Theorem funfv2f 6911

Description: The value of a function. Version of funfv2 6910 using a bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2006.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
funfv2f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
funfv2f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹

Assertion

Ref	Expression
funfv2f	⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Proof of Theorem funfv2f

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		funfv2 6910	. 2 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤})
2		funfv2f.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴
3		funfv2f.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐹
4		nfcv 2894	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝑤
5	2, 3, 4	nfbr 5138	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑤
6		nfv 1915	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝐴𝐹𝑦
7		breq2 5095	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑦 → (𝐴𝐹𝑤 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
8	5, 6, 7	cbvabw 2802	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
9	8	unieqi 4871	. 2 ⊢ ∪ {𝑤 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑤} = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦}
10	1, 9	eqtrdi 2782	1 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑦})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1541  {cab 2709  Ⅎwnfc 2879  ∪ cuni 4859   class class class wbr 5091  Fun wfun 6475  ‘cfv 6481

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2160  ax-12 2180  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5234  ax-nul 5244  ax-pr 5370

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2929  df-ral 3048  df-rex 3057  df-rab 3396  df-v 3438  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4284  df-if 4476  df-sn 4577  df-pr 4579  df-op 4583  df-uni 4860  df-br 5092  df-opab 5154  df-id 5511  df-xp 5622  df-rel 5623  df-cnv 5624  df-co 5625  df-dm 5626  df-rn 5627  df-res 5628  df-ima 5629  df-iota 6437  df-fun 6483  df-fn 6484  df-fv 6489

This theorem is referenced by: (None)