P. 69 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6801-6900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cbvixp 6801*	Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.)
|- F/_ y B   &    |- F/_ x C   &    |- ( x = y -> B = C )   =>    |- X_ x e. A B = X_ y e. A C
Theorem	cbvixpv 6802*	Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( x = y -> B = C )   =>    |- X_ x e. A B = X_ y e. A C
Theorem	nfixpxy 6803*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2023.)
|- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ y B   =>    |- F/_ y X_ x e. A B
Theorem	nfixp1 6804	The index variable in an indexed Cartesian product is not free. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x X_ x e. A B
Theorem	ixpprc 6805*	A cartesian product of proper-class many sets is empty, because any function in the cartesian product has to be a set with domain A, which is not possible for a proper class domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.)
|- ( -. A e. _V -> X_ x e. A B = (/) )
Theorem	ixpf 6806*	A member of an infinite Cartesian product maps to the indexed union of the product argument. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- ( F e. X_ x e. A B -> F : A --> U_ x e. A B )
Theorem	uniixp 6807*	The union of an infinite Cartesian product is included in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- U. X_ x e. A B C_ ( A X. U_ x e. A B )
Theorem	ixpexgg 6808*	The existence of an infinite Cartesian product. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. Remark in Enderton p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2023.)
|- ( ( A e. W /\ A. x e. A B e. V ) -> X_ x e. A B e. _V )
Theorem	ixpin 6809*	The intersection of two infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- X_ x e. A ( B i^i C ) = ( X_ x e. A B i^i X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpiinm 6810*	The indexed intersection of a collection of infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2023.)
|- ( E. z z e. B -> X_ x e. A |^|_ y e. B C = |^|_ y e. B X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpintm 6811*	The intersection of a collection of infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2023.)
|- ( E. z z e. B -> X_ x e. A |^| B = |^|_ y e. B X_ x e. A y )
Theorem	ixp0x 6812	An infinite Cartesian product with an empty index set. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2007.)
|- X_ x e. (/) A = { (/) }
Theorem	ixpssmap2g 6813*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. This version of ixpssmapg 6814 avoids ax-coll 4158. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|- ( U_ x e. A B e. V -> X_ x e. A B C_ ( U_ x e. A B ^m A ) )
Theorem	ixpssmapg 6814*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. x e. A B e. V -> X_ x e. A B C_ ( U_ x e. A B ^m A ) )
Theorem	0elixp 6815	Membership of the empty set in an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 29-Sep-2006.)
|- (/) e. X_ x e. (/) A
Theorem	ixpm 6816*	If an infinite Cartesian product of a family B ( x ) is inhabited, every B ( x ) is inhabited. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2023.)
|- ( E. f f e. X_ x e. A B -> A. x e. A E. z z e. B )
Theorem	ixp0 6817	The infinite Cartesian product of a family B ( x ) with an empty member is empty. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2006.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2023.)
|- ( E. x e. A B = (/) -> X_ x e. A B = (/) )
Theorem	ixpssmap 6818*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- X_ x e. A B C_ ( U_ x e. A B ^m A )
Theorem	resixp 6819*	Restriction of an element of an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by FL, 7-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
|- ( ( B C_ A /\ F e. X_ x e. A C ) -> ( F |` B ) e. X_ x e. B C )
Theorem	mptelixpg 6820*	Condition for an explicit member of an indexed product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Jan-2015.)
|- ( I e. V -> ( ( x e. I |-> J ) e. X_ x e. I K <-> A. x e. I J e. K ) )
Theorem	elixpsn 6821*	Membership in a class of singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( F e. X_ x e. { A } B <-> E. y e. B F = { <. A , y >. } ) )
Theorem	ixpsnf1o 6822*	A bijection between a class and single-point functions to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A |-> ( { I } X. { x } ) )   =>    |- ( I e. V -> F : A -1-1-onto-> X_ y e. { I } A )
Theorem	mapsnf1o 6823*	A bijection between a set and single-point functions to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A |-> ( { I } X. { x } ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ I e. W ) -> F : A -1-1-onto-> ( A ^m { I } ) )
2.6.28  Equinumerosity
Syntax	cen 6824	Extend class definition to include the equinumerosity relation ("approximately equals" symbol)
class ~~
Syntax	cdom 6825	Extend class definition to include the dominance relation (curly less-than-or-equal)
class ~<_
Syntax	cfn 6826	Extend class definition to include the class of all finite sets.
