Theorem onfrALT 44539

Description: The membership relation is foundational on the class of ordinal numbers. onfrALT 44539 is an alternate proof of onfr 6371. onfrALTVD 44880 is the Virtual Deduction proof from which onfrALT 44539 is derived. The Virtual Deduction proof mirrors the working proof of onfr 6371 which is the main part of the proof of Theorem 7.12 of the first edition of TakeutiZaring. The proof of the corresponding Proposition 7.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38 (second edition) does not contain the working proof equivalent of onfrALTVD 44880. This theorem does not rely on the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
onfrALT	⊢ E Fr On

Proof of Theorem onfrALT

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑎 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfepfr 5622	. 2 ⊢ ( E Fr On ↔ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
2		simpr 484	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → 𝑎 ≠ ∅)
3		n0 4316	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎)
4		onfrALTlem1 44538	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
5	4	expd 415	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
6		onfrALTlem2 44536	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
7	6	expd 415	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → (¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
8		pm2.61 192	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ((¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
9	5, 7, 8	syl6c 70	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
10	9	exlimdv 1933	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
11	3, 10	biimtrid 242	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑎 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
12	2, 11	mpd 15	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
13	1, 12	mpgbir 1799	1 ⊢ E Fr On

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ≠ wne 2925  ∃wrex 3053   ∩ cin 3913   ⊆ wss 3914  ∅c0 4296   E cep 5537   Fr wfr 5588  Oncon0 6332

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-13 2370  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-tr 5215  df-eprel 5538  df-po 5546  df-so 5547  df-fr 5591  df-we 5593  df-ord 6335  df-on 6336

This theorem is referenced by: (None)