Theorem canth 5779

Description: No set A is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e., no function can map A onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. (Use nex 1480 if you want the form -. E. f f : A -onto-> ~P A.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Noah R Kingdon, 23-Jul-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
canth.1	|- A e. _V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
canth	|- -. F : A -onto-> ~P A

Proof of Theorem canth

Dummy variables x y are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		canth.1	. . . 4 |- A e. _V
2		ssrab2 3213	. . . 4 |- { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } C_ A
3	1, 2	elpwi2 4120	. . 3 |- { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ~P A
4		forn 5396	. . 3 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> ran F = ~P A )
5	3, 4	eleqtrrid 2247	. 2 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F )
6		pm5.19 696	. . . . . 6 |- -. ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) )
7		eleq2 2221	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } -> ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> y e. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
8		id 19	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = y -> x = y )
9		fveq2 5469	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = y -> ( F ` x ) = ( F ` y ) )
10	8, 9	eleq12d 2228	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( x = y -> ( x e. ( F ` x ) <-> y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
11	10	notbid 657	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = y -> ( -. x e. ( F ` x ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
12	11	elrab3 2869	. . . . . . 7 |- ( y e. A -> ( y e. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
13	7, 12	sylan9bbr 459	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( y e. A /\ ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) -> ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
14	6, 13	mto 652	. . . . 5 |- -. ( y e. A /\ ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } )
15	14	imnani 681	. . . 4 |- ( y e. A -> -. ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } )
16	15	nrex 2549	. . 3 |- -. E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) }
17		fofn 5395	. . . 4 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> F Fn A )
18		fvelrnb 5517	. . . 4 |- ( F Fn A -> ( { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F <-> E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
19	17, 18	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> ( { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F <-> E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
20	16, 19	mtbiri 665	. 2 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> -. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F )
21	5, 20	pm2.65i 629	1 |- -. F : A -onto-> ~P A

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   /\ wa 103   <-> wb 104   = wceq 1335   e. wcel 2128   E.wrex 2436   {crab 2439   _Vcvv 2712   ~Pcpw 3543   ran crn 4588   Fn wfn 5166   -onto->wfo 5169   ` cfv 5171

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 604  ax-in2 605  ax-io 699  ax-5 1427  ax-7 1428  ax-gen 1429  ax-ie1 1473  ax-ie2 1474  ax-8 1484  ax-10 1485  ax-11 1486  ax-i12 1487  ax-bndl 1489  ax-4 1490  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-14 2131  ax-ext 2139  ax-sep 4083  ax-pow 4136  ax-pr 4170

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1338  df-fal 1341  df-nf 1441  df-sb 1743  df-eu 2009  df-mo 2010  df-clab 2144  df-cleq 2150  df-clel 2153  df-nfc 2288  df-ral 2440  df-rex 2441  df-rab 2444  df-v 2714  df-sbc 2938  df-un 3106  df-in 3108  df-ss 3115  df-pw 3545  df-sn 3566  df-pr 3567  df-op 3569  df-uni 3774  df-br 3967  df-opab 4027  df-mpt 4028  df-id 4254  df-xp 4593  df-rel 4594  df-cnv 4595  df-co 4596  df-dm 4597  df-rn 4598  df-iota 5136  df-fun 5173  df-fn 5174  df-f 5175  df-fo 5177  df-fv 5179

This theorem is referenced by: (None)