| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 320 of 510) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31453) |
(31454-32976) |
(32977-50912) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | shsel2i 31901 | A subspace sum contains a member of one of its subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | shsvsi 31902 | Vector subtraction belongs to subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐶 −ℎ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | shunssi 31903 | Union is smaller than subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | shunssji 31904 | Union is smaller than Hilbert lattice join. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | shsleji 31905 | Subspace sum is smaller than Hilbert lattice join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | shjcomi 31906 | Commutative law for join in Sℋ. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | shsub1i 31907 | Subspace sum is an upper bound of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | shsub2i 31908 | Subspace sum is an upper bound of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | shub1i 31909 | Hilbert lattice join is an upper bound of two subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | shjcli 31910 | Closure of Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
| Theorem | shjshcli 31911 | Sℋ closure of join. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Sℋ | ||
| Theorem | shlessi 31912 | Subset implies subset of subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | shlej1i 31913 | Add disjunct to both sides of Hilbert subspace ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | shlej2i 31914 | Add disjunct to both sides of Hilbert subspace ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | shslej 31915 | Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | shincl 31916 | Closure of intersection of two subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Sℋ ) | ||
| Theorem | shub1 31917 | Hilbert lattice join is an upper bound of two subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | shub2 31918 | A subspace is a subset of its Hilbert lattice join with another. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | shsidmi 31919 | Idempotent law for Hilbert subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | shslubi 31920 | The least upper bound law for Hilbert subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | shlesb1i 31921 | Hilbert lattice ordering in terms of subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | shsval2i 31922* | An alternate way to express subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Sℋ ∣ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥} | ||
| Theorem | shsval3i 31923 | An alternate way to express subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (span‘(𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | shmodsi 31924 | The modular law holds for subspace sum. Similar to part of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐴 +ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | shmodi 31925 | The modular law is implied by the closure of subspace sum. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | pjhthlem1 31926* | Lemma for pjhth 31928. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Jul-2022.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 (normℎ‘(𝐴 −ℎ 𝐵)) ≤ (normℎ‘(𝐴 −ℎ 𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝑇 = (((𝐴 −ℎ 𝐵) ·ih 𝐶) / ((𝐶 ·ih 𝐶) + 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 −ℎ 𝐵) ·ih 𝐶) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | pjhthlem2 31927* | Lemma for pjhth 31928. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | pjhth 31928 | Projection Theorem: Any Hilbert space vector 𝐴 can be decomposed uniquely into a member 𝑥 of a closed subspace 𝐻 and a member 𝑦 of the complement of the subspace. Theorem 3.7(i) of [Beran] p. 102 (existence part). (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐻 +ℋ (⊥‘𝐻)) = ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | pjhtheu 31929* | Projection Theorem: Any Hilbert space vector 𝐴 can be decomposed uniquely into a member 𝑥 of a closed subspace 𝐻 and a member 𝑦 of the complement of the subspace. Theorem 3.7(i) of [Beran] p. 102. See pjhtheu2 31951 for the uniqueness of 𝑦. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
| Definition | df-pjh 31930* | Define the projection function on a Hilbert space, as a mapping from the Hilbert lattice to a function on Hilbert space. Every closed subspace is associated with a unique projection function. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 66, adopted as a definition. (projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴 is the projection of vector 𝐴 onto closed subspace 𝐻. Note that the range of projℎ is the set of all projection operators, so 𝑇 ∈ ran projℎ means that 𝑇 is a projection operator. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ projℎ = (ℎ ∈ Cℋ ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ℋ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ ℎ ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘ℎ)𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | pjhfval 31931* | The value of the projection map. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (projℎ‘𝐻) = (𝑥 ∈ ℋ ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | pjhval 31932* | Value of a projection. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | pjpreeq 31933* | Equality with a projection. This version of pjeq 31934 does not assume the Axiom of Choice via pjhth 31928. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐻 +ℋ (⊥‘𝐻))) → (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝐵 +ℎ 𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | pjeq 31934* | Equality with a projection. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝐵 +ℎ 𝑥)))) | ||
| Theorem | axpjcl 31935 | Closure of a projection in its subspace. If we consider this together with axpjpj 31955 to be axioms, the need for the ax-hcompl 31737 can often be avoided for the kinds of theorems we are interested in here. An interesting project is to see how far we can go by using them in place of it. In particular, we can prove the orthomodular law pjomli 31970.) (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | pjhcl 31936 | Closure of a projection in Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | omlsilem 31937 | Lemma for orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐻 & ⊢ (𝐻 ∩ (⊥‘𝐺)) = 0ℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ (⊥‘𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 +ℎ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | omlsii 31938 | Subspace inference form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 & ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | omlsi 31939 | Subspace form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. Compare the orthomodular law in Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ococi 31940 | Complement of complement of a closed subspace of Hilbert space. Theorem 3.7(ii) of [Beran] p. 102. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | ococ 31941 | Complement of complement of a closed subspace of Hilbert space. Theorem 3.7(ii) of [Beran] p. 102. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dfch2 31942 | Alternate definition of the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-2000.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ Cℋ = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ℋ ∣ (⊥‘(⊥‘𝑥)) = 𝑥} | ||
| Theorem | ococin 31943* | The double complement is the smallest closed subspace containing a subset of Hilbert space. Remark 3.12(B) of [Beran] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 8-Aug-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℋ → (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | hsupval2 31944* | Alternate definition of supremum of a subset of the Hilbert lattice. Definition of supremum in Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. We actually define it on any collection of Hilbert space subsets, not just the Hilbert lattice Cℋ, to allow more general theorems. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 ℋ → ( ∨ℋ ‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | chsupval2 31945* | The value of the supremum of a set of closed subspaces of Hilbert space. Definition of supremum in Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ Cℋ → ( ∨ℋ ‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | sshjval2 31946* | Value of join in the set of closed subspaces of Hilbert space Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2000.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | chsupid 31947* | A subspace is the supremum of all smaller subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → ( ∨ℋ ‘{𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴}) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chsupsn 31948 | Value of supremum of subset of Cℋ on a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → ( ∨ℋ ‘{𝐴}) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | shlub 31949 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound (among Hilbert lattice elements) of two subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | shlubi 31950 | Hilbert lattice join is the least upper bound (among Hilbert lattice elements) of two subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | pjhtheu2 31951* | Uniqueness of 𝑦 for the projection theorem. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ∃!𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | pjcli 31952 | Closure of a projection in its subspace. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | pjhcli 31953 | Closure of a projection in Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | pjpjpre 31954 | Decomposition of a vector into projections. This formulation of axpjpj 31955 avoids pjhth 31928. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐻 +ℋ (⊥‘𝐻))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | axpjpj 31955 | Decomposition of a vector into projections. See comment in axpjcl 31935. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → 𝐴 = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pjclii 31956 | Closure of a projection in its subspace. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐻 | ||
| Theorem | pjhclii 31957 | Closure of a projection in Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ∈ ℋ | ||
| Theorem | pjpj0i 31958 | Decomposition of a vector into projections. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjpji 31959 | Decomposition of a vector into projections. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjpjhth 31960* | Projection Theorem: Any Hilbert space vector 𝐴 can be decomposed into a member 𝑥 of a closed subspace 𝐻 and a member 𝑦 of the complement of the subspace. Theorem 3.7(i) of [Beran] p. 102 (existence part). (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | pjpjhthi 31961* | Projection Theorem: Any Hilbert space vector 𝐴 can be decomposed into a member 𝑥 of a closed subspace 𝐻 and a member 𝑦 of the complement of the subspace. Theorem 3.7(i) of [Beran] p. 102 (existence part). (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐻 ∃𝑦 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)𝐴 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | pjop 31962 | Orthocomplement projection in terms of projection. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pjpo 31963 | Projection in terms of orthocomplement projection. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pjopi 31964 | Orthocomplement projection in terms of projection. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjpoi 31965 | Projection in terms of orthocomplement projection. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjoc1i 31966 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = 0ℎ) | ||
| Theorem | pjchi 31967 | Projection of a vector in the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(ii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pjoccl 31968 | The part of a vector that belongs to the orthocomplemented space. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | pjoc1 31969 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = 0ℎ)) | ||
| Theorem | pjomli 31970 | Subspace form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. Compare the orthomodular law in Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. Derived using projections; compare omlsi 31939. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pjoml 31971 | Subspace form of orthomodular law in the Hilbert lattice. Compare the orthomodular law in Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. Derived using projections; compare omlsi 31939. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ)) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pjococi 31972 | Proof of orthocomplement theorem using projections. Compare ococ 31941. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐻)) = 𝐻 | ||
| Theorem | pjoc2i 31973 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(iii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻) ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0ℎ) | ||
| Theorem | pjoc2 31974 | Projection of a vector in the orthocomplement of the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(iii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻) ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 0ℎ)) | ||
| Theorem | sh0le 31975 | The zero subspace is the smallest subspace. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ch0le 31976 | The zero subspace is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | shle0 31977 | No subspace is smaller than the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | chle0 31978 | No Hilbert lattice element is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | chnlen0 31979 | A Hilbert lattice element that is not a subset of another is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ Cℋ → (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | ch0pss 31980 | The zero subspace is a proper subset of nonzero Hilbert lattice elements. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (0ℋ ⊊ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | orthin 31981 | The intersection of orthogonal subspaces is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ)) | ||
| Theorem | ssjo 31982 | The lattice join of a subset with its orthocomplement is the whole space. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ℋ → (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)) = ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | shne0i 31983* | A nonzero subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ) | ||
| Theorem | shs0i 31984 | Hilbert subspace sum with the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | shs00i 31985 | Two subspaces are zero iff their join is zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 = 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 = 0ℋ) ↔ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | ch0lei 31986 | The closed subspace zero is the smallest member of Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 0ℋ ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | chle0i 31987 | No Hilbert closed subspace is smaller than zero. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | chne0i 31988* | A nonzero closed subspace has a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ) | ||
| Theorem | chocini 31989 | Intersection of a closed subspace and its orthocomplement. Part of Proposition 1 of [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) = 0ℋ | ||
| Theorem | chj0i 31990 | Join with lattice zero in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 0ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | chm1i 31991 | Meet with lattice one in Cℋ. (Contributed by NM, 24-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ ℋ) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | chjcli 31992 | Closure of Cℋ join. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
| Theorem | chsleji 31993 | Subspace sum is smaller than subspace join. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | chseli 31994* | Membership in subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | chincli 31995 | Closure of Hilbert lattice intersection. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ | ||
| Theorem | chsscon3i 31996 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chsscon1i 31997 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chsscon2i 31998 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chcon2i 31999 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = (⊥‘𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 = (⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | chcon1i 32000 | Hilbert lattice contraposition law. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |