Theorem suppssof1 5930

Description: Formula building theorem for support restrictions: vector operation with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
suppssof1.s	|- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
suppssof1.o	|- ( ( ph /\ v e. R ) -> ( Y O v ) = Z )
suppssof1.a	|- ( ph -> A : D --> V )
suppssof1.b	|- ( ph -> B : D --> R )
suppssof1.d	|- ( ph -> D e. W )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppssof1	|- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, v   v, B   v, O   v, R   v, Y   v, Z

Allowed substitution hints:   A( v)   D( v)   L( v)   V( v)   W( v)

Proof of Theorem suppssof1

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		suppssof1.a	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> A : D --> V )
2		ffn 5208	. . . . . 6 |- ( A : D --> V -> A Fn D )
3	1, 2	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> A Fn D )
4		suppssof1.b	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> B : D --> R )
5		ffn 5208	. . . . . 6 |- ( B : D --> R -> B Fn D )
6	4, 5	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> B Fn D )
7		suppssof1.d	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> D e. W )
8		inidm 3232	. . . . 5 |- ( D i^i D ) = D
9		eqidd 2101	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) = ( A ` x ) )
10		eqidd 2101	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( B ` x ) = ( B ` x ) )
11	3, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 10	offval 5921	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( A oF O B ) = ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) )
12	11	cnveqd 4653	. . 3 |- ( ph -> `' ( A oF O B ) = `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) )
13	12	imaeq1d 4816	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) = ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) )
14	1	feqmptd 5406	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> A = ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) )
15	14	cnveqd 4653	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> `' A = `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) )
16	15	imaeq1d 4816	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) = ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
17		suppssof1.s	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
18	16, 17	eqsstr3d 3084	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
19		suppssof1.o	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ v e. R ) -> ( Y O v ) = Z )
20		funfvex 5370	. . . . 5 |- ( ( Fun A /\ x e. dom A ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
21	20	funfni 5159	. . . 4 |- ( ( A Fn D /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
22	3, 21	sylan 279	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
23	4	ffvelrnda 5487	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( B ` x ) e. R )
24	18, 19, 22, 23	suppssov1 5911	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )
25	13, 24	eqsstrd 3083	1 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1299   e. wcel 1448   _Vcvv 2641   \ cdif 3018   C_ wss 3021   {csn 3474   |-> cmpt 3929   `'ccnv 4476   "cima 4480   Fn wfn 5054   -->wf 5055   ` cfv 5059  (class class class)co 5706   oFcof 5912

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 584  ax-in2 585  ax-io 671  ax-5 1391  ax-7 1392  ax-gen 1393  ax-ie1 1437  ax-ie2 1438  ax-8 1450  ax-10 1451  ax-11 1452  ax-i12 1453  ax-bndl 1454  ax-4 1455  ax-14 1460  ax-17 1474  ax-i9 1478  ax-ial 1482  ax-i5r 1483  ax-ext 2082  ax-coll 3983  ax-sep 3986  ax-pow 4038  ax-pr 4069  ax-setind 4390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 932  df-tru 1302  df-fal 1305  df-nf 1405  df-sb 1704  df-eu 1963  df-mo 1964  df-clab 2087  df-cleq 2093  df-clel 2096  df-nfc 2229  df-ne 2268  df-ral 2380  df-rex 2381  df-reu 2382  df-rab 2384  df-v 2643  df-sbc 2863  df-csb 2956  df-dif 3023  df-un 3025  df-in 3027  df-ss 3034  df-pw 3459  df-sn 3480  df-pr 3481  df-op 3483  df-uni 3684  df-iun 3762  df-br 3876  df-opab 3930  df-mpt 3931  df-id 4153  df-xp 4483  df-rel 4484  df-cnv 4485  df-co 4486  df-dm 4487  df-rn 4488  df-res 4489  df-ima 4490  df-iota 5024  df-fun 5061  df-fn 5062  df-f 5063  df-f1 5064  df-fo 5065  df-f1o 5066  df-fv 5067  df-ov 5709  df-oprab 5710  df-mpo 5711  df-of 5914

This theorem is referenced by: (None)