Theorem funcoeqres 5445

Description: Express a constraint on a composition as a constraint on the composand. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funcoeqres	⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = 𝐻) → (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺) = (𝐻 ∘ ◡𝐺))

Proof of Theorem funcoeqres

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funcocnv2 5439	. . . 4 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺) = ( I ↾ ran 𝐺))
2	1	coeq2d 4748	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → (𝐹 ∘ (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺)) = (𝐹 ∘ ( I ↾ ran 𝐺)))
3		coass 5104	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺))
4	3	eqcomi 2161	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∘ (𝐺 ∘ ◡𝐺)) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺)
5		coires1 5103	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∘ ( I ↾ ran 𝐺)) = (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺)
6	2, 4, 5	3eqtr3g 2213	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐺 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺))
7		coeq1 4743	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = 𝐻 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∘ ◡𝐺) = (𝐻 ∘ ◡𝐺))
8	6, 7	sylan9req 2211	1 ⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = 𝐻) → (𝐹 ↾ ran 𝐺) = (𝐻 ∘ ◡𝐺))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1335   I cid 4248  ^◡ccnv 4585  ran crn 4587   ↾ cres 4588   ∘ ccom 4590  Fun wfun 5164

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1427  ax-7 1428  ax-gen 1429  ax-ie1 1473  ax-ie2 1474  ax-8 1484  ax-10 1485  ax-11 1486  ax-i12 1487  ax-bndl 1489  ax-4 1490  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-14 2131  ax-ext 2139  ax-sep 4082  ax-pow 4135  ax-pr 4169

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 965  df-tru 1338  df-nf 1441  df-sb 1743  df-eu 2009  df-mo 2010  df-clab 2144  df-cleq 2150  df-clel 2153  df-nfc 2288  df-ral 2440  df-rex 2441  df-v 2714  df-un 3106  df-in 3108  df-ss 3115  df-pw 3545  df-sn 3566  df-pr 3567  df-op 3569  df-br 3966  df-opab 4026  df-id 4253  df-xp 4592  df-rel 4593  df-cnv 4594  df-co 4595  df-dm 4596  df-rn 4597  df-res 4598  df-fun 5172

This theorem is referenced by: (None)