MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ackbij1lem7 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ackbij1lem7 10196
Description: Lemma for ackbij1 10208. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
ackbij.f 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘ 𝑦𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))
Assertion
Ref Expression
ackbij1lem7 (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) → (𝐹𝐴) = (card‘ 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦

Proof of Theorem ackbij1lem7
StepHypRef Expression
1 iuneq1 4980 . . 3 (𝑥 = 𝐴 𝑦𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦) = 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦))
21fveq2d 6869 . 2 (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (card‘ 𝑦𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)) = (card‘ 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))
3 ackbij.f . 2 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘ 𝑦𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))
4 fvex 6878 . 2 (card‘ 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)) ∈ V
52, 3, 4fvmpt 6975 1 (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) → (𝐹𝐴) = (card‘ 𝑦𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4   = wceq 1540  wcel 2109  cin 3921  𝒫 cpw 4571  {csn 4597   ciun 4963  cmpt 5196   × cxp 5644  cfv 6519  ωcom 7850  Fincfn 8922  cardccrd 9906
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5395
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2880  df-ne 2928  df-ral 3047  df-rex 3056  df-rab 3412  df-v 3457  df-dif 3925  df-un 3927  df-ss 3939  df-nul 4305  df-if 4497  df-sn 4598  df-pr 4600  df-op 4604  df-uni 4880  df-iun 4965  df-br 5116  df-opab 5178  df-mpt 5197  df-id 5541  df-xp 5652  df-rel 5653  df-cnv 5654  df-co 5655  df-dm 5656  df-iota 6472  df-fun 6521  df-fv 6527
This theorem is referenced by:  ackbij1lem8  10197  ackbij1lem9  10198
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator