Theorem clrellem 44389

Description: When the property 𝜓 holds for a relation substituted for 𝑥, then the closure on that property is a relation if the base set is a relation. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jul-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
clrellem.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ V)
clrellem.rel	⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑋)
clrellem.sub	⊢ (𝑥 = ◡◡𝑌 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
clrellem.sup	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌)
clrellem.maj	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
clrellem	⊢ (𝜑 → Rel ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓)})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑋   𝑥,𝑌   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem clrellem

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		clrellem.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ V)
2		cnvexg 7930	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ V → ◡𝑌 ∈ V)
3		cnvexg 7930	. . . 4 ⊢ (◡𝑌 ∈ V → ◡◡𝑌 ∈ V)
4	1, 2, 3	3syl 19	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡◡𝑌 ∈ V)
5		clrellem.rel	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝑋)
6		dfrel2 6192	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Rel 𝑋 ↔ ◡◡𝑋 = 𝑋)
7	5, 6	sylib 221	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡◡𝑋 = 𝑋)
8		clrellem.sup	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌)
9		cnvss 5863	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 → ◡𝑋 ⊆ ◡𝑌)
10		cnvss 5863	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (◡𝑋 ⊆ ◡𝑌 → ◡◡𝑋 ⊆ ◡◡𝑌)
11	8, 9, 10	3syl 19	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡◡𝑋 ⊆ ◡◡𝑌)
12	7, 11	eqsstrrd 3975	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ⊆ ◡◡𝑌)
13		clrellem.maj	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
14		relcnv 6111	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel ◡◡𝑌
15	14	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel ◡◡𝑌)
16	12, 13, 15	jca31 524	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 ⊆ ◡◡𝑌 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ Rel ◡◡𝑌))
17		clrellem.sub	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = ◡◡𝑌 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
18	17	cleq2lem 44375	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ◡◡𝑌 → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑋 ⊆ ◡◡𝑌 ∧ 𝜒)))
19		releq 5768	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = ◡◡𝑌 → (Rel 𝑥 ↔ Rel ◡◡𝑌))
20	18, 19	anbi12d 644	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ◡◡𝑌 → (((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ Rel 𝑥) ↔ ((𝑋 ⊆ ◡◡𝑌 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ Rel ◡◡𝑌)))
21	4, 16, 20	spcedv 3560	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ Rel 𝑥))
22		releq 5768	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (Rel 𝑦 ↔ Rel 𝑥))
23	22	rexab2 3665	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓)}Rel 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ Rel 𝑥))
24	23	biimpri 231	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ Rel 𝑥) → ∃𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓)}Rel 𝑦)
25		relint 5811	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓)}Rel 𝑦 → Rel ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓)})
26	21, 24, 25	3syl 19	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜓)})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146  {cab 2744  ∃wrex 3092  Vcvv 3458   ⊆ wss 3908  ∩ cint 4917  ^◡ccnv 5665  Rel wrel 5671

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5262  ax-pow 5341  ax-pr 5409  ax-un 7745

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-int 4918  df-iin 4964  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677

This theorem is used by: (None)