![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > fco2 | GIF version |
Description: Functionality of a composition with weakened out of domain condition on the first argument. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Mar-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
fco2 | ⊢ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵):𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐶) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | fco 5383 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵):𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐶) | |
2 | frn 5376 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → ran 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐵) | |
3 | cores 5134 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (ran 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)) | |
4 | 2, 3 | syl 14 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)) |
5 | 4 | adantl 277 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵):𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)) |
6 | 5 | feq1d 5354 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵):𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) → (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐶 ↔ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐶)) |
7 | 1, 6 | mpbid 147 | 1 ⊢ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵):𝐵⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐶) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 = wceq 1353 ⊆ wss 3131 ran crn 4629 ↾ cres 4630 ∘ ccom 4632 ⟶wf 5214 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 709 ax-5 1447 ax-7 1448 ax-gen 1449 ax-ie1 1493 ax-ie2 1494 ax-8 1504 ax-10 1505 ax-11 1506 ax-i12 1507 ax-bndl 1509 ax-4 1510 ax-17 1526 ax-i9 1530 ax-ial 1534 ax-i5r 1535 ax-14 2151 ax-ext 2159 ax-sep 4123 ax-pow 4176 ax-pr 4211 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 980 df-tru 1356 df-nf 1461 df-sb 1763 df-eu 2029 df-mo 2030 df-clab 2164 df-cleq 2170 df-clel 2173 df-nfc 2308 df-ral 2460 df-rex 2461 df-v 2741 df-un 3135 df-in 3137 df-ss 3144 df-pw 3579 df-sn 3600 df-pr 3601 df-op 3603 df-br 4006 df-opab 4067 df-id 4295 df-xp 4634 df-rel 4635 df-cnv 4636 df-co 4637 df-dm 4638 df-rn 4639 df-res 4640 df-fun 5220 df-fn 5221 df-f 5222 |
This theorem is referenced by: isomninnlem 14863 iswomninnlem 14882 ismkvnnlem 14885 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |