Theorem pats 40087

Description: The set of atoms in a poset. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
patoms.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
patoms.z	⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)
patoms.c	⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)
patoms.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pats	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 0 𝐶𝑥})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝐾

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑥)   𝐷(𝑥)   0 (𝑥)

Proof of Theorem pats

Dummy variable 𝑝 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 3476	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐾 ∈ V)
2		patoms.a	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
3		fveq2 6881	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝐾 → (Base‘𝑝) = (Base‘𝐾))
4		patoms.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝐾 → (Base‘𝑝) = 𝐵)
6		fveq2 6881	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝐾 → ( ⋖ ‘𝑝) = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾))
7		patoms.c	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)
8	6, 7	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝐾 → ( ⋖ ‘𝑝) = 𝐶)
9	8	breqd 5120	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝐾 → ((0.‘𝑝)( ⋖ ‘𝑝)𝑥 ↔ (0.‘𝑝)𝐶𝑥))
10		fveq2 6881	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝐾 → (0.‘𝑝) = (0.‘𝐾))
11		patoms.z	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)
12	10, 11	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝐾 → (0.‘𝑝) = 0 )
13	12	breq1d 5119	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝐾 → ((0.‘𝑝)𝐶𝑥 ↔ 0 𝐶𝑥))
14	9, 13	bitrd 282	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝐾 → ((0.‘𝑝)( ⋖ ‘𝑝)𝑥 ↔ 0 𝐶𝑥))
15	5, 14	rabeqbidv 3434	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝐾 → {𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∣ (0.‘𝑝)( ⋖ ‘𝑝)𝑥} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 0 𝐶𝑥})
16		df-ats 40069	. . . 4 ⊢ Atoms = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ {𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∣ (0.‘𝑝)( ⋖ ‘𝑝)𝑥})
17	4	fvexi 6895	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
18	17	rabex 5309	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 0 𝐶𝑥} ∈ V
19	15, 16, 18	fvmpt 6989	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ V → (Atoms‘𝐾) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 0 𝐶𝑥})
20	2, 19	eqtrid 2810	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ V → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 0 𝐶𝑥})
21	1, 20	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 0 𝐶𝑥})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3455   class class class wbr 5109  ‘cfv 6536  Basecbs 17273  0.cp0 18481   ⋖ ccvr 40064  Atomscatm 40065

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fv 6544  df-ats 40069

This theorem is used by:  isat  40088