Theorem canth 5871

Description: No set A is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e., no function can map A onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. (Use nex 1511 if you want the form -. E. f f : A -onto-> ~P A.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Noah R Kingdon, 23-Jul-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
canth.1	|- A e. _V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
canth	|- -. F : A -onto-> ~P A

Proof of Theorem canth

Dummy variables x y are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		canth.1	. . . 4 |- A e. _V
2		ssrab2 3264	. . . 4 |- { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } C_ A
3	1, 2	elpwi2 4187	. . 3 |- { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ~P A
4		forn 5479	. . 3 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> ran F = ~P A )
5	3, 4	eleqtrrid 2283	. 2 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F )
6		pm5.19 707	. . . . . 6 |- -. ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) )
7		eleq2 2257	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } -> ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> y e. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
8		id 19	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = y -> x = y )
9		fveq2 5554	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = y -> ( F ` x ) = ( F ` y ) )
10	8, 9	eleq12d 2264	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( x = y -> ( x e. ( F ` x ) <-> y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
11	10	notbid 668	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = y -> ( -. x e. ( F ` x ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
12	11	elrab3 2917	. . . . . . 7 |- ( y e. A -> ( y e. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
13	7, 12	sylan9bbr 463	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( y e. A /\ ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) -> ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
14	6, 13	mto 663	. . . . 5 |- -. ( y e. A /\ ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } )
15	14	imnani 692	. . . 4 |- ( y e. A -> -. ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } )
16	15	nrex 2586	. . 3 |- -. E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) }
17		fofn 5478	. . . 4 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> F Fn A )
18		fvelrnb 5604	. . . 4 |- ( F Fn A -> ( { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F <-> E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
19	17, 18	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> ( { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F <-> E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
20	16, 19	mtbiri 676	. 2 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> -. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F )
21	5, 20	pm2.65i 640	1 |- -. F : A -onto-> ~P A

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1364   e. wcel 2164   E.wrex 2473   {crab 2476   _Vcvv 2760   ~Pcpw 3601   ran crn 4660   Fn wfn 5249   -onto->wfo 5252   ` cfv 5254

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4147  ax-pow 4203  ax-pr 4238

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2986  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-pw 3603  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-uni 3836  df-br 4030  df-opab 4091  df-mpt 4092  df-id 4324  df-xp 4665  df-rel 4666  df-cnv 4667  df-co 4668  df-dm 4669  df-rn 4670  df-iota 5215  df-fun 5256  df-fn 5257  df-f 5258  df-fo 5260  df-fv 5262

This theorem is referenced by: (None)