| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 54 of 171) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | unidmrn 5301 | The double union of the converse of a class is its field. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2008.) |
| ⊢ ∪ ∪ ◡𝐴 = (dom 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | relcnvfld 5302 | if 𝑅 is a relation, its double union equals the double union of its converse. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ ∪ 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ ◡𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | dfdm2 5303 | Alternate definition of domain df-dm 4765 that doesn't require dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2010.) |
| ⊢ dom 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ (◡𝐴 ∘ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | unixpm 5304* | The double class union of an inhabited cross product is the union of its members. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) → ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | unixp0im 5305 | The union of an empty cross product is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ → ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | cnvexg 5306 | The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | cnvex 5307 | The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2003.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ◡𝐴 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | relcnvexb 5308 | A relation is a set iff its converse is a set. (Contributed by FL, 3-Mar-2007.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ V ↔ ◡𝑅 ∈ V)) | ||
| Theorem | ressn 5309 | Restriction of a class to a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ↾ {𝐵}) = ({𝐵} × (𝐴 “ {𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | cnviinm 5310* | The converse of an intersection is the intersection of the converse. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ◡∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ◡𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | cnvpom 5311* | The converse of a partial order relation is a partial order relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2005.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ ◡𝑅 Po 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvsom 5312* | The converse of a strict order relation is a strict order relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ ◡𝑅 Or 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | coexg 5313 | The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | coex 5314 | The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2003.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | xpcom 5315* | Composition of two cross products. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Syntax | cio 5316 | Extend class notation with Russell's definition description binder (inverted iota). |
| class (℩𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | iotajust 5317* | Soundness justification theorem for df-iota 5318. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}} | ||
| Definition | df-iota 5318* |
Define Russell's definition description binder, which can be read as
"the unique 𝑥 such that 𝜑," where 𝜑
ordinarily contains
𝑥 as a free variable. Our definition
is meaningful only when there
is exactly one 𝑥 such that 𝜑 is true (see iotaval 5330);
otherwise, it evaluates to the empty set (see iotanul 5334). Russell used
the inverted iota symbol ℩ to represent
the binder.
Sometimes proofs need to expand an iota-based definition. That is, given "X = the x for which ... x ... x ..." holds, the proof needs to get to "... X ... X ...". A general strategy to do this is to use iotacl 5343 (for unbounded iota). This can be easier than applying a version that applies an explicit substitution, because substituting an iota into its own property always has a bound variable clash which must be first renamed or else guarded with NF. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} | ||
| Theorem | dfiota2 5319* | Alternate definition for descriptions. Definition 8.18 in [Quine] p. 56. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)} | ||
| Theorem | nfiota1 5320 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | nfiotadw 5321* | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | nfiotaw 5322* | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | cbviota 5323 | Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbviotavw 5324* | Change bound variables in a description binder. Version of cbviotav 5325 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | cbviotav 5325* | Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | sb8iota 5326 | Variable substitution in description binder. Compare sb8eu 2095. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | iotaeq 5327 | Equality theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | iotabi 5328 | Equivalence theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | uniabio 5329* | Part of Theorem 8.17 in [Quine] p. 56. This theorem serves as a lemma for the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | iotaval 5330* | Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | iotauni 5331 | Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | iotaint 5332 | Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | iota1 5333 | Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | iotanul 5334 | Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | euiotaex 5335 | Theorem 8.23 in [Quine] p. 58, with existential uniqueness condition added. This theorem proves the existence of the ℩ class under our definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | iotass 5336* | Value of iota based on a proposition which holds only for values which are subsets of a given class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (℩𝑥𝜑) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iotaexab 5337 | Existence of the ℩ class when all the possible values are contained in a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ 𝑉 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | iota4 5338 | Theorem *14.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | iota4an 5339 | Theorem *14.23 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → [(℩𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | iota5 5340* | A method for computing iota. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iotabidv 5341* | Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜓) = (℩𝑥𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | iotabii 5342 | Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | iotacl 5343 |
Membership law for descriptions.
This can useful for expanding an unbounded iota-based definition (see df-iota 5318). (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | iota2df 5344 | A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | iota2d 5345* | A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | eliota 5346* | An element of an iota expression. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (℩𝑥𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝐴 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | eliotaeu 5347 | An inhabited iota expression has a unique value. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Nov-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (℩𝑥𝜑) → ∃!𝑥𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | iota2 5348* | The unique element such that 𝜑. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | sniota 5349 | A class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {(℩𝑥𝜑)}) | ||
| Theorem | iotam 5350* | Representation of "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴 which is inhabited (that means that "the unique element such that 𝜑 " exists). (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑤 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 = (℩𝑥𝜑)) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | csbiotag 5351* | Class substitution within a description binder. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(℩𝑦𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
| Syntax | wfun 5352 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a function.) |
| wff Fun 𝐴 | ||
| Syntax | wfn 5353 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with a domain. (Read: 𝐴 is a function on 𝐵.) |
| wff 𝐴 Fn 𝐵 | ||
| Syntax | wf 5354 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 into 𝐵.) |
| wff 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 | ||
| Syntax | wf1 5355 | Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one into 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. |
| wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 | ||
| Syntax | wfo 5356 | Extend the definition of a wff to include onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) The notation ("onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. |
| wff 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 | ||
| Syntax | wf1o 5357 | Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one onto 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. |
| wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 | ||
| Syntax | cfv 5358 | Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. (Read: The value of 𝐹 at 𝐴, or "𝐹 of 𝐴.") |
| class (𝐹‘𝐴) | ||
| Syntax | wiso 5359 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the isomorphism property. (Read: 𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) |
| wff 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) | ||
| Definition | df-fun 5360 | Define predicate that determines if some class 𝐴 is a function. Definition 10.1 of [Quine] p. 65. For example, the expression Fun I is true (funi 5390). This is not the same as defining a specific function's mapping, which is typically done using the format of cmpt 4177 with the maps-to notation (see df-mpt 4179). Contrast this predicate with the predicates to determine if some class is a function with a given domain (df-fn 5361), a function with a given domain and codomain (df-f 5362), a one-to-one function (df-f1 5363), an onto function (df-fo 5364), or a one-to-one onto function (df-f1o 5365). For alternate definitions, see dffun2 5368, dffun4 5369, dffun6 5372, dffun7 5385, dffun8 5386, and dffun9 5387. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∘ ◡𝐴) ⊆ I )) | ||
| Definition | df-fn 5361 | Define a function with domain. Definition 6.15(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 Fn 𝐵 ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Definition | df-f 5362 | Define a function (mapping) with domain and codomain. Definition 6.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
| Definition | df-f1 5363 | Define a one-to-one function. Compare Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹)) | ||
| Definition | df-fo 5364 | Define an onto function. Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("onto" under the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Definition | df-f1o 5365 | Define a one-to-one onto function. Compare Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵)) | ||
| Definition | df-fv 5366* | Define the value of a function, (𝐹‘𝐴), also known as function application. For example, ( I ‘∅) = ∅. Typically, function 𝐹 is defined using maps-to notation (see df-mpt 4179), but this is not required. For example, 𝐹 = {〈2, 6〉, 〈3, 9〉} → (𝐹‘3) = 9. We will later define two-argument functions using ordered pairs as (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐹‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉). This particular definition is quite convenient: it can be applied to any class and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful. The left apostrophe notation originated with Peano and was adopted in Definition *30.01 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 235, Definition 10.11 of [Quine] p. 68, and Definition 6.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. It means the same thing as the more familiar 𝐹(𝐴) notation for a function's value at 𝐴, i.e., "𝐹 of 𝐴," but without context-dependent notational ambiguity. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) Revised to use ℩. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) = (℩𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥) | ||
| Definition | df-isom 5367* | Define the isomorphism predicate. We read this as "𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵". Normally, 𝑅 and 𝑆 are ordering relations on 𝐴 and 𝐵 respectively. Definition 6.28 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 32, whose notation is the same as ours except that 𝑅 and 𝑆 are subscripts. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝐻‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐻‘𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | dffun2 5368* | Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑥𝐴𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | dffun4 5369* | Alternate definition of a function. Definition 6.4(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | dffun5r 5370* | A way of proving a relation is a function, analogous to mo2r 2135. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)) → Fun 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dffun6f 5371* | Definition of function, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | dffun6 5372* | Alternate definition of a function using "at most one" notation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ (Rel 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | funmo 5373* | A function has at most one value for each argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∃*𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | dffun4f 5374* | Definition of function like dffun4 5369 but using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 〈𝑥, 𝑧〉 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝑧))) | ||
| Theorem | funrel 5375 | A function is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 → Rel 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 0nelfun 5376 | A function does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Nov-2021.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝑅 → ∅ ∉ 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | funss 5377 | Subclass theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐵 → Fun 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | funeq 5378 | Equality theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | funeqi 5379 | Equality inference for the function predicate. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | funeqd 5380 | Equality deduction for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nffun 5381 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a function. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Fun 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | sbcfung 5382 | Distribute proper substitution through the function predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | funeu 5383* | There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴𝐹𝐵) → ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | funeu2 5384* | There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ 𝐹) → ∃!𝑦〈𝐴, 𝑦〉 ∈ 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | dffun7 5385* | Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. (Enderton's definition is ambiguous because "there is only one" could mean either "there is at most one" or "there is exactly one". However, dffun8 5386 shows that it does not matter which meaning we pick.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | dffun8 5386* | Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. Compare dffun7 5385. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | dffun9 5387* | Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2007.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃*𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐴 𝑥𝐴𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | funfn 5388 | An equivalence for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 Fn dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | funfnd 5389 | A function is a function over its domain. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 23-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 Fn dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | funi 5390 | The identity relation is a function. Part of Theorem 10.4 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) |
| ⊢ Fun I | ||
| Theorem | nfunv 5391 | The universe is not a function. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 27-Jan-2004.) |
| ⊢ ¬ Fun V | ||
| Theorem | funopg 5392 | A Kuratowski ordered pair is a function only if its components are equal. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | funopab 5393* | A class of ordered pairs is a function when there is at most one second member for each pair. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) |
| ⊢ (Fun {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | funopabeq 5394* | A class of ordered pairs of values is a function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.) |
| ⊢ Fun {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐴} | ||
| Theorem | funopab4 5395* | A class of ordered pairs of values in the form used by df-mpt 4179 is a function. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.) |
| ⊢ Fun {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴)} | ||
| Theorem | funmpt 5396 | A function in maps-to notation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.) |
| ⊢ Fun (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | funmpt2 5397 | Functionality of a class given by a maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ Fun 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | funco 5398 | The composition of two functions is a function. Exercise 29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺) → Fun (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | funres 5399 | A restriction of a function is a function. Compare Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | funresd 5400 | A restriction of a function is a function. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 2-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |