P. 66 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6501-6600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rdgisucinc 6501*	Value of the recursive definition generator at a successor. This can be thought of as a generalization of oasuc 6580 and omsuc 6588. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)))
Theorem	rdgon 6502*	Evaluating the recursive definition generator produces an ordinal. There is a hypothesis that the characteristic function produces ordinals on ordinal arguments. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ On)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ On)
Theorem	rdg0 6503	The initial value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴
Theorem	rdg0g 6504	The initial value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	rdgexg 6505	The recursive definition generator produces a set on a set input. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ V)
2.6.22  Finite recursion
Syntax	cfrec 6506	Extend class notation with the finite recursive definition generator, with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼.
class frec(𝐹, 𝐼)
Definition	df-frec 6507*	Define a recursive definition generator on ω (the class of finite ordinals) with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼. This rather amazing operation allows us to define, with compact direct definitions, functions that are usually defined in textbooks only with indirect self-referencing recursive definitions. A recursive definition requires advanced metalogic to justify - in particular, eliminating a recursive definition is very difficult and often not even shown in textbooks. On the other hand, the elimination of a direct definition is a matter of simple mechanical substitution. The price paid is the daunting complexity of our frec operation (especially when df-recs 6421 that it is built on is also eliminated). But once we get past this hurdle, definitions that would otherwise be recursive become relatively simple; see frec0g 6513 and frecsuc 6523. Unlike with transfinite recursion, finite recurson can readily divide definitions and proofs into zero and successor cases, because even without excluded middle we have theorems such as nn0suc 4673. The analogous situation with transfinite recursion - being able to say that an ordinal is zero, successor, or limit - is enabled by excluded middle and thus is not available to us. For the characteristic functions which satisfy the conditions given at frecrdg 6524, this definition and df-irdg 6486 restricted to ω produce the same result. Note: We introduce frec with the philosophical goal of being able to eliminate all definitions with direct mechanical substitution and to verify easily the soundness of definitions. Metamath itself has no built-in technical limitation that prevents multiple-part recursive definitions in the traditional textbook style. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2019.)
⊢ frec(𝐹, 𝐼) = (recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼))})) ↾ ω)
Theorem	freceq1 6508	Equality theorem for the finite recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) = frec(𝐺, 𝐴))
Theorem	freceq2 6509	Equality theorem for the finite recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) = frec(𝐹, 𝐵))
Theorem	frecex 6510	Finite recursion produces a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Aug-2021.)
⊢ frec(𝐹, 𝐴) ∈ V
Theorem	frecfun 6511	Finite recursion produces a function. See also frecfnom 6517 which also states that the domain of that function is ω but which puts conditions on 𝐴 and 𝐹. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Fun frec(𝐹, 𝐴)
Theorem	nffrec 6512	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the finite recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥frec(𝐹, 𝐴)
Theorem	frec0g 6513	The initial value resulting from finite recursive definition generation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	frecabex 6514*	The class abstraction from df-frec 6507 exists. This is a lemma for other finite recursion proofs. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-May-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑆 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑆‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑆 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))} ∈ V)
Theorem	frecabcl 6515*	The class abstraction from df-frec 6507 exists. Unlike frecabex 6514 the function 𝐹 only needs to be defined on 𝑆, not all sets. This is a lemma for other finite recursion proofs. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑁⟶𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝐺 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝐺 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))} ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	frectfr 6516*	Lemma to connect transfinite recursion theorems with finite recursion. That is, given the conditions 𝐹 Fn V and 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 on frec(𝐹, 𝐴), we want to be able to apply tfri1d 6451 or tfri2d 6452, and this lemma lets us satisfy hypotheses of those theorems. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2019.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))})    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∀𝑦(Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ V))
Theorem	frecfnom 6517*	The function generated by finite recursive definition generation is a function on omega. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-May-2020.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) Fn ω)
Theorem	freccllem 6518*	Lemma for freccl 6519. Just giving a name to a common expression to simplify the proof. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	freccl 6519*	Closure for finite recursion. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Mar-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ω)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	frecfcllem 6520*	Lemma for frecfcl 6521. Just giving a name to a common expression to simplify the proof. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → frec(𝐹, 𝐴):ω⟶𝑆)
Theorem	frecfcl 6521*	Finite recursion yields a function on the natural numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → frec(𝐹, 𝐴):ω⟶𝑆)
Theorem	frecsuclem 6522*	Lemma for frecsuc 6523. Just giving a name to a common expression to simplify the proof. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Mar-2022.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))})    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)))
Theorem	frecsuc 6523*	The successor value resulting from finite recursive definition generation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Mar-2022.)
⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)))
Theorem	frecrdg 6524*	Transfinite recursion restricted to omega. Given a suitable characteristic function, df-frec 6507 produces the same results as df-irdg 6486 restricted to ω. Presumably the theorem would also hold if 𝐹 Fn V were changed to ∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn V)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) = (rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ ω))
2.6.23  Ordinal arithmetic
Syntax	c1o 6525	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 1.
class 1o
Syntax	c2o 6526	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 2.
class 2o
Syntax	c3o 6527	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 3.
class 3o
Syntax	c4o 6528	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 4.
class 4o
Syntax	coa 6529	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal addition operation.
class +o
Syntax	comu 6530	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal multiplication operation.
class ·o
Syntax	coei 6531	Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal exponentiation operation.
class ↑o
Definition	df-1o 6532	Define the ordinal number 1. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
⊢ 1o = suc ∅
Definition	df-2o 6533	Define the ordinal number 2. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
⊢ 2o = suc 1o
Definition	df-3o 6534	Define the ordinal number 3. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 3o = suc 2o
Definition	df-4o 6535	Define the ordinal number 4. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 4o = suc 3o
Definition	df-oadd 6536*	Define the ordinal addition operation. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.)
⊢ +o = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑧), 𝑥)‘𝑦))
Definition	df-omul 6537*	Define the ordinal multiplication operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ·o = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 +o 𝑥)), ∅)‘𝑦))
Definition	df-oexpi 6538*	Define the ordinal exponentiation operation. This definition is similar to a conventional definition of exponentiation except that it defines ∅ ↑o 𝐴 to be 1o for all 𝐴 ∈ On, in order to avoid having different cases for whether the base is ∅ or not. We do not yet have an extensive development of ordinal exponentiation. For background on ordinal exponentiation without excluded middle, see Tom de Jong, Nicolai Kraus, Fredrik Nordvall Forsberg, and Chuangjie Xu (2025), "Ordinal Exponentiation in Homotopy Type Theory", arXiv:2501.14542 , https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14542 which is formalized in the TypeTopology proof library at https://ordinal-exponentiation-hott.github.io/. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ↑o = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ·o 𝑥)), 1o)‘𝑦))
Theorem	1on 6539	Ordinal 1 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
⊢ 1o ∈ On
Theorem	1oex 6540	Ordinal 1 is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Jul-2022.)
⊢ 1o ∈ V
Theorem	2on 6541	Ordinal 2 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
⊢ 2o ∈ On
Theorem	2on0 6542	Ordinal two is not zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 2o ≠ ∅
Theorem	3on 6543	Ordinal 3 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
⊢ 3o ∈ On
Theorem	4on 6544	Ordinal 3 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
⊢ 4o ∈ On
Theorem	df1o2 6545	Expanded value of the ordinal number 1. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
⊢ 1o = {∅}
Theorem	df2o3 6546	Expanded value of the ordinal number 2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 2o = {∅, 1o}
Theorem	df2o2 6547	Expanded value of the ordinal number 2. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.)
⊢ 2o = {∅, {∅}}
Theorem	1n0 6548	Ordinal one is not equal to ordinal zero. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2004.)
⊢ 1o ≠ ∅
Theorem	xp01disj 6549	Cartesian products with the singletons of ordinals 0 and 1 are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × {∅}) ∩ (𝐶 × {1o})) = ∅
Theorem	xp01disjl 6550	Cartesian products with the singletons of ordinals 0 and 1 are disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (({∅} × 𝐴) ∩ ({1o} × 𝐶)) = ∅
Theorem	ordgt0ge1 6551	Two ways to express that an ordinal class is positive. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2004.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 1o ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	ordge1n0im 6552	An ordinal greater than or equal to 1 is nonzero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (1o ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	el1o 6553	Membership in ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
Theorem	dif1o 6554	Two ways to say that 𝐴 is a nonzero number of the set 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 1o) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅))
Theorem	2oconcl 6555	Closure of the pair swapping function on 2o. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 2o → (1o ∖ 𝐴) ∈ 2o)
Theorem	0lt1o 6556	Ordinal zero is less than ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ 1o
Theorem	0lt2o 6557	Ordinal zero is less than ordinal two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2022.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ 2o
Theorem	1lt2o 6558	Ordinal one is less than ordinal two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2022.)
⊢ 1o ∈ 2o
Theorem	el2oss1o 6559	Being an element of ordinal two implies being a subset of ordinal one. The converse is equivalent to excluded middle by ss1oel2o 16265. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 2o → 𝐴 ⊆ 1o)
Theorem	oafnex 6560	The characteristic function for ordinal addition is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑥) Fn V
Theorem	sucinc 6561*	Successor is increasing. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑧)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)
Theorem	sucinc2 6562*	Successor is increasing. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑧)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵))
Theorem	fnoa 6563	Functionality and domain of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ +o Fn (On × On)
Theorem	oaexg 6564	Ordinal addition is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	omfnex 6565*	The characteristic function for ordinal multiplication is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 +o 𝐴)) Fn V)
Theorem	fnom 6566	Functionality and domain of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ·o Fn (On × On)
Theorem	omexg 6567	Ordinal multiplication is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	fnoei 6568	Functionality and domain of ordinal exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ↑o Fn (On × On)
Theorem	oeiexg 6569	Ordinal exponentiation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ V)
Theorem	oav 6570*	Value of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑥), 𝐴)‘𝐵))
Theorem	omv 6571*	Value of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 +o 𝐴)), ∅)‘𝐵))
Theorem	oeiv 6572*	Value of ordinal exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ·o 𝐴)), 1o)‘𝐵))
Theorem	oa0 6573	Addition with zero. Proposition 8.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o ∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	om0 6574	Ordinal multiplication with zero. Definition 8.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ·o ∅) = ∅)
Theorem	oei0 6575	Ordinal exponentiation with zero exponent. Definition 8.30 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ↑o ∅) = 1o)
Theorem	oacl 6576	Closure law for ordinal addition. Proposition 8.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1995.) (Constructive proof by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ On)
Theorem	omcl 6577	Closure law for ordinal multiplication. Proposition 8.16 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.) (Constructive proof by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ On)
Theorem	oeicl 6578	Closure law for ordinal exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ On)
Theorem	oav2 6579*	Value of ordinal addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 suc (𝐴 +o 𝑥)))
Theorem	oasuc 6580	Addition with successor. Definition 8.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 56. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o suc 𝐵) = suc (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	omv2 6581*	Value of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐴 ·o 𝑥) +o 𝐴))
Theorem	onasuc 6582	Addition with successor. Theorem 4I(A2) of [Enderton] p. 79. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 +o suc 𝐵) = suc (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	oa1suc 6583	Addition with 1 is same as successor. Proposition 4.34(a) of [Mendelson] p. 266. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o 1o) = suc 𝐴)
Theorem	o1p1e2 6584	1 + 1 = 2 for ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (1o +o 1o) = 2o
Theorem	oawordi 6585	Weak ordering property of ordinal addition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 +o 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 +o 𝐵)))
Theorem	oawordriexmid 6586*	A weak ordering property of ordinal addition which implies excluded middle. The property is proposition 8.7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 59. Compare with oawordi 6585. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ On ∧ 𝑏 ∈ On ∧ 𝑐 ∈ On) → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑎 +o 𝑐) ⊆ (𝑏 +o 𝑐)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	oaword1 6587	An ordinal is less than or equal to its sum with another. Part of Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	omsuc 6588	Multiplication with successor. Definition 8.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o suc 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ·o 𝐵) +o 𝐴))
Theorem	onmsuc 6589	Multiplication with successor. Theorem 4J(A2) of [Enderton] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ·o suc 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ·o 𝐵) +o 𝐴))
2.6.24  Natural number arithmetic
Theorem	nna0 6590	Addition with zero. Theorem 4I(A1) of [Enderton] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 +o ∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	nnm0 6591	Multiplication with zero. Theorem 4J(A1) of [Enderton] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ·o ∅) = ∅)
Theorem	nnasuc 6592	Addition with successor. Theorem 4I(A2) of [Enderton] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 +o suc 𝐵) = suc (𝐴 +o 𝐵))
Theorem	nnmsuc 6593	Multiplication with successor. Theorem 4J(A2) of [Enderton] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ·o suc 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ·o 𝐵) +o 𝐴))
Theorem	nna0r 6594	Addition to zero. Remark in proof of Theorem 4K(2) of [Enderton] p. 81. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (∅ +o 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	nnm0r 6595	Multiplication with zero. Exercise 16 of [Enderton] p. 82. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (∅ ·o 𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	nnacl 6596	Closure of addition of natural numbers. Proposition 8.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 59. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ ω)
Theorem	nnmcl 6597	Closure of multiplication of natural numbers. Proposition 8.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ ω)
Theorem	nnacli 6598	ω is closed under addition. Inference form of nnacl 6596. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ω    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ ω
Theorem	nnmcli 6599	ω is closed under multiplication. Inference form of nnmcl 6597. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ω    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ ω
Theorem	nnacom 6600	Addition of natural numbers is commutative. Theorem 4K(2) of [Enderton] p. 81. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = (𝐵 +o 𝐴))