Theorem exmidmotap 7321

Description: The proposition that every class has at most one tight apartness is equivalent to excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Feb-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
exmidmotap	⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 𝑥)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑟

Proof of Theorem exmidmotap

Dummy variables 𝑠 𝑢 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simprl 529	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ∧ 𝑠 TAp 𝑥)) → 𝑟 TAp 𝑥)
2		exmidapne 7320	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (EXMID → (𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ↔ 𝑟 = {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)}))
3	2	adantr 276	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ∧ 𝑠 TAp 𝑥)) → (𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ↔ 𝑟 = {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)}))
4	1, 3	mpbid 147	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ∧ 𝑠 TAp 𝑥)) → 𝑟 = {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)})
5		simprr 531	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ∧ 𝑠 TAp 𝑥)) → 𝑠 TAp 𝑥)
6		exmidapne 7320	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (EXMID → (𝑠 TAp 𝑥 ↔ 𝑠 = {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)}))
7	6	adantr 276	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ∧ 𝑠 TAp 𝑥)) → (𝑠 TAp 𝑥 ↔ 𝑠 = {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)}))
8	5, 7	mpbid 147	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ∧ 𝑠 TAp 𝑥)) → 𝑠 = {⟨𝑢, 𝑣⟩ ∣ ((𝑢 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ 𝑢 ≠ 𝑣)})
9	4, 8	eqtr4d 2229	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((EXMID ∧ (𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ∧ 𝑠 TAp 𝑥)) → 𝑟 = 𝑠)
10	9	ex 115	. . . . 5 ⊢ (EXMID → ((𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ∧ 𝑠 TAp 𝑥) → 𝑟 = 𝑠))
11	10	alrimivv 1886	. . . 4 ⊢ (EXMID → ∀𝑟∀𝑠((𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ∧ 𝑠 TAp 𝑥) → 𝑟 = 𝑠))
12		tapeq1 7312	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑟 = 𝑠 → (𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ↔ 𝑠 TAp 𝑥))
13	12	mo4 2103	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑟∀𝑠((𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ∧ 𝑠 TAp 𝑥) → 𝑟 = 𝑠))
14	11, 13	sylibr 134	. . 3 ⊢ (EXMID → ∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 𝑥)
15	14	alrimiv 1885	. 2 ⊢ (EXMID → ∀𝑥∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 𝑥)
16		2onn 6574	. . . 4 ⊢ 2o ∈ ω
17		tapeq2 7313	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 2o → (𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ↔ 𝑟 TAp 2o))
18	17	mobidv 2078	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 2o → (∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 𝑥 ↔ ∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 2o))
19	18	spcgv 2847	. . . 4 ⊢ (2o ∈ ω → (∀𝑥∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 𝑥 → ∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 2o))
20	16, 19	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 𝑥 → ∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 2o)
21		2omotap 7319	. . 3 ⊢ (∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 2o → EXMID)
22	20, 21	syl 14	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 𝑥 → EXMID)
23	15, 22	impbii 126	1 ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑟 𝑟 TAp 𝑥)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105  ∀wal 1362   = wceq 1364  ∃*wmo 2043   ∈ wcel 2164   ≠ wne 2364  {copab 4089  EXMIDwem 4223  ωcom 4622  2_oc2o 6463   TAp wtap 7309

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-13 2166  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-sep 4147  ax-nul 4155  ax-pow 4203  ax-pr 4238  ax-un 4464  ax-setind 4569  ax-iinf 4620

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-stab 832  df-dc 836  df-3or 981  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ne 2365  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2986  df-dif 3155  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-nul 3447  df-pw 3603  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-uni 3836  df-int 3871  df-br 4030  df-opab 4091  df-mpt 4092  df-tr 4128  df-exmid 4224  df-id 4324  df-iord 4397  df-on 4399  df-suc 4402  df-iom 4623  df-xp 4665  df-rel 4666  df-cnv 4667  df-co 4668  df-dm 4669  df-rn 4670  df-iota 5215  df-fun 5256  df-fn 5257  df-f 5258  df-fo 5260  df-fv 5262  df-1st 6193  df-2nd 6194  df-1o 6469  df-2o 6470  df-pap 7308  df-tap 7310

This theorem is referenced by: (None)