Theorem canth 5968

Description: No set A is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e., no function can map A onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. (Use nex 1548 if you want the form -. E. f f : A -onto-> ~P A.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Noah R Kingdon, 23-Jul-2024.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
canth.1	|- A e. _V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
canth	|- -. F : A -onto-> ~P A

Proof of Theorem canth

Dummy variables x y are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		canth.1	. . . 4 |- A e. _V
2		ssrab2 3312	. . . 4 |- { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } C_ A
3	1, 2	elpwi2 4248	. . 3 |- { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ~P A
4		forn 5562	. . 3 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> ran F = ~P A )
5	3, 4	eleqtrrid 2321	. 2 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F )
6		pm5.19 713	. . . . . 6 |- -. ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) )
7		eleq2 2295	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } -> ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> y e. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
8		id 19	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = y -> x = y )
9		fveq2 5639	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( x = y -> ( F ` x ) = ( F ` y ) )
10	8, 9	eleq12d 2302	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( x = y -> ( x e. ( F ` x ) <-> y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
11	10	notbid 673	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = y -> ( -. x e. ( F ` x ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
12	11	elrab3 2963	. . . . . . 7 |- ( y e. A -> ( y e. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
13	7, 12	sylan9bbr 463	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( y e. A /\ ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) -> ( y e. ( F ` y ) <-> -. y e. ( F ` y ) ) )
14	6, 13	mto 668	. . . . 5 |- -. ( y e. A /\ ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } )
15	14	imnani 697	. . . 4 |- ( y e. A -> -. ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } )
16	15	nrex 2624	. . 3 |- -. E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) }
17		fofn 5561	. . . 4 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> F Fn A )
18		fvelrnb 5693	. . . 4 |- ( F Fn A -> ( { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F <-> E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
19	17, 18	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> ( { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F <-> E. y e. A ( F ` y ) = { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } ) )
20	16, 19	mtbiri 681	. 2 |- ( F : A -onto-> ~P A -> -. { x e. A | -. x e. ( F ` x ) } e. ran F )
21	5, 20	pm2.65i 644	1 |- -. F : A -onto-> ~P A

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   = wceq 1397   e. wcel 2202   E.wrex 2511   {crab 2514   _Vcvv 2802   ~Pcpw 3652   ran crn 4726   Fn wfn 5321   -onto->wfo 5324   ` cfv 5326

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-pow 4264  ax-pr 4299

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-fal 1403  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-sbc 3032  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-uni 3894  df-br 4089  df-opab 4151  df-mpt 4152  df-id 4390  df-xp 4731  df-rel 4732  df-cnv 4733  df-co 4734  df-dm 4735  df-rn 4736  df-iota 5286  df-fun 5328  df-fn 5329  df-f 5330  df-fo 5332  df-fv 5334

This theorem is referenced by: (None)