| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: The existence of omega
(the class of natural numbers). Axiom 7 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 43. This
theorem is proved assuming the Axiom of
Infinity and in fact is equivalent to it, as shown by the reverse
derivation inf0 4586.
A finitist (someone who doesn't believe in infinity) could, without contradiction, replace the Axiom of Infinity by its denial ¬ ω ∈ V; this would lead to ω = On (the proper class of ordinals) by omon 3138 and onprc 2984. The finitist could still develop natural number, integer, and rational number arithmetic but would be denied the real numbers (as well as much of the rest of mathematics). In deference to the finitist, much of our development is done, when possible, without invoking the Axiom of Infinity; an example is Peano's axioms peano1 3144 through peano5 3148 (which many textbooks prove more easily assuming Infinity). |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| omex | ⊢ ω ∈ V |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | zfinf 4606 | . . 3 ⊢ ∃x(∅ ∈ x ⋀ ∀y ∈ x suc y ∈ x) | |
| 2 | peano5 3148 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ x ⋀ ∀y ∈ ω (y ∈ x → suc y ∈ x)) → ω ⊆ x) | |
| 3 | ax-1 4 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((y ∈ x → suc y ∈ x) → (y ∈ ω → (y ∈ x → suc y ∈ x))) | |
| 4 | 3 | r19.20i2 1700 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (∀y ∈ x suc y ∈ x → ∀y ∈ ω (y ∈ x → suc y ∈ x)) |
| 5 | 2, 4 | sylan2 451 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ x ⋀ ∀y ∈ x suc y ∈ x) → ω ⊆ x) |
| 6 | 5 | 19.22i 1038 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃x(∅ ∈ x ⋀ ∀y ∈ x suc y ∈ x) → ∃xω ⊆ x) |
| 7 | 1, 6 | ax-mp 7 | . 2 ⊢ ∃xω ⊆ x |
| 8 | visset 1809 | . . . 4 ⊢ x ∈ V | |
| 9 | 8 | ssex 2714 | . . 3 ⊢ (ω ⊆ x → ω ∈ V) |
| 10 | 9 | 19.23aiv 1293 | . 2 ⊢ (∃xω ⊆ x → ω ∈ V) |
| 11 | 7, 10 | ax-mp 7 | 1 ⊢ ω ∈ V |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 3 ⋀ wa 223 ∈ wcel 956 ∃wex 978 ∀wral 1642 Vcvv 1807 ⊆ wss 2043 ∅c0 2276 suc csuc 2945 ωcom 3126 |
| This theorem is referenced by: inf5 4608 omelon 4609 dfom3 4610 elom3 4611 oancom 4613 isfinite 4614 nnsdom 4615 omenps 4616 omensuc 4617 unbnnt 4619 noinfep 4620 tz9.1 4626 sucdom 4822 aleph0 4843 alephprc 4873 alephfplem4 4879 alephval2 4882 dominf 4884 cfom 4896 cdainf 4917 niex 4989 nnenom 7448 xpomen 7450 unben 7456 aleph1re 7502 infxpidmlem10 7512 infdif 7519 iunctb 7525 aleph1irr 7528 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 4 ax-2 5 ax-3 6 ax-mp 7 ax-7 960 ax-gen 961 ax-8 962 ax-10 964 ax-11 965 ax-12 966 ax-13 967 ax-14 968 ax-17 969 ax-4 971 ax-5o 973 ax-6o 976 ax-9o 1121 ax-10o 1138 ax-16 1208 ax-11o 1216 ax-ext 1457 ax-sep 2698 ax-nul 2705 ax-pow 2737 ax-pr 2774 ax-un 2861 ax-inf2 4605 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 147 df-or 224 df-an 225 df-3or 775 df-3an 776 df-ex 979 df-sb 1170 df-eu 1380 df-mo 1381 df-clab 1462 df-cleq 1467 df-clel 1470 df-ne 1584 df-ral 1646 df-rex 1647 df-v 1808 df-dif 2045 df-un 2046 df-in 2047 df-ss 2049 df-nul 2277 df-if 2358 df-pw 2398 df-sn 2408 df-pr 2409 df-tp 2411 df-op 2412 df-uni 2499 df-br 2615 df-opab 2662 df-tr 2676 df-eprel 2827 df-po 2835 df-so 2845 df-fr 2912 df-we 2929 df-ord 2946 df-on 2947 df-lim 2948 df-suc 2949 df-om 3127 |