Theorem onfrALT 44546

Description: The membership relation is foundational on the class of ordinal numbers. onfrALT 44546 is an alternate proof of onfr 6374. onfrALTVD 44887 is the Virtual Deduction proof from which onfrALT 44546 is derived. The Virtual Deduction proof mirrors the working proof of onfr 6374 which is the main part of the proof of Theorem 7.12 of the first edition of TakeutiZaring. The proof of the corresponding Proposition 7.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38 (second edition) does not contain the working proof equivalent of onfrALTVD 44887. This theorem does not rely on the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
onfrALT	⊢ E Fr On

Proof of Theorem onfrALT

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑎 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfepfr 5625	. 2 ⊢ ( E Fr On ↔ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
2		simpr 484	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → 𝑎 ≠ ∅)
3		n0 4319	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎)
4		onfrALTlem1 44545	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
5	4	expd 415	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
6		onfrALTlem2 44543	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
7	6	expd 415	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → (¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
8		pm2.61 192	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ((¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
9	5, 7, 8	syl6c 70	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
10	9	exlimdv 1933	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
11	3, 10	biimtrid 242	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑎 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
12	2, 11	mpd 15	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
13	1, 12	mpgbir 1799	1 ⊢ E Fr On

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ≠ wne 2926  ∃wrex 3054   ∩ cin 3916   ⊆ wss 3917  ∅c0 4299   E cep 5540   Fr wfr 5591  Oncon0 6335

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-13 2371  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pr 5390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3757  df-csb 3866  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-tr 5218  df-eprel 5541  df-po 5549  df-so 5550  df-fr 5594  df-we 5596  df-ord 6338  df-on 6339

This theorem is referenced by: (None)