prproropf1olem0 - Mathbox for Alexander van der Vekens

	Mathbox for Alexander van der Vekens		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > prproropf1olem0		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem prproropf1olem0 48251

Description: Lemma 0 for prproropf1o 48256. Remark: 𝑂, the set of ordered ordered pairs, i.e., ordered pairs in which the first component is less than the second component, can alternatively be written as 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ (1^st ‘𝑥)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑥)} or even as 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩ ∈ 𝑅}, by which the relationship between ordered and unordered pair is immediately visible. (Contributed by AV, 18-Mar-2023.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
prproropf1o.o	⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
prproropf1olem0	⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑂 ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))

**Proof of Theorem prproropf1olem0**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prproropf1o.o	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉))
2	1	eleq2i 2855	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑂 ↔ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉)))
3		elin 3921	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉)) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉)))
4		ancom 465	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉))) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑅))
5		eleq1 2851	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
6		df-br 5110	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊) ↔ ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
7	5, 6	bitr4di 292	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
8	7	adantr 485	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
9	8	pm5.32i 584	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑅) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
10	4, 9	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉))) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
11		elxp6 8016	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉) ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)))
12	11	anbi2i 634	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉)) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉))))
13		df-3an 1105	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
14	10, 12, 13	3bitr4i 306	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉)) ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
15	2, 3, 14	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑂 ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 400 ∧ w3a 1103 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2143 ∩ cin 3904 ⟨cop 4595 class class class wbr 5109 × cxp 5659 ‘cfv 6536 1^st c1st 7980 2^nd c2nd 7981

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1825 ax-4 1839 ax-5 1940 ax-6 1997 ax-7 2038 ax-8 2145 ax-9 2153 ax-10 2176 ax-11 2192 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5257 ax-nul 5269 ax-pr 5404 ax-un 7732

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1810 df-nf 1814 df-sb 2097 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2838 df-nfc 2912 df-ne 2959 df-ral 3080 df-rex 3090 df-rab 3417 df-v 3457 df-dif 3908 df-un 3910 df-in 3912 df-ss 3922 df-nul 4287 df-if 4488 df-sn 4590 df-pr 4592 df-op 4596 df-uni 4873 df-br 5110 df-opab 5174 df-mpt 5193 df-id 5556 df-xp 5667 df-rel 5668 df-cnv 5669 df-co 5670 df-dm 5671 df-rn 5672 df-iota 6492 df-fun 6538 df-fv 6544 df-1st 7982 df-2nd 7983

This theorem is referenced by: prproropf1olem1 48252 prproropf1olem3 48254 prproropf1o 48256

W3C validator