![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > nfun | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the union of classes. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nfun.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
nfun.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nfun | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-un 3954 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} | |
2 | nfun.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
3 | 2 | nfcri 2891 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 |
4 | nfun.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
5 | 4 | nfcri 2891 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 |
6 | 3, 5 | nfor 1908 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) |
7 | 6 | nfab 2910 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)} |
8 | 1, 7 | nfcxfr 2902 | 1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ∨ wo 846 ∈ wcel 2107 {cab 2710 Ⅎwnfc 2884 ∪ cun 3947 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2109 ax-9 2117 ax-10 2138 ax-11 2155 ax-12 2172 ax-ext 2704 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-or 847 df-ex 1783 df-nf 1787 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2711 df-cleq 2725 df-clel 2811 df-nfc 2886 df-un 3954 |
This theorem is referenced by: nfsymdif 4247 csbun 4439 iunxdif3 5099 nfsuc 6437 nfsup 9446 nfdju 9902 iunconn 22932 nosupbnd2 27219 noinfbnd2 27234 ordtconnlem1 32904 esumsplit 33051 measvuni 33212 bnj958 33951 bnj1000 33952 bnj1408 34047 bnj1446 34056 bnj1447 34057 bnj1448 34058 bnj1466 34064 bnj1467 34065 rdgssun 36259 exrecfnlem 36260 poimirlem16 36504 poimirlem19 36507 pimxrneun 44199 pimrecltpos 45424 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |