Theorem mpomptx 7466

Description: Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. In this version 𝐵(𝑥) is not assumed to be constant w.r.t 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
mpompt.1	⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝐶 = 𝐷)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mpomptx	⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵,𝑧   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦   𝑧,𝐷

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑧)   𝐷(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem mpomptx

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-mpt 5177	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶)}
2		df-mpo 7358	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)}
3		eliunxp 5784	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)))
4	3	anbi1i 624	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶))
5		19.41vv 1950	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶))
6		anass 468	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶)))
7		mpompt.1	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝐶 = 𝐷)
8	7	eqeq2d 2740	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝑤 = 𝐶 ↔ 𝑤 = 𝐷))
9	8	anbi2d 630	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)))
10	9	pm5.32i 574	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)))
11	6, 10	bitri 275	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)))
12	11	2exbii 1849	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)))
13	4, 5, 12	3bitr2i 299	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)))
14	13	opabbii 5162	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶)} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷))}
15		dfoprab2 7411	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷))}
16	14, 15	eqtr4i 2755	. . 3 ⊢ {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)}
17	2, 16	eqtr4i 2755	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷) = {⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∣ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐶)}
18	1, 17	eqtr4i 2755	1 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109  {csn 4579  ⟨cop 4585  ∪ ciun 4944  {copab 5157   ↦ cmpt 5176   × cxp 5621  {coprab 7354   ∈ cmpo 7355

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5238  ax-nul 5248  ax-pr 5374

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3397  df-v 3440  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4479  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-op 4586  df-iun 4946  df-opab 5158  df-mpt 5177  df-xp 5629  df-rel 5630  df-oprab 7357  df-mpo 7358

This theorem is referenced by:  mpompt  7467  mpomptsx  8006  dmmpossx  8008  fmpox  8009  gsumcom2  19872