Theorem crctisclwlk 30438

Description: A circuit is a closed walk. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
crctisclwlk	⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Proof of Theorem crctisclwlk

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		crctprop 30436	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
2		trliswlk 30337	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
3		isclwlk 30417	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
4	3	biimpri 231	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))) → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
5	2, 4	sylan 592	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))) → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
6	1, 5	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   class class class wbr 5108  ‘cfv 6566  0cc0 11239  ♯chash 14515  Walkscwlks 30234  Trailsctrls 30330  ClWalkscclwlks 30414  Circuitsccrcts 30428

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fv 6574  df-wlks 30237  df-trls 30332  df-clwlks 30415  df-crcts 30430

This theorem is used by: (None)