Theorem sumeq2w 15750

Description: Equality theorem for sum, when the class expressions 𝐵 and 𝐶 are equal everywhere. Proved using only Extensionality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sumeq2w	⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem sumeq2w

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑚 𝑛 𝑥 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		csbeq2 3857	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶)
2	1	ifeq1d 4506	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0) = if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))
3	2	mpteq2dv 5204	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0)))
4	3	seqeq3d 14052	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) = seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))))
5	4	breq1d 5118	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥 ↔ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥))
6	5	anbi2d 641	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥)))
7	6	rexbidv 3188	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥)))
8		csbeq2 3857	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵 = ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶)
9	8	mpteq2dv 5204	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))
10	9	seqeq3d 14052	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵)) = seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶)))
11	10	fveq1d 6883	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚) = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚))
12	11	eqeq2d 2773	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚) ↔ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚)))
13	12	anbi2d 641	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚)) ↔ (𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚))))
14	13	exbidv 1950	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚)) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚))))
15	14	rexbidv 3188	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚)) ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚))))
16	7, 15	orbi12d 931	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚))) ↔ (∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚)))))
17	16	iotabidv 6520	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚)))) = (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚)))))
18		df-sum 15745	. 2 ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚))))
19		df-sum 15745	. 2 ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚))))
20	17, 18, 19	3eqtr4g 2822	1 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∨ wo 860  ∀wal 1567   = wceq 1569  ∃wex 1808   ∈ wcel 2142  ∃wrex 3088  ⦋csb 3852   ⊆ wss 3904  ifcif 4486   class class class wbr 5108   ↦ cmpt 5191  ℩cio 6490  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6535  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7412  0cc0 11106  1c1 11107   + caddc 11109  ℕcn 12239  ℤcz 12597  ℤ_≥cuz 12868  ...cfz 13541  seqcseq 14044   ⇝ cli 15542  Σcsu 15744

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3744  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-xp 5666  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-pred 6302  df-iota 6492  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-frecs 8276  df-wrecs 8307  df-recs 8356  df-rdg 8395  df-seq 14045  df-sum 15745

This theorem is used by: (None)