P. 79 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 7801-7900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	pwexb 7801	The Axiom of Power Sets and its converse. A class is a set iff its power class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	elpwpwel 7802	A class belongs to a double power class if and only if its union belongs to the power class. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Jan-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	eldifpw 7803	Membership in a power class difference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2007.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐶) ∈ (𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ∖ 𝒫 𝐵))
Theorem	elpwun 7804	Membership in the power class of a union. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	pwuncl 7805	Power classes are closed under union. (Contributed by AV, 27-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ 𝒫 𝑋)
Theorem	iunpw 7806*	An indexed union of a power class in terms of the power class of the union of its index. Part of Exercise 24(b) of [Enderton] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝒫 𝑥)
Theorem	fr3nr 7807	A well-founded relation has no 3-cycle loops. Special case of Proposition 6.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∧ 𝐶𝑅𝐷 ∧ 𝐷𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	epne3 7808	A well-founded class contains no 3-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (( E Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	dfwe2 7809*	Alternate definition of well-ordering. Definition 6.24(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
2.4.2  Ordinals (continued)
Theorem	epweon 7810	The membership relation well-orders the class of ordinal numbers. This proof does not require the axiom of regularity. Proposition 4.8(g) of [Mendelson] p. 244. For a shorter proof requiring ax-un 7770, see epweonALT 7811. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2003.) Avoid ax-un 7770. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 30-Nov-2024.)
⊢ E We On
Theorem	epweonALT 7811	Alternate proof of epweon 7810, shorter but requiring ax-un 7770. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2003.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ E We On
Theorem	ordon 7812	The class of all ordinal numbers is ordinal. Proposition 7.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38, but without using the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1994.)
⊢ Ord On
Theorem	onprc 7813	No set contains all ordinal numbers. Proposition 7.13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38, but without using the Axiom of Regularity. This is also known as the Burali-Forti paradox (remark in [Enderton] p. 194). In 1897, Cesare Burali-Forti noticed that since the "set" of all ordinal numbers is an ordinal class (ordon 7812), it must be both an element of the set of all ordinal numbers yet greater than every such element. ZF set theory resolves this paradox by not allowing the class of all ordinal numbers to be a set (so instead it is a proper class). Here we prove the denial of its existence. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1994.)
⊢ ¬ On ∈ V
Theorem	ssorduni 7814	The union of a class of ordinal numbers is ordinal. Proposition 7.19 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. Lemma 2.7 of [Schloeder] p. 4. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → Ord ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	ssonuni 7815	The union of a set of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 132. Lemma 2.7 of [Schloeder] p. 4. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ⊆ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On))
Theorem	ssonunii 7816	The union of a set of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Corollary 7N(d) of [Enderton] p. 193. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	ordeleqon 7817	A way to express the ordinal property of a class in terms of the class of ordinal numbers. Corollary 7.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2003.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∨ 𝐴 = On))
Theorem	ordsson 7818	Any ordinal class is a subclass of the class of ordinal numbers. Corollary 7.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ On)
Theorem	dford5 7819	A class is ordinal iff it is a subclass of On and transitive. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ Tr 𝐴))
Theorem	onss 7820	An ordinal number is a subset of the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 ⊆ On)
Theorem	predon 7821	The predecessor of an ordinal under E and On is itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Mar-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → Pred( E , On, 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	predonOLD 7822	Obsolete version of predon 7821 as of 16-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Mar-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → Pred( E , On, 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	ssonprc 7823	Two ways of saying a class of ordinals is unbounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (𝐴 ∉ V ↔ ∪ 𝐴 = On))
Theorem	onuni 7824	The union of an ordinal number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	orduni 7825	The union of an ordinal class is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → Ord ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	onint 7826	The intersection (infimum) of a nonempty class of ordinal numbers belongs to the class. Compare Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 45. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	onint0 7827	The intersection of a class of ordinal numbers is zero iff the class contains zero. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (∩ 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	onssmin 7828*	A nonempty class of ordinal numbers has the smallest member. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)
Theorem	onminesb 7829	If a property is true for some ordinal number, it is true for a minimal ordinal number. This version uses explicit substitution. Theorem Schema 62 of [Suppes] p. 228. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝜑 → [∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	onminsb 7830	If a property is true for some ordinal number, it is true for a minimal ordinal number. This version uses implicit substitution. Theorem Schema 62 of [Suppes] p. 228. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	oninton 7831	The intersection of a nonempty collection of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Compare Exercise 6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	onintrab 7832	The intersection of a class of ordinal numbers exists iff it is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On)
Theorem	onintrab2 7833	An existence condition equivalent to an intersection's being an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝜑 ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On)
Theorem	onnmin 7834	No member of a set of ordinal numbers belongs to its minimum. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ ∩ 𝐴)
Theorem	onnminsb 7835*	An ordinal number smaller than the minimum of a set of ordinal numbers does not have the property determining that set. 𝜓 is the wff resulting from the substitution of 𝐴 for 𝑥 in wff 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	oneqmin 7836*	A way to show that an ordinal number equals the minimum of a nonempty collection of ordinal numbers: it must be in the collection, and it must not be larger than any member of the collection. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → (𝐴 = ∩ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)))
Theorem	uniordint 7837*	The union of a set of ordinals is equal to the intersection of its upper bounds. Problem 2.5(ii) of [BellMachover] p. 471. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → ∪ 𝐴 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥})
Theorem	onminex 7838*	If a wff is true for an ordinal number, then there is the smallest ordinal number for which it is true. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	sucon 7839	The class of all ordinal numbers is its own successor. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2003.)
⊢ suc On = On
Theorem	sucexb 7840	A successor exists iff its class argument exists. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ suc 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	sucexg 7841	The successor of a set is a set (generalization). (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → suc 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	sucex 7842	The successor of a set is a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ suc 𝐴 ∈ V
Theorem	onmindif2 7843	The minimum of a class of ordinal numbers is less than the minimum of that class with its minimum removed. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ ∩ (𝐴 ∖ {∩ 𝐴}))
Theorem	ordsuci 7844	The successor of an ordinal class is an ordinal class. Remark 1.5 of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.) Extract and adapt from a subproof of onsuc 7847. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → Ord suc 𝐴)
Theorem	sucexeloni 7845	If the successor of an ordinal number exists, it is an ordinal number. This variation of onsuc 7847 does not require ax-un 7770. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Nov-2024.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 11-Jan-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → suc 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	sucexeloniOLD 7846	Obsolete version of sucexeloni 7845 as of 6-Jan-2025. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 30-Nov-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → suc 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	onsuc 7847	The successor of an ordinal number is an ordinal number. Closed form of onsuci 7875. Forward implication of onsucb 7853. Proposition 7.24 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41. Remark 1.5 of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by BTernaryTau, 30-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	suceloniOLD 7848	Obsolete version of onsuc 7847 as of 30-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	ordsuc 7849	A class is ordinal if and only if its successor is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1995.) Avoid ax-un 7770. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 6-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ Ord suc 𝐴)
Theorem	ordsucOLD 7850	Obsolete version of ordsuc 7849 as of 6-Jan-2025. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ Ord suc 𝐴)
Theorem	ordpwsuc 7851	The collection of ordinals in the power class of an ordinal is its successor. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ On) = suc 𝐴)
Theorem	onpwsuc 7852	The collection of ordinal numbers in the power set of an ordinal number is its successor. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ On) = suc 𝐴)
Theorem	onsucb 7853	A class is an ordinal number if and only if its successor is an ordinal number. Biconditional form of onsuc 7847. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ suc 𝐴 ∈ On)
Theorem	ordsucss 7854	The successor of an element of an ordinal class is a subset of it. Lemma 1.14 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	onpsssuc 7855	An ordinal number is a proper subset of its successor. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 ⊊ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	ordelsuc 7856	A set belongs to an ordinal iff its successor is a subset of the ordinal. Exercise 8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	onsucmin 7857*	The successor of an ordinal number is the smallest larger ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥})
Theorem	ordsucelsuc 7858	Membership is inherited by successors. Generalization of Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
Theorem	ordsucsssuc 7859	The subclass relationship between two ordinal classes is inherited by their successors. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵))
Theorem	ordsucuniel 7860	Given an element 𝐴 of the union of an ordinal 𝐵, suc 𝐴 is an element of 𝐵 itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Mar-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	ordsucun 7861	The successor of the maximum (i.e. union) of two ordinals is the maximum of their successors. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → suc (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (suc 𝐴 ∪ suc 𝐵))
Theorem	ordunpr 7862	The maximum of two ordinals is equal to one of them. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ∈ {𝐵, 𝐶})
Theorem	ordunel 7863	The maximum of two ordinals belongs to a third if each of them do. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	onsucuni 7864	A class of ordinal numbers is a subclass of the successor of its union. Similar to Proposition 7.26 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → 𝐴 ⊆ suc ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	ordsucuni 7865	An ordinal class is a subclass of the successor of its union. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ suc ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	orduniorsuc 7866	An ordinal class is either its union or the successor of its union. If we adopt the view that zero is a limit ordinal, this means every ordinal class is either a limit or a successor. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = suc ∪ 𝐴))
Theorem	unon 7867	The class of all ordinal numbers is its own union. Exercise 11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ∪ On = On
Theorem	ordunisuc 7868	An ordinal class is equal to the union of its successor. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ∪ suc 𝐴 = 𝐴)
Theorem	orduniss2 7869*	The union of the ordinal subsets of an ordinal number is that number. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴} = 𝐴)
Theorem	onsucuni2 7870	A successor ordinal is the successor of its union. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → suc ∪ 𝐴 = 𝐴)
Theorem	0elsuc 7871	The successor of an ordinal class contains the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ∅ ∈ suc 𝐴)
Theorem	limon 7872	The class of ordinal numbers is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1995.)
⊢ Lim On
Theorem	onuniorsuc 7873	An ordinal number is either its own union (if zero or a limit ordinal) or the successor of its union. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.) Put in closed form. (Revised by BJ, 11-Jan-2025.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = suc ∪ 𝐴))
Theorem	onssi 7874	An ordinal number is a subset of On. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ On
Theorem	onsuci 7875	The successor of an ordinal number is an ordinal number. Inference associated with onsuc 7847 and onsucb 7853. Corollary 7N(c) of [Enderton] p. 193. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ suc 𝐴 ∈ On
Theorem	onuniorsuciOLD 7876	Obsolete version of onuniorsuc 7873 as of 11-Jan-2025. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = suc ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	onuninsuci 7877*	An ordinal is equal to its union if and only if it is not the successor of an ordinal. A closed-form generalization of this result is orduninsuc 7880. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
Theorem	onsucssi 7878	A set belongs to an ordinal number iff its successor is a subset of the ordinal number. Exercise 8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ suc 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	nlimsucg 7879	A successor is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ Lim suc 𝐴)
Theorem	orduninsuc 7880*	An ordinal class is equal to its union if and only if it is not the successor of an ordinal. Closed-form generalization of onuninsuci 7877. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥))
Theorem	ordunisuc2 7881*	An ordinal equal to its union contains the successor of each of its members. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	ordzsl 7882*	An ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Remark 1.12 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ Lim 𝐴))
Theorem	onzsl 7883*	An ordinal number is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥 ∨ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ Lim 𝐴)))
Theorem	dflim3 7884*	An alternate definition of a limit ordinal, which is any ordinal that is neither zero nor a successor. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)))
Theorem	dflim4 7885*	An alternate definition of a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	limsuc 7886	The successor of a member of a limit ordinal is also a member. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	limsssuc 7887	A class includes a limit ordinal iff the successor of the class includes it. (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵))
Theorem	nlimon 7888*	Two ways to express the class of non-limit ordinal numbers. Part of Definition 7.27 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42, who use the symbol KI for this class. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2004.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ¬ Lim 𝑥}
Theorem	limuni3 7889*	The union of a nonempty class of limit ordinals is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 Lim 𝑥) → Lim ∪ 𝐴)
2.4.3  Transfinite induction
Theorem	tfi 7890*	The Principle of Transfinite Induction. Theorem 7.17 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 39. This principle states that if 𝐴 is a class of ordinal numbers with the property that every ordinal number included in 𝐴 also belongs to 𝐴, then every ordinal number is in 𝐴. See Theorem tfindes 7900 or tfinds 7897 for the version involving basis and induction hypotheses. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 = On)
Theorem	tfisg 7891*	A closed form of tfis 7892. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑥 ∈ On 𝜑)
Theorem	tfis 7892*	Transfinite Induction Schema. If all ordinal numbers less than a given number 𝑥 have a property (induction hypothesis), then all ordinal numbers have the property (conclusion). Exercise 25 of [Enderton] p. 200. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → 𝜑)
Theorem	tfis2f 7893*	Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → 𝜑)
Theorem	tfis2 7894*	Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → 𝜑)
Theorem	tfis3 7895*	Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝜒)
Theorem	tfisi 7896*	A transfinite induction scheme in "implicit" form where the induction is done on an object derived from the object of interest. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ On ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑇) ∧ ∀𝑦(𝑆 ∈ 𝑅 → 𝜒)) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝑅 = 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	tfinds 7897*	Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. Theorem Schema 4 of [Suppes] p. 197. Theorem 1.19 of [Schloeder] p. 3. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝜏)
Theorem	tfindsg 7898*	Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. The basis of this version is an arbitrary ordinal 𝐵 instead of zero. Remark in [TakeutiZaring] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (((Lim 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑥) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐵 ⊆ 𝑦 → 𝜒) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝜏)
Theorem	tfindsg2 7899*	Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. The basis of this version is an arbitrary ordinal suc 𝐵 instead of zero. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2005.) Remove unnecessary distinct variable conditions. (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ ((Lim 𝑥 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐵 ∈ 𝑦 → 𝜒) → 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜏)
Theorem	tfindes 7900*	Transfinite Induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis, the second is the induction step for successors, and the third is the induction step for limit ordinals. Theorem Schema 4 of [Suppes] p. 197. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2004.)
⊢ [∅ / 𝑥]𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (𝜑 → [suc 𝑥 / 𝑥]𝜑))    &   ⊢ (Lim 𝑦 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → 𝜑)