Theorem sumeq2w 15888

Description: Equality theorem for sum, when the class expressions 𝐵 and 𝐶 are equal everywhere. Proved using only Extensionality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sumeq2w	⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)

Proof of Theorem sumeq2w

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑚 𝑛 𝑥 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		csbeq2 3856	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵 = ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶)
2	1	ifeq1d 4505	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0) = if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))
3	2	mpteq2dv 5202	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0)) = (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0)))
4	3	seqeq3d 14179	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) = seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))))
5	4	breq1d 5116	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥 ↔ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥))
6	5	anbi2d 642	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥)))
7	6	rexbidv 3190	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥)))
8		csbeq2 3856	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵 = ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶)
9	8	mpteq2dv 5202	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵) = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))
10	9	seqeq3d 14179	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵)) = seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶)))
11	10	fveq1d 6910	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚) = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚))
12	11	eqeq2d 2774	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚) ↔ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚)))
13	12	anbi2d 642	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚)) ↔ (𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚))))
14	13	exbidv 1956	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚)) ↔ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚))))
15	14	rexbidv 3190	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚)) ↔ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚))))
16	7, 15	orbi12d 932	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚))) ↔ (∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚)))))
17	16	iotabidv 6541	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚)))) = (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚)))))
18		df-sum 15883	. 2 ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐵, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐵))‘𝑚))))
19		df-sum 15883	. 2 ⊢ Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶 = (℩𝑥(∃𝑚 ∈ ℤ (𝐴 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑚) ∧ seq𝑚( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℤ ↦ if(𝑛 ∈ 𝐴, ⦋𝑛 / 𝑘⦌𝐶, 0))) ⇝ 𝑥) ∨ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...𝑚)⟶1-1onto𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = (seq1( + , (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ⦋(𝑓‘𝑛) / 𝑘⦌𝐶))‘𝑚))))
20	17, 18, 19	3eqtr4g 2823	1 ⊢ (∀𝑘 𝐵 = 𝐶 → Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐶)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147  ∃wrex 3090  ⦋csb 3851   ⊆ wss 3900  ifcif 4485   class class class wbr 5106   ↦ cmpt 5189  ℩cio 6510  ⟶1-1ontowf1o 6557  ‘cfv 6558  (class class class)co 7443  0cc0 11227  1c1 11228   + caddc 11230  ℕcn 12362  ℤcz 12720  ℤ_≥cuz 12992  ...cfz 13666  seqcseq 14171   ⇝ cli 15680  Σcsu 15882

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-xp 5661  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6322  df-iota 6512  df-fv 6566  df-ov 7446  df-oprab 7447  df-mpo 7448  df-frecs 8327  df-wrecs 8358  df-recs 8407  df-rdg 8446  df-seq 14172  df-sum 15883

This theorem is used by: (None)