| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 157 of 497) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30845) |
(30846-32368) |
(32369-49617) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | o1compt 15601* | Sufficient condition for transforming the index set of an eventually bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑚 ∈ ℝ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑚 ≤ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimcn1 15602* | Image of a limit under a continuous map. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝𝑟 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐶)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝐶))) < 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ⇝𝑟 (𝐹‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimcn1b 15603* | Image of a limit under a continuous map. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑋⟶ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐶)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝐶))) < 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹‘𝐵)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐹‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimcn3 15604* | Image of a limit under a continuous map, two-arg version. Originally a subproof of rlimcn2 15605. (Contributed by SN, 27-Sep-2024.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵𝐹𝐶) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅𝐹𝑆) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑠 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 (((abs‘(𝑢 − 𝑅)) < 𝑟 ∧ (abs‘(𝑣 − 𝑆)) < 𝑠) → (abs‘((𝑢𝐹𝑣) − (𝑅𝐹𝑆))) < 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝐹𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝑅𝐹𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimcn2 15605* | Image of a limit under a continuous map, two-arg version. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑋 × 𝑌)⟶ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑠 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 (((abs‘(𝑢 − 𝑅)) < 𝑟 ∧ (abs‘(𝑣 − 𝑆)) < 𝑠) → (abs‘((𝑢𝐹𝑣) − (𝑅𝐹𝑆))) < 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝐹𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝑅𝐹𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | climcn1 15606* | Image of a limit under a continuous map. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝑧) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝐴))) < 𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ (𝐹‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | climcn2 15607* | Image of a limit under a continuous map, two-arg version. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑢𝐹𝑣) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐷 (((abs‘(𝑢 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(𝑣 − 𝐵)) < 𝑧) → (abs‘((𝑢𝐹𝑣) − (𝐴𝐹𝐵))) < 𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐾‘𝑘) = ((𝐺‘𝑘)𝐹(𝐻‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ⇝ (𝐴𝐹𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | addcn2 15608* | Complex number addition is a continuous function. Part of Proposition 14-4.16 of [Gleason] p. 243. (We write out the definition directly because df-cn 23163 and df-cncf 24820 are not yet available to us. See addcn 24803 for the abbreviated version.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑢 ∈ ℂ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℂ (((abs‘(𝑢 − 𝐵)) < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(𝑣 − 𝐶)) < 𝑧) → (abs‘((𝑢 + 𝑣) − (𝐵 + 𝐶))) < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | subcn2 15609* | Complex number subtraction is a continuous function. Part of Proposition 14-4.16 of [Gleason] p. 243. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑢 ∈ ℂ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℂ (((abs‘(𝑢 − 𝐵)) < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(𝑣 − 𝐶)) < 𝑧) → (abs‘((𝑢 − 𝑣) − (𝐵 − 𝐶))) < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | mulcn2 15610* | Complex number multiplication is a continuous function. Part of Proposition 14-4.16 of [Gleason] p. 243. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑢 ∈ ℂ ∀𝑣 ∈ ℂ (((abs‘(𝑢 − 𝐵)) < 𝑦 ∧ (abs‘(𝑣 − 𝐶)) < 𝑧) → (abs‘((𝑢 · 𝑣) − (𝐵 · 𝐶))) < 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | reccn2 15611* | The reciprocal function is continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = (if(1 ≤ ((abs‘𝐴) · 𝐵), 1, ((abs‘𝐴) · 𝐵)) · ((abs‘𝐴) / 2)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0}) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ (ℂ ∖ {0})((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((1 / 𝑧) − (1 / 𝐴))) < 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cn1lem 15612* | A sufficient condition for a function to be continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹:ℂ⟶ℂ & ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝐴))) ≤ (abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑧) − (𝐹‘𝐴))) < 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | abscn2 15613* | The absolute value function is continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((abs‘𝑧) − (abs‘𝐴))) < 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | cjcn2 15614* | The complex conjugate function is continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((∗‘𝑧) − (∗‘𝐴))) < 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | recn2 15615* | The real part function is continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((ℜ‘𝑧) − (ℜ‘𝐴))) < 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | imcn2 15616* | The imaginary part function is continuous. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((ℑ‘𝑧) − (ℑ‘𝐴))) < 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | climcn1lem 15617* | The limit of a continuous function, theorem form. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ 𝐻:ℂ⟶ℂ & ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℝ+) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℂ ((abs‘(𝑧 − 𝐴)) < 𝑦 → (abs‘((𝐻‘𝑧) − (𝐻‘𝐴))) < 𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐻‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | climabs 15618* | Limit of the absolute value of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (abs‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | climcj 15619* | Limit of the complex conjugate of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (∗‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (∗‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | climre 15620* | Limit of the real part of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (ℜ‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (ℜ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | climim 15621* | Limit of the imaginary part of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (ℑ‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (ℑ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimmptrcl 15622* | Reverse closure for a real limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | rlimabs 15623* | Limit of the absolute value of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (abs‘𝐵)) ⇝𝑟 (abs‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimcj 15624* | Limit of the complex conjugate of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (∗‘𝐵)) ⇝𝑟 (∗‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimre 15625* | Limit of the real part of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (ℜ‘𝐵)) ⇝𝑟 (ℜ‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimim 15626* | Limit of the imaginary part of a sequence. Proposition 12-2.4(c) of [Gleason] p. 172. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (ℑ‘𝐵)) ⇝𝑟 (ℑ‘𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | o1of2 15627* | Show that a binary operation preserves eventual boundedness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (((𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑛 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ)) → (((abs‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑚 ∧ (abs‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑛) → (abs‘(𝑥𝑅𝑦)) ≤ 𝑀)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑂(1)) → (𝐹 ∘f 𝑅𝐺) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | o1add 15628 | The sum of two eventually bounded functions is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑂(1)) → (𝐹 ∘f + 𝐺) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | o1mul 15629 | The product of two eventually bounded functions is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑂(1)) → (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | o1sub 15630 | The difference of two eventually bounded functions is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Fan Zheng, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑂(1)) → (𝐹 ∘f − 𝐺) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimo1 15631 | Any function with a finite limit is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimdmo1 15632 | A convergent function is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | o1rlimmul 15633 | The product of an eventually bounded function and a function of limit zero has limit zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐺 ⇝𝑟 0) → (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ⇝𝑟 0) | ||
| Theorem | o1const 15634* | A constant function is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | lo1const 15635* | A constant function is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | lo1mptrcl 15636* | Reverse closure for an eventually upper bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | o1mptrcl 15637* | Reverse closure for an eventually bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) | ||
| Theorem | o1add2 15638* | The sum of two eventually bounded functions is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | o1mul2 15639* | The product of two eventually bounded functions is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 · 𝐶)) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | o1sub2 15640* | The product of two eventually bounded functions is eventually bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | lo1add 15641* | The sum of two eventually upper bounded functions is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | lo1mul 15642* | The product of an eventually upper bounded function and a positive eventually upper bounded function is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 · 𝐶)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | lo1mul2 15643* | The product of an eventually upper bounded function and a positive eventually upper bounded function is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐶 · 𝐵)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | o1dif 15644* | If the difference of two functions is eventually bounded, eventual boundedness of either one implies the other. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ∈ 𝑂(1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1))) | ||
| Theorem | lo1sub 15645* | The difference of an eventually upper bounded function and an eventually bounded function is eventually upper bounded. The "correct" sharp result here takes the second function to be eventually lower bounded instead of just bounded, but our notation for this is simply (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1), so it is just a special case of lo1add 15641. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | climadd 15646* | Limit of the sum of two converging sequences. Proposition 12-2.1(a) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) + (𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ (𝐴 + 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | climmul 15647* | Limit of the product of two converging sequences. Proposition 12-2.1(c) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | climsub 15648* | Limit of the difference of two converging sequences. Proposition 12-2.1(b) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝ (𝐴 − 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | climaddc1 15649* | Limit of a constant 𝐶 added to each term of a sequence. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) + 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐴 + 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | climaddc2 15650* | Limit of a constant 𝐶 added to each term of a sequence. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐶 + (𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐶 + 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | climmulc2 15651* | Limit of a sequence multiplied by a constant 𝐶. Corollary 12-2.2 of [Gleason] p. 171. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐶 · (𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐶 · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | climsubc1 15652* | Limit of a constant 𝐶 subtracted from each term of a sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = ((𝐹‘𝑘) − 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐴 − 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | climsubc2 15653* | Limit of a constant 𝐶 minus each term of a sequence. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐶 − (𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ (𝐶 − 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | climle 15654* | Comparison of the limits of two sequences. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 10-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | climsqz 15655* | Convergence of a sequence sandwiched between another converging sequence and its limit. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ≤ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | climsqz2 15656* | Convergence of a sequence sandwiched between another converging sequence and its limit. (Contributed by NM, 14-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | rlimadd 15657* | Limit of the sum of two converging functions. Proposition 12-2.1(a) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 + 𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐷 + 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimsub 15658* | Limit of the difference of two converging functions. Proposition 12-2.1(b) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 − 𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐷 − 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimmul 15659* | Limit of the product of two converging functions. Proposition 12-2.1(c) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 · 𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐷 · 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimdiv 15660* | Limit of the quotient of two converging functions. Proposition 12-2.1(a) of [Gleason] p. 168. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ≠ 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵 / 𝐶)) ⇝𝑟 (𝐷 / 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimneg 15661* | Limit of the negative of a sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵) ⇝𝑟 -𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | rlimle 15662* | Comparison of the limits of two sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ≤ 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | rlimsqzlem 15663* | Lemma for rlimsqz 15664 and rlimsqz2 15665. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐸)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐸) | ||
| Theorem | rlimsqz 15664* | Convergence of a sequence sandwiched between another converging sequence and its limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | rlimsqz2 15665* | Convergence of a sequence sandwiched between another converging sequence and its limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐷 ≤ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇝𝑟 𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | lo1le 15666* | Transfer eventual upper boundedness from a larger function to a smaller function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐶 ≤ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | o1le 15667* | Transfer eventual boundedness from a larger function to a smaller function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑥)) → (abs‘𝐶) ≤ (abs‘𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | rlimno1 15668* | A function whose inverse converges to zero is unbounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (1 / 𝐵)) ⇝𝑟 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ≠ 0) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1)) | ||
| Theorem | clim2ser 15669* | The limit of an infinite series with an initial segment removed. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( + , 𝐹) ⇝ (𝐴 − (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | clim2ser2 15670* | The limit of an infinite series with an initial segment added. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq(𝑁 + 1)( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ (𝐴 + (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | iserex 15671* | An infinite series converges, if and only if the series does with initial terms removed. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ seq𝑁( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ )) | ||
| Theorem | isermulc2 15672* | Multiplication of an infinite series by a constant. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 14-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) = (𝐶 · (𝐹‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ⇝ (𝐶 · 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | climlec2 15673* | Comparison of a constant to the limit of a sequence. (Contributed by NM, 28-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | iserle 15674* | Comparison of the limits of two infinite series. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 12-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐺) ⇝ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | iserge0 15675* | The limit of an infinite series of nonnegative reals is nonnegative. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | climub 15676* | The limit of a monotonic sequence is an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘𝑁) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | climserle 15677* | The partial sums of a converging infinite series with nonnegative terms are bounded by its limit. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑘)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | isershft 15678 | Index shift of the limit of an infinite series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ seq(𝑀 + 𝑁)( + , (𝐹 shift 𝑁)) ⇝ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | isercolllem1 15679* | Lemma for isercoll 15682. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ ℕ) → (𝐺 ↾ 𝑆) Isom < , < (𝑆, (𝐺 “ 𝑆))) | ||
| Theorem | isercolllem2 15680* | Lemma for isercoll 15682. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐺‘1))) → (1...(♯‘(𝐺 “ (◡𝐺 “ (𝑀...𝑁))))) = (◡𝐺 “ (𝑀...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | isercolllem3 15681* | Lemma for isercoll 15682. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝑍 ∖ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐺‘1))) → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁) = (seq1( + , 𝐻)‘(♯‘(𝐺 “ (◡𝐺 “ (𝑀...𝑁)))))) | ||
| Theorem | isercoll 15682* | Rearrange an infinite series by spacing out the terms using an order isomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:ℕ⟶𝑍) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝑍 ∖ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq1( + , 𝐻) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | isercoll2 15683* | Generalize isercoll 15682 so that both sequences have arbitrary starting point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (ℤ≥‘𝑁) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘𝑘) < (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ (𝑊 ∖ ran 𝐺)) → (𝐹‘𝑛) = 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑛 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹‘𝑛) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐻‘𝑘) = (𝐹‘(𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (seq𝑀( + , 𝐻) ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ seq𝑁( + , 𝐹) ⇝ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | climsup 15684* | A bounded monotonic sequence converges to the supremum of its range. Theorem 12-5.1 of [Gleason] p. 180. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ (𝐹‘(𝑘 + 1))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹‘𝑘) ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ sup(ran 𝐹, ℝ, < )) | ||
| Theorem | climcau 15685* | A converging sequence of complex numbers is a Cauchy sequence. Theorem 12-5.3 of [Gleason] p. 180 (necessity part). (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | climbdd 15686* | A converging sequence of complex numbers is bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑍 (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) ≤ 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | caucvgrlem 15687* | Lemma for caurcvgr 15688. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Feb-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ((lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (lim sup‘𝐹))) < (3 · 𝑅)))) | ||
| Theorem | caurcvgr 15688* | A Cauchy sequence of real numbers converges to its limit supremum. The third hypothesis specifies that 𝐹 is a Cauchy sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 (lim sup‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | caucvgrlem2 15689* | Lemma for caucvgr 15690. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥)) & ⊢ 𝐻:ℂ⟶ℝ & ⊢ (((𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝐹‘𝑗) ∈ ℂ) → (abs‘((𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) − (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑗)))) ≤ (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑛 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑛))) ⇝𝑟 ( ⇝𝑟 ‘(𝐻 ∘ 𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | caucvgr 15690* | A Cauchy sequence of complex numbers converges to a complex number. Theorem 12-5.3 of [Gleason] p. 180 (sufficiency part). (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑗 ≤ 𝑘 → (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 ) | ||
| Theorem | caurcvg 15691* | A Cauchy sequence of real numbers converges to its limit supremum. The fourth hypothesis specifies that 𝐹 is a Cauchy sequence. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑚))) < 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ (lim sup‘𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | caurcvg2 15692* | A Cauchy sequence of real numbers converges, existence version. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℝ ∧ (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ) | ||
| Theorem | caucvg 15693* | A Cauchy sequence of complex numbers converges to a complex number. Theorem 12-5.3 of [Gleason] p. 180 (sufficiency part). (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-Feb-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-May-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ) | ||
| Theorem | caucvgb 15694* | A function is convergent if and only if it is Cauchy. Theorem 12-5.3 of [Gleason] p. 180. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘((𝐹‘𝑘) − (𝐹‘𝑗))) < 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | serf0 15695* | If an infinite series converges, its underlying sequence converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Feb-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0) | ||
| Theorem | iseraltlem1 15696* | Lemma for iseralt 15699. A decreasing sequence with limit zero consists of positive terms. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 0) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍) → 0 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | iseraltlem2 15697* | Lemma for iseralt 15699. The terms of an alternating series form a chain of inequalities in alternate terms, so that for example 𝑆(1) ≤ 𝑆(3) ≤ 𝑆(5) ≤ ... and ... ≤ 𝑆(4) ≤ 𝑆(2) ≤ 𝑆(0) (assuming 𝑀 = 0 so that these terms are defined). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = ((-1↑𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → ((-1↑𝑁) · (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘(𝑁 + (2 · 𝐾)))) ≤ ((-1↑𝑁) · (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | iseraltlem3 15698* | Lemma for iseralt 15699. From iseraltlem2 15697, we have (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) and (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 1) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1), and we also have (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 1) = (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) − 𝐺(𝑛 + 1) for each 𝑛 by the definition of the partial sum 𝑆, so combining the inequalities we get (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) − 𝐺(𝑛 + 1) = (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 1) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1) = (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) − 𝐺(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) ≤ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) + 𝐺(𝑛 + 1), so ∣ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1) − (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) ∣ = ∣ 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘 + 1) − 𝑆(𝑛) ∣ ≤ 𝐺(𝑛 + 1) and ∣ (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) − (-1↑𝑛) · 𝑆(𝑛) ∣ = ∣ 𝑆(𝑛 + 2𝑘) − 𝑆(𝑛) ∣ ≤ 𝐺(𝑛 + 1). Thus, both even and odd partial sums are Cauchy if 𝐺 converges to 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = ((-1↑𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0) → ((abs‘((seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘(𝑁 + (2 · 𝐾))) − (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) ≤ (𝐺‘(𝑁 + 1)) ∧ (abs‘((seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘((𝑁 + (2 · 𝐾)) + 1)) − (seq𝑀( + , 𝐹)‘𝑁))) ≤ (𝐺‘(𝑁 + 1)))) | ||
| Theorem | iseralt 15699* | The alternating series test. If 𝐺(𝑘) is a decreasing sequence that converges to 0, then Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝑍(-1↑𝑘) · 𝐺(𝑘) is a convergent series. (Note that the first term is positive if 𝑀 is even, and negative if 𝑀 is odd. If the parity of your series does not match up with this, you will need to post-compose the series with multiplication by -1 using isermulc2 15672.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑍⟶ℝ) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐺‘(𝑘 + 1)) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑘)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⇝ 0) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = ((-1↑𝑘) · (𝐺‘𝑘))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → seq𝑀( + , 𝐹) ∈ dom ⇝ ) | ||
| Syntax | csu 15700 | Extend class notation to include finite and infinite summations. (An underscore was added to the ASCII token in order to facilitate set.mm text searches, since "sum" is a commonly used word in comments.) |
| class Σ𝑘 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |