Theorem phplem3g 6978

Description: A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. Version of phplem3 6976 with unnecessary hypotheses removed. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
phplem3g	|- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) )

Proof of Theorem phplem3g

Dummy variables a b are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq1 2270	. . . . 5 |- ( b = B -> ( b e. suc A <-> B e. suc A ) )
2	1	anbi2d 464	. . . 4 |- ( b = B -> ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) <-> ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) ) )
3		sneq 3654	. . . . . 6 |- ( b = B -> { b } = { B } )
4	3	difeq2d 3299	. . . . 5 |- ( b = B -> ( suc A \ { b } ) = ( suc A \ { B } ) )
5	4	breq2d 4071	. . . 4 |- ( b = B -> ( A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) <-> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) ) )
6	2, 5	imbi12d 234	. . 3 |- ( b = B -> ( ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) ) <-> ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) ) ) )
7		eleq1 2270	. . . . . . 7 |- ( a = A -> ( a e. om <-> A e. om ) )
8		suceq 4467	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( a = A -> suc a = suc A )
9	8	eleq2d 2277	. . . . . . 7 |- ( a = A -> ( b e. suc a <-> b e. suc A ) )
10	7, 9	anbi12d 473	. . . . . 6 |- ( a = A -> ( ( a e. om /\ b e. suc a ) <-> ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) ) )
11		id 19	. . . . . . 7 |- ( a = A -> a = A )
12	8	difeq1d 3298	. . . . . . 7 |- ( a = A -> ( suc a \ { b } ) = ( suc A \ { b } ) )
13	11, 12	breq12d 4072	. . . . . 6 |- ( a = A -> ( a ~~ ( suc a \ { b } ) <-> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) ) )
14	10, 13	imbi12d 234	. . . . 5 |- ( a = A -> ( ( ( a e. om /\ b e. suc a ) -> a ~~ ( suc a \ { b } ) ) <-> ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) ) ) )
15		vex 2779	. . . . . 6 |- a e. _V
16		vex 2779	. . . . . 6 |- b e. _V
17	15, 16	phplem3 6976	. . . . 5 |- ( ( a e. om /\ b e. suc a ) -> a ~~ ( suc a \ { b } ) )
18	14, 17	vtoclg 2838	. . . 4 |- ( A e. om -> ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) ) )
19	18	anabsi5 579	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. om /\ b e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { b } ) )
20	6, 19	vtoclg 2838	. 2 |- ( B e. suc A -> ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) ) )
21	20	anabsi7 581	1 |- ( ( A e. om /\ B e. suc A ) -> A ~~ ( suc A \ { B } ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1373   e. wcel 2178   \ cdif 3171   {csn 3643   class class class wbr 4059   suc csuc 4430   omcom 4656   ~~ cen 6848

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-13 2180  ax-14 2181  ax-ext 2189  ax-sep 4178  ax-nul 4186  ax-pow 4234  ax-pr 4269  ax-un 4498  ax-setind 4603  ax-iinf 4654

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 837  df-3or 982  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-fal 1379  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-eu 2058  df-mo 2059  df-clab 2194  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-ne 2379  df-ral 2491  df-rex 2492  df-rab 2495  df-v 2778  df-dif 3176  df-un 3178  df-in 3180  df-ss 3187  df-nul 3469  df-pw 3628  df-sn 3649  df-pr 3650  df-op 3652  df-uni 3865  df-int 3900  df-br 4060  df-opab 4122  df-tr 4159  df-id 4358  df-iord 4431  df-on 4433  df-suc 4436  df-iom 4657  df-xp 4699  df-rel 4700  df-cnv 4701  df-co 4702  df-dm 4703  df-rn 4704  df-res 4705  df-ima 4706  df-fun 5292  df-fn 5293  df-f 5294  df-f1 5295  df-fo 5296  df-f1o 5297  df-en 6851

This theorem is referenced by:  phplem4dom  6984  phpm  6988  phplem4on  6990