Theorem crctisclwlk 29830

Description: A circuit is a closed walk. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
crctisclwlk	⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Proof of Theorem crctisclwlk

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		crctprop 29828	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
2		trliswlk 29733	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
3		isclwlk 29809	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
4	3	biimpri 228	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))) → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
5	2, 4	sylan 579	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))) → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
6	1, 5	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   class class class wbr 5166  ‘cfv 6573  0cc0 11184  ♯chash 14379  Walkscwlks 29632  Trailsctrls 29726  ClWalkscclwlks 29806  Circuitsccrcts 29820

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-csb 3922  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fv 6581  df-wlks 29635  df-trls 29728  df-clwlks 29807  df-crcts 29822

This theorem is referenced by: (None)