P. 80 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 7901-8000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ovtpos 7901	The transposition swaps the arguments in a two-argument function. When 𝐹 is a matrix, which is to say a function from (1...𝑚) × (1...𝑛) to ℝ or some ring, tpos 𝐹 is the transposition of 𝐹, which is where the name comes from. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)
Theorem	tposfun 7902	The transposition of a function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun tpos 𝐹)
Theorem	dftpos2 7903*	Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ◡dom 𝐹 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})))
Theorem	dftpos3 7904*	Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 5557. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})
Theorem	dftpos4 7905*	Alternate definition of tpos. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ((V × V) ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}))
Theorem	tpostpos 7906	Value of the double transposition for a general class 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∩ (((V × V) ∪ {∅}) × V))
Theorem	tpostpos2 7907	Value of the double transposition for a relation on triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom 𝐹) → tpos tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹)
Theorem	tposfn2 7908	The domain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → tpos 𝐹 Fn ◡𝐴))
Theorem	tposfo2 7909	Condition for a surjective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–onto→𝐵))
Theorem	tposf2 7910	The domain and range of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴⟶𝐵))
Theorem	tposf12 7911	Condition for an injective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
Theorem	tposf1o2 7912	Condition of a bijective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵))
Theorem	tposfo 7913	The domain and range of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)–onto→𝐶)
Theorem	tposf 7914	The domain and range of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)⟶𝐶)
Theorem	tposfn 7915	Functionality of a transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) → tpos 𝐹 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐴))
Theorem	tpos0 7916	Transposition of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos ∅ = ∅
Theorem	tposco 7917	Transposition of a composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ tpos (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tpossym 7918*	Two ways to say a function is symmetric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)))
Theorem	tposeqi 7919	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺
Theorem	tposex 7920	A transposition is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	nftpos 7921	Hypothesis builder for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥tpos 𝐹
Theorem	tposoprab 7922*	Transposition of a class of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	tposmpo 7923*	Transposition of a two-argument mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)
Theorem	tposconst 7924	The transposition of a constant operation using the relation representation. (Contributed by SO, 11-Jul-2018.)
⊢ tpos ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × {𝐶}) = ((𝐵 × 𝐴) × {𝐶})
2.4.12  Curry and uncurry
Syntax	ccur 7925	Extend class notation to include the currying function.
class curry 𝐴
Syntax	cunc 7926	Extend class notation to include the uncurrying function.
class uncurry 𝐴
Definition	df-cur 7927*	Define the currying of 𝐹, which splits a function of two arguments into a function of the first argument, producing a function over the second argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ curry 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ dom dom 𝐹 ↦ {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩𝐹𝑧})
Definition	df-unc 7928*	Define the uncurrying of 𝐹, which takes a function producing functions, and transforms it into a two-argument function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ uncurry 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑦(𝐹‘𝑥)𝑧}
Theorem	mpocurryd 7929*	The currying of an operation given in maps-to notation, splitting the operation (function of two arguments) into a function of the first argument, producing a function over the second argument. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → curry 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)))
Theorem	mpocurryvald 7930*	The value of a curried operation given in maps-to notation is a function over the second argument of the original operation. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (curry 𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶))
Theorem	fvmpocurryd 7931*	The value of the value of a curried operation given in maps-to notation is the operation value of the original operation. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((curry 𝐹‘𝐴)‘𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
2.4.13  Undefined values
Syntax	cund 7932	Extend class notation with undefined value function.
class Undef
Definition	df-undef 7933	Define the undefined value function, whose value at set 𝑠 is guaranteed not to be a member of 𝑠 (see pwuninel 7935). (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ Undef = (𝑠 ∈ V ↦ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑠)
Theorem	pwuninel2 7934	Direct proof of pwuninel 7935 avoiding functions and thus several ZF axioms. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	pwuninel 7935	The power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. See also pwuninel2 7934. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ¬ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	undefval 7936	Value of the undefined value function. Normally we will not reference the explicit value but will use undefnel 7938 instead. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (Undef‘𝑆) = 𝒫 ∪ 𝑆)
Theorem	undefnel2 7937	The undefined value generated from a set is not a member of the set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ (Undef‘𝑆) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	undefnel 7938	The undefined value generated from a set is not a member of the set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (Undef‘𝑆) ∉ 𝑆)
Theorem	undefne0 7939	The undefined value generated from a set is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (Undef‘𝑆) ≠ ∅)
2.4.14  Well-founded recursion
Syntax	cwrecs 7940	Declare syntax for the well-founded recursive function generator.
class wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹)
Definition	df-wrecs 7941*	Here we define the well-founded recursive function generator. This function takes the usual expressions from recursion theorems and forms a unified definition. Specifically, given a function 𝐹, a relationship 𝑅, and a base set 𝐴, this definition generates a function 𝐺 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) that has property that, at any point 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, (𝐺‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑥))). See wfr1 7967, wfr2 7968, and wfr3 7969. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = ∪ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}
Theorem	wrecseq123 7942	General equality theorem for the well-founded recursive function generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑅 = 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = 𝐺) → wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = wrecs(𝑆, 𝐵, 𝐺))
Theorem	nfwrecs 7943	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the well-founded recursive function generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹)
Theorem	wrecseq1 7944	Equality theorem for the well-founded recursive function generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = wrecs(𝑆, 𝐴, 𝐹))
Theorem	wrecseq2 7945	Equality theorem for the well-founded recursive function generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐵, 𝐹))
Theorem	wrecseq3 7946	Equality theorem for the well-founded recursive function generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐹) = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺))
Theorem	wfr3g 7947*	Functions defined by well-founded recursion are identical up to relation, domain, and characteristic function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Feb-2011.)
⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐻‘(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)))) ∧ (𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑦) = (𝐻‘(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺)
Theorem	wfrlem1 7948*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. The final item we are interested in is the union of acceptable functions 𝐵. This lemma just changes bound variables for later use. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤))))}
Theorem	wfrlem2 7949*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. An acceptable function is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 → Fun 𝑔)
Theorem	wfrlem3 7950*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. An acceptable function's domain is a subset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 → dom 𝑔 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	wfrlem3a 7951*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. Show membership in the class of acceptable functions. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ (𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑤)))))
Theorem	wfrlem4 7952*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. Properties of the restriction of an acceptable function to the domain of another one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.) (Revised by AV, 18-Jul-2022.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) Fn (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)((𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘((𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) ↾ Pred(𝑅, (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ), 𝑎)))))
Theorem	wfrlem5 7953*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. The values of two acceptable functions agree within their domains. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	wfrrel 7954	The well-founded recursion generator generates a relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2018.)
⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ Rel 𝐹
Theorem	wfrdmss 7955	The domain of the well-founded recursion generator is a subclass of 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.)
⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴
Theorem	wfrlem8 7956	Lemma for well-founded recursion. Compute the prececessor class for an 𝑅 minimal element of (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.)
⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹), 𝑋) = ∅ ↔ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) = Pred(𝑅, dom 𝐹, 𝑋))
Theorem	wfrdmcl 7957	Given 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹, then its predecessor class is a subset of dom 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.)
⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋) ⊆ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	wfrlem10 7958*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. When 𝑧 is an 𝑅 minimal element of (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹), then its predecessor class is equal to dom 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹) ∧ Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹), 𝑧) = ∅) → Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧) = dom 𝐹)
Theorem	wfrfun 7959	The well-founded function generator generates a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ Fun 𝐹
Theorem	wfrlem12 7960*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. Here, we compute the value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))
Theorem	wfrlem13 7961*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. From here through wfrlem16 7964, we aim to prove that dom 𝐹 = 𝐴. We do this by supposing that there is an element 𝑧 of 𝐴 that is not in dom 𝐹. We then define 𝐶 by extending dom 𝐹 with the appropriate value at 𝑧. We then show that 𝑧 cannot be an 𝑅 minimal element of (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹), meaning that (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹) must be empty, so dom 𝐹 = 𝐴. Here, we show that 𝐶 is a function extending the domain of 𝐹 by one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐹 ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧)))⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹) → 𝐶 Fn (dom 𝐹 ∪ {𝑧}))
Theorem	wfrlem14 7962*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. Compute the value of 𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐹 ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧)))⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹) → (𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝐶‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘(𝐶 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦)))))
Theorem	wfrlem15 7963*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. When 𝑧 is 𝑅 minimal, 𝐶 is an acceptable function. This step is where the Axiom of Replacement becomes required. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐹 ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧)))⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹) ∧ Pred(𝑅, (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹), 𝑧) = ∅) → 𝐶 ∈ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘(𝑓 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑦))))})
Theorem	wfrlem16 7964*	Lemma for well-founded recursion. If 𝑧 is 𝑅 minimal in (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹), then 𝐶 is acceptable and thus a subset of 𝐹, but dom 𝐶 is bigger than dom 𝐹. Thus, 𝑧 cannot be minimal, so (𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐹) must be empty, and (due to wfrdmss 7955), dom 𝐹 = 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Apr-2011.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐹 ∪ {⟨𝑧, (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧)))⟩})    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐹 = 𝐴
Theorem	wfrlem17 7965	Without using ax-rep 5182, show that all restrictions of wrecs are sets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋)) ∈ V)
Theorem	wfr2a 7966	A weak version of wfr2 7968 which is useful for proofs that avoid the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 30-Jul-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))))
Theorem	wfr1 7967	The Principle of Well-Founded Recursion, part 1 of 3. We start with an arbitrary function 𝐺. Then, using a base class 𝐴 and a well-ordering 𝑅 of 𝐴, we define a function 𝐹. This function is said to be defined by "well-founded recursion." The purpose of these three theorems is to demonstrate the properties of 𝐹. We begin by showing that 𝐹 is a function over 𝐴. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn 𝐴
Theorem	wfr2 7968	The Principle of Well-Founded Recursion, part 2 of 3. Next, we show that the value of 𝐹 at any 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 is 𝐺 recursively applied to all "previous" values of 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑋))))
Theorem	wfr3 7969*	The principle of Well-Founded Recursion, part 3 of 3. Finally, we show that 𝐹 is unique. We do this by showing that any function 𝐻 with the same properties we proved of 𝐹 in wfr1 7967 and wfr2 7968 is identical to 𝐹. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Apr-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.)
⊢ 𝑅 We 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝑅 Se 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = wrecs(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐻 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑧) = (𝐺‘(𝐻 ↾ Pred(𝑅, 𝐴, 𝑧)))) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
2.4.15  Functions on ordinals; strictly monotone ordinal functions
Theorem	iunon 7970*	The indexed union of a set of ordinal numbers 𝐵(𝑥) is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ On) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ On)
Theorem	iinon 7971*	The nonempty indexed intersection of a class of ordinal numbers 𝐵(𝑥) is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ On)
Theorem	onfununi 7972*	A property of functions on ordinal numbers. Generalization of Theorem Schema 8E of [Enderton] p. 218. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-May-2009.)
⊢ (Lim 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑦) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝐹‘𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) → (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑆) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑥))
Theorem	onovuni 7973*	A variant of onfununi 7972 for operations. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-May-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Lim 𝑦 → (𝐴𝐹𝑦) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝐴𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) → (𝐴𝐹𝑥) ⊆ (𝐴𝐹𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑆 ≠ ∅) → (𝐴𝐹∪ 𝑆) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐴𝐹𝑥))
Theorem	onoviun 7974*	A variant of onovuni 7973 with indexed unions. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 26-May-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (Lim 𝑦 → (𝐴𝐹𝑦) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 (𝐴𝐹𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) → (𝐴𝐹𝑥) ⊆ (𝐴𝐹𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐾 𝐿 ∈ On ∧ 𝐾 ≠ ∅) → (𝐴𝐹∪ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾 𝐿) = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾 (𝐴𝐹𝐿))
Theorem	onnseq 7975*	There are no length ω decreasing sequences in the ordinals. See also noinfep 9117 for a stronger version assuming Regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘∅) ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ ω ¬ (𝐹‘suc 𝑥) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))
Syntax	wsmo 7976	Introduce the strictly monotone ordinal function. A strictly monotone function is one that is constantly increasing across the ordinals.
wff Smo 𝐴
Definition	df-smo 7977*	Definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. Definition 7.46 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (Smo 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴:dom 𝐴⟶On ∧ Ord dom 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐴‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴‘𝑦))))
Theorem	dfsmo2 7978*	Alternate definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (Smo 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On ∧ Ord dom 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)))
Theorem	issmo 7979*	Conditions for which 𝐴 is a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Nov-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2386. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 19-May-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴:𝐵⟶On    &   ⊢ Ord 𝐵    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐴‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴‘𝑦)))    &   ⊢ dom 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Smo 𝐴
Theorem	issmo2 7980*	Alternate definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → ((𝐵 ⊆ On ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)) → Smo 𝐹))
Theorem	smoeq 7981	Equality theorem for strictly monotone functions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (Smo 𝐴 ↔ Smo 𝐵))
Theorem	smodm 7982	The domain of a strictly monotone function is an ordinal. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ (Smo 𝐴 → Ord dom 𝐴)
Theorem	smores 7983	A strictly monotone function restricted to an ordinal remains strictly monotone. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((Smo 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴) → Smo (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵))
Theorem	smores3 7984	A strictly monotone function restricted to an ordinal remains strictly monotone. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((Smo (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐵) → Smo (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶))
Theorem	smores2 7985	A strictly monotone ordinal function restricted to an ordinal is still monotone. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ((Smo 𝐹 ∧ Ord 𝐴) → Smo (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	smodm2 7986	The domain of a strictly monotone ordinal function is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝐹) → Ord 𝐴)
Theorem	smofvon2 7987	The function values of a strictly monotone ordinal function are ordinals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (Smo 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ On)
Theorem	iordsmo 7988	The identity relation restricted to the ordinals is a strictly monotone function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ Ord 𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Smo ( I ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	smo0 7989	The null set is a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 20-Nov-2011.)
⊢ Smo ∅
Theorem	smofvon 7990	If 𝐵 is a strictly monotone ordinal function, and 𝐴 is in the domain of 𝐵, then the value of the function at 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 20-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((Smo 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → (𝐵‘𝐴) ∈ On)
Theorem	smoel 7991	If 𝑥 is less than 𝑦 then a strictly monotone function's value will be strictly less at 𝑥 than at 𝑦. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 22-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((Smo 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐵‘𝐴))
Theorem	smoiun 7992*	The value of a strictly monotone ordinal function contains its indexed union. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 22-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((Smo 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐵‘𝐴))
Theorem	smoiso 7993	If 𝐹 is an isomorphism from an ordinal 𝐴 onto 𝐵, which is a subset of the ordinals, then 𝐹 is a strictly monotonic function. Exercise 3 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Smo 𝐹)
Theorem	smoel2 7994	A strictly monotone ordinal function preserves the membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝐹) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵))
Theorem	smo11 7995	A strictly monotone ordinal function is one-to-one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Smo 𝐹) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)
Theorem	smoord 7996	A strictly monotone ordinal function preserves strict ordering. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝐹) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐹‘𝐷)))
Theorem	smoword 7997	A strictly monotone ordinal function preserves weak ordering. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝐹) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐶) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐷)))
Theorem	smogt 7998	A strictly monotone ordinal function is greater than or equal to its argument. Exercise 1 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 23-Nov-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝐹 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐶))
Theorem	smorndom 7999	The range of a strictly monotone ordinal function dominates the domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Smo 𝐹 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	smoiso2 8000	The strictly monotone ordinal functions are also isomorphisms of subclasses of On equipped with the membership relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Mar-2013.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ Smo 𝐹) ↔ 𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵)))