Theorem onfrALT 44520

Description: The membership relation is foundational on the class of ordinal numbers. onfrALT 44520 is an alternate proof of onfr 6434. onfrALTVD 44862 is the Virtual Deduction proof from which onfrALT 44520 is derived. The Virtual Deduction proof mirrors the working proof of onfr 6434 which is the main part of the proof of Theorem 7.12 of the first edition of TakeutiZaring. The proof of the corresponding Proposition 7.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38 (second edition) does not contain the working proof equivalent of onfrALTVD 44862. This theorem does not rely on the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
onfrALT	⊢ E Fr On

Proof of Theorem onfrALT

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑎 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfepfr 5684	. 2 ⊢ ( E Fr On ↔ ∀𝑎((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
2		simpr 484	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → 𝑎 ≠ ∅)
3		n0 4376	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎)
4		onfrALTlem1 44519	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
5	4	expd 415	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
6		onfrALTlem2 44517	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∧ ¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
7	6	expd 415	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → (¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)))
8		pm2.61 192	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ((¬ (𝑎 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
9	5, 7, 8	syl6c 70	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
10	9	exlimdv 1932	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
11	3, 10	biimtrid 242	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → (𝑎 ≠ ∅ → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅))
12	2, 11	mpd 15	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑎 ⊆ On ∧ 𝑎 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 (𝑎 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅)
13	1, 12	mpgbir 1797	1 ⊢ E Fr On

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537  ∃wex 1777   ≠ wne 2946  ∃wrex 3076   ∩ cin 3975   ⊆ wss 3976  ∅c0 4352   E cep 5598   Fr wfr 5649  Oncon0 6395

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-13 2380  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pr 5447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-sbc 3805  df-csb 3922  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-tr 5284  df-eprel 5599  df-po 5607  df-so 5608  df-fr 5652  df-we 5654  df-ord 6398  df-on 6399

This theorem is referenced by: (None)