Theorem onfrALT 45143

Description: The membership relation is foundational on the class of ordinal numbers. onfrALT 45143 is an alternate proof of onfr 6397. onfrALTVD 45484 is the Virtual Deduction proof from which onfrALT 45143 is derived. The Virtual Deduction proof mirrors the working proof of onfr 6397 which is the main part of the proof of Theorem 7.12 of the first edition of TakeutiZaring. The proof of the corresponding Proposition 7.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38 (second edition) does not contain the working proof equivalent of onfrALTVD 45484. This theorem does not rely on the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
onfrALT	⊢ E Fr On

Proof of Theorem onfrALT

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑎 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfepfr 5643	. 2 ⊢ ( E Fr On ↔ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
2		simpr 489	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → 𝑎 ≠ ∅)
3		n0 4314	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎)
4		onfrALTlem1 45142	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
5	4	expd 420	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
6		onfrALTlem2 45140	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
7	6	expd 420	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → (¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
8		pm2.61 194	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ((¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
9	5, 7, 8	syl6c 71	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
10	9	exlimdv 1960	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
11	3, 10	biimtrid 245	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑎 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
12	2, 11	mpd 16	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
13	1, 12	mpgbir 1826	1 ⊢ E Fr On

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1567  ∃wex 1806   ≠ wne 2964  ∃wrex 3095   ∩ cin 3912   ⊆ wss 3913  ∅c0 4294   E cep 5558   Fr wfr 5609  Oncon0 6357

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-10 2182  ax-11 2198  ax-12 2219  ax-13 2410  ax-ext 2741  ax-sep 5258  ax-pr 5402

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-nf 1811  df-sb 2098  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2965  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3862  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4490  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4874  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-tr 5220  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-ord 6360  df-on 6361

This theorem is referenced by: (None)