Theorem opsqrlem3 31904

Description: Lemma for opsqri . (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opsqrlem2.1	⊢ 𝑇 ∈ HrmOp
opsqrlem2.2	⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))
opsqrlem2.3	⊢ 𝐹 = seq1(𝑆, (ℕ × { 0hop }))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opsqrlem3	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝐻 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝐺𝑆𝐻) = (𝐺 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺)))))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑇

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑆(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐻(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem opsqrlem3

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 22	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐺 → 𝑧 = 𝐺)
2	1, 1	coeq12d 5858	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐺 → (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧) = (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺))
3	2	oveq2d 7421	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐺 → (𝑇 −op (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧)) = (𝑇 −op (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺)))
4	3	oveq2d 7421	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐺 → ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧))) = ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺))))
5	1, 4	oveq12d 7423	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐺 → (𝑧 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧)))) = (𝐺 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺)))))
6		eqidd 2727	. 2 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐻 → (𝐺 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺)))) = (𝐺 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺)))))
7		opsqrlem2.2	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))))
8		id 22	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → 𝑥 = 𝑧)
9	8, 8	coeq12d 5858	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥) = (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧))
10	9	oveq2d 7421	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)) = (𝑇 −op (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧)))
11	10	oveq2d 7421	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥))) = ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧))))
12	8, 11	oveq12d 7423	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥)))) = (𝑧 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧)))))
13		eqidd 2727	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝑧 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧)))) = (𝑧 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧)))))
14	12, 13	cbvmpov 7500	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑦 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑥 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑥 ∘ 𝑥))))) = (𝑧 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑤 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑧 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧)))))
15	7, 14	eqtri 2754	. 2 ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑧 ∈ HrmOp, 𝑤 ∈ HrmOp ↦ (𝑧 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝑧 ∘ 𝑧)))))
16		ovex 7438	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺)))) ∈ V
17	5, 6, 15, 16	ovmpo 7564	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ HrmOp ∧ 𝐻 ∈ HrmOp) → (𝐺𝑆𝐻) = (𝐺 +op ((1 / 2) ·op (𝑇 −op (𝐺 ∘ 𝐺)))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1533   ∈ wcel 2098  {csn 4623   × cxp 5667   ∘ ccom 5673  (class class class)co 7405   ∈ cmpo 7407  1c1 11113   / cdiv 11875  ℕcn 12216  2c2 12271  seqcseq 13972   +_op chos 30700   ·_op chot 30701   −_op chod 30702   0_hop ch0o 30705  HrmOpcho 30712

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789  ax-4 1803  ax-5 1905  ax-6 1963  ax-7 2003  ax-8 2100  ax-9 2108  ax-10 2129  ax-11 2146  ax-12 2163  ax-ext 2697  ax-sep 5292  ax-nul 5299  ax-pr 5420

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1536  df-fal 1546  df-ex 1774  df-nf 1778  df-sb 2060  df-mo 2528  df-eu 2557  df-clab 2704  df-cleq 2718  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2935  df-ral 3056  df-rex 3065  df-rab 3427  df-v 3470  df-sbc 3773  df-dif 3946  df-un 3948  df-in 3950  df-ss 3960  df-nul 4318  df-if 4524  df-sn 4624  df-pr 4626  df-op 4630  df-uni 4903  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-id 5567  df-xp 5675  df-rel 5676  df-cnv 5677  df-co 5678  df-dm 5679  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6539  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7408  df-oprab 7409  df-mpo 7410

This theorem is referenced by:  opsqrlem4  31905  opsqrlem5  31906