Theorem mpomptx 7273

Description: Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. In this version 𝐵(𝑥) is not assumed to be constant w.r.t 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
mpompt.1	⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝐶 = 𝐷)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mpomptx	⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵,𝑧   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦   𝑧,𝐷

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑧)   𝐷(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem mpomptx

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-mpt 5108	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶)}
2		df-mpo 7169	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)}
3		eliunxp 5674	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
4	3	anbi1i 627	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶))
5		19.41vv 1957	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶))
6		anass 472	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶)))
7		mpompt.1	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
8	7	eqeq2d 2749	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝑤 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝑤 = 𝐷))
9	8	anbi2d 632	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)))
10	9	pm5.32i 578	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)))
11	6, 10	bitri 278	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)))
12	11	2exbii 1855	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)))
13	4, 5, 12	3bitr2i 302	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)))
14	13	opabbii 5094	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶)} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷))}
15		dfoprab2 7220	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷))}
16	14, 15	eqtr4i 2764	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)}
17	2, 16	eqtr4i 2764	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷) = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶)}
18	1, 17	eqtr4i 2764	1 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1542  ∃wex 1786   ∈ wcel 2113  {csn 4513  ⟨cop 4519  ∪ ciun 4878  {copab 5089   ↦ cmpt 5107   × cxp 5517  {coprab 7165   ∈ cmpo 7166

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1916  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2019  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2144  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2710  ax-sep 5164  ax-nul 5171  ax-pr 5293

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2717  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2881  df-ral 3058  df-rex 3059  df-v 3399  df-sbc 3680  df-csb 3789  df-dif 3844  df-un 3846  df-in 3848  df-ss 3858  df-nul 4210  df-if 4412  df-sn 4514  df-pr 4516  df-op 4520  df-iun 4880  df-opab 5090  df-mpt 5108  df-xp 5525  df-rel 5526  df-oprab 7168  df-mpo 7169

This theorem is referenced by:  mpompt  7274  mpomptsx  7780  dmmpossx  7782  fmpox  7783  gsumcom2  19207