Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rspc2ev | GIF version |
Description: 2-variable restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1999.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspc2v.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
rspc2v.2 | ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rspc2ev | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rspc2v.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
2 | 1 | rspcev 2825 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒) |
3 | 2 | anim2i 340 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒)) |
4 | 3 | 3impb 1188 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒)) |
5 | rspc2v.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
6 | 5 | rexbidv 2465 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒)) |
7 | 6 | rspcev 2825 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑) |
8 | 4, 7 | syl 14 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 103 ↔ wb 104 ∧ w3a 967 = wceq 1342 ∈ wcel 2135 ∃wrex 2443 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 699 ax-5 1434 ax-7 1435 ax-gen 1436 ax-ie1 1480 ax-ie2 1481 ax-8 1491 ax-10 1492 ax-11 1493 ax-i12 1494 ax-bndl 1496 ax-4 1497 ax-17 1513 ax-i9 1517 ax-ial 1521 ax-i5r 1522 ax-ext 2146 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 969 df-tru 1345 df-nf 1448 df-sb 1750 df-clab 2151 df-cleq 2157 df-clel 2160 df-nfc 2295 df-rex 2448 df-v 2723 |
This theorem is referenced by: rspc3ev 2842 opelxp 4628 rspceov 5875 2dom 6762 apreim 8492 addcn2 11237 mulcn2 11239 divalglemnn 11840 bezoutlema 11917 bezoutlemb 11918 pythagtriplem18 12192 pczpre 12208 pcdiv 12213 txuni2 12803 txopn 12812 txdis 12824 txdis1cn 12825 xmettxlem 13056 2irrexpq 13441 2irrexpqap 13443 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |