prproropf1olem0 - Mathbox for Alexander van der Vekens

	Mathbox for Alexander van der Vekens		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > prproropf1olem0		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem prproropf1olem0 43064

Description: Lemma 0 for prproropf1o 43069. Remark: 𝑂, the set of ordered ordered pairs, i.e., ordered pairs in which the first component is less than the second component, can alternatively be written as 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ (1^st ‘𝑥)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑥)} or even as 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩ ∈ 𝑅}, by which the relationship between ordered and unordered pair is immediately visible. (Contributed by AV, 18-Mar-2023.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
prproropf1o.o	⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
prproropf1olem0	⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑂 ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))

**Proof of Theorem prproropf1olem0**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prproropf1o.o	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉))
2	1	eleq2i 2850	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑂 ↔ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉)))
3		elin 4051	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉)) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉)))
4		ancom 453	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉))) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑅))
5		eleq1 2846	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
6		df-br 4926	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊) ↔ ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
7	5, 6	syl6bbr 281	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
8	7	adantr 473	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
9	8	pm5.32i 567	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑅) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
10	4, 9	bitri 267	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉))) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
11		elxp6 7533	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉) ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)))
12	11	anbi2i 614	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉)) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉))))
13		df-3an 1071	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
14	10, 12, 13	3bitr4i 295	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉)) ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
15	2, 3, 14	3bitri 289	1 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑂 ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ↔ wb 198 ∧ wa 387 ∧ w3a 1069 = wceq 1508 ∈ wcel 2051 ∩ cin 3821 ⟨cop 4441 class class class wbr 4925 × cxp 5401 ‘cfv 6185 1^st c1st 7497 2^nd c2nd 7498

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1759 ax-4 1773 ax-5 1870 ax-6 1929 ax-7 1966 ax-8 2053 ax-9 2060 ax-10 2080 ax-11 2094 ax-12 2107 ax-13 2302 ax-ext 2743 ax-sep 5056 ax-nul 5063 ax-pow 5115 ax-pr 5182 ax-un 7277

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 199 df-an 388 df-or 835 df-3an 1071 df-tru 1511 df-ex 1744 df-nf 1748 df-sb 2017 df-mo 2548 df-eu 2585 df-clab 2752 df-cleq 2764 df-clel 2839 df-nfc 2911 df-ral 3086 df-rex 3087 df-rab 3090 df-v 3410 df-sbc 3675 df-dif 3825 df-un 3827 df-in 3829 df-ss 3836 df-nul 4173 df-if 4345 df-sn 4436 df-pr 4438 df-op 4442 df-uni 4709 df-br 4926 df-opab 4988 df-mpt 5005 df-id 5308 df-xp 5409 df-rel 5410 df-cnv 5411 df-co 5412 df-dm 5413 df-rn 5414 df-iota 6149 df-fun 6187 df-fv 6193 df-1st 7499 df-2nd 7500

This theorem is referenced by: prproropf1olem1 43065 prproropf1olem3 43067 prproropf1o 43069

W3C validator