| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 66 of 172) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | supp0cosupp0fn 6501 | The support of the composition of two functions is empty if the support of the outer function is empty. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺)) → ((𝐹 supp 𝑍) = ∅ → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍) = ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | imacosuppfn 6502 | The image of the support of the composition of two functions is the support of the outer function. (Contributed by AV, 30-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺)) → ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 supp 𝑍) ⊆ ran 𝐺) → (𝐺 “ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) supp 𝑍)) = (𝐹 supp 𝑍))) | ||
The following theorems are about maps-to operations (see df-mpo 6084) where the domain of the second argument depends on the domain of the first argument, especially when the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, in short "x-maps-to operations". For labels, the abbreviations "mpox" are used (since "x" usually denotes the first argument). This is in line with the currently used conventions for such cases (see cbvmpox 6160, ovmpox 6211 and fmpox 6430). If the first argument is an ordered pair, as in the following, the abbreviation is extended to "mpoxop", and the maps-to operations are called "x-op maps-to operations" for short. | ||
| Theorem | opeliunxp2f 6503* | Membership in a union of Cartesian products, using bound-variable hypothesis for 𝐸 instead of distinct variable conditions as in opeliunxp2 4918. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐸 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopn0yelv 6504* | If there is an element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, then the second argument is an element of the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopoveq 6505* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [〈𝑉, 𝑊〉 / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopovel 6506* | Element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [〈𝑉, 𝑊〉 / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | rbropapd 6507* | Properties of a pair in an extended binary relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {〈𝑓, 𝑝〉 ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)}) & ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒)))) | ||
| Theorem | rbropap 6508* | Properties of a pair in a restricted binary relation 𝑀 expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction: 𝑀 is the binary relation 𝑊 restricted by the condition 𝜓. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {〈𝑓, 𝑝〉 ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)}) & ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Syntax | ctpos 6509 | The transposition of a function. |
| class tpos 𝐹 | ||
| Definition | df-tpos 6510* | Define the transposition of a function, which is a function 𝐺 = tpos 𝐹 satisfying 𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝐹(𝑦, 𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})) | ||
| Theorem | tposss 6511 | Subset theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | tposeq 6512 | Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | tposeqd 6513 | Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | tposssxp 6514 | The transposition is a subset of a cross product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) × ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | reltpos 6515 | The transposition is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel tpos 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | brtpos2 6516 | Value of the transposition at a pair 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ∧ ∪ ◡{𝐴}𝐹𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | brtpos0 6517 | The behavior of tpos when the left argument is the empty set (which is not an ordered pair but is the "default" value of an ordered pair when the arguments are proper classes). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅tpos 𝐹𝐴 ↔ ∅𝐹𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | reldmtpos 6518 | Necessary and sufficient condition for dom tpos 𝐹 to be a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ dom 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | brtposg 6519 | The transposition swaps arguments of a three-parameter relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉tpos 𝐹𝐶 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉𝐹𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ottposg 6520 | The transposition swaps the first two elements in a collection of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | dmtpos 6521 | The domain of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = ◡dom 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | rntpos 6522 | The range of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → ran tpos 𝐹 = ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | tposexg 6523 | The transposition of a set is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → tpos 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | ovtposg 6524 | The transposition swaps the arguments in a two-argument function. When 𝐹 is a matrix, which is to say a function from ( 1 ... m ) × ( 1 ... n ) to the reals or some ring, tpos 𝐹 is the transposition of 𝐹, which is where the name comes from. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | tposfun 6525 | The transposition of a function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun tpos 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | dftpos2 6526* | Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ◡dom 𝐹 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}))) | ||
| Theorem | dftpos3 6527* | Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 4780. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 〈𝑦, 𝑥〉𝐹𝑧}) | ||
| Theorem | dftpos4 6528* | Alternate definition of tpos. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ((V × V) ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})) | ||
| Theorem | tpostpos 6529 | Value of the double transposition for a general class 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∩ (((V × V) ∪ {∅}) × V)) | ||
| Theorem | tpostpos2 6530 | Value of the double transposition for a relation on triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom 𝐹) → tpos tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | tposfn2 6531 | The domain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → tpos 𝐹 Fn ◡𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | tposfo2 6532 | Condition for a surjective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–onto→𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | tposf2 6533 | The domain and codomain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴⟶𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | tposf12 6534 | Condition for an injective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–1-1→𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | tposf1o2 6535 | Condition of a bijective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | tposfo 6536 | The domain and codomain/range of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)–onto→𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | tposf 6537 | The domain and codomain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)⟶𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | tposfn 6538 | Functionality of a transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) → tpos 𝐹 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | tpos0 6539 | Transposition of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos ∅ = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | tposco 6540 | Transposition of a composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | tpossym 6541* | Two ways to say a function is symmetric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | tposeqi 6542 | Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺 | ||
| Theorem | tposex 6543 | A transposition is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ tpos 𝐹 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | nftpos 6544 | Hypothesis builder for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥tpos 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | tposoprab 6545* | Transposition of a class of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑦, 𝑥〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | tposmpo 6546* | Transposition of a two-argument mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | pwuninel2 6547 | The power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 2pwuninelg 6548 | The power set of the power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ 𝒫 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iunon 6549* | The indexed union of a set of ordinal numbers 𝐵(𝑥) is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ On) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ On) | ||
| Syntax | wsmo 6550 | Introduce the strictly monotone ordinal function. A strictly monotone function is one that is constantly increasing across the ordinals. |
| wff Smo 𝐴 | ||
| Definition | df-smo 6551* | Definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. Definition 7.46 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Smo 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴:dom 𝐴⟶On ∧ Ord dom 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐴‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴‘𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | dfsmo2 6552* | Alternate definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ (Smo 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On ∧ Ord dom 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | issmo 6553* | Conditions for which 𝐴 is a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴:𝐵⟶On & ⊢ Ord 𝐵 & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐴‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴‘𝑦))) & ⊢ dom 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Smo 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | issmo2 6554* | Alternate definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → ((𝐵 ⊆ On ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)) → Smo 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | smoeq 6555 | Equality theorem for strictly monotone functions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (Smo 𝐴 ↔ Smo 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | smodm 6556 | The domain of a strictly monotone function is an ordinal. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Smo 𝐴 → Ord dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | smores 6557 | A strictly monotone function restricted to an ordinal remains strictly monotone. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴) → Smo (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | smores3 6558 | A strictly monotone function restricted to an ordinal remains strictly monotone. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐵) → Smo (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | smores2 6559 | A strictly monotone ordinal function restricted to an ordinal is still monotone. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo 𝐹 ∧ Ord 𝐴) → Smo (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | smodm2 6560 | The domain of a strictly monotone ordinal function is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝐹) → Ord 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | smofvon2dm 6561 | The function values of a strictly monotone ordinal function are ordinals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | iordsmo 6562 | The identity relation restricted to the ordinals is a strictly monotone function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ Ord 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Smo ( I ↾ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | smo0 6563 | The empty set is a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 20-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ Smo ∅ | ||
| Theorem | smofvon 6564 | If 𝐵 is a strictly monotone ordinal function, and 𝐴 is in the domain of 𝐵, then the value of the function at 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 20-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → (𝐵‘𝐴) ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | smoel 6565 | If 𝑥 is less than 𝑦 then a strictly monotone function's value will be strictly less at 𝑥 than at 𝑦. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 22-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐵‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | smoiun 6566* | The value of a strictly monotone ordinal function contains its indexed union. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 22-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐵‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | smoiso 6567 | If 𝐹 is an isomorphism from an ordinal 𝐴 onto 𝐵, which is a subset of the ordinals, then 𝐹 is a strictly monotonic function. Exercise 3 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Smo 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | smoel2 6568 | A strictly monotone ordinal function preserves the epsilon relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝐹) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵)) | ||
| Syntax | crecs 6569 | Notation for a function defined by strong transfinite recursion. |
| class recs(𝐹) | ||
| Definition | df-recs 6570* |
Define a function recs(𝐹) on On, the
class of ordinal
numbers, by transfinite recursion given a rule 𝐹 which sets the next
value given all values so far. See df-irdg 6635 for more details on why
this definition is desirable. Unlike df-irdg 6635 which restricts the
update rule to use only the previous value, this version allows the
update rule to use all previous values, which is why it is
described
as "strong", although it is actually more primitive. See tfri1d 6600 and
tfri2d 6601 for the primary contract of this definition.
(Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ recs(𝐹) = ∪ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} | ||
| Theorem | recseq 6571 | Equality theorem for recs. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → recs(𝐹) = recs(𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | nfrecs 6572 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for recs. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥recs(𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlem1 6573* | A technical lemma for transfinite recursion. Compare Lemma 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 47. (Contributed by NM, 23-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐺)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐵‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑥))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐺‘𝑥) = (𝐵‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑥))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlem3ag 6574* | Lemma for transfinite recursion. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ V → (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤))))) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlem3a 6575* | Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝐺 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝐺 ↾ 𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlem3 6576* | Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} | ||
| Theorem | tfrlem3-2d 6577* | Lemma for transfinite recursion which changes a bound variable (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑔) ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlem4 6578* | Lemma for transfinite recursion. 𝐴 is the class of all "acceptable" functions, and 𝐹 is their union. First we show that an acceptable function is in fact a function. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 → Fun 𝑔) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlem5 6579* | Lemma for transfinite recursion. The values of two acceptable functions are the same within their domains. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑥𝑔𝑢 ∧ 𝑥ℎ𝑣) → 𝑢 = 𝑣)) | ||
| Theorem | recsfval 6580* | Lemma for transfinite recursion. The definition recs is the union of all acceptable functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} ⇒ ⊢ recs(𝐹) = ∪ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | tfrlem6 6581* | Lemma for transfinite recursion. The union of all acceptable functions is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} ⇒ ⊢ Rel recs(𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlem7 6582* | Lemma for transfinite recursion. The union of all acceptable functions is a function. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} ⇒ ⊢ Fun recs(𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlem8 6583* | Lemma for transfinite recursion. The domain of recs is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Alan Sare, 11-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} ⇒ ⊢ Ord dom recs(𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlem9 6584* | Lemma for transfinite recursion. Here we compute the value of recs (the union of all acceptable functions). (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom recs(𝐹) → (recs(𝐹)‘𝐵) = (𝐹‘(recs(𝐹) ↾ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | tfrfun 6585 | Transfinite recursion produces a function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ Fun recs(𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | tfr2a 6586 | A weak version of transfinite recursion. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | tfr0dm 6587 | Transfinite recursion is defined at the empty set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺‘∅) ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ ∈ dom 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | tfr0 6588 | Transfinite recursion at the empty set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐺‘∅) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹‘∅) = (𝐺‘∅)) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlemisucfn 6589* | We can extend an acceptable function by one element to produce a function. Lemma for tfrlemi1 6597. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑧 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑔 Fn 𝑧) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑔 ∪ {〈𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)〉}) Fn suc 𝑧) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlemisucaccv 6590* | We can extend an acceptable function by one element to produce an acceptable function. Lemma for tfrlemi1 6597. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑧 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑔 Fn 𝑧) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑔 ∪ {〈𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)〉}) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlemibacc 6591* | Each element of 𝐵 is an acceptable function. Lemma for tfrlemi1 6597. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ = (𝑔 ∪ {〈𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)〉}))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlemibxssdm 6592* | The union of 𝐵 is defined on all ordinals. Lemma for tfrlemi1 6597. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ = (𝑔 ∪ {〈𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)〉}))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ⊆ dom ∪ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlemibfn 6593* | The union of 𝐵 is a function defined on 𝑥. Lemma for tfrlemi1 6597. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ = (𝑔 ∪ {〈𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)〉}))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐵 Fn 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlemibex 6594* | The set 𝐵 exists. Lemma for tfrlemi1 6597. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ = (𝑔 ∪ {〈𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)〉}))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlemiubacc 6595* | The union of 𝐵 satisfies the recursion rule (lemma for tfrlemi1 6597). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ = (𝑔 ∪ {〈𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)〉}))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑥 (∪ 𝐵‘𝑢) = (𝐹‘(∪ 𝐵 ↾ 𝑢))) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlemiex 6596* | Lemma for tfrlemi1 6597. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) & ⊢ 𝐵 = {ℎ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ℎ = (𝑔 ∪ {〈𝑧, (𝐹‘𝑔)〉}))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑥 ∈ On) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑢) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑢)))) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlemi1 6597* |
We can define an acceptable function on any ordinal.
As with many of the transfinite recursion theorems, we have a hypothesis that states that 𝐹 is a function and that it is defined for all ordinals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Mar-2019.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ∃𝑔(𝑔 Fn 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔‘𝑢) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑢)))) | ||
| Theorem | tfrlemi14d 6598* | The domain of recs is all ordinals (lemma for transfinite recursion). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → dom recs(𝐹) = On) | ||
| Theorem | tfrexlem 6599* | The transfinite recursion function is set-like if the input is. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ V)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (recs(𝐹)‘𝐶) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | tfri1d 6600* |
Principle of Transfinite Recursion, part 1 of 3. Theorem 7.41(1) of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 47, with an
additional condition.
The condition is that 𝐺 is defined "everywhere", which is stated here as (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ V. Alternately, ∀𝑥 ∈ On∀𝑓(𝑓 Fn 𝑥 → 𝑓 ∈ dom 𝐺) would suffice. Given a function 𝐺 satisfying that condition, we define a class 𝐴 of all "acceptable" functions. The final function we're interested in is the union 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) of them. 𝐹 is then said to be defined by transfinite recursion. The purpose of the 3 parts of this theorem is to demonstrate properties of 𝐹. In this first part we show that 𝐹 is a function whose domain is all ordinal numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-May-2019.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = recs(𝐺) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑥) ∈ V)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn On) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |