ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  rexiunxp GIF version

Theorem rexiunxp 4833
Description: Write a double restricted quantification as one universal quantifier. In this version of rexxp 4835, 𝐵(𝑦) is not assumed to be constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Feb-2015.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
ralxp.1 (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑𝜓))
Assertion
Ref Expression
rexiunxp (∃𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵 𝜓)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵,𝑧   𝜑,𝑦,𝑧   𝜓,𝑥
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑦,𝑧)   𝐵(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem rexiunxp
StepHypRef Expression
1 eliunxp 4830 . . . . . 6 (𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)))
21anbi1i 458 . . . . 5 ((𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑))
3 19.41vv 1928 . . . . 5 (∃𝑦𝑧((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑦𝑧(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑))
42, 3bitr4i 187 . . . 4 ((𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑))
54exbii 1629 . . 3 (∃𝑥(𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑))
6 exrot3 1714 . . . 4 (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧𝑥((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑))
7 anass 401 . . . . . . 7 (((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)))
87exbii 1629 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑥((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)))
9 vex 2776 . . . . . . . 8 𝑦 ∈ V
10 vex 2776 . . . . . . . 8 𝑧 ∈ V
119, 10opex 4286 . . . . . . 7 𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∈ V
12 ralxp.1 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑𝜓))
1312anbi2d 464 . . . . . . 7 (𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)))
1411, 13ceqsexv 2813 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑥(𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
158, 14bitri 184 . . . . 5 (∃𝑥((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
16152exbii 1630 . . . 4 (∃𝑦𝑧𝑥((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
176, 16bitri 184 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧((𝑥 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ (𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵)) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
185, 17bitri 184 . 2 (∃𝑥(𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
19 df-rex 2491 . 2 (∃𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
20 r2ex 2527 . 2 (∃𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝑧((𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵) ∧ 𝜓))
2118, 19, 203bitr4i 212 1 (∃𝑥 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝐵)𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝐴𝑧𝐵 𝜓)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 104  wb 105   = wceq 1373  wex 1516  wcel 2177  wrex 2486  {csn 3638  cop 3641   ciun 3936   × cxp 4686
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-14 2180  ax-ext 2188  ax-sep 4173  ax-pow 4229  ax-pr 4264
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2193  df-cleq 2199  df-clel 2202  df-nfc 2338  df-ral 2490  df-rex 2491  df-v 2775  df-sbc 3003  df-csb 3098  df-un 3174  df-in 3176  df-ss 3183  df-pw 3623  df-sn 3644  df-pr 3645  df-op 3647  df-iun 3938  df-opab 4117  df-xp 4694  df-rel 4695
This theorem is referenced by:  rexxp  4835
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator