P. 80 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 7901-8000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
2.4.5  Peano's postulates
Theorem	peano1 7901	Zero is a natural number. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. Note: Unlike most textbooks, our proofs of peano1 7901 through peano5 7906 do not use the Axiom of Infinity. Unlike Takeuti and Zaring, they also do not use the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.) Avoid ax-un 7752. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ ω
Theorem	peano2 7902	The successor of any natural number is a natural number. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → suc 𝐴 ∈ ω)
Theorem	peano3 7903	The successor of any natural number is not zero. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.) Avoid ax-nul 5259. (Revised by Umit Teoman Dogan, 10-Jun-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → suc 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	peano3OLD 7904	Obsolete version of peano3 7903 as of 10-Jun-2026. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → suc 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	peano4 7905	Two natural numbers are equal iff their successors are equal, i.e. the successor function is one-to-one. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	peano5 7906*	The induction postulate: any class containing zero and closed under the successor operation contains all natural numbers. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43, except our proof does not require the Axiom of Infinity. The more traditional statement of mathematical induction as a theorem schema, with a basis and an induction step, is derived from this theorem as Theorem findes 7913. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.) Avoid ax-10 2177, ax-12 2212. (Revised by GG, 3-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((∅ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ω (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → ω ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	nn0suc 7907*	A natural number is either 0 or a successor. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
2.4.6  Finite induction (for finite ordinals)
Theorem	find 7908*	The Principle of Finite Induction (mathematical induction). Corollary 7.31 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. The simpler hypothesis shown here was suggested in an email from "Colin" on 1-Oct-2001. The hypothesis states that 𝐴 is a set of natural numbers, zero belongs to 𝐴, and given any member of 𝐴 the member's successor also belongs to 𝐴. The conclusion is that every natural number is in 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 28-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ω ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = ω
Theorem	finds 7909*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝜏)
Theorem	findsg 7910*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. The basis of this version is an arbitrary natural number 𝐵 instead of zero. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1995.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝜏)
Theorem	finds2 7911*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2002.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝜏 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜏 → 𝜑))
Theorem	finds1 7912*	Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-2006.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → 𝜑)
Theorem	findes 7913	Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. See tfindes 7875 for the transfinite version. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.)
⊢ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → 𝜑)
2.4.7  Relations and functions (cont.)
Theorem	dmexg 7914	The domain of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	rnexg 7915	The range of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. Similar to Lemma 3D of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ran 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	dmexd 7916	The domain of a set is a set. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	fndmexd 7917	If a function is a set, its domain is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ V)
Theorem	dmfex 7918	If a mapping is a set, its domain is a set. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	fndmexb 7919	The domain of a function is a set iff the function is a set. (Contributed by AV, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐹 ∈ V))
Theorem	fdmexb 7920	The domain of a function is a set iff the function is a set. (Contributed by AV, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐹 ∈ V))
Theorem	dmfexALT 7921	Alternate proof of dmfex 7918: shorter but using ax-rep 5231. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.) (Proof shortened by AV, 23-Aug-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	dmex 7922	The domain of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	rnex 7923	The range of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. Similar to Lemma 3D of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jul-2008.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ran 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	iprc 7924	The identity function is a proper class. This means, for example, that we cannot use it as a member of the class of continuous functions unless it is restricted to a set, as in idcn 23581. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jan-2007.)
⊢ ¬ I ∈ V
Theorem	resiexg 7925	The existence of a restricted identity function, proved without using the Axiom of Replacement (unlike resfunexg 7222). (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( I ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	imaexg 7926	The image of a set is a set. Theorem 3.17 of [Monk1] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	imaex 7927	The image of a set is a set. Theorem 3.17 of [Monk1] p. 39. (Contributed by JJ, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	rnexd 7928	The range of a set is a set. Deduction version of rnexd 7928. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	imaexd 7929	The image of a set is a set. Deduction version of imaexg 7926. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 14-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 “ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	exse2 7930	Any set relation is set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑅 Se 𝐴)
Theorem	xpexr 7931	If a Cartesian product is a set, one of its components must be a set. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∨ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	xpexr2 7932	If a nonempty Cartesian product is a set, so are both of its components. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (((𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≠ ∅) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	xpexcnv 7933	A condition where the converse of xpex 7768 holds as well. Corollary 6.9(2) in [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 13-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	soex 7934	If the relation in a strict order is a set, then the base field is also a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elxp4 7935	Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp5 7936, elxp6 8036, and elxp7 8037. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨∪ dom {𝐴}, ∪ ran {𝐴}⟩ ∧ (∪ dom {𝐴} ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∪ ran {𝐴} ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	elxp5 7936	Membership in a Cartesian product requiring no quantifiers or dummy variables. Provides a slightly shorter version of elxp4 7935 when the double intersection does not create class existence problems (caused by int0 4921). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨∩ ∩ 𝐴, ∪ ran {𝐴}⟩ ∧ (∩ ∩ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∪ ran {𝐴} ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	cnvexg 7937	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	cnvex 7938	The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ◡𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	relcnvexb 7939	A relation is a set iff its converse is a set. (Contributed by FL, 3-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ V ↔ ◡𝑅 ∈ V))
Theorem	f1oexrnex 7940	If the range of a 1-1 onto function is a set, the function itself is a set. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jun-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	f1oexbi 7941*	There is a one-to-one onto function from a set to a second set iff there is a one-to-one onto function from the second set to the first set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑔 𝑔:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐴)
Theorem	coexg 7942	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	coex 7943	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	coexd 7944	The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by SN, 7-Feb-2025.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	funcnvuni 7945*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of single-rooted sets is single-rooted. (See funcnv 6610 for "single-rooted" definition.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (Fun ◡𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → Fun ◡∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	fun11uni 7946*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of one-to-one functions is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ Fun ◡𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → (Fun ∪ 𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡∪ 𝐴))
Theorem	resf1extb 7947	Extension of an injection which is a restriction of a function. (Contributed by AV, 3-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) → (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐶):𝐶–1-1→𝐵 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∉ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∪ {𝑋})):(𝐶 ∪ {𝑋})–1-1→𝐵))
Theorem	resf1ext2b 7948	Extension of an injection which is a restriction of a function. (Contributed by AV, 3-Oct-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((Fun ◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑋) ∉ (𝐹 “ 𝐶)) ↔ Fun ◡(𝐹 ↾ (𝐶 ∪ {𝑋}))))
Theorem	fex2 7949	A function with bounded domain and codomain is a set. This version of fex 7233 is proven without the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5231, but depends on ax-un 7752, which is not required for the proof of fex 7233. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	fabexd 7950*	Existence of a set of functions. In contrast to fabex 7952 or fabexg 7951, the condition in the class abstraction does not contain the function explicitly, but the function can be derived from it. Therefore, this theorem is also applicable for more special functions like one-to-one, onto or one-to-one onto functions. (Contributed by AV, 20-May-2025.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑓:𝑋⟶𝑌)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑓 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)
Theorem	fabexg 7951*	Existence of a set of functions. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 25-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	fabex 7952*	Existence of a set of functions. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	mapex 7953*	The class of all functions mapping one set to another is a set. Remark after Definition 10.24 of [Kunen] p. 31. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 4-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Jun-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵} ∈ V)
Theorem	f1oabexg 7954*	The class of all 1-1-onto functions mapping one set to another is a set. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 25-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jun-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∣ (𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	fiunlem 7955*	Lemma for fiun 7956 and f1iun 7957. Formerly part of f1iun 7957. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑢 = 𝐵) → ∀𝑣 ∈ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 = 𝐵} (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∨ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢))
Theorem	fiun 7956*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of functions is a function. Analogous to f1iun 7957. (Contributed by AV, 6-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵:∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐷⟶𝑆)
Theorem	f1iun 7957*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of one-to-one functions is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵:𝐷–1-1→𝑆 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵:∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐷–1-1→𝑆)
Theorem	fviunfun 7958*	The function value of an indexed union is the value of one of the indexed functions. (Contributed by AV, 4-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝑈 = ∪ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐼 (𝐹‘𝑖)    ⇒   ⊢ ((Fun 𝑈 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom (𝐹‘𝐽)) → (𝑈‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝐽)‘𝑋))
Theorem	ffoss 7959*	Relationship between a mapping and an onto mapping. Figure 38 of [Enderton] p. 145. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	f11o 7960*	Relationship between one-to-one and one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-1998.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	resfunexgALT 7961	Alternate proof of resfunexg 7222, shorter but requiring ax-pow 5326 and ax-un 7752. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	cofunexg 7962	Existence of a composition when the first member is a function. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	cofunex2g 7963	Existence of a composition when the second member is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun ◡𝐵) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	fnexALT 7964	Alternate proof of fnex 7224, derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funimaexg 6627. This version uses ax-pow 5326 and ax-un 7752, whereas fnex 7224 does not. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	funexw 7965	Weak version of funex 7226 that holds without ax-rep 5231. If the domain and codomain of a function exist, so does the function. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	mptexw 7966*	Weak version of mptex 7230 that holds without ax-rep 5231. If the domain and codomain of a function given by maps-to notation are sets, the function is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ V
Theorem	funrnex 7967	If the domain of a function exists, so does its range. Part of Theorem 4.15(v) of [Monk1] p. 46. This theorem is derived using the Axiom of Replacement in the form of funex 7226. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (dom 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐹 → ran 𝐹 ∈ V))
Theorem	zfrep6OLD 7968*	Obsolete proof of zfrep6 5241 as of 5-Apr-2026. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2003.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃!𝑦𝜑 → ∃𝑤∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑤 𝜑)
Theorem	focdmex 7969	If the domain of an onto function exists, so does its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	f1dmex 7970	If the codomain of a one-to-one function exists, so does its domain. This theorem is equivalent to the Axiom of Replacement ax-rep 5231. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	f1ovv 7971	The codomain/range of a 1-1 onto function is a set iff its domain is a set. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	fvclex 7972*	Existence of the class of values of a set. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-1995.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ V
Theorem	fvresex 7973*	Existence of the class of values of a restricted class. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 𝑦 = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)‘𝑥)} ∈ V
Theorem	abrexexg 7974*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. The class 𝐵 can be thought of as an expression in 𝑥 (which is typically a free variable in the class expression substituted for 𝐵) and the class abstraction appearing in the statement as the class of values 𝐵 as 𝑥 varies through 𝐴. If the "domain" 𝐴 is a set, then the abstraction is also a set. Therefore, this statement is a kind of Replacement. This can be seen by tracing back through the path axrep6g 5242, axrep6 5239, ax-rep 5231. See also abrexex2g 7977. There are partial converses under additional conditions, see for instance abnexg 7771. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) Avoid ax-10 2177, ax-11 2193, ax-12 2212, ax-pr 5390, ax-un 7752 and shorten proof. (Revised by SN, 11-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V)
Theorem	abrexex 7975*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. See the comment of abrexexg 7974. See also abrexex2 7982. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = 𝐵} ∈ V
Theorem	iunexg 7976*	The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-2006.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V)
Theorem	abrexex2g 7977*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝑊) → {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3d 7978*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction, deduction version. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3rd 7979*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction if the second components are elements of a set. (Contributed by AV, 17-Sep-2023.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ V)
Theorem	opabex3 7980*	Existence of an ordered pair abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
Theorem	iunex 7981*	The existence of an indexed union. 𝑥 is normally a free-variable parameter in the class expression substituted for 𝐵, which can be read informally as 𝐵(𝑥). (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ V
Theorem	abrexex2 7982*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥 and 𝑦. See also abrexex 7975. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	abexssex 7983*	Existence of a class abstraction with an existentially quantified expression. Both 𝑥 and 𝑦 can be free in 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2006.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V
Theorem	abexex 7984*	A condition where a class abstraction continues to exist after its wff is existentially quantified. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	f1oweALT 7985*	Alternate proof of one direction of f1owe 7362, more direct since not using the isomorphism predicate, but requiring ax-un 7752. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝐹‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐹‘𝑦)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝑆 We 𝐵 → 𝑅 We 𝐴))
Theorem	wemoiso 7986*	Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. TODO: Shorten finnisoeu 10196. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	wemoiso2 7987*	Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two well-ordered sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 12-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 We 𝐵 → ∃*𝑓 𝑓 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))
Theorem	oprabexd 7988*	Existence of an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by AV, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → ∃*𝑧𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	oprabex 7989*	Existence of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑧𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	oprabex3 7990*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	oprabrexex2 7991*	Existence of an existentially restricted operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	ab2rexex 7992*	Existence of a class abstraction of existentially restricted sets. Variables 𝑥 and 𝑦 are normally free-variable parameters in the class expression substituted for 𝐶, which can be thought of as 𝐶(𝑥, 𝑦). See comments for abrexex 7975. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = 𝐶} ∈ V
Theorem	ab2rexex2 7993*	Existence of an existentially restricted class abstraction. 𝜑 normally has free-variable parameters 𝑥, 𝑦, and 𝑧. Compare abrexex2 7982. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑} ∈ V
Theorem	xpexgALT 7994	Alternate proof of xpexg 7765 requiring Replacement (ax-rep 5231) but not Power Set (ax-pow 5326). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	offval3 7995*	General value of (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) with no assumptions on functionality of 𝐹 and 𝐺. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥))))
Theorem	offres 7996	Pointwise combination commutes with restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ↾ 𝐷) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∘f 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)))
Theorem	ofmres 7997*	Equivalent expressions for a restriction of the function operation map. Unlike ∘f 𝑅 which is a proper class, ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) can be a set by ofmresex 7998, allowing it to be used as a function or structure argument. By ofmresval 7710, the restricted operation map values are the same as the original values, allowing theorems for ∘f 𝑅 to be reused. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑔 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑓 ∘f 𝑅𝑔))
Theorem	ofmresex 7998	Existence of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( ∘f 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∈ V)
Theorem	mptcnfimad 7999*	The converse of a mapping of subsets to their image of a bijection. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2025.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑥))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑉–1-1-onto→𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran 𝑀 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝑀 = (𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑀 ↦ (◡𝐹 “ 𝑦)))
2.4.8  First and second members of an ordered pair
Syntax	c1st 8000	Extend the definition of a class to include the first member an ordered pair function.
class 1st