Theorem canth 5842

Description: No set A is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e., no function can map A onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. (Use nex 1510 if you want the form -. E. f f : A -onto-> ~P A.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Noah R Kingdon, 23-Jul-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
canth.1	|- A e. _V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
canth	|- -. F : A -onto-> ~P A

Proof of Theorem canth

Dummy variables x y are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		canth.1	. . . 4 |- A e. _V
2		ssrab2 3252	. . . 4 |- { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } C_ A
3	1, 2	elpwi2 4170	. . 3 |- { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ~P A
4		forn 5453	. . 3 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> ran F = ~P A )
5	3, 4	eleqtrrid 2277	. 2 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F )
6		pm5.19 707	. . . . . 6 |- -. ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) )
7		eleq2 2251	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } -> ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> y e. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
8		id 19	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = y -> x = y )
9		fveq2 5527	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = y -> ( F ` x ) = ( F ` y ) )
10	8, 9	eleq12d 2258	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( x = y -> ( x e. ( F ` x ) <-> y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
11	10	notbid 668	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = y -> ( -. x e. ( F ` x ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
12	11	elrab3 2906	. . . . . . 7 |- ( y e. A -> ( y e. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
13	7, 12	sylan9bbr 463	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( y e. A /\ ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) -> ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
14	6, 13	mto 663	. . . . 5 |- -. ( y e. A /\ ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } )
15	14	imnani 692	. . . 4 |- ( y e. A -> -. ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } )
16	15	nrex 2579	. . 3 |- -. E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) }
17		fofn 5452	. . . 4 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> F Fn A )
18		fvelrnb 5576	. . . 4 |- ( F Fn A -> ( { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F <-> E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
19	17, 18	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> ( { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F <-> E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
20	16, 19	mtbiri 676	. 2 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> -. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F )
21	5, 20	pm2.65i 640	1 |- -. F : A -onto-> ~P A

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1363   e. wcel 2158   E.wrex 2466   {crab 2469   _Vcvv 2749   ~Pcpw 3587   ran crn 4639   Fn wfn 5223   -onto->wfo 5226   ` cfv 5228

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1457  ax-7 1458  ax-gen 1459  ax-ie1 1503  ax-ie2 1504  ax-8 1514  ax-10 1515  ax-11 1516  ax-i12 1517  ax-bndl 1519  ax-4 1520  ax-17 1536  ax-i9 1540  ax-ial 1544  ax-i5r 1545  ax-14 2161  ax-ext 2169  ax-sep 4133  ax-pow 4186  ax-pr 4221

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 981  df-tru 1366  df-fal 1369  df-nf 1471  df-sb 1773  df-eu 2039  df-mo 2040  df-clab 2174  df-cleq 2180  df-clel 2183  df-nfc 2318  df-ral 2470  df-rex 2471  df-rab 2474  df-v 2751  df-sbc 2975  df-un 3145  df-in 3147  df-ss 3154  df-pw 3589  df-sn 3610  df-pr 3611  df-op 3613  df-uni 3822  df-br 4016  df-opab 4077  df-mpt 4078  df-id 4305  df-xp 4644  df-rel 4645  df-cnv 4646  df-co 4647  df-dm 4648  df-rn 4649  df-iota 5190  df-fun 5230  df-fn 5231  df-f 5232  df-fo 5234  df-fv 5236

This theorem is referenced by: (None)