Theorem funcoeqres 5504

Description: Express a constraint on a composition as a constraint on the composand. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funcoeqres	⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = 𝐻) → (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺) = (𝐻 ∘ ◡𝐺))

Proof of Theorem funcoeqres

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funcocnv2 5498	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺) = ( I ↾ ran 𝐺))
2	1	coeq2d 4801	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → (𝐹 ∘ (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘ ( I ↾ ran 𝐺)))
3		coass 5159	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺))
4	3	eqcomi 2191	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∘ (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺)) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺)
5		coires1 5158	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∘ ( I ↾ ran 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺)
6	2, 4, 5	3eqtr3g 2243	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺))
7		coeq1 4796	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = 𝐻 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐻 ∘ ◡𝐺))
8	6, 7	sylan9req 2241	1 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = 𝐻) → (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺) = (𝐻 ∘ ◡𝐺))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1363   I cid 4300  ^◡ccnv 4637  ran crn 4639   ↾ cres 4640   ∘ ccom 4642  Fun wfun 5222

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1457  ax-7 1458  ax-gen 1459  ax-ie1 1503  ax-ie2 1504  ax-8 1514  ax-10 1515  ax-11 1516  ax-i12 1517  ax-bndl 1519  ax-4 1520  ax-17 1536  ax-i9 1540  ax-ial 1544  ax-i5r 1545  ax-14 2161  ax-ext 2169  ax-sep 4133  ax-pow 4186  ax-pr 4221

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 981  df-tru 1366  df-nf 1471  df-sb 1773  df-eu 2039  df-mo 2040  df-clab 2174  df-cleq 2180  df-clel 2183  df-nfc 2318  df-ral 2470  df-rex 2471  df-v 2751  df-un 3145  df-in 3147  df-ss 3154  df-pw 3589  df-sn 3610  df-pr 3611  df-op 3613  df-br 4016  df-opab 4077  df-id 4305  df-xp 4644  df-rel 4645  df-cnv 4646  df-co 4647  df-dm 4648  df-rn 4649  df-res 4650  df-fun 5230

This theorem is referenced by: (None)