MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  sscon Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem sscon 4066
Description: Contraposition law for subsets. Exercise 15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
sscon (𝐴𝐵 → (𝐶𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶𝐴))

Proof of Theorem sscon
Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ssel 3908 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
21con3d 155 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵 → (¬ 𝑥𝐵 → ¬ 𝑥𝐴))
32anim2d 614 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) → (𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐴)))
4 eldif 3891 . . 3 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
5 eldif 3891 . . 3 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐴) ↔ (𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐴))
63, 4, 53imtr4g 299 . 2 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐴)))
76ssrdv 3921 1 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝐶𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶𝐴))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wa 399  wcel 2111  cdif 3878  wss 3881
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2770
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-v 3443  df-dif 3884  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898
This theorem is referenced by:  sscond  4069  complss  4074  sscon34b  4219  sorpsscmpl  7440  sbthlem1  8611  sbthlem2  8612  cantnfp1lem1  9125  cantnfp1lem3  9127  isf34lem7  9790  isf34lem6  9791  setsres  16517  mplsubglem  20672  cctop  21611  clsval2  21655  ntrss  21660  hauscmplem  22011  ptbasin  22182  cfinfil  22498  csdfil  22499  uniioombllem5  24191  kur14lem6  32571  bj-2upln1upl  34460  dvasin  35141  clsk3nimkb  40743  fourierdlem62  42810  caragendifcl  43153
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator