Theorem frege108d 40094

Description: If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 108 of [Frege1879] p. 74. Compare with frege108 40310. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
frege108d.r	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)
frege108d.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
frege108d.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
frege108d.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)
frege108d.ac	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
frege108d.cb	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege108d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem frege108d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frege108d.r	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)
2		frege108d.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		frege108d.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4		frege108d.c	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)
5		frege108d.ac	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
6		frege108d.cb	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)
7	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6	frege102d 40092	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
8	7	frege106d 40093	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 843   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2110  Vcvv 3494   class class class wbr 5058  ‘cfv 6349  t+ctcl 14339

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5195  ax-nul 5202  ax-pow 5258  ax-pr 5321  ax-un 7455

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3772  df-dif 3938  df-un 3940  df-in 3942  df-ss 3951  df-nul 4291  df-if 4467  df-pw 4540  df-sn 4561  df-pr 4563  df-op 4567  df-uni 4832  df-int 4869  df-br 5059  df-opab 5121  df-mpt 5139  df-id 5454  df-xp 5555  df-rel 5556  df-cnv 5557  df-co 5558  df-dm 5559  df-rn 5560  df-res 5561  df-iota 6308  df-fun 6351  df-fv 6357  df-trcl 14341

This theorem is referenced by:  frege111d  40097