Theorem ackbij1lem7 10224

Description: Lemma for ackbij1 10236. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ackbij.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ackbij1lem7	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐹,𝑦   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦

Proof of Theorem ackbij1lem7

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		iuneq1 4975	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦) = ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦))
2	1	fveq2d 6889	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)) = (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))
3		ackbij.f	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) ↦ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))
4		fvex 6898	. 2 ⊢ (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)) ∈ V
5	2, 3, 4	fvmpt 6993	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝒫 ω ∩ Fin) → (𝐹‘𝐴) = (card‘∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑦} × 𝒫 𝑦)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ∩ cin 3905  𝒫 cpw 4564  {csn 4591  ∪ ciun 4958   ↦ cmpt 5194   × cxp 5661  ‘cfv 6540  ωcom 7868  Fincfn 8949  cardccrd 9937

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fv 6548

This theorem is used by:  ackbij1lem8  10225  ackbij1lem9  10226