MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  sscon Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem sscon 4166
Description: Contraposition law for subsets. Exercise 15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
sscon (𝐴𝐵 → (𝐶𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶𝐴))

Proof of Theorem sscon
Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ssel 4002 . . . . 5 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥𝐴𝑥𝐵))
21con3d 152 . . . 4 (𝐴𝐵 → (¬ 𝑥𝐵 → ¬ 𝑥𝐴))
32anim2d 611 . . 3 (𝐴𝐵 → ((𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵) → (𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐴)))
4 eldif 3986 . . 3 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐵) ↔ (𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐵))
5 eldif 3986 . . 3 (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐴) ↔ (𝑥𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥𝐴))
63, 4, 53imtr4g 296 . 2 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶𝐴)))
76ssrdv 4014 1 (𝐴𝐵 → (𝐶𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶𝐴))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wa 395  wcel 2108  cdif 3973  wss 3976
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2711
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1778  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-ss 3993
This theorem is referenced by:  sscond  4169  complss  4174  sscon34b  4323  sorpsscmpl  7769  sbthlem1  9149  sbthlem2  9150  cantnfp1lem1  9747  cantnfp1lem3  9749  isf34lem7  10448  isf34lem6  10449  setsres  17225  mplsubglem  22042  cctop  23034  clsval2  23079  ntrss  23084  hauscmplem  23435  ptbasin  23606  cfinfil  23922  csdfil  23923  uniioombllem5  25641  kur14lem6  35179  bj-2upln1upl  36990  dvasin  37664  clsk3nimkb  44002  fourierdlem62  46089  caragendifcl  46435
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator