P. 479 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 47801-47900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	reuabaiotaiota 47801*	The iota and the alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 are equal iff there is a unique satisfying value of {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	reuaiotaiota 47802	The iota and the alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 are equal iff there is a unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	aiotaexb 47803	The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is a set iff there is a unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	aiotavb 47804	The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is the universe iff there is no unique value 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = V)
Theorem	aiotaint 47805	This is to df-aiota 47799 what iotauni 6515 is to df-iota 6494 (it uses intersection like df-aiota 47799, similar to iotauni 6515 using union like df-iota 6494; we could also prove an analogous result using union here too, in the same way that we have iotaint 6516). (Contributed by BJ, 31-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩'𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	dfaiota3 47806	Alternate definition of ℩', using the if operator: this is to df-aiota 47799 what dfiota4 6530 is to df-iota 6494. It is simpler than df-aiota 47799 and uses no dummy variables, so it would be the preferred definition if ℩' becomes the description binder used in set.mm. (Contributed by BJ, 31-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥𝜑) = if(∃!𝑥𝜑, ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}, V)
Theorem	iotan0aiotaex 47807	If the iota over a wff 𝜑 is not empty, the alternate iota over 𝜑 is a set. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ((℩𝑥𝜑) ≠ ∅ → (℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	aiotaexaiotaiota 47808	The alternate iota over a wff 𝜑 is a set iff the iota and the alternate iota over 𝜑 are equal. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ((℩'𝑥𝜑) ∈ V ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩'𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	aiotaval 47809*	Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of (alternate) iota. (Contributed by AV, 24-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩'𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)
Theorem	aiota0def 47810*	Example for a defined alternate iota being the empty set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 is a wff satisfied by a unique value 𝑥, namely 𝑥 = ∅ (the empty set is the one and only set which is a subset of every set). This corresponds to iota0def 47752. (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥∀𝑦 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) = ∅
Theorem	aiota0ndef 47811*	Example for an undefined alternate iota being no set, i.e., ∀𝑦𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 is a wff not satisfied by a (unique) value 𝑥 (there is no set, and therefore certainly no unique set, which contains every set). This is different from iota0ndef 47753, where the iota still is a set (the empty set). (Contributed by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (℩'𝑥∀𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ∉ V
21.49.3  Double restricted existential uniqueness
21.49.3.1  Restricted quantification (extension)
Theorem	r19.32 47812	Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers, analogous to r19.32v 3198. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rexsb 47813*	An equivalent expression for restricted existence, analogous to exsb 2391. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	rexrsb 47814*	An equivalent expression for restricted existence, analogous to exsb 2391. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))
Theorem	2rexsb 47815*	An equivalent expression for double restricted existence, analogous to rexsb 47813. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
Theorem	2rexrsb 47816*	An equivalent expression for double restricted existence, analogous to 2exsb 2392. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → 𝜑))
Theorem	cbvral2 47817*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution, analogous to cbvral2v 3357. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	cbvrex2 47818*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution, analogous to cbvrex2v 3358. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralndv1 47819	Example for a theorem about a restricted universal quantification in which the restricting class depends on (actually is) the bound variable: All sets containing themselves contain the universal class. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑥 V ∈ 𝑥
Theorem	ralndv2 47820	Second example for a theorem about a restricted universal quantification in which the restricting class depends on the bound variable: all subsets of a set are sets. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥𝑥 ∈ V
21.49.3.2  Restricted uniqueness and "at most one" quantification
Theorem	reuf1odnf 47821*	There is exactly one element in each of two isomorphic sets. Variant of reuf1od 47822 with no distinct variable condition for 𝜒. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	reuf1od 47822*	There is exactly one element in each of two isomorphic sets. (Contributed by AV, 19-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐶–1-1-onto→𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝑦)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝜒))
Theorem	euoreqb 47823*	There is a set which is equal to one of two other sets iff the other sets are equal. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jan-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
21.49.3.3  Analogs to Existential uniqueness (double quantification)
Theorem	2reu3 47824*	Double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu3 2681. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃*𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)))
Theorem	2reu7 47825*	Two equivalent expressions for double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu7 2685. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ∧ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
Theorem	2reu8 47826*	Two equivalent expressions for double restricted existential uniqueness, analogous to 2eu8 2686. Curiously, we can put ∃! on either of the internal conjuncts but not both. We can also commute ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 using 2reu7 47825. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑))
21.49.3.4  Additional theorems for double restricted existential uniqueness
Theorem	2reu8i 47827*	Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification, see also 2reu8 47826. The involved wffs depend on the setvar variables as follows: ph(x,y), ta(v,y), ch(x,w), th(v,w), et(x,b), ps(a,b), ze(a,w). (Contributed by AV, 1-Apr-2023.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑏 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑎 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜁))    &   ⊢ (((𝜒 → 𝑦 = 𝑤) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝑦 = 𝑤)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑏) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (𝜂 → (𝑏 = 𝑦 ∧ (𝜓 → 𝑎 = 𝑥)))))
Theorem	2reuimp0 47828*	Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification. The involved wffs depend on the setvar variables as follows: ph(a,b), th(a,c), ch(d,b), ta(d,c), et(a,e), ps(a,f) (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 𝜑 → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝜂 ∧ ((𝜒 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 (𝜏 → 𝑏 = 𝑐)) → 𝑎 = 𝑑)) ∧ (𝜓 → 𝑒 = 𝑓)))
Theorem	2reuimp 47829*	Implication of a double restricted existential uniqueness in terms of restricted existential quantification and restricted universal quantification if the class of the quantified elements is not empty. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑐 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑑 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑒 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜂))    &   ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝑓 → (𝜃 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃!𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∃!𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 𝜑) → ∃𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑑 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜏 → 𝑏 = 𝑐)) → (𝜓 → (𝜂 ∧ (𝑎 = 𝑑 ∧ 𝑒 = 𝑓)))))
21.49.4  Alternative definitions of function and operation values The current definition of the value (𝐹‘𝐴) of a function 𝐹 at an argument 𝐴 (see df-fv 6546) assures that this value is always a set, see fex 7226. This is because this definition can be applied to any classes 𝐹 and 𝐴, and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful (as shown by ndmfv 6915 and fvprc 6875). Although it is very convenient for many theorems on functions and their proofs, there are some cases in which from (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ alone it cannot be decided/derived whether (𝐹‘𝐴) is meaningful (𝐹 is actually a function which is defined for 𝐴 and really has the function value ∅ at 𝐴) or not. Therefore, additional assumptions are required, such as ∅ ∉ ran 𝐹, ∅ ∈ ran 𝐹 or Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 (see, for example, ndmfvrcl 6916). To avoid such an ambiguity, an alternative definition (𝐹'''𝐴) (see df-afv 47834) would be possible which evaluates to the universal class ((𝐹'''𝐴) = V) if it is not meaningful (see afvnfundmuv 47853, ndmafv 47854, afvprc 47858 and nfunsnafv 47856), and which corresponds to the current definition ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐴)) if it is (see afvfundmfveq 47852). That means (𝐹'''𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see afvpcfv0 47860), but (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V is not generally valid. In the theory of partial functions, it is a common case that 𝐹 is not defined at 𝐴, which also would result in (𝐹'''𝐴) = V. In this context we say (𝐹'''𝐴) "is not defined" instead of "is not meaningful". With this definition the following intuitive equivalence holds: (𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ V <-> "(𝐹'''𝐴) is meaningful/defined". An interesting question would be if (𝐹‘𝐴) could be replaced by (𝐹'''𝐴) in most of the theorems based on function values. If we look at the (currently 19) proofs using the definition df-fv 6546 of (𝐹‘𝐴), we see that analogues for the following 8 theorems can be proven using the alternative definition: fveq1 6882-> afveq1 47848, fveq2 6883-> afveq2 47849, nffv 6893-> nfafv 47850, csbfv12 6928-> csbafv12g , fvres 6902-> afvres 47886, rlimdm 15604-> rlimdmafv 47891, tz6.12-1 6906-> tz6.12-1-afv 47888, fveu 6872-> afveu 47867. Three theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6546 are within a mathbox (fvsb 45140) or not used (isumclim3 15812, avril1 30792). However, the remaining 8 theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6546 are used more or less often: * fvex 6896: used in about 1750 proofs. * tz6.12-1 6906: root theorem of many theorems which have not a strict analogue, and which are used many times: fvprc 6875 (used in about 127 proofs), tz6.12i 6909 (used - indirectly via fvbr0 6910 and fvrn0 6911- in 18 proofs, and in fvclss 7241 used in fvclex 7957 used in fvresex 7958, which is not used!), dcomex 10432 (used in 4 proofs), ndmfv 6915 (used in 86 proofs) and nfunsn 6922 (used by dffv2 6978 which is not used). * fv2 6878: only used by elfv 6881, which is only used by fv3 6901, which is not used. * dffv3 6879: used by dffv4 6880 (the previous "df-fv"), which now is only used in deprecated (usage discouraged) theorems or within mathboxes (csbfv12gALTVD 45587), by shftval 15113 (itself used in 9 proofs), by dffv5 36392 (mathbox) and by fvco2 6980, which has the analogue afvco2 47890. * fvopab5 7025: used only by ajval 31191 (not used) and by adjval 32220 (used - indirectly - in 9 proofs). * zsum 15771: used (via isum 15772, sum0 15774 and fsumsers 15781) in more than 90 proofs. * isumshft 15895: used in pserdv2 26571 and (via logtayl 26803) 4 other proofs. * ovtpos 8238: used in 14 proofs. As a result of this analysis we can say that the current definition of a function value is crucial for Metamath and cannot be exchanged easily with an alternative definition. While fv2 6878, dffv3 6879, fvopab5 7025, zsum 15771, isumshft 15895 and ovtpos 8238 are not critical or are, hopefully, also valid for the alternative definition, fvex 6896 and tz6.12-1 6906 (and the theorems based on them) are essential for the current definition of function values. With the same arguments, an alternative definition of operation values ((𝐴𝑂𝐵)) could be meaningful to avoid ambiguities, see df-aov 47835. For additional details, see https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4 47835.
Syntax	wdfat 47830	Extend the definition of a wff to include the "defined at" predicate. Read: "(the function) 𝐹 is defined at (the argument) 𝐴". In a previous version, the token "def@" was used. However, since the @ is used (informally) as a replacement for $ in commented out sections that may be deleted some day. While there is no violation of any standard to use the @ in a token, it could make the search for such commented-out sections slightly more difficult. (See remark of Norman Megill at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4).
wff 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
Syntax	cafv 47831	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. Read: "the value of 𝐹 at 𝐴 " or "𝐹 of 𝐴". In a previous version, the symbol " ' " was used. However, since the similarity with the symbol ‘ used for the current definition of a function's value (see df-fv 6546), which, by the way, was intended to visualize that in many cases ‘ and " ' " are exchangeable, makes reading the theorems, especially those which use both definitions as dfafv2 47846, very difficult, 3 apostrophes ''' are used now so that it's easier to distinguish from df-fv 6546 and df-ima 5676. And not three backticks ( three times ‘) since that would be annoying to escape in a comment. (See remark of Norman Megill and Gerard Lang at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4 5676).
class (𝐹'''𝐴)
Syntax	caov 47832	Extend class notation to include the value of an operation 𝐹 (such as +) for two arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵. Note that the syntax is simply three class symbols in a row surrounded by a pair of parentheses in contrast to the current definition, see df-ov 7415.
class ((𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Definition	df-dfat 47833	Definition of the predicate that determines if some class 𝐹 is defined as function for an argument 𝐴 or, in other words, if the function value for some class 𝐹 for an argument 𝐴 is defined. We say that 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴 if a 𝐹 is a function restricted to the member 𝐴 of its domain. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})))
Definition	df-afv 47834*	Alternative definition of the value of a function, (𝐹'''𝐴), also known as function application. In contrast to (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see df-fv 6546 and ndmfv 6915), (𝐹'''𝐴) = V if F is not defined for A! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.) (Revised by BJ/AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = (℩'𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥)
Definition	df-aov 47835	Define the value of an operation. In contrast to df-ov 7415, the alternative definition for a function value (see df-afv 47834) is used. By this, the value of the operation applied to two arguments is the universal class if the operation is not defined for these two arguments. There are still no restrictions of any kind on what those class expressions may be, although only certain kinds of class expressions - a binary operation 𝐹 and its arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵- will be useful for proving meaningful theorems. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐹'''⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
21.49.4.1  Restricted quantification (extension)
Theorem	ralbinrald 47836*	Elemination of a restricted universal quantification under certain conditions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Aug-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))
21.49.4.2  The universal class (extension)
Theorem	nvelim 47837	If a class is the universal class it doesn't belong to any class, generalization of nvel 5283. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = V → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
21.49.4.3  Introduce the Axiom of Power Sets (extension)
Theorem	alneu 47838	If a statement holds for all sets, there is not a unique set for which the statement holds. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	eu2ndop1stv 47839*	If there is a unique second component in an ordered pair contained in a given set, the first component must be a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
21.49.4.4  Predicate "defined at"
Theorem	dfateq12d 47840	Equality deduction for "defined at". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ 𝐺 defAt 𝐵))
Theorem	nfdfat 47841	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "defined at". To prove a deduction version of this theorem is not easily possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of "defined at" is based on are not available (e.g., for Fun/Rel, dom, ⊆, etc.). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
Theorem	dfdfat2 47842*	Alternate definition of the predicate "defined at" not using the Fun predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	fundmdfat 47843	A function is defined at any element of its domain. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → 𝐹 defAt 𝐴)
Theorem	dfatprc 47844	A function is not defined at a proper class. (Contributed by AV, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴)
Theorem	dfatelrn 47845	The value of a function 𝐹 at a set 𝐴 is in the range of the function 𝐹 if 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
21.49.4.5  Alternative definition of the value of a function
Theorem	dfafv2 47846	Alternative definition of (𝐹'''𝐴) using (𝐹‘𝐴) directly. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.) (Revised by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
Theorem	afveq12d 47847	Equality deduction for function value, analogous to fveq12d 6890. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐺'''𝐵))
Theorem	afveq1 47848	Equality theorem for function value, analogous to fveq1 6882. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐺'''𝐴))
Theorem	afveq2 47849	Equality theorem for function value, analogous to fveq1 6882. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐵))
Theorem	nfafv 47850	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value, analogous to nffv 6893. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nffvd 6895 is not easily possible because a deduction version of nfdfat 47841 cannot be shown easily. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)
Theorem	csbafv12g 47851	Move class substitution in and out of a function value, analogous to csbfv12 6928, with a direct proof proposed by Mario Carneiro, analogous to csbov123 7456. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹'''𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹'''⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))
Theorem	afvfundmfveq 47852	If a class is a function restricted to a member of its domain, then the function value for this member is equal for both definitions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afvnfundmuv 47853	If a set is not in the domain of a class or the class is not a function restricted to the set, then the function value for this set is the universe. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	ndmafv 47854	The value of a class outside its domain is the universe, compare with ndmfv 6915. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvdm 47855	If the function value of a class for an argument is a set, the argument is contained in the domain of the class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	nfunsnafv 47856	If the restriction of a class to a singleton is not a function, its value is the universe, compare with nfunsn 6922. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvfunressn 47857	If the function value of a class for an argument is a set, the class restricted to the singleton of the argument is a function. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}))
Theorem	afvprc 47858	A function's value at a proper class is the universe, compare with fvprc 6875. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvv 47859	If a function's value at an argument is a set, the argument is also a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	afvpcfv0 47860	If the value of the alternative function at an argument is the universe, the function's value at this argument is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	afvnufveq 47861	The value of the alternative function at a set as argument equals the function's value at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ≠ V → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afvvfveq 47862	The value of the alternative function at a set as argument equals the function's value at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv0fv0 47863	If the value of the alternative function at an argument is the empty set, the function's value at this argument is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	afvfvn0fveq 47864	If the function's value at an argument is not the empty set, it equals the value of the alternative function at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv0nbfvbi 47865	The function's value at an argument is an element of a set if and only if the value of the alternative function at this argument is an element of that set, if the set does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (∅ ∉ 𝐵 → ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	afvfv0bi 47866	The function's value at an argument is the empty set if and only if the value of the alternative function at this argument is either the empty set or the universe. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = ∅ ∨ (𝐹'''𝐴) = V))
Theorem	afveu 47867*	The value of a function at a unique point, analogous to fveu 6872. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 𝐴𝐹𝑥 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑥})
Theorem	fnbrafvb 47868	Equivalence of function value and binary relation, analogous to fnbrfvb 6933. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹'''𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	fnopafvb 47869	Equivalence of function value and ordered pair membership, analogous to fnopfvb 6934. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹'''𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	funbrafvb 47870	Equivalence of function value and binary relation, analogous to funbrfvb 6936. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	funopafvb 47871	Equivalence of function value and ordered pair membership, analogous to funopfvb 6937. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	funbrafv 47872	The second argument of a binary relation on a function is the function's value, analogous to funbrfv 6931. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵))
Theorem	funbrafv2b 47873	Function value in terms of a binary relation, analogous to funbrfv2b 6940. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵)))
Theorem	dfafn5a 47874*	Representation of a function in terms of its values, analogous to dffn5 6941 (only one direction of implication!). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹'''𝑥)))
Theorem	dfafn5b 47875*	Representation of a function in terms of its values, analogous to dffn5 6941 (only if it is assumed that the function value for each x is a set). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹'''𝑥))))
Theorem	fnrnafv 47876*	The range of a function expressed as a collection of the function's values, analogous to fnrnfv 6942. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → ran 𝐹 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = (𝐹'''𝑥)})
Theorem	afvelrnb 47877*	A member of a function's range is a value of the function, analogous to fvelrnb 6943 with the additional requirement that the member must be a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	afvelrnb0 47878*	A member of a function's range is a value of the function, only one direction of implication of fvelrnb 6943. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	dfaimafn 47879*	Alternate definition of the image of a function, analogous to dfimafn 6945. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝑦})
Theorem	dfaimafn2 47880*	Alternate definition of the image of a function as an indexed union of singletons of function values, analogous to dfimafn2 6946. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {(𝐹'''𝑥)})
Theorem	afvelima 47881*	Function value in an image, analogous to fvelima 6948. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝐴)
Theorem	afvelrn 47882	A function's value belongs to its range, analogous to fvelrn 7073. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	fnafvelrn 47883	A function's value belongs to its range, analogous to fnfvelrn 7077. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹'''𝐵) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	fafvelcdm 47884	A function's value belongs to its codomain, analogous to ffvelcdm 7078. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹'''𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	ffnafv 47885*	A function maps to a class to which all values belong, analogous to ffnfv 7116. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	afvres 47886	The value of a restricted function, analogous to fvres 6902. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)'''𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐴))
Theorem	tz6.12-afv 47887*	Function value. Theorem 6.12(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27, analogous to tz6.12 6907. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ∧ ∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝑦)
Theorem	tz6.12-1-afv 47888*	Function value (Theorem 6.12(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27, analogous to tz6.12-1 6906. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝑦 ∧ ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝑦)
Theorem	dmfcoafv 47889	Domains of a function composition, analogous to dmfco 6979. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝐴 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ↔ (𝐺'''𝐴) ∈ dom 𝐹))
Theorem	afvco2 47890	Value of a function composition, analogous to fvco2 6980. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)'''𝑋) = (𝐹'''(𝐺'''𝑋)))
Theorem	rlimdmafv 47891	Two ways to express that a function has a limit, analogous to rlimdm 15604. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 ( ⇝𝑟 '''𝐹)))
21.49.4.6  Alternative definition of the value of an operation
Theorem	aoveq123d 47892	Equality deduction for operation value, analogous to oveq123d 7433. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐵𝐺𝐷)) )
Theorem	nfaov 47893	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for operation value, analogous to nfov 7442. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nfovd 7441 is not quickly possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of alternative operation values is based on are not available (see nfafv 47850). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ((𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	csbaovg 47894	Move class substitution in and out of an operation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ ((𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) )
Theorem	aovfundmoveq 47895	If a class is a function restricted to an ordered pair of its domain, then the value of the operation on this pair is equal for both definitions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	aovnfundmuv 47896	If an ordered pair is not in the domain of a class or the class is not a function restricted to the ordered pair, then the operation value for this pair is the universal class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐹 defAt ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	ndmaov 47897	The value of an operation outside its domain, analogous to ndmafv 47854. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝐹 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	ndmaovg 47898	The value of an operation outside its domain, analogous to ndmovg 7595. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((dom 𝐹 = (𝑅 × 𝑆) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	aovvdm 47899	If the operation value of a class for an ordered pair is a set, the ordered pair is contained in the domain of the class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ 𝐶 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	nfunsnaov 47900	If the restriction of a class to a singleton is not a function, its operation value is the universal class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)