prproropf1olem0 - Mathbox for Alexander van der Vekens

	Mathbox for Alexander van der Vekens		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > prproropf1olem0		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem prproropf1olem0 48108

Description: Lemma 0 for prproropf1o 48113. Remark: 𝑂, the set of ordered ordered pairs, i.e., ordered pairs in which the first component is less than the second component, can alternatively be written as 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ (1^st ‘𝑥)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑥)} or even as 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩ ∈ 𝑅}, by which the relationship between ordered and unordered pair is immediately visible. (Contributed by AV, 18-Mar-2023.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
prproropf1o.o	⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
prproropf1olem0	⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑂 ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))

**Proof of Theorem prproropf1olem0**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prproropf1o.o	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉))
2	1	eleq2i 2854	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑂 ↔ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉)))
3		elin 3920	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉)) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉)))
4		ancom 464	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉))) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑅))
5		eleq1 2850	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
6		df-br 5101	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊) ↔ ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
7	5, 6	bitr4di 291	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
8	7	adantr 484	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
9	8	pm5.32i 582	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑅) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
10	4, 9	bitri 277	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉))) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
11		elxp6 8004	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉) ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)))
12	11	anbi2i 632	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉)) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉))))
13		df-3an 1100	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
14	10, 12, 13	3bitr4i 305	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉)) ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
15	2, 3, 14	3bitri 299	1 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑂 ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ↔ wb 208 ∧ wa 399 ∧ w3a 1098 = wceq 1560 ∈ wcel 2142 ∩ cin 3903 ⟨cop 4588 class class class wbr 5100 × cxp 5645 ‘cfv 6521 1^st c1st 7968 2^nd c2nd 7969

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1815 ax-4 1829 ax-5 1930 ax-6 1987 ax-7 2028 ax-8 2144 ax-9 2152 ax-10 2175 ax-11 2191 ax-12 2212 ax-ext 2734 ax-sep 5246 ax-nul 5256 ax-pr 5390 ax-un 7718

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-3an 1100 df-tru 1563 df-fal 1573 df-ex 1800 df-nf 1804 df-sb 2091 df-mo 2566 df-eu 2596 df-clab 2741 df-cleq 2754 df-clel 2837 df-nfc 2911 df-ne 2958 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-rab 3415 df-v 3456 df-dif 3907 df-un 3909 df-in 3911 df-ss 3921 df-nul 4286 df-if 4481 df-sn 4583 df-pr 4585 df-op 4589 df-uni 4866 df-br 5101 df-opab 5163 df-mpt 5182 df-id 5542 df-xp 5653 df-rel 5654 df-cnv 5655 df-co 5656 df-dm 5657 df-rn 5658 df-iota 6477 df-fun 6523 df-fv 6529 df-1st 7970 df-2nd 7971

This theorem is referenced by: prproropf1olem1 48109 prproropf1olem3 48111 prproropf1o 48113

W3C validator