Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > 2dom | GIF version |
Description: A set that dominates ordinal 2 has at least 2 different members. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
2dom | ⊢ (2o ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df2o2 6410 | . . . 4 ⊢ 2o = {∅, {∅}} | |
2 | 1 | breq1i 3996 | . . 3 ⊢ (2o ≼ 𝐴 ↔ {∅, {∅}} ≼ 𝐴) |
3 | brdomi 6727 | . . 3 ⊢ ({∅, {∅}} ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴) | |
4 | 2, 3 | sylbi 120 | . 2 ⊢ (2o ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴) |
5 | f1f 5403 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → 𝑓:{∅, {∅}}⟶𝐴) | |
6 | 0ex 4116 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V | |
7 | 6 | prid1 3689 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅, {∅}} |
8 | ffvelrn 5629 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓:{∅, {∅}}⟶𝐴 ∧ ∅ ∈ {∅, {∅}}) → (𝑓‘∅) ∈ 𝐴) | |
9 | 5, 7, 8 | sylancl 411 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → (𝑓‘∅) ∈ 𝐴) |
10 | p0ex 4174 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ {∅} ∈ V | |
11 | 10 | prid2 3690 | . . . . 5 ⊢ {∅} ∈ {∅, {∅}} |
12 | ffvelrn 5629 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓:{∅, {∅}}⟶𝐴 ∧ {∅} ∈ {∅, {∅}}) → (𝑓‘{∅}) ∈ 𝐴) | |
13 | 5, 11, 12 | sylancl 411 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → (𝑓‘{∅}) ∈ 𝐴) |
14 | 0nep0 4151 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ≠ {∅} | |
15 | 14 | neii 2342 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ ∅ = {∅} |
16 | f1fveq 5751 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 ∧ (∅ ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∧ {∅} ∈ {∅, {∅}})) → ((𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅}) ↔ ∅ = {∅})) | |
17 | 7, 11, 16 | mpanr12 437 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → ((𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅}) ↔ ∅ = {∅})) |
18 | 15, 17 | mtbiri 670 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → ¬ (𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅})) |
19 | eqeq1 2177 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘∅) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦)) | |
20 | 19 | notbid 662 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘∅) → (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ (𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦)) |
21 | eqeq2 2180 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘{∅}) → ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅}))) | |
22 | 21 | notbid 662 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘{∅}) → (¬ (𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ (𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅}))) |
23 | 20, 22 | rspc2ev 2849 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑓‘∅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘{∅}) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅})) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
24 | 9, 13, 18, 23 | syl3anc 1233 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
25 | 24 | exlimiv 1591 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑓 𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
26 | 4, 25 | syl 14 | 1 ⊢ (2o ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 104 = wceq 1348 ∃wex 1485 ∈ wcel 2141 ∃wrex 2449 ∅c0 3414 {csn 3583 {cpr 3584 class class class wbr 3989 ⟶wf 5194 –1-1→wf1 5195 ‘cfv 5198 2oc2o 6389 ≼ cdom 6717 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-in1 609 ax-in2 610 ax-io 704 ax-5 1440 ax-7 1441 ax-gen 1442 ax-ie1 1486 ax-ie2 1487 ax-8 1497 ax-10 1498 ax-11 1499 ax-i12 1500 ax-bndl 1502 ax-4 1503 ax-17 1519 ax-i9 1523 ax-ial 1527 ax-i5r 1528 ax-13 2143 ax-14 2144 ax-ext 2152 ax-sep 4107 ax-nul 4115 ax-pow 4160 ax-pr 4194 ax-un 4418 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 975 df-tru 1351 df-nf 1454 df-sb 1756 df-eu 2022 df-mo 2023 df-clab 2157 df-cleq 2163 df-clel 2166 df-nfc 2301 df-ne 2341 df-ral 2453 df-rex 2454 df-v 2732 df-sbc 2956 df-dif 3123 df-un 3125 df-in 3127 df-ss 3134 df-nul 3415 df-pw 3568 df-sn 3589 df-pr 3590 df-op 3592 df-uni 3797 df-br 3990 df-opab 4051 df-id 4278 df-suc 4356 df-xp 4617 df-rel 4618 df-cnv 4619 df-co 4620 df-dm 4621 df-rn 4622 df-iota 5160 df-fun 5200 df-fn 5201 df-f 5202 df-f1 5203 df-fv 5206 df-1o 6395 df-2o 6396 df-dom 6720 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |