Theorem phplem3g 7041

Description: A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. Version of phplem3 7039 with unnecessary hypotheses removed. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
phplem3g	|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) )

Proof of Theorem phplem3g

Dummy variables a b are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2294	. . . . 5 |- ( b = B -> ( b e. suc A <-> B e. suc A ) )
2	1	anbi2d 464	. . . 4 |- ( b = B -> ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) <-> ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) ) )
3		sneq 3680	. . . . . 6 |- ( b = B -> { b } = { B } )
4	3	difeq2d 3325	. . . . 5 |- ( b = B -> ( suc A \ { b } ) = ( suc A \ { B } ) )
5	4	breq2d 4100	. . . 4 |- ( b = B -> ( A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) <-> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) ) )
6	2, 5	imbi12d 234	. . 3 |- ( b = B -> ( ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) ) <-> ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) ) ) )
7		eleq1 2294	. . . . . . 7 |- ( a = A -> ( a e. om <-> A e. om ) )
8		suceq 4499	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( a = A -> suc a = suc A )
9	8	eleq2d 2301	. . . . . . 7 |- ( a = A -> ( b e. suc a <-> b e. suc A ) )
10	7, 9	anbi12d 473	. . . . . 6 |- ( a = A -> ( ( a e. om /\ b e. suc a ) <-> ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) ) )
11		id 19	. . . . . . 7 |- ( a = A -> a = A )
12	8	difeq1d 3324	. . . . . . 7 |- ( a = A -> ( suc a \ { b } ) = ( suc A \ { b } ) )
13	11, 12	breq12d 4101	. . . . . 6 |- ( a = A -> ( a ~~ ( suc a \ { b } ) <-> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) ) )
14	10, 13	imbi12d 234	. . . . 5 |- ( a = A -> ( ( ( a e. om /\ b e. suc a ) -> a ~~ ( suc a \ { b } ) ) <-> ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) ) ) )
15		vex 2805	. . . . . 6 |- a e. _V
16		vex 2805	. . . . . 6 |- b e. _V
17	15, 16	phplem3 7039	. . . . 5 |- ( ( a e. om /\ b e. suc a ) -> a ~~ ( suc a \ { b } ) )
18	14, 17	vtoclg 2864	. . . 4 |- ( A e. om -> ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) ) )
19	18	anabsi5 581	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) )
20	6, 19	vtoclg 2864	. 2 |- ( B e. suc A -> ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) ) )
21	20	anabsi7 583	1 |- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1397   e. wcel 2202   \ cdif 3197   {csn 3669   class class class wbr 4088   suc csuc 4462   omcom 4688   ~~ cen 6906

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-nul 4215  ax-pow 4264  ax-pr 4299  ax-un 4530  ax-setind 4635  ax-iinf 4686

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 842  df-3or 1005  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-fal 1403  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ne 2403  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-nul 3495  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-uni 3894  df-int 3929  df-br 4089  df-opab 4151  df-tr 4188  df-id 4390  df-iord 4463  df-on 4465  df-suc 4468  df-iom 4689  df-xp 4731  df-rel 4732  df-cnv 4733  df-co 4734  df-dm 4735  df-rn 4736  df-res 4737  df-ima 4738  df-fun 5328  df-fn 5329  df-f 5330  df-f1 5331  df-fo 5332  df-f1o 5333  df-en 6909

This theorem is referenced by:  phplem4dom  7047  phpm  7051  phplem4on  7053