Theorem suppssof1 6148

Description: Formula building theorem for support restrictions: vector operation with left annihilator. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Mar-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
suppssof1.s	|- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
suppssof1.o	|- ( ( ph /\ v e. R ) -> ( Y O v ) = Z )
suppssof1.a	|- ( ph -> A : D --> V )
suppssof1.b	|- ( ph -> B : D --> R )
suppssof1.d	|- ( ph -> D e. W )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppssof1	|- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, v   v, B   v, O   v, R   v, Y   v, Z

Allowed substitution hints:   A( v)   D( v)   L( v)   V( v)   W( v)

Proof of Theorem suppssof1

Dummy variable x is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		suppssof1.a	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> A : D --> V )
2		ffn 5403	. . . . . 6 |- ( A : D --> V -> A Fn D )
3	1, 2	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> A Fn D )
4		suppssof1.b	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> B : D --> R )
5		ffn 5403	. . . . . 6 |- ( B : D --> R -> B Fn D )
6	4, 5	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> B Fn D )
7		suppssof1.d	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> D e. W )
8		inidm 3368	. . . . 5 |- ( D i^i D ) = D
9		eqidd 2194	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) = ( A ` x ) )
10		eqidd 2194	. . . . 5 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( B ` x ) = ( B ` x ) )
11	3, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 10	offval 6138	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( A oF O B ) = ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) )
12	11	cnveqd 4838	. . 3 |- ( ph -> `' ( A oF O B ) = `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) )
13	12	imaeq1d 5004	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) = ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) )
14	1	feqmptd 5610	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> A = ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) )
15	14	cnveqd 4838	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> `' A = `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) )
16	15	imaeq1d 5004	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) = ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) )
17		suppssof1.s	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( `' A " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
18	16, 17	eqsstrrd 3216	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( A ` x ) ) " ( _V \ { Y } ) ) C_ L )
19		suppssof1.o	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ v e. R ) -> ( Y O v ) = Z )
20		funfvex 5571	. . . . 5 |- ( ( Fun A /\ x e. dom A ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
21	20	funfni 5354	. . . 4 |- ( ( A Fn D /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
22	3, 21	sylan 283	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( A ` x ) e. _V )
23	4	ffvelcdmda 5693	. . 3 |- ( ( ph /\ x e. D ) -> ( B ` x ) e. R )
24	18, 19, 22, 23	suppssov1 6127	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( x e. D |-> ( ( A ` x ) O ( B ` x ) ) ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )
25	13, 24	eqsstrd 3215	1 |- ( ph -> ( `' ( A oF O B ) " ( _V \ { Z } ) ) C_ L )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1364   e. wcel 2164   _Vcvv 2760   \ cdif 3150   C_ wss 3153   {csn 3618   |-> cmpt 4090   `'ccnv 4658   "cima 4662   Fn wfn 5249   -->wf 5250   ` cfv 5254  (class class class)co 5918   oFcof 6128

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-14 2167  ax-ext 2175  ax-coll 4144  ax-sep 4147  ax-pow 4203  ax-pr 4238  ax-setind 4569

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-fal 1370  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-eu 2045  df-mo 2046  df-clab 2180  df-cleq 2186  df-clel 2189  df-nfc 2325  df-ne 2365  df-ral 2477  df-rex 2478  df-reu 2479  df-rab 2481  df-v 2762  df-sbc 2986  df-csb 3081  df-dif 3155  df-un 3157  df-in 3159  df-ss 3166  df-pw 3603  df-sn 3624  df-pr 3625  df-op 3627  df-uni 3836  df-iun 3914  df-br 4030  df-opab 4091  df-mpt 4092  df-id 4324  df-xp 4665  df-rel 4666  df-cnv 4667  df-co 4668  df-dm 4669  df-rn 4670  df-res 4671  df-ima 4672  df-iota 5215  df-fun 5256  df-fn 5257  df-f 5258  df-f1 5259  df-fo 5260  df-f1o 5261  df-fv 5262  df-ov 5921  df-oprab 5922  df-mpo 5923  df-of 6130

This theorem is referenced by: (None)