Theorem frege108d 41364

Description: If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 108 of [Frege1879] p. 74. Compare with frege108 41579. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
frege108d.r	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)
frege108d.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
frege108d.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
frege108d.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)
frege108d.ac	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
frege108d.cb	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege108d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem frege108d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frege108d.r	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)
2		frege108d.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		frege108d.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4		frege108d.c	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)
5		frege108d.ac	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
6		frege108d.cb	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)
7	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6	frege102d 41362	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
8	7	frege106d 41363	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 844   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  Vcvv 3432   class class class wbr 5074  ‘cfv 6433  t+ctcl 14696

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pow 5288  ax-pr 5352  ax-un 7588

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-pw 4535  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-int 4880  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-mpt 5158  df-id 5489  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-res 5601  df-iota 6391  df-fun 6435  df-fv 6441  df-trcl 14698

This theorem is referenced by:  frege111d  41367