| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > 2dom | GIF version | ||
| Description: A set that dominates ordinal 2 has at least 2 different members. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 2dom | ⊢ (2o ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df2o2 6641 | . . . 4 ⊢ 2o = {∅, {∅}} | |
| 2 | 1 | breq1i 4100 | . . 3 ⊢ (2o ≼ 𝐴 ↔ {∅, {∅}} ≼ 𝐴) |
| 3 | brdomi 6963 | . . 3 ⊢ ({∅, {∅}} ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | sylbi 121 | . 2 ⊢ (2o ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴) |
| 5 | f1f 5551 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → 𝑓:{∅, {∅}}⟶𝐴) | |
| 6 | 0ex 4221 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V | |
| 7 | 6 | prid1 3781 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅, {∅}} |
| 8 | ffvelcdm 5788 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓:{∅, {∅}}⟶𝐴 ∧ ∅ ∈ {∅, {∅}}) → (𝑓‘∅) ∈ 𝐴) | |
| 9 | 5, 7, 8 | sylancl 413 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → (𝑓‘∅) ∈ 𝐴) |
| 10 | p0ex 4284 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ {∅} ∈ V | |
| 11 | 10 | prid2 3782 | . . . . 5 ⊢ {∅} ∈ {∅, {∅}} |
| 12 | ffvelcdm 5788 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓:{∅, {∅}}⟶𝐴 ∧ {∅} ∈ {∅, {∅}}) → (𝑓‘{∅}) ∈ 𝐴) | |
| 13 | 5, 11, 12 | sylancl 413 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → (𝑓‘{∅}) ∈ 𝐴) |
| 14 | 0nep0 4261 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ≠ {∅} | |
| 15 | 14 | neii 2405 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ ∅ = {∅} |
| 16 | f1fveq 5923 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 ∧ (∅ ∈ {∅, {∅}} ∧ {∅} ∈ {∅, {∅}})) → ((𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅}) ↔ ∅ = {∅})) | |
| 17 | 7, 11, 16 | mpanr12 439 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → ((𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅}) ↔ ∅ = {∅})) |
| 18 | 15, 17 | mtbiri 682 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → ¬ (𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅})) |
| 19 | eqeq1 2238 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘∅) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦)) | |
| 20 | 19 | notbid 673 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓‘∅) → (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ (𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦)) |
| 21 | eqeq2 2241 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘{∅}) → ((𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦 ↔ (𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅}))) | |
| 22 | 21 | notbid 673 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘{∅}) → (¬ (𝑓‘∅) = 𝑦 ↔ ¬ (𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅}))) |
| 23 | 20, 22 | rspc2ev 2926 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑓‘∅) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑓‘{∅}) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝑓‘∅) = (𝑓‘{∅})) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
| 24 | 9, 13, 18, 23 | syl3anc 1274 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
| 25 | 24 | exlimiv 1647 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑓 𝑓:{∅, {∅}}–1-1→𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
| 26 | 4, 25 | syl 14 | 1 ⊢ (2o ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 105 = wceq 1398 ∃wex 1541 ∈ wcel 2202 ∃wrex 2512 ∅c0 3496 {csn 3673 {cpr 3674 class class class wbr 4093 ⟶wf 5329 –1-1→wf1 5330 ‘cfv 5333 2oc2o 6619 ≼ cdom 6951 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 619 ax-in2 620 ax-io 717 ax-5 1496 ax-7 1497 ax-gen 1498 ax-ie1 1542 ax-ie2 1543 ax-8 1553 ax-10 1554 ax-11 1555 ax-i12 1556 ax-bndl 1558 ax-4 1559 ax-17 1575 ax-i9 1579 ax-ial 1583 ax-i5r 1584 ax-13 2204 ax-14 2205 ax-ext 2213 ax-sep 4212 ax-nul 4220 ax-pow 4270 ax-pr 4305 ax-un 4536 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-3an 1007 df-tru 1401 df-nf 1510 df-sb 1811 df-eu 2082 df-mo 2083 df-clab 2218 df-cleq 2224 df-clel 2227 df-nfc 2364 df-ne 2404 df-ral 2516 df-rex 2517 df-v 2805 df-sbc 3033 df-dif 3203 df-un 3205 df-in 3207 df-ss 3214 df-nul 3497 df-pw 3658 df-sn 3679 df-pr 3680 df-op 3682 df-uni 3899 df-br 4094 df-opab 4156 df-id 4396 df-suc 4474 df-xp 4737 df-rel 4738 df-cnv 4739 df-co 4740 df-dm 4741 df-rn 4742 df-iota 5293 df-fun 5335 df-fn 5336 df-f 5337 df-f1 5338 df-fv 5341 df-1o 6625 df-2o 6626 df-dom 6954 |
| This theorem is referenced by: fundm2domnop0 11158 isnzr2 14262 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |