7904* | Obsolete proof of zfrep6 5218 as of 5-Apr-2026. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2003.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | focdmex 7905 | If the domain of an onto function exists, so does its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | f1dmex 7906 | If the codomain of a one-to-one function exists, so does its domain. This theorem is equivalent to the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5206. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | f1ovv 7907 | The codomain/range of a 1-1 onto function is a set iff its domain is a set. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐵 ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | fvclex 7908* | Existence of the class of values of a set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | fvresex 7909* | Existence of the class of values of a restricted class. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)‘𝑥)} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | abrexexg 7910* | Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. The class 𝐵 can be thought of as an expression in 𝑥 (which is typically a free variable in the class expression substituted for 𝐵) and the class abstraction appearing in the statement as the class of values 𝐵 as 𝑥 varies through 𝐴. If the "domain" 𝐴 is a set, then the abstraction is also a set. Therefore, this statement is a kind of Replacement. This can be seen by tracing back through the path axrep6g 5219, axrep6 5215, ax-rep 5206. See also abrexex2g 7913. There are partial converses under additional conditions, see for instance abnexg 7706. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2152, ax-11 2168, ax-12 2189, ax-pr 5369, ax-un 7685 and shorten proof. (Revised by SN, 11-Dec-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | abrexex 7911* | Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. See the comment of abrexexg 7910. See also abrexex2 7918. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | iunexg 7912* | The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | abrexex2g 7913* | Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝑊) → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | opabex3d 7914* | Existence of an ordered pair abstraction, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | opabex3rd 7915* | Existence of an ordered pair abstraction if the second components are elements of a set. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2023.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | opabex3 7916* | Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | iunex 7917* | The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for 𝐵, which can be read informally as 𝐵(𝑥). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | abrexex2 7918* | Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥 and 𝑦. See also abrexex 7911. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | abexssex 7919* | Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both 𝑥 and 𝑦 can be free in 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | abexex 7920* | A condition where a class abstraction continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝜑} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | f1oweALT 7921* | Alternate proof of f1owe 7304, more direct since not using the isomorphism predicate, but requiring ax-un 7685. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝑆 We 𝐵 → 𝑅 We 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | wemoiso 7922* | Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. TODO: Shorten finnisoeu 10033. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | wemoiso2 7923* | Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | oprabexd 7924* | Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ∃*𝑧𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | oprabex 7925* | Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑧𝜑) & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | oprabex3 7926* | Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = 〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑢, 𝑓〉) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | oprabrexex2 7927* | Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | ab2rexex 7928* | Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. Variables 𝑥 and 𝑦 are normally free-variable parameters in the class expression substituted for 𝐶, which can be thought of as 𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦). See comments for abrexex 7911. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = 𝐶} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | ab2rexex2 7929* | Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥, 𝑦, and 𝑧. Compare abrexex2 7918. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑} ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | xpexgALT 7930 | Alternate proof of xpexg 7700 requiring Replacement (ax-rep 5206) but not Power Set (ax-pow 5301). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | offval3 7931* | General value of (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) with no assumptions on functionality of 𝐹 and 𝐺. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | offres 7932 | Pointwise combination commutes with restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ↾ 𝐷) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∘f 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | ofmres 7933* | Equivalent expressions for a restriction of the function operation map. Unlike ∘f 𝑅 which is a proper class, ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) can be a set by ofmresex 7934, allowing it to be used as a function or structure argument. By ofmresval 7643, the restricted operation map values are the same as the original values, allowing theorems for ∘f 𝑅 to be reused. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑓 ∘f 𝑅𝑔)) | ||
| Theorem | ofmresex 7934 | Existence of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | mptcnfimad 7935* | The converse of a mapping of subsets to their image of a bijection. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝑀 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑀 ↦ (◡𝐹 “ 𝑦))) | ||
| Syntax | c1st 7936 | Extend the definition of a class to include the first member an ordered pair function. |
| class 1st | ||
| Syntax | c2nd 7937 | Extend the definition of a class to include the second member an ordered pair function. |
| class 2nd | ||
| Definition | df-1st 7938 | Define a function that extracts the first member, or abscissa, of an ordered pair. Theorem op1st 7946 proves that it does this. For example, (1st ‘〈3, 4〉) = 3. Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op1sta 6183 and op1stb 5418). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ 1st = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∪ dom {𝑥}) | ||
| Definition | df-2nd 7939 | Define a function that extracts the second member, or ordinate, of an ordered pair. Theorem op2nd 7947 proves that it does this. For example, (2nd ‘〈3, 4〉) = 4. Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op2nda 6186 and op2ndb 6185). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ 2nd = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∪ ran {𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | 1stval 7940 | The value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (1st ‘𝐴) = ∪ dom {𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | 2ndval 7941 | The value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (2nd ‘𝐴) = ∪ ran {𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | 1stnpr 7942 | Value of the first-member function at non-pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (1st ‘𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | 2ndnpr 7943 | Value of the second-member function at non-pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Sep-2017.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (2nd ‘𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | 1st0 7944 | The value of the first-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.) |
| ⊢ (1st ‘∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | 2nd0 7945 | The value of the second-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.) |
