Theorem lshpset 38936

Description: The set of all hyperplanes of a left module or left vector space. The vector 𝑣 is called a generating vector for the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lshpset.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
lshpset.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
lshpset.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)
lshpset.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lshpset	⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐻 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑆,𝑠   𝑣,𝑉   𝑣,𝑠,𝑊

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑆(𝑣)   𝐻(𝑣,𝑠)   𝑁(𝑣,𝑠)   𝑉(𝑠)   𝑋(𝑣,𝑠)

Proof of Theorem lshpset

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lshpset.h	. 2 ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)
2		elex 3509	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝑊 ∈ V)
3		fveq2 6922	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSubSp‘𝑤) = (LSubSp‘𝑊))
4		lshpset.s	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2798	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSubSp‘𝑤) = 𝑆)
6		fveq2 6922	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (Base‘𝑤) = (Base‘𝑊))
7		lshpset.v	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
8	6, 7	eqtr4di 2798	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (Base‘𝑤) = 𝑉)
9	8	neeq2d 3007	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ↔ 𝑠 ≠ 𝑉))
10		fveq2 6922	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSpan‘𝑤) = (LSpan‘𝑊))
11		lshpset.n	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2798	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSpan‘𝑤) = 𝑁)
13	12	fveq1d 6924	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})))
14	13, 8	eqeq12d 2756	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤) ↔ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉))
15	8, 14	rexeqbidv 3355	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉))
16	9, 15	anbi12d 631	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤)) ↔ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)))
17	5, 16	rabeqbidv 3462	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → {𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤))} = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})
18		df-lshyp 38935	. . . 4 ⊢ LSHyp = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤))})
19	4	fvexi 6936	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
20	19	rabex 5357	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)} ∈ V
21	17, 18, 20	fvmpt 7031	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ V → (LSHyp‘𝑊) = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})
22	2, 21	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → (LSHyp‘𝑊) = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})
23	1, 22	eqtrid 2792	1 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐻 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108   ≠ wne 2946  ∃wrex 3076  {crab 3443  Vcvv 3488   ∪ cun 3974  {csn 4648  ‘cfv 6575  Basecbs 17260  LSubSpclss 20954  LSpanclspn 20994  LSHypclsh 38933

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-iota 6527  df-fun 6577  df-fv 6583  df-lshyp 38935

This theorem is referenced by:  islshp  38937