Theorem crctisclwlk 29879

Description: A circuit is a closed walk. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
crctisclwlk	⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Proof of Theorem crctisclwlk

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		crctprop 29877	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
2		trliswlk 29781	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
3		isclwlk 29858	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
4	3	biimpri 228	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))) → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
5	2, 4	sylan 581	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))) → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
6	1, 5	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   class class class wbr 5100  ‘cfv 6500  0cc0 11038  ♯chash 14265  Walkscwlks 29682  Trailsctrls 29774  ClWalkscclwlks 29855  Circuitsccrcts 29869

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5253  ax-pr 5379

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-mpt 5182  df-id 5527  df-xp 5638  df-rel 5639  df-cnv 5640  df-co 5641  df-dm 5642  df-rn 5643  df-res 5644  df-ima 5645  df-iota 6456  df-fun 6502  df-fv 6508  df-wlks 29685  df-trls 29776  df-clwlks 29856  df-crcts 29871

This theorem is referenced by: (None)