Theorem exmidmotap 7591

Description: The proposition that every class has at most one tight apartness is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
exmidmotap	|- (EXMID <-> A. x E* r r TAp x )

Distinct variable group:   x, r

Proof of Theorem exmidmotap

Dummy variables s u v are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simprl 531	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> r TAp x )
2		exmidapne 7590	. . . . . . . . 9 |- (EXMID -> ( r TAp x <-> r = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
3	2	adantr 276	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> ( r TAp x <-> r = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
4	1, 3	mpbid 147	. . . . . . 7 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> r = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } )
5		simprr 533	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> s TAp x )
6		exmidapne 7590	. . . . . . . . 9 |- (EXMID -> ( s TAp x <-> s = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
7	6	adantr 276	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> ( s TAp x <-> s = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
8	5, 7	mpbid 147	. . . . . . 7 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> s = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } )
9	4, 8	eqtr4d 2270	. . . . . 6 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> r = s )
10	9	ex 115	. . . . 5 |- (EXMID -> ( ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) -> r = s ) )
11	10	alrimivv 1924	. . . 4 |- (EXMID -> A. r A. s ( ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) -> r = s ) )
12		tapeq1 7582	. . . . 5 |- ( r = s -> ( r TAp x <-> s TAp x ) )
13	12	mo4 2144	. . . 4 |- ( E* r r TAp x <-> A. r A. s ( ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) -> r = s ) )
14	11, 13	sylibr 134	. . 3 |- (EXMID -> E* r r TAp x )
15	14	alrimiv 1923	. 2 |- (EXMID -> A. x E* r r TAp x )
16		2onn 6767	. . . 4 |- 2o e. om
17		tapeq2 7583	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = 2o -> ( r TAp x <-> r TAp 2o ) )
18	17	mobidv 2118	. . . . 5 |- ( x = 2o -> ( E* r r TAp x <-> E* r r TAp 2o ) )
19	18	spcgv 2906	. . . 4 |- ( 2o e. om -> ( A. x E* r r TAp x -> E* r r TAp 2o ) )
20	16, 19	ax-mp 5	. . 3 |- ( A. x E* r r TAp x -> E* r r TAp 2o )
21		2omotap 7589	. . 3 |- ( E* r r TAp 2o -> EXMID )
22	20, 21	syl 14	. 2 |- ( A. x E* r r TAp x -> EXMID )
23	15, 22	impbii 126	1 |- (EXMID <-> A. x E* r r TAp x )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   A.wal 1396   = wceq 1398   E*wmo 2083   e. wcel 2205   =/= wne 2414   {copab 4175  EXMIDwem 4312   omcom 4717   2oc2o 6654   TAp wtap 7578

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2207  ax-14 2208  ax-ext 2216  ax-sep 4233  ax-nul 4241  ax-pow 4292  ax-pr 4327  ax-un 4559  ax-setind 4664  ax-iinf 4715

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-stab 839  df-dc 843  df-3or 1006  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2085  df-mo 2086  df-clab 2221  df-cleq 2227  df-clel 2230  df-nfc 2375  df-ne 2415  df-ral 2527  df-rex 2528  df-rab 2531  df-v 2817  df-sbc 3046  df-dif 3216  df-un 3218  df-in 3220  df-ss 3227  df-nul 3513  df-pw 3676  df-sn 3700  df-pr 3701  df-op 3703  df-uni 3920  df-int 3955  df-br 4115  df-opab 4177  df-mpt 4178  df-tr 4214  df-exmid 4313  df-id 4419  df-iord 4492  df-on 4494  df-suc 4497  df-iom 4718  df-xp 4760  df-rel 4761  df-cnv 4762  df-co 4763  df-dm 4764  df-rn 4765  df-iota 5317  df-fun 5359  df-fn 5360  df-f 5361  df-fo 5363  df-fv 5365  df-1st 6347  df-2nd 6348  df-1o 6660  df-2o 6661  df-pap 7572  df-tap 7579

This theorem is referenced by: (None)