Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > findes | GIF version |
Description: Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
findes.1 | ⊢ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 |
findes.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
findes | ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | dfsbcq2 2949 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
2 | sbequ 1827 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
3 | dfsbcq2 2949 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = suc 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
4 | sbequ12r 1759 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)) | |
5 | findes.1 | . 2 ⊢ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑 | |
6 | nfv 1515 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ ω | |
7 | nfs1v 1926 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 | |
8 | nfsbc1v 2964 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 | |
9 | 7, 8 | nfim 1559 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) |
10 | 6, 9 | nfim 1559 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ ω → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) |
11 | eleq1 2227 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ ω ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ω)) | |
12 | sbequ12 1758 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
13 | suceq 4374 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → suc 𝑥 = suc 𝑦) | |
14 | dfsbcq 2948 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (suc 𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ([suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
15 | 13, 14 | syl 14 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) |
16 | 12, 15 | imbi12d 233 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))) |
17 | 11, 16 | imbi12d 233 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))) |
18 | findes.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | |
19 | 10, 17, 18 | chvar 1744 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ω → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → [suc 𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) |
20 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 19 | finds 4571 | 1 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ω → 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 104 = wceq 1342 [wsb 1749 ∈ wcel 2135 [wsbc 2946 ∅c0 3404 suc csuc 4337 ωcom 4561 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-in1 604 ax-in2 605 ax-io 699 ax-5 1434 ax-7 1435 ax-gen 1436 ax-ie1 1480 ax-ie2 1481 ax-8 1491 ax-10 1492 ax-11 1493 ax-i12 1494 ax-bndl 1496 ax-4 1497 ax-17 1513 ax-i9 1517 ax-ial 1521 ax-i5r 1522 ax-13 2137 ax-14 2138 ax-ext 2146 ax-sep 4094 ax-nul 4102 ax-pow 4147 ax-pr 4181 ax-un 4405 ax-iinf 4559 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 969 df-tru 1345 df-nf 1448 df-sb 1750 df-clab 2151 df-cleq 2157 df-clel 2160 df-nfc 2295 df-ral 2447 df-rex 2448 df-v 2723 df-sbc 2947 df-dif 3113 df-un 3115 df-in 3117 df-ss 3124 df-nul 3405 df-pw 3555 df-sn 3576 df-pr 3577 df-uni 3784 df-int 3819 df-suc 4343 df-iom 4562 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |