| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 66 of 164) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Syntax | cfrec 6501 | Extend class notation with the finite recursive definition generator, with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼. |
| class frec(𝐹, 𝐼) | ||
| Definition | df-frec 6502* |
Define a recursive definition generator on ω (the
class of finite
ordinals) with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼.
This rather amazing operation allows us to define, with compact direct
definitions, functions that are usually defined in textbooks only with
indirect self-referencing recursive definitions. A recursive definition
requires advanced metalogic to justify - in particular, eliminating a
recursive definition is very difficult and often not even shown in
textbooks. On the other hand, the elimination of a direct definition is
a matter of simple mechanical substitution. The price paid is the
daunting complexity of our frec operation
(especially when df-recs 6416
that it is built on is also eliminated). But once we get past this
hurdle, definitions that would otherwise be recursive become relatively
simple; see frec0g 6508 and frecsuc 6518.
Unlike with transfinite recursion, finite recurson can readily divide definitions and proofs into zero and successor cases, because even without excluded middle we have theorems such as nn0suc 4671. The analogous situation with transfinite recursion - being able to say that an ordinal is zero, successor, or limit - is enabled by excluded middle and thus is not available to us. For the characteristic functions which satisfy the conditions given at frecrdg 6519, this definition and df-irdg 6481 restricted to ω produce the same result. Note: We introduce frec with the philosophical goal of being able to eliminate all definitions with direct mechanical substitution and to verify easily the soundness of definitions. Metamath itself has no built-in technical limitation that prevents multiple-part recursive definitions in the traditional textbook style. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 10-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ frec(𝐹, 𝐼) = (recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼))})) ↾ ω) | ||
| Theorem | freceq1 6503 | Equality theorem for the finite recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) = frec(𝐺, 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | freceq2 6504 | Equality theorem for the finite recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) = frec(𝐹, 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | frecex 6505 | Finite recursion produces a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Aug-2021.) |
| ⊢ frec(𝐹, 𝐴) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | frecfun 6506 | Finite recursion produces a function. See also frecfnom 6512 which also states that the domain of that function is ω but which puts conditions on 𝐴 and 𝐹. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ Fun frec(𝐹, 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nffrec 6507 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the finite recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥frec(𝐹, 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | frec0g 6508 | The initial value resulting from finite recursive definition generation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | frecabex 6509* | The class abstraction from df-frec 6502 exists. This is a lemma for other finite recursion proofs. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑆 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑆‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑆 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))} ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | frecabcl 6510* | The class abstraction from df-frec 6502 exists. Unlike frecabex 6509 the function 𝐹 only needs to be defined on 𝑆, not all sets. This is a lemma for other finite recursion proofs. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ω) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑁⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝐺 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝐺 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))} ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | frectfr 6511* |
Lemma to connect transfinite recursion theorems with finite recursion.
That is, given the conditions 𝐹 Fn V and 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 on
frec(𝐹, 𝐴), we want to be able to apply tfri1d 6446 or tfri2d 6447,
and this lemma lets us satisfy hypotheses of those theorems.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))}) ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∀𝑦(Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | frecfnom 6512* | The function generated by finite recursive definition generation is a function on omega. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) Fn ω) | ||
| Theorem | freccllem 6513* | Lemma for freccl 6514. Just giving a name to a common expression to simplify the proof. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ω) & ⊢ 𝐺 = recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | freccl 6514* | Closure for finite recursion. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ω) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | frecfcllem 6515* | Lemma for frecfcl 6516. Just giving a name to a common expression to simplify the proof. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))})) ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → frec(𝐹, 𝐴):ω⟶𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | frecfcl 6516* | Finite recursion yields a function on the natural numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) → frec(𝐹, 𝐴):ω⟶𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | frecsuclem 6517* | Lemma for frecsuc 6518. Just giving a name to a common expression to simplify the proof. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑚 ∈ ω (dom 𝑔 = suc 𝑚 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑚))) ∨ (dom 𝑔 = ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))}) ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | frecsuc 6518* | The successor value resulting from finite recursive definition generation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(frec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | frecrdg 6519* |
Transfinite recursion restricted to omega.
Given a suitable characteristic function, df-frec 6502 produces the same results as df-irdg 6481 restricted to ω. Presumably the theorem would also hold if 𝐹 Fn V were changed to ∀𝑧(𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ V. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → frec(𝐹, 𝐴) = (rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ ω)) | ||
| Syntax | c1o 6520 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 1. |
| class 1o | ||
| Syntax | c2o 6521 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 2. |
| class 2o | ||
| Syntax | c3o 6522 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 3. |
| class 3o | ||
| Syntax | c4o 6523 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 4. |
| class 4o | ||
| Syntax | coa 6524 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal addition operation. |
| class +o | ||
| Syntax | comu 6525 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal multiplication operation. |
| class ·o | ||
| Syntax | coei 6526 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal exponentiation operation. |
| class ↑o | ||
| Definition | df-1o 6527 | Define the ordinal number 1. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.) |
| ⊢ 1o = suc ∅ | ||
| Definition | df-2o 6528 | Define the ordinal number 2. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.) |
| ⊢ 2o = suc 1o | ||
| Definition | df-3o 6529 | Define the ordinal number 3. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ 3o = suc 2o | ||
| Definition | df-4o 6530 | Define the ordinal number 4. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ 4o = suc 3o | ||
| Definition | df-oadd 6531* | Define the ordinal addition operation. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) |
| ⊢ +o = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑧), 𝑥)‘𝑦)) | ||
| Definition | df-omul 6532* | Define the ordinal multiplication operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) |
| ⊢ ·o = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 +o 𝑥)), ∅)‘𝑦)) | ||
| Definition | df-oexpi 6533* |
Define the ordinal exponentiation operation.
This definition is similar to a conventional definition of exponentiation except that it defines ∅ ↑o 𝐴 to be 1o for all 𝐴 ∈ On, in order to avoid having different cases for whether the base is ∅ or not. We do not yet have an extensive development of ordinal exponentiation. For background on ordinal exponentiation without excluded middle, see Tom de Jong, Nicolai Kraus, Fredrik Nordvall Forsberg, and Chuangjie Xu (2025), "Ordinal Exponentiation in Homotopy Type Theory", arXiv:2501.14542 , https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.14542 which is formalized in the TypeTopology proof library at https://ordinal-exponentiation-hott.github.io/. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ↑o = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ·o 𝑥)), 1o)‘𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | 1on 6534 | Ordinal 1 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.) |
| ⊢ 1o ∈ On | ||
| Theorem | 1oex 6535 | Ordinal 1 is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ 1o ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | 2on 6536 | Ordinal 2 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ 2o ∈ On | ||
| Theorem | 2on0 6537 | Ordinal two is not zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 2o ≠ ∅ | ||
| Theorem | 3on 6538 | Ordinal 3 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.) |
| ⊢ 3o ∈ On | ||
| Theorem | 4on 6539 | Ordinal 3 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.) |
| ⊢ 4o ∈ On | ||
| Theorem | df1o2 6540 | Expanded value of the ordinal number 1. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ 1o = {∅} | ||
| Theorem | df2o3 6541 | Expanded value of the ordinal number 2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 2o = {∅, 1o} | ||
| Theorem | df2o2 6542 | Expanded value of the ordinal number 2. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ 2o = {∅, {∅}} | ||
| Theorem | 1n0 6543 | Ordinal one is not equal to ordinal zero. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2004.) |
| ⊢ 1o ≠ ∅ | ||
| Theorem | xp01disj 6544 | Cartesian products with the singletons of ordinals 0 and 1 are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2007.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × {∅}) ∩ (𝐶 × {1o})) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | xp01disjl 6545 | Cartesian products with the singletons of ordinals 0 and 1 are disjoint. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2023.) |
| ⊢ (({∅} × 𝐴) ∩ ({1o} × 𝐶)) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | ordgt0ge1 6546 | Two ways to express that an ordinal class is positive. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2004.) |
| ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 1o ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ordge1n0im 6547 | An ordinal greater than or equal to 1 is nonzero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (1o ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | el1o 6548 | Membership in ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2005.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | dif1o 6549 | Two ways to say that 𝐴 is a nonzero number of the set 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 1o) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | 2oconcl 6550 | Closure of the pair swapping function on 2o. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 2o → (1o ∖ 𝐴) ∈ 2o) | ||
| Theorem | 0lt1o 6551 | Ordinal zero is less than ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2005.) |
| ⊢ ∅ ∈ 1o | ||
| Theorem | 0lt2o 6552 | Ordinal zero is less than ordinal two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ ∅ ∈ 2o | ||
| Theorem | 1lt2o 6553 | Ordinal one is less than ordinal two. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ 1o ∈ 2o | ||
| Theorem | el2oss1o 6554 | Being an element of ordinal two implies being a subset of ordinal one. The converse is equivalent to excluded middle by ss1oel2o 16235. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 2o → 𝐴 ⊆ 1o) | ||
| Theorem | oafnex 6555 | The characteristic function for ordinal addition is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑥) Fn V | ||
| Theorem | sucinc 6556* | Successor is increasing. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑧) ⇒ ⊢ ∀𝑥 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | sucinc2 6557* | Successor is increasing. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑧) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | fnoa 6558 | Functionality and domain of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ +o Fn (On × On) | ||
| Theorem | oaexg 6559 | Ordinal addition is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | omfnex 6560* | The characteristic function for ordinal multiplication is defined everywhere. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 +o 𝐴)) Fn V) | ||
| Theorem | fnom 6561 | Functionality and domain of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ·o Fn (On × On) | ||
| Theorem | omexg 6562 | Ordinal multiplication is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | fnoei 6563 | Functionality and domain of ordinal exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ↑o Fn (On × On) | ||
| Theorem | oeiexg 6564 | Ordinal exponentiation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | oav 6565* | Value of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑥), 𝐴)‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | omv 6566* | Value of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 +o 𝐴)), ∅)‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | oeiv 6567* | Value of ordinal exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ·o 𝐴)), 1o)‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | oa0 6568 | Addition with zero. Proposition 8.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o ∅) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | om0 6569 | Ordinal multiplication with zero. Definition 8.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ·o ∅) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | oei0 6570 | Ordinal exponentiation with zero exponent. Definition 8.30 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ↑o ∅) = 1o) | ||
| Theorem | oacl 6571 | Closure law for ordinal addition. Proposition 8.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1995.) (Constructive proof by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | omcl 6572 | Closure law for ordinal multiplication. Proposition 8.16 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-2004.) (Constructive proof by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | oeicl 6573 | Closure law for ordinal exponentiation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | oav2 6574* | Value of ordinal addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 12-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 suc (𝐴 +o 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | oasuc 6575 | Addition with successor. Definition 8.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 56. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o suc 𝐵) = suc (𝐴 +o 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | omv2 6576* | Value of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝐴 ·o 𝑥) +o 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | onasuc 6577 | Addition with successor. Theorem 4I(A2) of [Enderton] p. 79. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 +o suc 𝐵) = suc (𝐴 +o 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | oa1suc 6578 | Addition with 1 is same as successor. Proposition 4.34(a) of [Mendelson] p. 266. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o 1o) = suc 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | o1p1e2 6579 | 1 + 1 = 2 for ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.) |
| ⊢ (1o +o 1o) = 2o | ||
| Theorem | oawordi 6580 | Weak ordering property of ordinal addition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 +o 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 +o 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | oawordriexmid 6581* | A weak ordering property of ordinal addition which implies excluded middle. The property is proposition 8.7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 59. Compare with oawordi 6580. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ On ∧ 𝑏 ∈ On ∧ 𝑐 ∈ On) → (𝑎 ⊆ 𝑏 → (𝑎 +o 𝑐) ⊆ (𝑏 +o 𝑐))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | oaword1 6582 | An ordinal is less than or equal to its sum with another. Part of Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2004.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 +o 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | omsuc 6583 | Multiplication with successor. Definition 8.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o suc 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ·o 𝐵) +o 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | onmsuc 6584 | Multiplication with successor. Theorem 4J(A2) of [Enderton] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ·o suc 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ·o 𝐵) +o 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | nna0 6585 | Addition with zero. Theorem 4I(A1) of [Enderton] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 +o ∅) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nnm0 6586 | Multiplication with zero. Theorem 4J(A1) of [Enderton] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ·o ∅) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | nnasuc 6587 | Addition with successor. Theorem 4I(A2) of [Enderton] p. 79. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 +o suc 𝐵) = suc (𝐴 +o 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nnmsuc 6588 | Multiplication with successor. Theorem 4J(A2) of [Enderton] p. 80. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ·o suc 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ·o 𝐵) +o 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | nna0r 6589 | Addition to zero. Remark in proof of Theorem 4K(2) of [Enderton] p. 81. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (∅ +o 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nnm0r 6590 | Multiplication with zero. Exercise 16 of [Enderton] p. 82. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (∅ ·o 𝐴) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | nnacl 6591 | Closure of addition of natural numbers. Proposition 8.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 59. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ ω) | ||
| Theorem | nnmcl 6592 | Closure of multiplication of natural numbers. Proposition 8.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ ω) | ||
| Theorem | nnacli 6593 | ω is closed under addition. Inference form of nnacl 6591. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ω ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ ω | ||
| Theorem | nnmcli 6594 | ω is closed under multiplication. Inference form of nnmcl 6592. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2012.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ω & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ω ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ ω | ||
| Theorem | nnacom 6595 | Addition of natural numbers is commutative. Theorem 4K(2) of [Enderton] p. 81. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = (𝐵 +o 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | nnaass 6596 | Addition of natural numbers is associative. Theorem 4K(1) of [Enderton] p. 81. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) +o 𝐶) = (𝐴 +o (𝐵 +o 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | nndi 6597 | Distributive law for natural numbers (left-distributivity). Theorem 4K(3) of [Enderton] p. 81. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ·o (𝐵 +o 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ·o 𝐵) +o (𝐴 ·o 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | nnmass 6598 | Multiplication of natural numbers is associative. Theorem 4K(4) of [Enderton] p. 81. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ·o 𝐶) = (𝐴 ·o (𝐵 ·o 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | nnmsucr 6599 | Multiplication with successor. Exercise 16 of [Enderton] p. 82. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ·o 𝐵) +o 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nnmcom 6600 | Multiplication of natural numbers is commutative. Theorem 4K(5) of [Enderton] p. 81. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 22-Oct-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = (𝐵 ·o 𝐴)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |