P. 80 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 7901-8000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	iunexg 7901*	The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	abrexex2g 7902*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝑊) → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3d 7903*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3rd 7904*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction if the second components are elements of a set. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2023.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3 7905*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
Theorem	iunex 7906*	The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for 𝐵, which can be read informally as 𝐵(𝑥). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V
Theorem	abrexex2 7907*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥 and 𝑦. See also abrexex 7900. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	abexssex 7908*	Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both 𝑥 and 𝑦 can be free in 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
Theorem	abexex 7909*	A condition where a class abstraction continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	f1oweALT 7910*	Alternate proof of f1owe 7293, more direct since not using the isomorphism predicate, but requiring ax-un 7674. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝑆 We 𝐵 → 𝑅 We 𝐴))
Theorem	wemoiso 7911*	Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. TODO: Shorten finnisoeu 10011. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	wemoiso2 7912*	Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	oprabexd 7913*	Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ∃*𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	oprabex 7914*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	oprabex3 7915*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	oprabrexex2 7916*	Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	ab2rexex 7917*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. Variables 𝑥 and 𝑦 are normally free-variable parameters in the class expression substituted for 𝐶, which can be thought of as 𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦). See comments for abrexex 7900. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = 𝐶} ∈ V
Theorem	ab2rexex2 7918*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥, 𝑦, and 𝑧. Compare abrexex2 7907. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	xpexgALT 7919	Alternate proof of xpexg 7689 requiring Replacement (ax-rep 5219) but not Power Set (ax-pow 5305). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	offval3 7920*	General value of (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) with no assumptions on functionality of 𝐹 and 𝐺. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥))))
Theorem	offres 7921	Pointwise combination commutes with restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ↾ 𝐷) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∘f 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)))
Theorem	ofmres 7922*	Equivalent expressions for a restriction of the function operation map. Unlike ∘f 𝑅 which is a proper class, ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) can be a set by ofmresex 7923, allowing it to be used as a function or structure argument. By ofmresval 7632, the restricted operation map values are the same as the original values, allowing theorems for ∘f 𝑅 to be reused. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑓 ∘f 𝑅𝑔))
Theorem	ofmresex 7923	Existence of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∈ V)
Theorem	mptcnfimad 7924*	The converse of a mapping of subsets to their image of a bijection. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝑀 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑀 ↦ (◡𝐹 “ 𝑦)))
2.4.8  First and second members of an ordered pair
Syntax	c1st 7925	Extend the definition of a class to include the first member an ordered pair function.
class 1st
Syntax	c2nd 7926	Extend the definition of a class to include the second member an ordered pair function.
class 2nd
Definition	df-1st 7927	Define a function that extracts the first member, or abscissa, of an ordered pair. Theorem op1st 7935 proves that it does this. For example, (1st ‘⟨3, 4⟩) = 3. Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op1sta 6177 and op1stb 5414). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 1st = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∪ dom {𝑥})
Definition	df-2nd 7928	Define a function that extracts the second member, or ordinate, of an ordered pair. Theorem op2nd 7936 proves that it does this. For example, (2nd ‘⟨3, 4⟩) = 4. Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op2nda 6180 and op2ndb 6179). The notation is the same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 2nd = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∪ ran {𝑥})
Theorem	1stval 7929	The value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (1st ‘𝐴) = ∪ dom {𝐴}
Theorem	2ndval 7930	The value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (2nd ‘𝐴) = ∪ ran {𝐴}
Theorem	1stnpr 7931	Value of the first-member function at non-pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (1st ‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	2ndnpr 7932	Value of the second-member function at non-pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 22-Sep-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (2nd ‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	1st0 7933	The value of the first-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (1st ‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	2nd0 7934	The value of the second-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
⊢ (2nd ‘∅) = ∅
Theorem	op1st 7935	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐴
Theorem	op2nd 7936	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐵
Theorem	op1std 7937	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → (1st ‘𝐶) = 𝐴)
Theorem	op2ndd 7938	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → (2nd ‘𝐶) = 𝐵)
Theorem	op1stg 7939	Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐴)
Theorem	op2ndg 7940	Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) = 𝐵)
Theorem	ot1stg 7941	Extract the first member of an ordered triple. (Due to infrequent usage, it isn't worthwhile at this point to define special extractors for triples, so we reuse the ordered pair extractors for ot1stg 7941, ot2ndg 7942, ot3rdg 7943.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (1st ‘(1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ot2ndg 7942	Extract the second member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 7941 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (2nd ‘(1st ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	ot3rdg 7943	Extract the third member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 7941 comment.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩) = 𝐶)
Theorem	1stval2 7944	Alternate value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (1st ‘𝐴) = ∩ ∩ 𝐴)
Theorem	2ndval2 7945	Alternate value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) → (2nd ‘𝐴) = ∩ ∩ ∩ ◡{𝐴})
Theorem	oteqimp 7946	The components of an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (𝑇 = ⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑍) → ((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐴 ∧ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑇)) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑇) = 𝐶)))
Theorem	fo1st 7947	The 1st function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 1st :V–onto→V
Theorem	fo2nd 7948	The 2nd function maps the universe onto the universe. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ 2nd :V–onto→V
Theorem	br1steqg 7949	Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 1st. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩1st 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐴))
Theorem	br2ndeqg 7950	Uniqueness condition for the binary relation 2nd. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jul-2020.) Revised to remove sethood hypothesis on 𝐶. (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Jan-2022.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩2nd 𝐶 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐵))
Theorem	f1stres 7951	Mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (1st ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐴
Theorem	f2ndres 7952	Mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (2nd ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐵
Theorem	fo1stres 7953	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → (1st ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐴)
Theorem	fo2ndres 7954	Onto mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second member of an ordered pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (2nd ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐵)
Theorem	1st2val 7955*	Value of an alternate definition of the 1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑥}‘𝐴) = (1st ‘𝐴)
Theorem	2nd2val 7956*	Value of an alternate definition of the 2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ({⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑦}‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐴)
Theorem	1stcof 7957	Composition of the first member function with another function. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2007.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐵 × 𝐶) → (1st ∘ 𝐹):𝐴⟶𝐵)
Theorem	2ndcof 7958	Composition of the second member function with another function. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐵 × 𝐶) → (2nd ∘ 𝐹):𝐴⟶𝐶)
Theorem	xp1st 7959	Location of the first element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	xp2nd 7960	Location of the second element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	elxp6 7961	Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 7858. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)⟩ ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	elxp7 7962	Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp4 7858. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	eqopi 7963	Equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶)) → 𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	xp2 7964*	Representation of Cartesian product based on ordered pair component functions. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (V × V) ∣ ((1st ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐵)}
Theorem	unielxp 7965	The membership relation for a Cartesian product is inherited by union. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	1st2nd2 7966	Reconstruction of a member of a Cartesian product in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → 𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)⟩)
Theorem	1st2ndb 7967	Reconstruction of an ordered pair in terms of its components. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ↔ 𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)⟩)
Theorem	xpopth 7968	An ordered pair theorem for members of Cartesian products. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐷) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 × 𝑆)) → (((1st ‘𝐴) = (1st ‘𝐵) ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = (2nd ‘𝐵)) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	eqop 7969	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → (𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶)))
Theorem	eqop2 7970	Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶)))
Theorem	op1steq 7971*	Two ways of expressing that an element is the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝑥⟩))
Theorem	opreuopreu 7972*	There is a unique ordered pair fulfilling a wff iff its components fulfil a corresponding wff. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑎 = (1st ‘𝑝) ∧ 𝑏 = (2nd ‘𝑝)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑝 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)∃𝑎∃𝑏(𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	el2xptp 7973*	A member of a nested Cartesian product is an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ((𝐵 × 𝐶) × 𝐷) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩)
Theorem	el2xptp0 7974	A member of a nested Cartesian product is an ordered triple. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ∈ ((𝑈 × 𝑉) × 𝑊) ∧ ((1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = 𝑋 ∧ (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) = 𝑌 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝑍)) ↔ 𝐴 = ⟨𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍⟩))
Theorem	el2xpss 7975*	Version of elrel 5742 for triple Cartesian products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Feb-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ ((𝐵 × 𝐶) × 𝐷)) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩)
Theorem	2nd1st 7976	Swap the members of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∪ ◡{𝐴} = ⟨(2nd ‘𝐴), (1st ‘𝐴)⟩)
Theorem	1st2nd 7977	Reconstruction of a member of a relation in terms of its ordered pair components. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)⟩)
Theorem	1stdm 7978	The first ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the domain of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ dom 𝑅)
Theorem	2ndrn 7979	The second ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the range of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝑅)
Theorem	1st2ndbr 7980	Express an element of a relation as a relationship between first and second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (1st ‘𝐴)𝐵(2nd ‘𝐴))
Theorem	releldm2 7981*	Two ways of expressing membership in the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	reldm 7982*	An expression for the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → dom 𝐴 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (1st ‘𝑥)))
Theorem	releldmdifi 7983*	One way of expressing membership in the difference of domains of two nested relations. (Contributed by AV, 26-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐵) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)(1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐶))
Theorem	funfv1st2nd 7984	The function value for the first component of an ordered pair is the second component of the ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 17-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐹‘(1st ‘𝑋)) = (2nd ‘𝑋))
Theorem	funelss 7985	If the first component of an element of a function is in the domain of a subset of the function, the element is a member of this subset. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((1st ‘𝑋) ∈ dom 𝐵 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	funeldmdif 7986*	Two ways of expressing membership in the difference of domains of two nested functions. (Contributed by AV, 27-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐶 ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∖ dom 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)(1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐶))
Theorem	sbcopeq1a 7987	Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered pair (analogue of sbceq1a 3748 that avoids the existential quantifiers of copsexg 5434). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ([(1st ‘𝐴) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	csbopeq1a 7988	Equality theorem for substitution of a class 𝐴 for an ordered pair ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ in 𝐵 (analogue of csbeq1a 3860). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ⦋(1st ‘𝐴) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑦⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	sbcoteq1a 7989	Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered triple. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → ([(1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) / 𝑦][(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑧]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	dfopab2 7990*	A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∣ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑}
Theorem	dfoprab3s 7991*	A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
Theorem	dfoprab3 7992*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	dfoprab4 7993*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	dfoprab4f 7994*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) Remove unnecessary distinct variable conditions. (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	opabex2 7995*	Condition for an operation to be a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabn1stprc 7996*	An ordered-pair class abstraction which does not depend on the first abstraction variable is a proper class. There must be, however, at least one set which satisfies the restricting wff. (Contributed by AV, 27-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∉ V)
Theorem	opiota 7997*	The property of a uniquely specified ordered pair. The proof uses properties of the ℩ description binder. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (℩𝑧∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (1st ‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (2nd ‘𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐷 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑧∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝐶 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 = 𝑌)))
Theorem	cnvoprab 7998*	The converse of a class abstraction of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.) (Proof shortened by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝑎 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑎 ∈ (V × V))    ⇒   ⊢ ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑎⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	dfxp3 7999*	Define the Cartesian product of three classes. Compare df-xp 5625. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)}
Theorem	elopabi 8000*	A consequence of membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜒)