Theorem funfv2f 6980

Description: The value of a function. Version of funfv2 6979 using a bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
funfv2f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
funfv2f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funfv2f	⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Proof of Theorem funfv2f

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfv2 6979	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤})
2		funfv2f.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		funfv2f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹
4		nfcv 2902	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤
5	2, 3, 4	nfbr 5195	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑤
6		nfv 1916	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝐴𝐹𝑦
7		breq2 5152	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝐴𝐹𝑤 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	cbvabw 2805	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
9	8	unieqi 4921	. 2 ⊢ ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
10	1, 9	eqtrdi 2787	1 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1540  {cab 2708  Ⅎwnfc 2882  ∪ cuni 4908   class class class wbr 5148  Fun wfun 6537  ‘cfv 6543

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5427

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3432  df-v 3475  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-id 5574  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-rn 5687  df-res 5688  df-ima 5689  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-fv 6551

This theorem is referenced by: (None)