Theorem suppssof1 6188

Description: Formula building theorem for support restrictions: vector operation with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
suppssof1.s	|- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
suppssof1.o	|- ( ( ph /\ v e. R ) -> ( Y O v ) = Z )
suppssof1.a	|- ( ph -> A : D --> V )
suppssof1.b	|- ( ph -> B : D --> R )
suppssof1.d	|- ( ph -> D e. W )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppssof1	|- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, v   v, B   v, O   v, R   v, Y   v, Z

Allowed substitution hints:   A( v)   D( v)   L( v)   V( v)   W( v)

Proof of Theorem suppssof1

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		suppssof1.a	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> A : D --> V )
2		ffn 5434	. . . . . 6 |- ( A : D --> V -> A Fn D )
3	1, 2	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> A Fn D )
4		suppssof1.b	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> B : D --> R )
5		ffn 5434	. . . . . 6 |- ( B : D --> R -> B Fn D )
6	4, 5	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> B Fn D )
7		suppssof1.d	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> D e. W )
8		inidm 3386	. . . . 5 |- ( D i^i D ) = D
9		eqidd 2207	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) = ( A ` x ) )
10		eqidd 2207	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( B ` x ) = ( B ` x ) )
11	3, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 10	offval 6178	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( A oF O B ) = ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) )
12	11	cnveqd 4861	. . 3 |- ( ph -> `' ( A oF O B ) = `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) )
13	12	imaeq1d 5029	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) = ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) )
14	1	feqmptd 5644	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> A = ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) )
15	14	cnveqd 4861	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> `' A = `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) )
16	15	imaeq1d 5029	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) = ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
17		suppssof1.s	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
18	16, 17	eqsstrrd 3234	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
19		suppssof1.o	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ v e. R ) -> ( Y O v ) = Z )
20		funfvex 5605	. . . . 5 |- ( ( Fun A /\ x e. dom A ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
21	20	funfni 5384	. . . 4 |- ( ( A Fn D /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
22	3, 21	sylan 283	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
23	4	ffvelcdmda 5727	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( B ` x ) e. R )
24	18, 19, 22, 23	suppssov1 6167	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )
25	13, 24	eqsstrd 3233	1 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1373   e. wcel 2177   _Vcvv 2773   \ cdif 3167   C_ wss 3170   {csn 3637   |-> cmpt 4112   `'ccnv 4681   "cima 4685   Fn wfn 5274   -->wf 5275   ` cfv 5279  (class class class)co 5956   oFcof 6168

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-14 2180  ax-ext 2188  ax-coll 4166  ax-sep 4169  ax-pow 4225  ax-pr 4260  ax-setind 4592

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-fal 1379  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-eu 2058  df-mo 2059  df-clab 2193  df-cleq 2199  df-clel 2202  df-nfc 2338  df-ne 2378  df-ral 2490  df-rex 2491  df-reu 2492  df-rab 2494  df-v 2775  df-sbc 3003  df-csb 3098  df-dif 3172  df-un 3174  df-in 3176  df-ss 3183  df-pw 3622  df-sn 3643  df-pr 3644  df-op 3646  df-uni 3856  df-iun 3934  df-br 4051  df-opab 4113  df-mpt 4114  df-id 4347  df-xp 4688  df-rel 4689  df-cnv 4690  df-co 4691  df-dm 4692  df-rn 4693  df-res 4694  df-ima 4695  df-iota 5240  df-fun 5281  df-fn 5282  df-f 5283  df-f1 5284  df-fo 5285  df-f1o 5286  df-fv 5287  df-ov 5959  df-oprab 5960  df-mpo 5961  df-of 6170

This theorem is referenced by: (None)