ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  rexiunxp GIF version

Theorem rexiunxp 4872
Description: Write a double restricted quantification as one universal quantifier. In this version of rexxp 4874, 𝐵(𝑦) is not assumed to be constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Feb-2015.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
ralxp.1 (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑𝜓))
Assertion
Ref Expression
rexiunxp (∃𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵 𝜓)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑧   𝜑,𝑦,𝑧   𝜓,𝑥
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑦,𝑧)   𝐵(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem rexiunxp
StepHypRef Expression
1 eliunxp 4869 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)))
21anbi1i 458 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑))
3 19.41vv 1952 . . . . 5 (∃𝑦𝑧((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑))
42, 3bitr4i 187 . . . 4 ((𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑))
54exbii 1653 . . 3 (∃𝑥(𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑))
6 exrot3 1738 . . . 4 (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧𝑥((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑))
7 anass 401 . . . . . . 7 (((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)))
87exbii 1653 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑥((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)))
9 vex 2805 . . . . . . . 8 𝑦 ∈ V
10 vex 2805 . . . . . . . 8 𝑧 ∈ V
119, 10opex 4321 . . . . . . 7 𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ V
12 ralxp.1 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑𝜓))
1312anbi2d 464 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)))
1411, 13ceqsexv 2842 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑥(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
158, 14bitri 184 . . . . 5 (∃𝑥((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
16152exbii 1654 . . . 4 (∃𝑦𝑧𝑥((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
176, 16bitri 184 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
185, 17bitri 184 . 2 (∃𝑥(𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
19 df-rex 2516 . 2 (∃𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
20 r2ex 2552 . 2 (∃𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
2118, 19, 203bitr4i 212 1 (∃𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵 𝜓)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 104  wb 105   = wceq 1397  wex 1540  wcel 2202  wrex 2511  {csn 3669  cop 3672   ciun 3970   × cxp 4723
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-pow 4264  ax-pr 4299
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-v 2804  df-sbc 3032  df-csb 3128  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-iun 3972  df-opab 4151  df-xp 4731  df-rel 4732
This theorem is referenced by:  rexxp  4874
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator