Theorem ismaxidl 38942

Description: Obsolete theorem, use ismxidl 33969 instead. The predicate "is a maximal ideal". (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ismaxidl.1	⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
ismaxidl.2	⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ismaxidl	⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdl‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑅,𝑗   𝑗,𝑀

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐺(𝑗)   𝑋(𝑗)

Proof of Theorem ismaxidl

Dummy variable 𝑖 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ismaxidl.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐺 = (1st ‘𝑅)
2		ismaxidl.2	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑋 = ran 𝐺
3	1, 2	maxidlval 38941	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (MaxIdl‘𝑅) = {𝑖 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))})
4	3	eleq2d 2847	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdl‘𝑅) ↔ 𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))}))
5		neeq1 3018	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋))
6		sseq1 3956	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 ↔ 𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗))
7		eqeq2 2773	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ↔ 𝑗 = 𝑀))
8	7	orbi1d 930	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋) ↔ (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))
9	6, 8	imbi12d 347	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)) ↔ (𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋))))
10	9	ralbidv 3186	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → (∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋))))
11	5, 10	anbi12d 644	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑖 = 𝑀 → ((𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋))) ↔ (𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))))
12	11	elrab 3645	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))))
13		3anass 1111	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋))) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ (𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))))
14	12, 13	bitr4i 281	. 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ {𝑖 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∣ (𝑖 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑖 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑖 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))} ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋))))
15	4, 14	bitrdi 290	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RingOps → (𝑀 ∈ (MaxIdl‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑀 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅) ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ (Idl‘𝑅)(𝑀 ⊆ 𝑗 → (𝑗 = 𝑀 ∨ 𝑗 = 𝑋)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2956  ∀wral 3077  {crab 3413   ⊆ wss 3899  ran crn 5652  ‘cfv 6531  1^st c1st 7988  RingOpscrngo 38796  Idlcidl 38909  MaxIdlcmaxidl 38911

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fv 6539  df-maxidl 38914

This theorem is used by:  maxidlidl  38943  maxidlnr  38944  maxidlmax  38945