HomeTheorem List (p. 320 of 505)
GIF version.
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List
| Home |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 320 of 505) | < Previous Next > |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-31211) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(31212-32734) |
Users' Mathboxes
(32735-50479) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | cmbr3 31901 | Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | cm0 31902 | The zero Hilbert lattice element commutes with every element. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → 0ℋ 𝐶ℋ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | cmidi 31903 | The commutes relation is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | pjoml2 31904 | Variation of orthomodular law. Definition in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | pjoml3 31905 | Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | pjoml5 31906 | The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cmcm 31907 | Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | cmcm3 31908 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | cmcm2 31909 | Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | lecm 31910 | Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fh1 31911 | Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. First of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | fh2 31912 | Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Second of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | cm2j 31913 | A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their join. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | fh1i 31914 | Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. First of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | fh2i 31915 | Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Second of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | fh3i 31916 | Variation of the Foulis-Holland Theorem. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | fh4i 31917 | Variation of the Foulis-Holland Theorem. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | cm2ji 31918 | A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their join. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | cm2mi 31919 | A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their meet. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | qlax1i 31920 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-1" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | qlax2i 31921 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-2" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | qlax3i 31922 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-3" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | qlax4i 31923 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-4" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | qlax5i 31924 | One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-5" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | qlaxr1i 31925 | One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r1" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | qlaxr2i 31926 | One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r2" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶 | ||
| Theorem | qlaxr4i 31927 | One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r4" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) = (⊥‘𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | qlaxr5i 31928 | One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r5" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | qlaxr3i 31929 | A variation of the orthomodular law, showing Cℋ is an orthomodular lattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r3" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ (𝐶 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐶)) = ((⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) ∨ℋ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵 | ||
| Theorem | chscllem1 31930* | Lemma for chscl 31934. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | chscllem2 31931* | Lemma for chscl 31934. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑣 ) | ||
| Theorem | chscllem3 31932* | Lemma for chscl 31934. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑁) = (𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐹‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | chscllem4 31933* | Lemma for chscl 31934. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐵)‘(𝐻‘𝑛))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | chscl 31934 | The subspace sum of two closed orthogonal spaces is closed. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ ) | ||
| Theorem | osumi 31935 | If two closed subspaces of a Hilbert space are orthogonal, their subspace sum equals their subspace join. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 67. Note that the (countable) Axiom of Choice is used for this proof via pjhth 31686, although "the hard part" of this proof, chscl 31934, requires no choice. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | osumcori 31936 | Corollary of osumi 31935. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | osumcor2i 31937 | Corollary of osumi 31935, showing it holds under the weaker hypothesis that 𝐴 and 𝐵 commute. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | osum 31938 | If two closed subspaces of a Hilbert space are orthogonal, their subspace sum equals their subspace join. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | spansnji 31939 | The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace equals their join. (Proof suggested by Eric Schechter 1-Jun-2004.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | spansnj 31940 | The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace equals their join. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵}))) | ||
| Theorem | spansnscl 31941 | The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace is closed. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) ∈ Cℋ ) | ||
| Theorem | sumspansn 31942 | The sum of two vectors belong to the span of one of them iff the other vector also belongs. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵) ∈ (span‘{𝐴}) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ (span‘{𝐴}))) | ||
| Theorem | spansnm0i 31943 | The meet of different one-dimensional subspaces is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) → ((span‘{𝐴}) ∩ (span‘{𝐵})) = 0ℋ) | ||
| Theorem | nonbooli 31944 | A Hilbert lattice with two or more dimensions fails the distributive law and therefore cannot be a Boolean algebra. This counterexample demonstrates a condition where ((𝐻 ∩ 𝐹) ∨ℋ (𝐻 ∩ 𝐺)) = 0ℋ but (𝐻 ∩ (𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ≠ 0ℋ. The antecedent specifies that the vectors 𝐴 and 𝐵 are nonzero and non-colinear. The last three hypotheses assign one-dimensional subspaces to 𝐹, 𝐺, and 𝐻. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 = (span‘{𝐴}) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (span‘{𝐵}) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (span‘{(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)}) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐻 ∩ (𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ≠ ((𝐻 ∩ 𝐹) ∨ℋ (𝐻 ∩ 𝐺))) | ||
| Theorem | spansncvi 31945 | Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) → 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) | ||
| Theorem | spansncv 31946 | Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) → 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶})))) | ||
| Theorem | 5oalem1 31947 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ 𝑅)) → 𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅)))) | ||
| Theorem | 5oalem2 31948 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷))) | ||
| Theorem | 5oalem3 31949 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)))) | ||
| Theorem | 5oalem4 31950 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺))))) | ||
| Theorem | 5oalem5 31951 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆))) ∧ (((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢)) ∧ (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆))))))) | ||
| Theorem | 5oalem6 31952 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ℎ = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ℎ = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ ℎ = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ ℎ = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢)))) → ℎ ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))))))))) | ||
| Theorem | 5oalem7 31953 | Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2000.) TODO: replace uses of ee4anv 2389 with 4exdistrv 1983 as in 3oalem3 31957. (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝐺) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))) ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆))))))))) | ||
| Theorem | 5oai 31954 | Orthoarguesian law 5OA. This 8-variable inference is called 5OA because it can be converted to a 5-variable equation (see Quantum Logic Explorer). (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) & ⊢ 𝐶 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐹 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐺) & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆))) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ ((((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))) ∨ℋ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝑆))))))))) | ||
| Theorem | 3oalem1 31955* | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) → (((𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℋ) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℋ))) | ||
| Theorem | 3oalem2 31956* | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) → 𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆)))))) | ||
| Theorem | 3oalem3 31957 | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))))) | ||
| Theorem | 3oalem4 31958 | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | 3oalem5 31959 | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑆)) = ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) | ||
| Theorem | 3oalem6 31960 | Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))))) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ∨ℋ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆))))) | ||
| Theorem | 3oai 31961 | 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. Equation IV of [GodowskiGreechie] p. 249. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ∨ℋ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆))))) | ||
| Theorem | pjorthi 31962 | Projection components on orthocomplemented subspaces are orthogonal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ·ih ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐵)) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | pjch1 31963 | Property of identity projection. Remark in [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → ((projℎ‘ ℋ)‘𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pjo 31964 | The orthogonal projection. Lemma 4.4(i) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) = (((projℎ‘ ℋ)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pjcompi 31965 | Component of a projection. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pjidmi 31966 | A projection is idempotent. Property (ii) of [Beran] p. 109. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) = ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pjadjii 31967 | A projection is self-adjoint. Property (i) of [Beran] p. 109. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ·ih 𝐵) = (𝐴 ·ih ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | pjaddii 31968 | Projection of vector sum is sum of projections. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)) = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | pjinormii 31969 | The inner product of a projection and its argument is the square of the norm of the projection. Remark in [Halmos] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ·ih 𝐴) = ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴))↑2) | ||
| Theorem | pjmulii 31970 | Projection of (scalar) product is product of projection. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘(𝐶 ·ℎ 𝐴)) = (𝐶 ·ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjsubii 31971 | Projection of vector difference is difference of projections. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘(𝐴 −ℎ 𝐵)) = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | pjsslem 31972 | Lemma for subset relationships of projections. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐻))‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐺))‘𝐴)) = (((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjss2i 31973 | Subset relationship for projections. Theorem 4.5(i)->(ii) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 ⊆ 𝐺 → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴)) = ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjssmii 31974 | Projection meet property. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 66. Also Theorem 4.5(i)->(iv) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 ⊆ 𝐺 → (((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) = ((projℎ‘(𝐺 ∩ (⊥‘𝐻)))‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjssge0ii 31975 | Theorem 4.5(iv)->(v) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) = ((projℎ‘(𝐺 ∩ (⊥‘𝐻)))‘𝐴) → 0 ≤ ((((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ·ih 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjdifnormii 31976 | Theorem 4.5(v)<->(vi) of [Beran] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (0 ≤ ((((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ·ih 𝐴) ↔ (normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴)) ≤ (normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pjcji 31977 | The projection on a subspace join is the sum of the projections. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ & ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐺) → ((projℎ‘(𝐻 ∨ℋ 𝐺))‘𝐴) = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | pjadji 31978 | A projection is self-adjoint. Property (i) of [Beran] p. 109. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ·ih 𝐵) = (𝐴 ·ih ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pjaddi 31979 | Projection of vector sum is sum of projections. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)) = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pjinormi 31980 | The inner product of a projection and its argument is the square of the norm of the projection. Remark in [Halmos] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ·ih 𝐴) = ((normℎ‘((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴))↑2)) | ||
| Theorem | pjsubi 31981 | Projection of vector difference is difference of projections. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘(𝐴 −ℎ 𝐵)) = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) −ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pjmuli 31982 | Projection of scalar product is scalar product of projection. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘(𝐴 ·ℎ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ·ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | pjige0i 31983 | The inner product of a projection and its argument is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → 0 ≤ (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ·ih 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjige0 31984 | The inner product of a projection and its argument is nonnegative. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → 0 ≤ (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) ·ih 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjcjt2 31985 | The projection on a subspace join is the sum of the projections. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐻 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐺) → ((projℎ‘(𝐻 ∨ℋ 𝐺))‘𝐴) = (((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) +ℎ ((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | pj0i 31986 | The projection of the zero vector. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘0ℎ) = 0ℎ | ||
| Theorem | pjch 31987 | Projection of a vector in the projection subspace. Lemma 4.4(ii) of [Beran] p. 111. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | pjid 31988 | The projection of a vector in the projection subspace is itself. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐻) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pjvec 31989* | The set of vectors belonging to the subspace of a projection. Part of Theorem 26.2 of [Halmos] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → 𝐻 = {𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∣ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝑥) = 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | pjocvec 31990* | The set of vectors belonging to the orthocomplemented subspace of a projection. Second part of Theorem 27.3 of [Halmos] p. 45. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (⊥‘𝐻) = {𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∣ ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘𝑥) = 0ℎ}) | ||
| Theorem | pjocini 31991 | Membership of projection in orthocomplement of intersection. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (⊥‘(𝐺 ∩ 𝐻)) → ((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) ∈ (⊥‘(𝐺 ∩ 𝐻))) | ||
| Theorem | pjini 31992 | Membership of projection in an intersection. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐺 ∩ 𝐻) → ((projℎ‘𝐺)‘𝐴) ∈ (𝐺 ∩ 𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | pjjsi 31993* | A sufficient condition for subspace join to be equal to subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Sℋ ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝐻)((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐺))‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐻 → (𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝐻) = (𝐺 +ℋ 𝐻)) | ||
| Theorem | pjfni 31994 | Functionality of a projection. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻) Fn ℋ | ||
| Theorem | pjrni 31995 | The range of a projection. Part of Theorem 26.2 of [Halmos] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ran (projℎ‘𝐻) = 𝐻 | ||
| Theorem | pjfoi 31996 | A projection maps onto its subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻): ℋ–onto→𝐻 | ||
| Theorem | pjfi 31997 | The mapping of a projection. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ (projℎ‘𝐻): ℋ⟶ ℋ | ||
| Theorem | pjvi 31998 | The value of a projection in terms of components. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ Cℋ ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐻 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (⊥‘𝐻)) → ((projℎ‘𝐻)‘(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | pjhfo 31999 | A projection maps onto its subspace. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → (projℎ‘𝐻): ℋ–onto→𝐻) | ||
| Theorem | pjrn 32000 | The range of a projection. Part of Theorem 26.2 of [Halmos] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐻 ∈ Cℋ → ran (projℎ‘𝐻) = 𝐻) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |