Theorem exmidmotap 7627

Description: The proposition that every class has at most one tight apartness is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
exmidmotap	|- (EXMID <-> A. x E* r r TAp x )

Distinct variable group:   x, r

Proof of Theorem exmidmotap

Dummy variables s u v are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simprl 535	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> r TAp x )
2		exmidapne 7626	. . . . . . . . 9 |- (EXMID -> ( r TAp x <-> r = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
3	2	adantr 276	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> ( r TAp x <-> r = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
4	1, 3	mpbid 147	. . . . . . 7 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> r = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } )
5		simprr 537	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> s TAp x )
6		exmidapne 7626	. . . . . . . . 9 |- (EXMID -> ( s TAp x <-> s = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
7	6	adantr 276	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> ( s TAp x <-> s = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } ) )
8	5, 7	mpbid 147	. . . . . . 7 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> s = { <. u , v >. | ( ( u e. x /\ v e. x ) /\ u =/= v ) } )
9	4, 8	eqtr4d 2274	. . . . . 6 |- ( (EXMID /\ ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) ) -> r = s )
10	9	ex 115	. . . . 5 |- (EXMID -> ( ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) -> r = s ) )
11	10	alrimivv 1928	. . . 4 |- (EXMID -> A. r A. s ( ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) -> r = s ) )
12		tapeq1 7618	. . . . 5 |- ( r = s -> ( r TAp x <-> s TAp x ) )
13	12	mo4 2148	. . . 4 |- ( E* r r TAp x <-> A. r A. s ( ( r TAp x /\ s TAp x ) -> r = s ) )
14	11, 13	sylibr 134	. . 3 |- (EXMID -> E* r r TAp x )
15	14	alrimiv 1927	. 2 |- (EXMID -> A. x E* r r TAp x )
16		2onn 6794	. . . 4 |- 2o e. om
17		tapeq2 7619	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = 2o -> ( r TAp x <-> r TAp 2o ) )
18	17	mobidv 2122	. . . . 5 |- ( x = 2o -> ( E* r r TAp x <-> E* r r TAp 2o ) )
19	18	spcgv 2912	. . . 4 |- ( 2o e. om -> ( A. x E* r r TAp x -> E* r r TAp 2o ) )
20	16, 19	ax-mp 5	. . 3 |- ( A. x E* r r TAp x -> E* r r TAp 2o )
21		2omotap 7625	. . 3 |- ( E* r r TAp 2o -> EXMID )
22	20, 21	syl 14	. 2 |- ( A. x E* r r TAp x -> EXMID )
23	15, 22	impbii 126	1 |- (EXMID <-> A. x E* r r TAp x )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   A.wal 1400   = wceq 1402   E*wmo 2087   e. wcel 2209   =/= wne 2420   {copab 4191  EXMIDwem 4331   omcom 4737   2oc2o 6681   TAp wtap 7614

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-iinf 4735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-stab 843  df-dc 847  df-3or 1010  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-tr 4230  df-exmid 4332  df-id 4438  df-iord 4511  df-on 4513  df-suc 4516  df-iom 4738  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-fo 5383  df-fv 5385  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375  df-1o 6687  df-2o 6688  df-pap 7608  df-tap 7615

This theorem is used by: (None)