Theorem crctisclwlk 29731

Description: A circuit is a closed walk. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
crctisclwlk	⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Proof of Theorem crctisclwlk

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		crctprop 29729	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
2		trliswlk 29632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
3		isclwlk 29710	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))))
4	3	biimpri 228	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))) → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
5	2, 4	sylan 580	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(♯‘𝐹))) → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
6	1, 5	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   class class class wbr 5110  ‘cfv 6514  0cc0 11075  ♯chash 14302  Walkscwlks 29531  Trailsctrls 29625  ClWalkscclwlks 29707  Circuitsccrcts 29721

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3757  df-csb 3866  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5536  df-xp 5647  df-rel 5648  df-cnv 5649  df-co 5650  df-dm 5651  df-rn 5652  df-res 5653  df-ima 5654  df-iota 6467  df-fun 6516  df-fv 6522  df-wlks 29534  df-trls 29627  df-clwlks 29708  df-crcts 29723

This theorem is referenced by: (None)