Theorem lshpset 39851

Description: The set of all hyperplanes of a left module or left vector space. The vector 𝑣 is called a generating vector for the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lshpset.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
lshpset.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
lshpset.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)
lshpset.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lshpset	⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐻 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑆,𝑠   𝑣,𝑉   𝑣,𝑠,𝑊

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑆(𝑣)   𝐻(𝑣, 𝑠)   𝑁(𝑣, 𝑠)   𝑉(𝑠)   𝑋(𝑣, 𝑠)

Proof of Theorem lshpset

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		lshpset.h	. 2 ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊)
2		elex 3471	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝑊 ∈ V)
3		fveq2 6878	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSubSp‘𝑤) = (LSubSp‘𝑊))
4		lshpset.s	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSubSp‘𝑤) = 𝑆)
6		fveq2 6878	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (Base‘𝑤) = (Base‘𝑊))
7		lshpset.v	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)
8	6, 7	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (Base‘𝑤) = 𝑉)
9	8	neeq2d 3015	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ↔ 𝑠 ≠ 𝑉))
10		fveq2 6878	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSpan‘𝑤) = (LSpan‘𝑊))
11		lshpset.n	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (LSpan‘𝑤) = 𝑁)
13	12	fveq1d 6880	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})))
14	13, 8	eqeq12d 2776	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤) ↔ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉))
15	8, 14	rexeqbidv 3335	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤) ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉))
16	9, 15	anbi12d 644	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ((𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤)) ↔ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)))
17	5, 16	rabeqbidv 3429	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → {𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤))} = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})
18		df-lshyp 39850	. . . 4 ⊢ LSHyp = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ {𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤) ∣ (𝑠 ≠ (Base‘𝑤) ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)((LSpan‘𝑤)‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = (Base‘𝑤))})
19	4	fvexi 6892	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
20	19	rabex 5303	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)} ∈ V
21	17, 18, 20	fvmpt 6986	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ V → (LSHyp‘𝑊) = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})
22	2, 21	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → (LSHyp‘𝑊) = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})
23	1, 22	eqtrid 2807	1 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐻 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑣})) = 𝑉)})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2955  ∃wrex 3086  {crab 3412  Vcvv 3450   ∪ cun 3897  {csn 4584  ‘cfv 6533  Basecbs 17301  LSubSpclss 21115  LSpanclspn 21155  LSHypclsh 39848

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fv 6541  df-lshyp 39850

This theorem is used by:  islshp  39852