Theorem frege108d 44039

Description: If either 𝐴 and 𝐶 are the same or 𝐶 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅 and 𝐵 is the successor to 𝐶, then either 𝐴 and 𝐵 are the same or 𝐵 follows 𝐴 in the transitive closure of 𝑅. Similar to Proposition 108 of [Frege1879] p. 74. Compare with frege108 44254. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jul-2020.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
frege108d.r	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)
frege108d.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
frege108d.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
frege108d.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)
frege108d.ac	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
frege108d.cb	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege108d	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem frege108d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frege108d.r	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ V)
2		frege108d.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3		frege108d.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4		frege108d.c	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ V)
5		frege108d.ac	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐶 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶))
6		frege108d.cb	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶𝑅𝐵)
7	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6	frege102d 44037	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵)
8	7	frege106d 44038	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(t+‘𝑅)𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 848   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3441   class class class wbr 5099  ‘cfv 6493  t+ctcl 14912

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5242  ax-nul 5252  ax-pow 5311  ax-pr 5378  ax-un 7682

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3401  df-v 3443  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4287  df-if 4481  df-pw 4557  df-sn 4582  df-pr 4584  df-op 4588  df-uni 4865  df-int 4904  df-br 5100  df-opab 5162  df-mpt 5181  df-id 5520  df-xp 5631  df-rel 5632  df-cnv 5633  df-co 5634  df-dm 5635  df-rn 5636  df-res 5637  df-iota 6449  df-fun 6495  df-fv 6501  df-trcl 14914

This theorem is referenced by:  frege111d  44042