Theorem lshpset 38971

Description: The set of all hyperplanes of a left module or left vector space. The vector 𝑣 is called a generating vector for the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lshpset.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
lshpset.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
lshpset.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)
lshpset.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lshpset	⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐻 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑆,𝑠   𝑣,𝑉   𝑣,𝑠,𝑊

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑆(𝑣)   𝐻(𝑣,𝑠)   𝑁(𝑣,𝑠)   𝑉(𝑠)   𝑋(𝑣,𝑠)

Proof of Theorem lshpset

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lshpset.h	. 2 ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)
2		elex 3468	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝑊 ∈ V)
3		fveq2 6858	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSubSp‘𝑤) = (LSubSp‘𝑊))
4		lshpset.s	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2782	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSubSp‘𝑤) = 𝑆)
6		fveq2 6858	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (Base‘𝑤) = (Base‘𝑊))
7		lshpset.v	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
8	6, 7	eqtr4di 2782	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (Base‘𝑤) = 𝑉)
9	8	neeq2d 2985	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ↔ 𝑠 ≠ 𝑉))
10		fveq2 6858	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSpan‘𝑤) = (LSpan‘𝑊))
11		lshpset.n	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2782	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSpan‘𝑤) = 𝑁)
13	12	fveq1d 6860	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})))
14	13, 8	eqeq12d 2745	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤) ↔ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉))
15	8, 14	rexeqbidv 3320	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉))
16	9, 15	anbi12d 632	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤)) ↔ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)))
17	5, 16	rabeqbidv 3424	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → {𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤))} = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})
18		df-lshyp 38970	. . . 4 ⊢ LSHyp = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤))})
19	4	fvexi 6872	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
20	19	rabex 5294	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)} ∈ V
21	17, 18, 20	fvmpt 6968	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ V → (LSHyp‘𝑊) = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})
22	2, 21	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → (LSHyp‘𝑊) = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})
23	1, 22	eqtrid 2776	1 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐻 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109   ≠ wne 2925  ∃wrex 3053  {crab 3405  Vcvv 3447   ∪ cun 3912  {csn 4589  ‘cfv 6511  Basecbs 17179  LSubSpclss 20837  LSpanclspn 20877  LSHypclsh 38968

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fv 6519  df-lshyp 38970

This theorem is referenced by:  islshp  38972