| ⊢ (2nd ‘∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | op1st 7946 | Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (1st ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | op2nd 7947 | Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (2nd ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | op1std 7948 | Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 = 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → (1st ‘𝐶) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | op2ndd 7949 | Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 = 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → (2nd ‘𝐶) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | op1stg 7950 | Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (1st ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | op2ndg 7951 | Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (2nd ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ot1stg 7952 | Extract the first member of an ordered triple. (Due to infrequent usage, it isn't worthwhile at this point to define special extractors for triples, so we reuse the ordered pair extractors for ot1stg 7952, ot2ndg 7953, ot3rdg 7954.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (1st ‘(1st ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ot2ndg 7953 | Extract the second member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 7952 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (2nd ‘(1st ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉)) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ot3rdg 7954 | Extract the third member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 7952 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | 1stval2 7955 | Alternate value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (1st ‘𝐴) = ∩ ∩ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 2ndval2 7956 | Alternate value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (2nd ‘𝐴) = ∩ ∩ ∩ ◡{𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | oteqimp 7957 | The components of an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑇 = 〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉 → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍) → ((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐴 ∧ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑇) = 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | fo1st 7958 | The 1st function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ 1st :V–onto→V | ||
| Theorem | fo2nd 7959 | The 2nd function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ 2nd :V–onto→V | ||
| Theorem | br1steqg 7960 | Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 1st. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉1st 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | br2ndeqg 7961 | Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 2nd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉2nd 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | f1stres 7962 | Mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (1st ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | f2ndres 7963 | Mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (2nd ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | fo1stres 7964 | Onto mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → (1st ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | fo2ndres 7965 | Onto mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (2nd ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | 1st2val 7966* | Value of an alternate definition of the 1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑥}‘𝐴) = (1st ‘𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 2nd2val 7967* | Value of an alternate definition of the 2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ({〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑦}‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 1stcof 7968 | Composition of the first member function with another function. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2007.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐵 × 𝐶) → (1st ∘ 𝐹):𝐴⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | 2ndcof 7969 | Composition of the second member function with another function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐵 × 𝐶) → (2nd ∘ 𝐹):𝐴⟶𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | xp1st 7970 | Location of the first element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | xp2nd 7971 | Location of the second element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | elxp6 7972 | Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 7869. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 〈(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)〉 ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | elxp7 7973 | Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 7869. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | eqopi 7974 | Equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶)) → 𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) | ||
| Theorem | xp2 7975* | Representation of Cartesian product based on ordered pair component functions. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (V × V) ∣ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)} | ||
| Theorem | unielxp 7976 | The membership relation for a Cartesian product is inherited by union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | 1st2nd2 7977 | Reconstruction of a member of a Cartesian product in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → 𝐴 = 〈(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)〉) | ||
| Theorem | 1st2ndb 7978 | Reconstruction of an ordered pair in terms of its components. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ↔ 𝐴 = 〈(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)〉) | ||
| Theorem | xpopth 7979 | An ordered pair theorem for members of Cartesian products. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐷) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 × 𝑆)) → (((1st ‘𝐴) = (1st ‘𝐵) ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐵)) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | eqop 7980 | Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | eqop2 7981 | Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | op1steq 7982* | Two ways of expressing that an element is the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝑥〉)) | ||
| Theorem | opreuopreu 7983* | There is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff iff its components fulfil a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑎 = (1st ‘𝑝) ∧ 𝑏 = (2nd ‘𝑝)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)∃𝑎∃𝑏(𝑝 = 〈𝑎, 𝑏〉 ∧ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | el2xptp 7984* | A member of a nested Cartesian product is an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ((𝐵 × 𝐶) × 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧〉) | ||
| Theorem | el2xptp0 7985 | A member of a nested Cartesian product is an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ∈ ((𝑈 × 𝑉) × 𝑊) ∧ ((1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = 𝑋 ∧ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = 𝑌 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝑍)) ↔ 𝐴 = 〈𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍〉)) | ||
| Theorem | el2xpss 7986* | Version of elrel 5748 for triple Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ ((𝐵 × 𝐶) × 𝐷)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧〉) | ||
| Theorem | 2nd1st 7987 | Swap the members of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∪ ◡{𝐴} = 〈(2nd ‘𝐴), (1st ‘𝐴)〉) | ||
| Theorem | 1st2nd 7988 | Reconstruction of a member of a relation in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 〈(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)〉) | ||
| Theorem | 1stdm 7989 | The first ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ dom 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | 2ndrn 7990 | The second ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the range of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | 1st2ndbr 7991 | Express an element of a relation as a relationship between first and second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (1st ‘𝐴)𝐵(2nd ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | releldm2 7992* | Two ways of expressing membership in the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | reldm 7993* | An expression for the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → dom 𝐴 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (1st ‘𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | releldmdifi 7994* | One way of expressing membership in the difference of domains of two nested relations. (Contributed by AV, 26-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐵) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)(1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | funfv1st2nd 7995 | The function value for the first component of an ordered pair is the second component of the ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 17-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑋)) = (2nd ‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | funelss 7996 | If the first component of an element of a function is in the domain of a subset of the function, the element is a member of this subset. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((1st ‘𝑋) ∈ dom 𝐵 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | funeldmdif 7997* | Two ways of expressing membership in the difference of domains of two nested functions. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)(1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | sbcopeq1a 7998 | Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered pair (analogue of sbceq1a 3741 that avoids the existential quantifiers of copsexg 5439). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → ([(1st ‘𝐴) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | csbopeq1a 7999 | Equality theorem for substitution of a class 𝐴 for an ordered pair 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 in 𝐵 (analogue of csbeq1a 3852). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → ⦋(1st ‘𝐴) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑦⦌𝐵 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | sbcoteq1a 8000 | Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered triple. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧〉 → ([(1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) / 𝑦][(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |