Theorem issubmd 12870

Description: Deduction for proving a submonoid. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Aug-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Sep-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
issubmd.b	|- B = ( Base ` M )
issubmd.p	|- .+ = ( +g ` M )
issubmd.z	|- .0. = ( 0g ` M )
issubmd.m	|- ( ph -> M e. Mnd )
issubmd.cz	|- ( ph -> ch )
issubmd.cp	|- ( ( ph /\ ( ( x e. B /\ y e. B ) /\ ( th /\ ta ) ) ) -> et )
issubmd.ch	|- ( z = .0. -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
issubmd.th	|- ( z = x -> ( ps <-> th ) )
issubmd.ta	|- ( z = y -> ( ps <-> ta ) )
issubmd.et	|- ( z = ( x .+ y ) -> ( ps <-> et ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
issubmd	|- ( ph -> { z e. B | ps } e. (SubMnd ` M ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, z, B   x, M, y   ph, x, y   ps, x, y   z, .+   z, .0.   ch, z   et, z   ta, z   th, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( z)   ps( z)   ch( x, y)   th( x, y)   ta( x, y)   et( x, y)   .+ ( x, y)   M( z)   .0. ( x, y)

Proof of Theorem issubmd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrab2 3242	. . 3 |- { z e. B | ps } C_ B
2	1	a1i 9	. 2 |- ( ph -> { z e. B | ps } C_ B )
3		issubmd.ch	. . 3 |- ( z = .0. -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
4		issubmd.m	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> M e. Mnd )
5		issubmd.b	. . . . 5 |- B = ( Base ` M )
6		issubmd.z	. . . . 5 |- .0. = ( 0g ` M )
7	5, 6	mndidcl 12836	. . . 4 |- ( M e. Mnd -> .0. e. B )
8	4, 7	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( ph -> .0. e. B )
9		issubmd.cz	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ch )
10	3, 8, 9	elrabd 2897	. 2 |- ( ph -> .0. e. { z e. B | ps } )
11		issubmd.th	. . . . . 6 |- ( z = x -> ( ps <-> th ) )
12	11	elrab 2895	. . . . 5 |- ( x e. { z e. B | ps } <-> ( x e. B /\ th ) )
13		issubmd.ta	. . . . . 6 |- ( z = y -> ( ps <-> ta ) )
14	13	elrab 2895	. . . . 5 |- ( y e. { z e. B | ps } <-> ( y e. B /\ ta ) )
15	12, 14	anbi12i 460	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. { z e. B | ps } /\ y e. { z e. B | ps } ) <-> ( ( x e. B /\ th ) /\ ( y e. B /\ ta ) ) )
16		issubmd.et	. . . . 5 |- ( z = ( x .+ y ) -> ( ps <-> et ) )
17	4	adantr 276	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( x e. B /\ th ) /\ ( y e. B /\ ta ) ) ) -> M e. Mnd )
18		simprll 537	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( x e. B /\ th ) /\ ( y e. B /\ ta ) ) ) -> x e. B )
19		simprrl 539	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( x e. B /\ th ) /\ ( y e. B /\ ta ) ) ) -> y e. B )
20		issubmd.p	. . . . . . 7 |- .+ = ( +g ` M )
21	5, 20	mndcl 12829	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( M e. Mnd /\ x e. B /\ y e. B ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. B )
22	17, 18, 19, 21	syl3anc 1238	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( x e. B /\ th ) /\ ( y e. B /\ ta ) ) ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. B )
23		an4 586	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( x e. B /\ th ) /\ ( y e. B /\ ta ) ) <-> ( ( x e. B /\ y e. B ) /\ ( th /\ ta ) ) )
24		issubmd.cp	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( x e. B /\ y e. B ) /\ ( th /\ ta ) ) ) -> et )
25	23, 24	sylan2b 287	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( x e. B /\ th ) /\ ( y e. B /\ ta ) ) ) -> et )
26	16, 22, 25	elrabd 2897	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( x e. B /\ th ) /\ ( y e. B /\ ta ) ) ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. { z e. B | ps } )
27	15, 26	sylan2b 287	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. { z e. B | ps } /\ y e. { z e. B | ps } ) ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. { z e. B | ps } )
28	27	ralrimivva 2559	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x e. { z e. B | ps } A. y e. { z e. B | ps } ( x .+ y ) e. { z e. B | ps } )
29	5, 6, 20	issubm 12868	. . 3 |- ( M e. Mnd -> ( { z e. B | ps } e. (SubMnd ` M ) <-> ( { z e. B | ps } C_ B /\ .0. e. { z e. B | ps } /\ A. x e. { z e. B | ps } A. y e. { z e. B | ps } ( x .+ y ) e. { z e. B | ps } ) ) )
30	4, 29	syl 14	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( { z e. B | ps } e. (SubMnd ` M ) <-> ( { z e. B | ps } C_ B /\ .0. e. { z e. B | ps } /\ A. x e. { z e. B | ps } A. y e. { z e. B | ps } ( x .+ y ) e. { z e. B | ps } ) ) )
31	2, 10, 28, 30	mpbir3and 1180	1 |- ( ph -> { z e. B | ps } e. (SubMnd ` M ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   /\ w3a 978   = wceq 1353   e. wcel 2148   A.wral 2455   {crab 2459   C_ wss 3131   ` cfv 5218  (class class class)co 5877   Basecbs 12464   +g cplusg 12538   0gc0g 12710   Mndcmnd 12822  SubMndcsubmnd 12855

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-13 2150  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-sep 4123  ax-pow 4176  ax-pr 4211  ax-un 4435  ax-cnex 7904  ax-resscn 7905  ax-1re 7907  ax-addrcl 7910

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-eu 2029  df-mo 2030  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-reu 2462  df-rmo 2463  df-rab 2464  df-v 2741  df-sbc 2965  df-csb 3060  df-un 3135  df-in 3137  df-ss 3144  df-pw 3579  df-sn 3600  df-pr 3601  df-op 3603  df-uni 3812  df-int 3847  df-br 4006  df-opab 4067  df-mpt 4068  df-id 4295  df-xp 4634  df-rel 4635  df-cnv 4636  df-co 4637  df-dm 4638  df-rn 4639  df-res 4640  df-iota 5180  df-fun 5220  df-fn 5221  df-fv 5226  df-riota 5833  df-ov 5880  df-inn 8922  df-2 8980  df-ndx 12467  df-slot 12468  df-base 12470  df-plusg 12551  df-0g 12712  df-mgm 12780  df-sgrp 12813  df-mnd 12823  df-submnd 12857

This theorem is referenced by: (None)