Theorem ismaxidl 39166

Description: Obsolete theorem, use ismxidl 34057 instead. The predicate "is a maximal ideal". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ismaxidl.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
ismaxidl.2	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ismaxidl	⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdl‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑅,𝑗   𝑗,𝑀

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐺(𝑗)   𝑋(𝑗)

Proof of Theorem ismaxidl

Dummy variable 𝑖 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ismaxidl.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
2		ismaxidl.2	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
3	1, 2	maxidlval 39165	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (MaxIdl‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))})
4	3	eleq2d 2850	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdl‘𝑅) ↔ 𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))}))
5		neeq1 3021	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋))
6		sseq1 3938	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 ↔ 𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗))
7		eqeq2 2775	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ↔ 𝑗 = 𝑀))
8	7	orbi1d 930	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋) ↔ (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))
9	6, 8	imbi12d 347	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)) ↔ (𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋))))
10	9	ralbidv 3189	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋))))
11	5, 10	anbi12d 644	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋))) ↔ (𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))))
12	11	elrab 3648	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))))
13		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋))) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))))
14	12, 13	bitr4i 281	. 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋))))
15	4, 14	bitrdi 290	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdl‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  ∀wral 3080  {crab 3416   ⊆ wss 3900  ran crn 5656  ‘cfv 6558  1^st c1st 8023  RingOpscrngo 39020  Idlcidl 39133  MaxIdlcmaxidl 39135

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5395

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fv 6566  df-maxidl 39138

This theorem is used by:  maxidlidl  39167  maxidlnr  39168  maxidlmax  39169