Theorem setrec1lem4 9975

Description: Lemma for setrec1 9976. If 𝑋 is recursively generated by 𝐹, then so is 𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴).

In the proof of setrec1 9976, the following is substituted for this theorem's 𝜑: (𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑧(∀𝑤 (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑦 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧)})) Therefore, we cannot declare 𝑧 to be a distinct variable from 𝜑, since we need it to appear as a bound variable in 𝜑. This theorem can be proven without the hypothesis Ⅎ𝑧𝜑, but the proof would be harder to read because theorems in deduction form would be interrupted by theorems like eximi 1867, making the antecedent of each line something more complicated than 𝜑. The proof of setrec1lem2 9971 could similarly be made easier to read by adding the hypothesis Ⅎ𝑧𝜑, but I had already finished the proof and decided to leave it as is. (Contributed by Emmett Weisz, 26-Nov-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
setrec1lem4.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
setrec1lem4.2	⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑦 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧)}
setrec1lem4.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
setrec1lem4.4	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋)
setrec1lem4.5	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑌)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
setrec1lem4	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) ∈ 𝑌)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑦,𝑤,𝑧,𝐴   𝑤,𝐹,𝑦,𝑧   𝑤,𝑋,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤)   𝑌(𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤)

Proof of Theorem setrec1lem4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		setrec1lem4.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
2		id 23	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → 𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋)
3		ssun1 4176	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑋 ⊆ (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴))
4	2, 3	sstrdi 3920	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → 𝑤 ⊆ (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)))
5	4	imim1i 64	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 ⊆ (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)))
6	5	alimi 1843	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → ∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)))
7		setrec1lem4.5	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑌)
8		setrec1lem4.2	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑌 = {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑦 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧)}
9	8, 7	setrec1lem1 9970	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑌 ↔ ∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧)))
10	7, 9	mpbid 235	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧))
11		sp 2219	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧) → (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧))
12	10, 11	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧))
13		setrec1lem4.4	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋)
14		sstr2 3915	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
15	13, 14	syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
16	12, 15	syld 48	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
17		setrec1lem4.3	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
18		sseq1 3933	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋))
19		sseq1 3933	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
20		fveq2 6886	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
21	20	sseq1d 3939	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → ((𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑧))
22	19, 21	imbi12d 347	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → ((𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑧)))
23	18, 22	imbi12d 347	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐴 → ((𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑧))))
24	17, 23	spcdvw 9974	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑧))))
25	13, 24	mpid 45	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑧)))
26	16, 25	mpdd 44	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑧))
27	12, 26	jcad 522	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ 𝑋 → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑧)))
28	6, 27	syl5 35	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑧)))
29		unss 4188	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝑧) ↔ (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) ⊆ 𝑧)
30	28, 29	imbitrdi 254	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) ⊆ 𝑧))
31	1, 30	alrimi 2249	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) ⊆ 𝑧))
32		fvex 6899	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ V
33		unexg 7761	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ V) → (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) ∈ V)
34	7, 32, 33	sylancl 598	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) ∈ V)
35	8, 34	setrec1lem1 9970	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) ∈ 𝑌 ↔ ∀𝑧(∀𝑤(𝑤 ⊆ (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) → (𝑤 ⊆ 𝑧 → (𝐹‘𝑤) ⊆ 𝑧)) → (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) ⊆ 𝑧)))
36	31, 35	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∪ (𝐹‘𝐴)) ∈ 𝑌)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1567   = wceq 1569  Ⅎwnf 1815   ∈ wcel 2144  {cab 2738  Vcvv 3450   ⊆ wss 3895   ∪ cun 4149  ‘cfv 6539

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7752

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-iota 6494  df-fv 6547

This theorem is used by:  setrec1  9976