P. 80 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 7901-8000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	f1dmex 7901	If the codomain of a one-to-one function exists, so does its domain. This theorem is equivalent to the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5224. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	f1ovv 7902	The codomain/range of a 1-1 onto function is a set iff its domain is a set. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	fvclex 7903*	Existence of the class of values of a set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-1995.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ V
Theorem	fvresex 7904*	Existence of the class of values of a restricted class. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)‘𝑥)} ∈ V
Theorem	abrexexg 7905*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. The class 𝐵 can be thought of as an expression in 𝑥 (which is typically a free variable in the class expression substituted for 𝐵) and the class abstraction appearing in the statement as the class of values 𝐵 as 𝑥 varies through 𝐴. If the "domain" 𝐴 is a set, then the abstraction is also a set. Therefore, this statement is a kind of Replacement. This can be seen by tracing back through the path axrep6g 5235, axrep6 5233, ax-rep 5224. See also abrexex2g 7908. There are partial converses under additional conditions, see for instance abnexg 7701. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2146, ax-11 2162, ax-12 2184, ax-pr 5377, ax-un 7680 and shorten proof. (Revised by SN, 11-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V)
Theorem	abrexex 7906*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. See the comment of abrexexg 7905. See also abrexex2 7913. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V
Theorem	iunexg 7907*	The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	abrexex2g 7908*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝑊) → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3d 7909*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3rd 7910*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction if the second components are elements of a set. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2023.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3 7911*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
Theorem	iunex 7912*	The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for 𝐵, which can be read informally as 𝐵(𝑥). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V
Theorem	abrexex2 7913*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥 and 𝑦. See also abrexex 7906. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	abexssex 7914*	Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both 𝑥 and 𝑦 can be free in 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
Theorem	abexex 7915*	A condition where a class abstraction continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	f1oweALT 7916*	Alternate proof of f1owe 7299, more direct since not using the isomorphism predicate, but requiring ax-un 7680. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝑆 We 𝐵 → 𝑅 We 𝐴))
Theorem	wemoiso 7917*	Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. TODO: Shorten finnisoeu 10023. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	wemoiso2 7918*	Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	oprabexd 7919*	Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ∃*𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	oprabex 7920*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	oprabex3 7921*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	oprabrexex2 7922*	Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	ab2rexex 7923*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. Variables 𝑥 and 𝑦 are normally free-variable parameters in the class expression substituted for 𝐶, which can be thought of as 𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦). See comments for abrexex 7906. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = 𝐶} ∈ V
Theorem	ab2rexex2 7924*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥, 𝑦, and 𝑧. Compare abrexex2 7913. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	xpexgALT 7925	Alternate proof of xpexg 7695 requiring Replacement (ax-rep 5224) but not Power Set (ax-pow 5310). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	offval3 7926*	General value of (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) with no assumptions on functionality of 𝐹 and 𝐺. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥))))
Theorem	offres 7927	Pointwise combination commutes with restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ↾ 𝐷) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∘f 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)))
Theorem	ofmres 7928*	Equivalent expressions for a restriction of the function operation map. Unlike ∘f 𝑅 which is a proper class, ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) can be a set by ofmresex 7929, allowing it to be used as a function or structure argument. By ofmresval 7638, the restricted operation map values are the same as the original values, allowing theorems for ∘f 𝑅 to be reused. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑓 ∘f 𝑅𝑔))
Theorem	ofmresex 7929	Existence of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∈ V)
Theorem	mptcnfimad 7930*	The converse of a mapping of subsets to their image of a bijection. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝑀 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑀 ↦ (◡𝐹 “ 𝑦)))
2.4.8  First and second members of an ordered pair
Syntax	c1st 7931	Extend the definition of a class to include the first member an ordered pair function.
class 1st
Syntax	c2nd 7932	Extend the definition of a class to include the second member an ordered pair function.
class 2nd
Definition	df-1st 7933	Define a function that extracts the first member, or abscissa, of an ordered pair. Theorem op1st 7941 proves that it does this. For example, (1st ‘⟨3, 4⟩) = 3. Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op1sta 6183 and op1stb 5419). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 1st = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∪ dom {𝑥})
Definition	df-2nd 7934	Define a function that extracts the second member, or ordinate, of an ordered pair. Theorem op2nd 7942 proves that it does this. For example, (2nd ‘⟨3, 4⟩) = 4. Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op2nda 6186 and op2ndb 6185). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 2nd = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∪ ran {𝑥})
Theorem	1stval 7935	The value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (1st ‘𝐴) = ∪ dom {𝐴}
Theorem	2ndval 7936	The value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (2nd ‘𝐴) = ∪ ran {𝐴}
Theorem	1stnpr 7937	Value of the first-member function at non-pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (1st ‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	2ndnpr 7938	Value of the second-member function at non-pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (2nd ‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	1st0 7939	The value of the first-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (1st ‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	2nd0 7940	The value of the second-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (2nd ‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	op1st 7941	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐴
Theorem	op2nd 7942	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐵
Theorem	op1std 7943	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → (1st ‘𝐶) = 𝐴)
Theorem	op2ndd 7944	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → (2nd ‘𝐶) = 𝐵)
Theorem	op1stg 7945	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐴)
Theorem	op2ndg 7946	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐵)
Theorem	ot1stg 7947	Extract the first member of an ordered triple. (Due to infrequent usage, it isn't worthwhile at this point to define special extractors for triples, so we reuse the ordered pair extractors for ot1stg 7947, ot2ndg 7948, ot3rdg 7949.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (1st ‘(1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ot2ndg 7948	Extract the second member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 7947 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (2nd ‘(1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	ot3rdg 7949	Extract the third member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 7947 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩) = 𝐶)
Theorem	1stval2 7950	Alternate value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (1st ‘𝐴) = ∩ ∩ 𝐴)
Theorem	2ndval2 7951	Alternate value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (2nd ‘𝐴) = ∩ ∩ ∩ ◡{𝐴})
Theorem	oteqimp 7952	The components of an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍) → ((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐴 ∧ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑇) = 𝐶)))
Theorem	fo1st 7953	The 1st function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 1st :V–onto→V
Theorem	fo2nd 7954	The 2nd function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 2nd :V–onto→V
Theorem	br1steqg 7955	Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 1st. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴))
Theorem	br2ndeqg 7956	Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 2nd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐵))
Theorem	f1stres 7957	Mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (1st ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐴
Theorem	f2ndres 7958	Mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (2nd ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐵
Theorem	fo1stres 7959	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → (1st ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐴)
Theorem	fo2ndres 7960	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (2nd ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐵)
Theorem	1st2val 7961*	Value of an alternate definition of the 1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑥}‘𝐴) = (1st ‘𝐴)
Theorem	2nd2val 7962*	Value of an alternate definition of the 2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑦}‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐴)
Theorem	1stcof 7963	Composition of the first member function with another function. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2007.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐵 × 𝐶) → (1st ∘ 𝐹):𝐴⟶𝐵)
Theorem	2ndcof 7964	Composition of the second member function with another function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐵 × 𝐶) → (2nd ∘ 𝐹):𝐴⟶𝐶)
Theorem	xp1st 7965	Location of the first element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	xp2nd 7966	Location of the second element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	elxp6 7967	Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 7864. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)⟩ ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	elxp7 7968	Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 7864. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	eqopi 7969	Equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶)) → 𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	xp2 7970*	Representation of Cartesian product based on ordered pair component functions. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (V × V) ∣ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	unielxp 7971	The membership relation for a Cartesian product is inherited by union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	1st2nd2 7972	Reconstruction of a member of a Cartesian product in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → 𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)⟩)
Theorem	1st2ndb 7973	Reconstruction of an ordered pair in terms of its components. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ↔ 𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)⟩)
Theorem	xpopth 7974	An ordered pair theorem for members of Cartesian products. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐷) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 × 𝑆)) → (((1st ‘𝐴) = (1st ‘𝐵) ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐵)) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	eqop 7975	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → (𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶)))
Theorem	eqop2 7976	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶)))
Theorem	op1steq 7977*	Two ways of expressing that an element is the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝑥⟩))
Theorem	opreuopreu 7978*	There is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff iff its components fulfil a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑎 = (1st ‘𝑝) ∧ 𝑏 = (2nd ‘𝑝)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)∃𝑎∃𝑏(𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	el2xptp 7979*	A member of a nested Cartesian product is an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ((𝐵 × 𝐶) × 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩)
Theorem	el2xptp0 7980	A member of a nested Cartesian product is an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ∈ ((𝑈 × 𝑉) × 𝑊) ∧ ((1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = 𝑋 ∧ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = 𝑌 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝑍)) ↔ 𝐴 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍⟩))
Theorem	el2xpss 7981*	Version of elrel 5747 for triple Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ ((𝐵 × 𝐶) × 𝐷)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩)
Theorem	2nd1st 7982	Swap the members of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∪ ◡{𝐴} = ⟨(2nd ‘𝐴), (1st ‘𝐴)⟩)
Theorem	1st2nd 7983	Reconstruction of a member of a relation in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)⟩)
Theorem	1stdm 7984	The first ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ dom 𝑅)
Theorem	2ndrn 7985	The second ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the range of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝑅)
Theorem	1st2ndbr 7986	Express an element of a relation as a relationship between first and second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (1st ‘𝐴)𝐵(2nd ‘𝐴))
Theorem	releldm2 7987*	Two ways of expressing membership in the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	reldm 7988*	An expression for the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → dom 𝐴 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (1st ‘𝑥)))
Theorem	releldmdifi 7989*	One way of expressing membership in the difference of domains of two nested relations. (Contributed by AV, 26-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐵) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)(1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐶))
Theorem	funfv1st2nd 7990	The function value for the first component of an ordered pair is the second component of the ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 17-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑋)) = (2nd ‘𝑋))
Theorem	funelss 7991	If the first component of an element of a function is in the domain of a subset of the function, the element is a member of this subset. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((1st ‘𝑋) ∈ dom 𝐵 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	funeldmdif 7992*	Two ways of expressing membership in the difference of domains of two nested functions. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)(1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐶))
Theorem	sbcopeq1a 7993	Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered pair (analogue of sbceq1a 3751 that avoids the existential quantifiers of copsexg 5439). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ([(1st ‘𝐴) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	csbopeq1a 7994	Equality theorem for substitution of a class 𝐴 for an ordered pair ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ in 𝐵 (analogue of csbeq1a 3863). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ⦋(1st ‘𝐴) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑦⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	sbcoteq1a 7995	Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered triple. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → ([(1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) / 𝑦][(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	dfopab2 7996*	A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∣ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑}
Theorem	dfoprab3s 7997*	A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
Theorem	dfoprab3 7998*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	dfoprab4 7999*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	dfoprab4f 8000*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) Remove unnecessary distinct variable conditions. (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}