prproropf1olem0 - Mathbox for Alexander van der Vekens

	Mathbox for Alexander van der Vekens		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > Mathboxes > prproropf1olem0		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem prproropf1olem0 47977

Description: Lemma 0 for prproropf1o 47982. Remark: 𝑂, the set of ordered ordered pairs, i.e., ordered pairs in which the first component is less than the second component, can alternatively be written as 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ (1^st ‘𝑥)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑥)} or even as 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ⟨(1^st ‘𝑥), (2^nd ‘𝑥)⟩ ∈ 𝑅}, by which the relationship between ordered and unordered pair is immediately visible. (Contributed by AV, 18-Mar-2023.)

**Hypothesis**
Ref	Expression
prproropf1o.o	⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
prproropf1olem0	⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑂 ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))

**Proof of Theorem prproropf1olem0**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prproropf1o.o	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉))
2	1	eleq2i 2829	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑂 ↔ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉)))
3		elin 3906	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑉 × 𝑉)) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉)))
4		ancom 460	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉))) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑅))
5		eleq1 2825	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∈ 𝑅))
6		df-br 5087	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊) ↔ ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∈ 𝑅)
7	5, 6	bitr4di 289	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
8	7	adantr 480	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ↔ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
9	8	pm5.32i 574	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑅) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
10	4, 9	bitri 275	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉))) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
11		elxp6 7970	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉) ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)))
12	11	anbi2i 624	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉)) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉))))
13		df-3an 1089	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)) ↔ ((𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉)) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
14	10, 12, 13	3bitr4i 303	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑉)) ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))
15	2, 3, 14	3bitri 297	1 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑂 ↔ (𝑊 = ⟨(1^st ‘𝑊), (2^nd ‘𝑊)⟩ ∧ ((1^st ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (2^nd ‘𝑊) ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (1^st ‘𝑊)𝑅(2^nd ‘𝑊)))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 ∧ w3a 1087 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2114 ∩ cin 3889 ⟨cop 4574 class class class wbr 5086 × cxp 5623 ‘cfv 6493 1^st c1st 7934 2^nd c2nd 7935

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2147 ax-11 2163 ax-12 2185 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5232 ax-nul 5242 ax-pr 5371 ax-un 7683

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2069 df-mo 2540 df-eu 2570 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2812 df-nfc 2886 df-ne 2934 df-ral 3053 df-rex 3063 df-rab 3391 df-v 3432 df-dif 3893 df-un 3895 df-in 3897 df-ss 3907 df-nul 4275 df-if 4468 df-sn 4569 df-pr 4571 df-op 4575 df-uni 4852 df-br 5087 df-opab 5149 df-mpt 5168 df-id 5520 df-xp 5631 df-rel 5632 df-cnv 5633 df-co 5634 df-dm 5635 df-rn 5636 df-iota 6449 df-fun 6495 df-fv 6501 df-1st 7936 df-2nd 7937

This theorem is referenced by: prproropf1olem1 47978 prproropf1olem3 47980 prproropf1o 47982

W3C validator