MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  sscon Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem sscon 4099
Description: Contraposition law for subsets. Exercise 15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
sscon (𝐴𝐵 → (𝐶𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶𝐴))

Proof of Theorem sscon
Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ssel 3933 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
21con3d 153 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵 → (¬ 𝑥𝐵 → ¬ 𝑥𝐴))
32anim2d 623 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) → (𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐴)))
4 eldif 3917 . . 3 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
5 eldif 3917 . . 3 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐴) ↔ (𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐴))
63, 4, 53imtr4g 299 . 2 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐴)))
76ssrdv 3945 1 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝐶𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶𝐴))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wa 400  wcel 2145  cdif 3904  wss 3907
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1818  ax-4 1832  ax-5 1933  ax-6 1990  ax-7 2031  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2737
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-tru 1566  df-ex 1803  df-sb 2094  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-v 3459  df-dif 3910  df-ss 3924
This theorem is referenced by:  sscond  4102  complss  4107  sscon34b  4259  sorpsscmpl  7721  sbthlem1  9063  sbthlem2  9064  cantnfp1lem1  9635  cantnfp1lem3  9637  isf34lem7  10351  isf34lem6  10352  setsres  17228  chnccat  18672  mplsubglem  22108  cctop  23124  clsval2  23168  ntrss  23173  hauscmplem  23524  ptbasin  23695  cfinfil  24011  csdfil  24012  uniioombllem5  25707  kur14lem6  35574  bj-2upln1upl  37521  dvasin  38215  readvrec2  42982  clsk3nimkb  44628  fourierdlem62  46740  caragendifcl  47086
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator