Theorem ercnv 6832

Description: The converse of an equivalence relation is itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ercnv	⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)

Proof of Theorem ercnv

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		errel 6820	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → Rel 𝑅)
2		relcnv 5168	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ◡𝑅
3		id 19	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → 𝑅 Er 𝐴)
4	3	ersymb 6825	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑦))
5		vex 2824	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
6		vex 2824	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
7	5, 6	brcnv 4965	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥◡𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)
8		df-br 4132	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥◡𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ◡𝑅)
9	7, 8	bitr3i 186	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ◡𝑅)
10		df-br 4132	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
11	4, 9, 10	3bitr3g 222	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ ◡𝑅 ↔ ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
12	11	eqrelrdv2 4876	. . 3 ⊢ (((Rel ◡𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅) ∧ 𝑅 Er 𝐴) → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)
13	2, 12	mpanl1 438	. 2 ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 Er 𝐴) → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)
14	1, 13	mpancom 426	1 ⊢ (𝑅 Er 𝐴 → ◡𝑅 = 𝑅)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1402   ∈ wcel 2209  ⟨cop 3712   class class class wbr 4131  ^◡ccnv 4775  Rel wrel 4781   Er wer 6808

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4251  ax-pow 4313  ax-pr 4348

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-v 2823  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-br 4132  df-opab 4194  df-xp 4782  df-rel 4783  df-cnv 4784  df-er 6811

This theorem is used by:  errn  6833