Theorem mapdhval2 41745

Description: Lemmma for ~? mapdh . (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
mapdh.q	⊢ 𝑄 = (0g‘𝐶)
mapdh.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((2nd ‘𝑥) = 0 , 𝑄, (℩ℎ ∈ 𝐷 ((𝑀‘(𝑁‘{(2nd ‘𝑥)})) = (𝐽‘{ℎ}) ∧ (𝑀‘(𝑁‘{((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) − (2nd ‘𝑥))})) = (𝐽‘{((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅ℎ)})))))
mapdh2.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
mapdh2.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵)
mapdh2.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 }))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mapdhval2	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘⟨𝑋, 𝐹, 𝑌⟩) = (℩ℎ ∈ 𝐷 ((𝑀‘(𝑁‘{𝑌})) = (𝐽‘{ℎ}) ∧ (𝑀‘(𝑁‘{(𝑋 − 𝑌)})) = (𝐽‘{(𝐹𝑅ℎ)}))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐷   𝑥,ℎ,𝐹   𝑥,𝐽   𝑥,𝑀   𝑥,𝑁   𝑥, 0   𝑥,𝑄   𝑥,𝑅   𝑥, −   ℎ,𝑋,𝑥   ℎ,𝑌,𝑥   𝜑,ℎ   0 ,ℎ

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝐴(𝑥,ℎ)   𝐵(𝑥,ℎ)   𝐶(𝑥,ℎ)   𝐷(ℎ)   𝑄(ℎ)   𝑅(ℎ)   𝐼(𝑥,ℎ)   𝐽(ℎ)   𝑀(ℎ)   − (ℎ)   𝑁(ℎ)   𝑉(𝑥,ℎ)

Proof of Theorem mapdhval2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		mapdh.q	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑄 = (0g‘𝐶)
2		mapdh.i	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((2nd ‘𝑥) = 0 , 𝑄, (℩ℎ ∈ 𝐷 ((𝑀‘(𝑁‘{(2nd ‘𝑥)})) = (𝐽‘{ℎ}) ∧ (𝑀‘(𝑁‘{((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑥)) − (2nd ‘𝑥))})) = (𝐽‘{((2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑥))𝑅ℎ)})))))
3		mapdh2.x	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
4		mapdh2.f	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐵)
5		mapdh2.y	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 }))
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	mapdhval 41743	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘⟨𝑋, 𝐹, 𝑌⟩) = if(𝑌 = 0 , 𝑄, (℩ℎ ∈ 𝐷 ((𝑀‘(𝑁‘{𝑌})) = (𝐽‘{ℎ}) ∧ (𝑀‘(𝑁‘{(𝑋 − 𝑌)})) = (𝐽‘{(𝐹𝑅ℎ)})))))
7		eldifsni 4766	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 }) → 𝑌 ≠ 0 )
8	7	neneqd 2937	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑌 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 }) → ¬ 𝑌 = 0 )
9		iffalse 4509	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑌 = 0 → if(𝑌 = 0 , 𝑄, (℩ℎ ∈ 𝐷 ((𝑀‘(𝑁‘{𝑌})) = (𝐽‘{ℎ}) ∧ (𝑀‘(𝑁‘{(𝑋 − 𝑌)})) = (𝐽‘{(𝐹𝑅ℎ)})))) = (℩ℎ ∈ 𝐷 ((𝑀‘(𝑁‘{𝑌})) = (𝐽‘{ℎ}) ∧ (𝑀‘(𝑁‘{(𝑋 − 𝑌)})) = (𝐽‘{(𝐹𝑅ℎ)}))))
10	5, 8, 9	3syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → if(𝑌 = 0 , 𝑄, (℩ℎ ∈ 𝐷 ((𝑀‘(𝑁‘{𝑌})) = (𝐽‘{ℎ}) ∧ (𝑀‘(𝑁‘{(𝑋 − 𝑌)})) = (𝐽‘{(𝐹𝑅ℎ)})))) = (℩ℎ ∈ 𝐷 ((𝑀‘(𝑁‘{𝑌})) = (𝐽‘{ℎ}) ∧ (𝑀‘(𝑁‘{(𝑋 − 𝑌)})) = (𝐽‘{(𝐹𝑅ℎ)}))))
11	6, 10	eqtrd 2770	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐼‘⟨𝑋, 𝐹, 𝑌⟩) = (℩ℎ ∈ 𝐷 ((𝑀‘(𝑁‘{𝑌})) = (𝐽‘{ℎ}) ∧ (𝑀‘(𝑁‘{(𝑋 − 𝑌)})) = (𝐽‘{(𝐹𝑅ℎ)}))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3459   ∖ cdif 3923  ifcif 4500  {csn 4601  ⟨cotp 4609   ↦ cmpt 5201  ‘cfv 6531  ℩crio 7361  (class class class)co 7405  1^st c1st 7986  2^nd c2nd 7987  0_gc0g 17453

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5266  ax-nul 5276  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7729

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3416  df-v 3461  df-dif 3929  df-un 3931  df-in 3933  df-ss 3943  df-nul 4309  df-if 4501  df-sn 4602  df-pr 4604  df-op 4608  df-ot 4610  df-uni 4884  df-br 5120  df-opab 5182  df-mpt 5202  df-id 5548  df-xp 5660  df-rel 5661  df-cnv 5662  df-co 5663  df-dm 5664  df-rn 5665  df-iota 6484  df-fun 6533  df-fv 6539  df-riota 7362  df-ov 7408  df-1st 7988  df-2nd 7989

This theorem is referenced by:  mapdhcl  41746  mapdheq  41747