Theorem ordsucun 7358

Description: The successor of the maximum (i.e. union) of two ordinals is the maximum of their successors. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordsucun	⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem ordsucun

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ordun 6132	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → Ord (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
2		ordsuc 7347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ Ord suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
3		ordelon 6055	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Ord suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ On)
4	3	ex 405	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ On))
5	2, 4	sylbi 209	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ On))
6	1, 5	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ On))
7		ordsuc 7347	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ Ord suc 𝐴)
8		ordsuc 7347	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 𝐵 ↔ Ord suc 𝐵)
9		ordun 6132	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ord suc 𝐴 ∧ Ord suc 𝐵) → Ord (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵))
10		ordelon 6055	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Ord (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ On)
11	10	ex 405	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Ord (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ On))
12	9, 11	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((Ord suc 𝐴 ∧ Ord suc 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ On))
13	7, 8, 12	syl2anb 588	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ On))
14		ordssun 6130	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)))
15	14	adantl 474	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)))
16		ordsssuc 6117	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ Ord (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
17	1, 16	sylan2 583	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)))
18		ordsssuc 6117	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ Ord 𝐴) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ suc 𝐴))
19	18	adantrr 704	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ suc 𝐴))
20		ordsssuc 6117	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ suc 𝐵))
21	20	adantrl 703	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ suc 𝐵))
22	19, 21	orbi12d 902	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵)) → ((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ suc 𝐵)))
23	15, 17, 22	3bitr3d 301	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ∈ suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ suc 𝐵)))
24		elun 4016	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ suc 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ suc 𝐵))
25	23, 24	syl6bbr 281	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ∈ suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵)))
26	25	expcom 406	. . 3 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ On → (𝑥 ∈ suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵))))
27	6, 13, 26	pm5.21ndd 372	. 2 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵)))
28	27	eqrdv 2776	1 ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 387   ∨ wo 833   = wceq 1507   ∈ wcel 2050   ∪ cun 3829   ⊆ wss 3831  Ord word 6030  Oncon0 6031  suc csuc 6033

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1758  ax-4 1772  ax-5 1869  ax-6 1928  ax-7 1965  ax-8 2052  ax-9 2059  ax-10 2079  ax-11 2093  ax-12 2106  ax-13 2301  ax-ext 2750  ax-sep 5061  ax-nul 5068  ax-pr 5187  ax-un 7281

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 388  df-or 834  df-3or 1069  df-3an 1070  df-tru 1510  df-ex 1743  df-nf 1747  df-sb 2016  df-mo 2547  df-eu 2583  df-clab 2759  df-cleq 2771  df-clel 2846  df-nfc 2918  df-ne 2968  df-ral 3093  df-rex 3094  df-rab 3097  df-v 3417  df-sbc 3684  df-dif 3834  df-un 3836  df-in 3838  df-ss 3845  df-pss 3847  df-nul 4181  df-if 4352  df-sn 4443  df-pr 4445  df-tp 4447  df-op 4449  df-uni 4714  df-br 4931  df-opab 4993  df-tr 5032  df-eprel 5318  df-po 5327  df-so 5328  df-fr 5367  df-we 5369  df-ord 6034  df-on 6035  df-suc 6037

This theorem is referenced by:  rankprb  9076  noetalem4  32741