Theorem canth 5952

Description: No set A is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e., no function can map A onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. (Use nex 1546 if you want the form -. E. f f : A -onto-> ~P A.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Noah R Kingdon, 23-Jul-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
canth.1	|- A e. _V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
canth	|- -. F : A -onto-> ~P A

Proof of Theorem canth

Dummy variables x y are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		canth.1	. . . 4 |- A e. _V
2		ssrab2 3309	. . . 4 |- { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } C_ A
3	1, 2	elpwi2 4242	. . 3 |- { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ~P A
4		forn 5551	. . 3 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> ran F = ~P A )
5	3, 4	eleqtrrid 2319	. 2 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F )
6		pm5.19 711	. . . . . 6 |- -. ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) )
7		eleq2 2293	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } -> ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> y e. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
8		id 19	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = y -> x = y )
9		fveq2 5627	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = y -> ( F ` x ) = ( F ` y ) )
10	8, 9	eleq12d 2300	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( x = y -> ( x e. ( F ` x ) <-> y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
11	10	notbid 671	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = y -> ( -. x e. ( F ` x ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
12	11	elrab3 2960	. . . . . . 7 |- ( y e. A -> ( y e. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
13	7, 12	sylan9bbr 463	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( y e. A /\ ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) -> ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
14	6, 13	mto 666	. . . . 5 |- -. ( y e. A /\ ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } )
15	14	imnani 695	. . . 4 |- ( y e. A -> -. ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } )
16	15	nrex 2622	. . 3 |- -. E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) }
17		fofn 5550	. . . 4 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> F Fn A )
18		fvelrnb 5681	. . . 4 |- ( F Fn A -> ( { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F <-> E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
19	17, 18	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> ( { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F <-> E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
20	16, 19	mtbiri 679	. 2 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> -. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F )
21	5, 20	pm2.65i 642	1 |- -. F : A -onto-> ~P A

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1395   e. wcel 2200   E.wrex 2509   {crab 2512   _Vcvv 2799   ~Pcpw 3649   ran crn 4720   Fn wfn 5313   -onto->wfo 5316   ` cfv 5318

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4202  ax-pow 4258  ax-pr 4293

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-fal 1401  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-rab 2517  df-v 2801  df-sbc 3029  df-un 3201  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210  df-pw 3651  df-sn 3672  df-pr 3673  df-op 3675  df-uni 3889  df-br 4084  df-opab 4146  df-mpt 4147  df-id 4384  df-xp 4725  df-rel 4726  df-cnv 4727  df-co 4728  df-dm 4729  df-rn 4730  df-iota 5278  df-fun 5320  df-fn 5321  df-f 5322  df-fo 5324  df-fv 5326

This theorem is referenced by: (None)