![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > findes | GIF version |
Description: Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
findes.1 | ⊢ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 |
findes.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
findes | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | dfsbcq2 2857 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
2 | sbequ 1775 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
3 | dfsbcq2 2857 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = suc 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
4 | sbequ12r 1709 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)) | |
5 | findes.1 | . 2 ⊢ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 | |
6 | nfv 1473 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ ω | |
7 | nfs1v 1870 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 | |
8 | nfsbc1v 2872 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 | |
9 | 7, 8 | nfim 1516 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) |
10 | 6, 9 | nfim 1516 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ ω → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) |
11 | eleq1 2157 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ ω ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ω)) | |
12 | sbequ12 1708 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
13 | suceq 4253 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝑦) | |
14 | dfsbcq 2856 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ([suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
15 | 13, 14 | syl 14 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) |
16 | 12, 15 | imbi12d 233 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))) |
17 | 11, 16 | imbi12d 233 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))) |
18 | findes.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
19 | 10, 17, 18 | chvar 1694 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) |
20 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 19 | finds 4443 | 1 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 104 = wceq 1296 ∈ wcel 1445 [wsb 1699 [wsbc 2854 ∅c0 3302 suc csuc 4216 ωcom 4433 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-in1 582 ax-in2 583 ax-io 668 ax-5 1388 ax-7 1389 ax-gen 1390 ax-ie1 1434 ax-ie2 1435 ax-8 1447 ax-10 1448 ax-11 1449 ax-i12 1450 ax-bndl 1451 ax-4 1452 ax-13 1456 ax-14 1457 ax-17 1471 ax-i9 1475 ax-ial 1479 ax-i5r 1480 ax-ext 2077 ax-sep 3978 ax-nul 3986 ax-pow 4030 ax-pr 4060 ax-un 4284 ax-iinf 4431 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 929 df-tru 1299 df-nf 1402 df-sb 1700 df-clab 2082 df-cleq 2088 df-clel 2091 df-nfc 2224 df-ral 2375 df-rex 2376 df-v 2635 df-sbc 2855 df-dif 3015 df-un 3017 df-in 3019 df-ss 3026 df-nul 3303 df-pw 3451 df-sn 3472 df-pr 3473 df-uni 3676 df-int 3711 df-suc 4222 df-iom 4434 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |