Theorem ackbij1lem7 9913

Description: Lemma for ackbij1 9925. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ackbij.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ackbij1lem7	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦

Proof of Theorem ackbij1lem7

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		iuneq1 4937	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦))
2	1	fveq2d 6760	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)) = (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))
3		ackbij.f	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))
4		fvex 6769	. 2 ⊢ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)) ∈ V
5	2, 3, 4	fvmpt 6857	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108   ∩ cin 3882  𝒫 cpw 4530  {csn 4558  ∪ ciun 4921   ↦ cmpt 5153   × cxp 5578  ‘cfv 6418  ωcom 7687  Fincfn 8691  cardccrd 9624

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pr 5347

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-iun 4923  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fv 6426

This theorem is referenced by:  ackbij1lem8  9914  ackbij1lem9  9915