Theorem exmidmotap 7259

Description: The proposition that every class has at most one tight apartness is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
exmidmotap	|- (EXMID <-> A. x E* r r TAp x )

Distinct variable group:   x, r

Proof of Theorem exmidmotap

Dummy variables s u v are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simprl 529	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> r TAp x )
2		exmidapne 7258	. . . . . . . . 9 |- (EXMID -> ( r TAp x <-> r = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
3	2	adantr 276	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> ( r TAp x <-> r = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
4	1, 3	mpbid 147	. . . . . . 7 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> r = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } )
5		simprr 531	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> s TAp x )
6		exmidapne 7258	. . . . . . . . 9 |- (EXMID -> ( s TAp x <-> s = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
7	6	adantr 276	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> ( s TAp x <-> s = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
8	5, 7	mpbid 147	. . . . . . 7 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> s = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } )
9	4, 8	eqtr4d 2213	. . . . . 6 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> r = s )
10	9	ex 115	. . . . 5 |- (EXMID -> ( ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) -> r = s ) )
11	10	alrimivv 1875	. . . 4 |- (EXMID -> A. r A. s ( ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) -> r = s ) )
12		tapeq1 7250	. . . . 5 |- ( r = s -> ( r TAp x <-> s TAp x ) )
13	12	mo4 2087	. . . 4 |- ( E* r r TAp x <-> A. r A. s ( ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) -> r = s ) )
14	11, 13	sylibr 134	. . 3 |- (EXMID -> E* r r TAp x )
15	14	alrimiv 1874	. 2 |- (EXMID -> A. x E* r r TAp x )
16		2onn 6521	. . . 4 |- 2o e. om
17		tapeq2 7251	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = 2o -> ( r TAp x <-> r TAp 2o ) )
18	17	mobidv 2062	. . . . 5 |- ( x = 2o -> ( E* r r TAp x <-> E* r r TAp 2o ) )
19	18	spcgv 2824	. . . 4 |- ( 2o e. om -> ( A. x E* r r TAp x -> E* r r TAp 2o ) )
20	16, 19	ax-mp 5	. . 3 |- ( A. x E* r r TAp x -> E* r r TAp 2o )
21		2omotap 7257	. . 3 |- ( E* r r TAp 2o -> EXMID )
22	20, 21	syl 14	. 2 |- ( A. x E* r r TAp x -> EXMID )
23	15, 22	impbii 126	1 |- (EXMID <-> A. x E* r r TAp x )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   A.wal 1351   = wceq 1353   E*wmo 2027   e. wcel 2148   =/= wne 2347   {copab 4063  EXMIDwem 4194   omcom 4589   2oc2o 6410   TAp wtap 7247

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 614  ax-in2 615  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-13 2150  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-sep 4121  ax-nul 4129  ax-pow 4174  ax-pr 4209  ax-un 4433  ax-setind 4536  ax-iinf 4587

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-stab 831  df-dc 835  df-3or 979  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-fal 1359  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-eu 2029  df-mo 2030  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ne 2348  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-rab 2464  df-v 2739  df-sbc 2963  df-dif 3131  df-un 3133  df-in 3135  df-ss 3142  df-nul 3423  df-pw 3577  df-sn 3598  df-pr 3599  df-op 3601  df-uni 3810  df-int 3845  df-br 4004  df-opab 4065  df-mpt 4066  df-tr 4102  df-exmid 4195  df-id 4293  df-iord 4366  df-on 4368  df-suc 4371  df-iom 4590  df-xp 4632  df-rel 4633  df-cnv 4634  df-co 4635  df-dm 4636  df-rn 4637  df-iota 5178  df-fun 5218  df-fn 5219  df-f 5220  df-fo 5222  df-fv 5224  df-1st 6140  df-2nd 6141  df-1o 6416  df-2o 6417  df-pap 7246  df-tap 7248

This theorem is referenced by: (None)