class Fin
Definition	df-en 6827*	Define the equinumerosity relation. Definition of [Enderton] p. 129. We define ~~ to be a binary relation rather than a connective, so its arguments must be sets to be meaningful. This is acceptable because we do not consider equinumerosity for proper classes. We derive the usual definition as bren 6834. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- ~~ = { <. x , y >. | E. f f : x -1-1-onto-> y }
Definition	df-dom 6828*	Define the dominance relation. Compare Definition of [Enderton] p. 145. Typical textbook definitions are derived as brdom 6838 and domen 6839. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- ~<_ = { <. x , y >. | E. f f : x -1-1-> y }
Definition	df-fin 6829*	Define the (proper) class of all finite sets. Similar to Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91, whose "Fin(a)" corresponds to our " a e. Fin". This definition is meaningful whether or not we accept the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 15845. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|- Fin = { x | E. y e. om x ~~ y }
Theorem	relen 6830	Equinumerosity is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- Rel ~~
Theorem	reldom 6831	Dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- Rel ~<_
Theorem	encv 6832	If two classes are equinumerous, both classes are sets. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) )
Theorem	breng 6833*	Equinumerosity relation. This variation of bren 6834 does not require the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a subproof of bren 6834. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 23-Sep-2024.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A ~~ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-onto-> B ) )
Theorem	bren 6834*	Equinumerosity relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-onto-> B )
Theorem	brdom2g 6835*	Dominance relation. This variation of brdomg 6836 does not require the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.) Extract from a subproof of brdomg 6836. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Nov-2024.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A ~<_ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-> B ) )
Theorem	brdomg 6836*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( A ~<_ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-> B ) )
Theorem	brdomi 6837*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~<_ B -> E. f f : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	brdom 6838*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ~<_ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	domen 6839*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ~<_ B <-> E. x ( A ~~ x /\ x C_ B ) )
Theorem	domeng 6840*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity, with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( A ~<_ B <-> E. x ( A ~~ x /\ x C_ B ) ) )
Theorem	ctex 6841	A class dominated by om is a set. See also ctfoex 7219 which says that a countable class is a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.) (Proof shortened by Jim Kingdon, 13-Mar-2023.)
|- ( A ~<_ om -> A e. _V )
Theorem	f1oen4g 6842	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto set function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 6847 does not require the Axiom of Collection nor the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
|- ( ( ( F e. V /\ A e. W /\ B e. X ) /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1dom4g 6843	The domain of a one-to-one set function is dominated by its codomain when the latter is a set. This variation of f1domg 6848 does not require the Axiom of Collection nor the Axiom of Union. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
|- ( ( ( F e. V /\ A e. W /\ B e. X ) /\ F : A -1-1-> B ) -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	f1oen3g 6844	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 6847 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1oen2g 6845	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 6847 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1dom2g 6846	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. This variation of f1domg 6848 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ F : A -1-1-> B ) -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	f1oeng 6847	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1domg 6848	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( F : A -1-1-> B -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	f1oen 6849	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( F : A -1-1-onto-> B -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1dom 6850	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( F : A -1-1-> B -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	isfi 6851*	Express " A is finite". Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91 (whose " Fin " is a predicate instead of a class). (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|- ( A e. Fin <-> E. x e. om A ~~ x )
Theorem	enssdom 6852	Equinumerosity implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
|- ~~ C_ ~<_
Theorem	endom 6853	Equinumerosity implies dominance. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	enrefg 6854	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> A ~~ A )
Theorem	enref 6855	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A ~~ A
Theorem	eqeng 6856	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A = B -> A ~~ B ) )
Theorem	domrefg 6857	Dominance is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A e. V -> A ~<_ A )
Theorem	en2d 6858*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. _V ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( y e. B -> D e. _V ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y = C ) <-> ( y e. B /\ x = D ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	en3d 6859*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( y e. B -> D e. A ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ( x = D <-> y = C ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	en2i 6860*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> C e. _V )   &    |- ( y e. B -> D e. _V )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y = C ) <-> ( y e. B /\ x = D ) )   =>    |- A ~~ B
Theorem	en3i 6861*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( y e. B -> D e. A )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ( x = D <-> y = C ) )   =>    |- A ~~ B
Theorem	dom2lem 6862*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A |-> C ) : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	dom2d 6863*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( B e. R -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	dom3d 6864*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	dom2 6865*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. C and D can be read C ( x ) and D ( y ), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) )   =>    |- ( B e. V -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	dom3 6866*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. C and D can be read C ( x ) and D ( y ), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	idssen 6867	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- _I C_ ~~
Theorem	domssr 6868	If C is a superset of B and B dominates A, then C also dominates A. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 7-Dec-2024.)
|- ( ( C e. V /\ B C_ C /\ A ~<_ B ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	ssdomg 6869	A set dominates its subsets. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A C_ B -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	ener 6870	Equinumerosity is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- ~~ Er _V
Theorem	ensymb 6871	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~~ B <-> B ~~ A )
Theorem	ensym 6872	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> B ~~ A )
Theorem	ensymi 6873	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   =>    |- B ~~ A
Theorem	ensymd 6874	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Deduction form of ensym 6872. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A ~~ B )   =>    |- ( ph -> B ~~ A )
Theorem	entr 6875	Transitivity of equinumerosity. Theorem 3 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ B ~~ C ) -> A ~~ C )
Theorem	domtr 6876	Transitivity of dominance relation. Theorem 17 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- ( ( A ~<_ B /\ B ~<_ C ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	entri 6877	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- B ~~ C   =>    |- A ~~ C
Theorem	entr2i 6878	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- B ~~ C   =>    |- C ~~ A
Theorem	entr3i 6879	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- A ~~ C   =>    |- B ~~ C
Theorem	entr4i 6880	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- C ~~ B   =>    |- A ~~ C
Theorem	endomtr 6881	Transitivity of equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ B ~<_ C ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	domentr 6882	Transitivity of dominance and equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A ~<_ B /\ B ~~ C ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	f1imaeng 6883	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
|- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ C C_ A /\ C e. V ) -> ( F " C ) ~~ C )
Theorem	f1imaen2g 6884	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (This version of f1imaen 6885 does not need ax-setind 4584.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ B e. V ) /\ ( C C_ A /\ C e. V ) ) -> ( F " C ) ~~ C )
Theorem	f1imaen 6885	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.)
|- C e. _V   =>    |- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ C C_ A ) -> ( F " C ) ~~ C )
Theorem	en0 6886	The empty set is equinumerous only to itself. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 88. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ (/) <-> A = (/) )
Theorem	ensn1 6887	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { A } ~~ 1o
Theorem	ensn1g 6888	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A e. V -> { A } ~~ 1o )
Theorem	enpr1g 6889	{ A , A } has only one element. (Contributed by FL, 15-Feb-2010.)
|- ( A e. V -> { A , A } ~~ 1o )
Theorem	en1 6890*	A set is equinumerous to ordinal one iff it is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)
|- ( A ~~ 1o <-> E. x A = { x } )
Theorem	en1bg 6891	A set is equinumerous to ordinal one iff it is a singleton. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2020.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A ~~ 1o <-> A = { U. A } ) )
Theorem	reuen1 6892*	Two ways to express "exactly one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> { x e. A | ph } ~~ 1o )
Theorem	euen1 6893	Two ways to express "exactly one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
|- ( E! x ph <-> { x | ph } ~~ 1o )
Theorem	euen1b 6894*	Two ways to express " A has a unique element". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~~ 1o <-> E! x x e. A )
Theorem	en1uniel 6895	A singleton contains its sole element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.)
|- ( S ~~ 1o -> U. S e. S )
Theorem	2dom 6896*	A set that dominates ordinal 2 has at least 2 different members. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)
|- ( 2o ~<_ A -> E. x e. A E. y e. A -. x = y )
Theorem	fundmen 6897	A function is equinumerous to its domain. Exercise 4 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- F e. _V   =>    |- ( Fun F -> dom F ~~ F )
Theorem	fundmeng 6898	A function is equinumerous to its domain. Exercise 4 of [Suppes] p. 98. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ Fun F ) -> dom F ~~ F )
Theorem	cnven 6899	A relational set is equinumerous to its converse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ( Rel A /\ A e. V ) -> A ~~ `' A )
Theorem	cnvct 6900	If a set is dominated by om, so is its converse. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.)
|- ( A ~<_ om -> `' A ~<_ om )