Theorem refrelsredund4 39083

Description: The naive version of the class of reflexive relations is redundant with respect to the class of reflexive relations (see dfrefrels2 38960) if the relations are symmetric as well. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Oct-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
refrelsredund4	⊢ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} Redund ⟨ RefRels , ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )⟩

Proof of Theorem refrelsredund4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inxpssres 5635	. . . . 5 ⊢ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟)
2		sstr2 3922	. . . . 5 ⊢ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) → (( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 → ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 → ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟)
4	3	ssrabi 38619	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ⊆ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟}
5		dfrefrels2 38960	. . 3 ⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟}
6	4, 5	sseqtrri 3964	. 2 ⊢ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ⊆ RefRels
7		in32 4158	. . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ SymRels ) ∩ RefRels ) = (({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ RefRels ) ∩ SymRels )
8		inrab 4244	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟}) = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟)}
9		dfsymrels2 38992	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ SymRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟}
10	9	ineq2i 4146	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ SymRels ) = ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟})
11		refsymrels2 39016	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ (( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟 ∧ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟)}
12	8, 10, 11	3eqtr4i 2772	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ SymRels ) = ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )
13	12	ineq1i 4145	. . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ SymRels ) ∩ RefRels ) = (( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) ∩ RefRels )
14		inass 4156	. . . 4 ⊢ (({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ RefRels ) ∩ SymRels ) = ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ))
15	7, 13, 14	3eqtr3ri 2771	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )) = (( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) ∩ RefRels )
16		in32 4158	. . 3 ⊢ (( RefRels ∩ SymRels ) ∩ RefRels ) = (( RefRels ∩ RefRels ) ∩ SymRels )
17		inass 4156	. . 3 ⊢ (( RefRels ∩ RefRels ) ∩ SymRels ) = ( RefRels ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ))
18	15, 16, 17	3eqtri 2766	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )) = ( RefRels ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ))
19		df-redund 39075	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} Redund ⟨ RefRels , ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )⟩ ↔ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ⊆ RefRels ∧ ({𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )) = ( RefRels ∩ ( RefRels ∩ SymRels ))))
20	6, 18, 19	mpbir2an 717	1 ⊢ {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ↾ dom 𝑟) ⊆ 𝑟} Redund ⟨ RefRels , ( RefRels ∩ SymRels )⟩

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1547  {crab 3391   ∩ cin 3882   ⊆ wss 3883   I cid 5512   × cxp 5616  ^◡ccnv 5617  dom cdm 5618  ran crn 5619   ↾ cres 5620   Rels crels 38552   RefRels crefrels 38555   SymRels csymrels 38561   Redund wredund 38571

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5218  ax-pr 5362

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3064  df-rab 3392  df-v 3433  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4262  df-if 4455  df-pw 4531  df-sn 4556  df-pr 4558  df-op 4562  df-br 5073  df-opab 5135  df-id 5513  df-xp 5624  df-rel 5625  df-cnv 5626  df-dm 5628  df-rn 5629  df-res 5630  df-rels 38807  df-ssr 38945  df-refs 38957  df-refrels 38958  df-syms 38989  df-symrels 38990  df-redund 39075

This theorem is referenced by:  refrelsredund2  39084