Theorem funfv2f 6929

Description: The value of a function. Version of funfv2 6928 using a bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
funfv2f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
funfv2f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funfv2f	⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Proof of Theorem funfv2f

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfv2 6928	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤})
2		funfv2f.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		funfv2f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹
4		nfcv 2898	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤
5	2, 3, 4	nfbr 5132	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑤
6		nfv 1916	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝐴𝐹𝑦
7		breq2 5089	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝐴𝐹𝑤 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	cbvabw 2807	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
9	8	unieqi 4862	. 2 ⊢ ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
10	1, 9	eqtrdi 2787	1 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1542  {cab 2714  Ⅎwnfc 2883  ∪ cuni 4850   class class class wbr 5085  Fun wfun 6492  ‘cfv 6498

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5231  ax-nul 5241  ax-pr 5375

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3390  df-v 3431  df-dif 3892  df-un 3894  df-in 3896  df-ss 3906  df-nul 4274  df-if 4467  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4851  df-br 5086  df-opab 5148  df-id 5526  df-xp 5637  df-rel 5638  df-cnv 5639  df-co 5640  df-dm 5641  df-rn 5642  df-res 5643  df-ima 5644  df-iota 6454  df-fun 6500  df-fn 6501  df-fv 6506

This theorem is referenced by: (None)