Theorem phplem3g 7037

Description: A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. Version of phplem3 7035 with unnecessary hypotheses removed. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
phplem3g	|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) )

Proof of Theorem phplem3g

Dummy variables a b are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2292	. . . . 5 |- ( b = B -> ( b e. suc A <-> B e. suc A ) )
2	1	anbi2d 464	. . . 4 |- ( b = B -> ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) <-> ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) ) )
3		sneq 3678	. . . . . 6 |- ( b = B -> { b } = { B } )
4	3	difeq2d 3323	. . . . 5 |- ( b = B -> ( suc A \ { b } ) = ( suc A \ { B } ) )
5	4	breq2d 4098	. . . 4 |- ( b = B -> ( A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) <-> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) ) )
6	2, 5	imbi12d 234	. . 3 |- ( b = B -> ( ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) ) <-> ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) ) ) )
7		eleq1 2292	. . . . . . 7 |- ( a = A -> ( a e. om <-> A e. om ) )
8		suceq 4497	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( a = A -> suc a = suc A )
9	8	eleq2d 2299	. . . . . . 7 |- ( a = A -> ( b e. suc a <-> b e. suc A ) )
10	7, 9	anbi12d 473	. . . . . 6 |- ( a = A -> ( ( a e. om /\ b e. suc a ) <-> ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) ) )
11		id 19	. . . . . . 7 |- ( a = A -> a = A )
12	8	difeq1d 3322	. . . . . . 7 |- ( a = A -> ( suc a \ { b } ) = ( suc A \ { b } ) )
13	11, 12	breq12d 4099	. . . . . 6 |- ( a = A -> ( a ~~ ( suc a \ { b } ) <-> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) ) )
14	10, 13	imbi12d 234	. . . . 5 |- ( a = A -> ( ( ( a e. om /\ b e. suc a ) -> a ~~ ( suc a \ { b } ) ) <-> ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) ) ) )
15		vex 2803	. . . . . 6 |- a e. _V
16		vex 2803	. . . . . 6 |- b e. _V
17	15, 16	phplem3 7035	. . . . 5 |- ( ( a e. om /\ b e. suc a ) -> a ~~ ( suc a \ { b } ) )
18	14, 17	vtoclg 2862	. . . 4 |- ( A e. om -> ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) ) )
19	18	anabsi5 579	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) )
20	6, 19	vtoclg 2862	. 2 |- ( B e. suc A -> ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) ) )
21	20	anabsi7 581	1 |- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1395   e. wcel 2200   \ cdif 3195   {csn 3667   class class class wbr 4086   suc csuc 4460   omcom 4686   ~~ cen 6902

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4205  ax-nul 4213  ax-pow 4262  ax-pr 4297  ax-un 4528  ax-setind 4633  ax-iinf 4684

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 840  df-3or 1003  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-fal 1401  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ne 2401  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-rab 2517  df-v 2802  df-dif 3200  df-un 3202  df-in 3204  df-ss 3211  df-nul 3493  df-pw 3652  df-sn 3673  df-pr 3674  df-op 3676  df-uni 3892  df-int 3927  df-br 4087  df-opab 4149  df-tr 4186  df-id 4388  df-iord 4461  df-on 4463  df-suc 4466  df-iom 4687  df-xp 4729  df-rel 4730  df-cnv 4731  df-co 4732  df-dm 4733  df-rn 4734  df-res 4735  df-ima 4736  df-fun 5326  df-fn 5327  df-f 5328  df-f1 5329  df-fo 5330  df-f1o 5331  df-en 6905

This theorem is referenced by:  phplem4dom  7043  phpm  7047  phplem4on  7049