Theorem refrelsredund4 38964

Description: The naive version of the class of reflexive relations is redundant with respect to the class of reflexive relations (see dfrefrels2 38841) if the relations are symmetric as well. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
refrelsredund4	⊢ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} Redund ⟨ RefRels , ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )⟩

Proof of Theorem refrelsredund4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inxpssres 5649	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟)
2		sstr2 3942	. . . . 5 ⊢ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) → (( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 → ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 → ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟)
4	3	ssrabi 38500	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ⊆ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟}
5		dfrefrels2 38841	. . 3 ⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟}
6	4, 5	sseqtrri 3985	. 2 ⊢ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ⊆ RefRels
7		in32 4184	. . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ SymRels ) ∩ RefRels ) = (({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ RefRels ) ∩ SymRels )
8		inrab 4270	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟}) = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟)}
9		dfsymrels2 38873	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ SymRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟}
10	9	ineq2i 4171	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ SymRels ) = ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟})
11		refsymrels2 38897	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟)}
12	8, 10, 11	3eqtr4i 2770	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ SymRels ) = ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )
13	12	ineq1i 4170	. . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ SymRels ) ∩ RefRels ) = (( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) ∩ RefRels )
14		inass 4182	. . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ RefRels ) ∩ SymRels ) = ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ))
15	7, 13, 14	3eqtr3ri 2769	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )) = (( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) ∩ RefRels )
16		in32 4184	. . 3 ⊢ (( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) ∩ RefRels ) = (( RefRels ∩ RefRels ) ∩ SymRels )
17		inass 4182	. . 3 ⊢ (( RefRels ∩ RefRels ) ∩ SymRels ) = ( RefRels ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ))
18	15, 16, 17	3eqtri 2764	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )) = ( RefRels ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ))
19		df-redund 38956	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} Redund ⟨ RefRels , ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )⟩ ↔ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ⊆ RefRels ∧ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )) = ( RefRels ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ))))
20	6, 18, 19	mpbir2an 712	1 ⊢ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} Redund ⟨ RefRels , ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )⟩

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542  {crab 3401   ∩ cin 3902   ⊆ wss 3903   I cid 5526   × cxp 5630  ^◡ccnv 5631  dom cdm 5632  ran crn 5633   ↾ cres 5634   Rels crels 38433   RefRels crefrels 38436   SymRels csymrels 38442   Redund wredund 38452

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5243  ax-pr 5379

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-id 5527  df-xp 5638  df-rel 5639  df-cnv 5640  df-dm 5642  df-rn 5643  df-res 5644  df-rels 38688  df-ssr 38826  df-refs 38838  df-refrels 38839  df-syms 38870  df-symrels 38871  df-redund 38956

This theorem is referenced by:  refrelsredund2  38965